Matrix Games Forums

Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

RE: Panzers vs The Bear: A WitE2 MP AAR (Soviet Perspective)

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Gary Grigsby's War in the East 2 >> After Action Reports >> RE: Panzers vs The Bear: A WitE2 MP AAR (Soviet Perspective) Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3 4 5   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Panzers vs The Bear: A WitE2 MP AAR (Soviet Perspec... - 3/2/2021 2:54:35 PM   
loki100


Posts: 10920
Joined: 10/20/2012
From: Utlima Thule
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Sammy5IsAlive

Are combat results like that last one new in WITE2? As far as I remember in previous versions stuff like fatigue/supply/available elements went into calculating the final CV and outcome and it was only subsequent to that outcome that rout results were determined. I can't remember anything like that battle where a unit 'won' its battle but still routed.


the combat engine was completely rewritten for WiTE2.

I was looking at some WiTE1 AARs and its noticeable that you can still see Pzrs rout or retreat through multiple hexes with next to no damage (a concept that was added in one of the early .08 patches).

big things, low morale/exp or high fatigue make a unit vulnerable to really bad losses if it is forced back. The other, as above, if you run low on combat elements you can see a collapse even if the unit is notionally strong - it still has its heavy weapons, its support stuff etc but lacks infantry or tanks.

So if you really push an offensive, it can catch up with, especially as the wider logistics system means its very hard for the Germans in 1941 to bring up replacements (& esp replacement tanks)

< Message edited by loki100 -- 3/2/2021 2:55:19 PM >


_____________________________


(in reply to Sammy5IsAlive)
Post #: 31
RE: Panzers vs The Bear: A WitE2 MP AAR (Soviet Perspec... - 3/2/2021 3:00:16 PM   
Sammy5IsAlive

 

Posts: 514
Joined: 8/4/2014
Status: offline
Thanks for the reply

I guess it is a matter of waiting to read the manual to work out how the new rules work.

(in reply to loki100)
Post #: 32
RE: Panzers vs The Bear: A WitE2 MP AAR (Soviet Perspec... - 3/4/2021 2:04:30 PM   
GloriousRuse

 

Posts: 906
Joined: 10/26/2013
Status: offline
T10

A turn that does not look that momentous (other than the collapse of the Dnepr in front of the Crimea), but one that has serious portents.

The panzers up north are being pulled back for either another thrust or a lateral shift, which means the western hill line near Leningrad will only have a week or two before it is breached. Some local counterattacks to reclaim good defensive terrain if the Germans failed to occupy. The north is slowly translating to an inch by inch fight and every inch counts. The Leningrad Air Command, you may notice, did not have a good day.



And in the center the fight near Orel and Vyazma has reached the point where it's either accept a die in place pocket or withdraw from the central terrain...if I had more forces I might very well take the DIP to buy the time, but I don't. The constant battering has prevented an effective build up, so a grudging withdrawal - but not before landing more body blows on the way out.



And down south, much the same, only on the east bank of the Dnepr. D-town will hold longer than history, but not much. I can't get the SW front pinned to the sea, so thoughts of relieving the city are given up in the sure knowledge the panzers haven't moved that far recently, which is usually a good sign they're getting ready to explode off the ropes hard. The attack below (against the freshly cut off panzer spearhead)is a good example of the type of attack that is carefully thrown in, knowing it will fail, but in this case knowing it will also drain supplies, fatigue, and potential movement out of key formations that won't be getting a delivery this week...



One other item of note for those watching at home. You may notice the air battles raging over these attacks - in WitE2 you have the option of toggling Ground Support on or off inside your turn and leaving it on or off for your opponent's turns, with your side's air force coming out to the fight if it is on. For the germans this is more of an operational decisions than a tactical one - the '41 LW isn't going to lose in the air unless a bunch of unprotected stukas get bounced, but the long term maintenance and operational losses of constant flight can end with the historical result of a tattered and barely functional force by winter, your best pilots having died in accidents on muddy airstrips. If you're willing to pay that price, air support can be a powerful tool.

For the soviets though, there is an immediate tactical problem. As we saw over Leningrad, if you outpace the range of your escorts and the Germans are flying, it's going to be butchery. Though if the germans have outrun their fighters, then as we saw in the center, 120 aircraft coming in to support the ground fight can make a big difference, or if it's like the south the aircraft can give a German formation a light working over even if the attack fails. The real knife's edge is where both sides have fighters in play. Your Migs are not going to win, they really aren't. But they might serve as an ablative shield that allows the ground attack aircraft to make it through...






(in reply to GloriousRuse)
Post #: 33
RE: Panzers vs The Bear: A WitE2 MP AAR (Soviet Perspec... - 3/4/2021 2:25:41 PM   
OccatorPilot

 

Posts: 4
Joined: 3/3/2021
Status: offline
I am currently reading Stahel's book on the '41/'42 winter campaign and one thing that strikes me from your interesting AAR are the relatively light losses suffered by the Soviets on the attack, even in the failed attack you highlight by the 40th Tank Division.

Looking at Stahel's book, he emphasizes the heavy casualties the Red Army takes on the attack due to the lack of expertise on the side of Junior Officers in the Red Army in the early war period, and due to local German counter attacks to confront Soviet breakthroughs

I read somewhere that with the current engine, damage suffered by a formation in a battle is not fully made visible in the immediate battle report, but that further negative effects owing to supply/morale/transportation checks will affect the unit. It would be interesting to see the state of 40th TD after this fight, is it still battle ready or not currently fit for frontline service?

What is your opinion about the damage that you see your units receive, both on the defense and on the attack?

(in reply to GloriousRuse)
Post #: 34
RE: Panzers vs The Bear: A WitE2 MP AAR (Soviet Perspec... - 3/4/2021 8:27:55 PM   
GloriousRuse

 

Posts: 906
Joined: 10/26/2013
Status: offline
Generally speaking, the “low cost” failed attacks you see are really ones where I’m deliberately launching harassing and probing attacks. Units will decide at certain ranges whether or not they want to keep committing to the business, and the “further out” they call it off, the less casualties for everyone. If you see a serious multi-division attack fail, initial casualties in the 8-15% range are common, and you can expect the same or up to double to be “Damaged” in the game engine which do not show as immediate losses (and which roughly translates to losing 40% of the Damaged element in addition to it no longer fighting).

Admittedly, at this point I’ve got eight games in the engine, so I have an ok sense of what to send for a probe - and I’ve learned that if you want to win a soviet attack, bring twice what you think you need, then bring more.

As for overall, there’s a pretty good chance I’ll hit the actual soviet losses in ‘41 (not that I’m thrilled about that in terms of what it means for who wins - the rains cannot come soon enough) and the Germans are burning bright to possibly even exceed their historical losses (though they are also outperforming their historical schedule it has to be said, something else I’m not thrilled about for what it says about the eventual victor).

(in reply to OccatorPilot)
Post #: 35
RE: Panzers vs The Bear: A WitE2 MP AAR (Soviet Perspec... - 3/4/2021 8:39:10 PM   
Erik Rutins

 

Posts: 37503
Joined: 3/28/2000
From: Vermont, USA
Status: offline
Worth also noting that the better the leadership, the more the chance that a failing attack will be called off before it results in the heaviest losses, so early Soviet failed attack and retreats tend to be a bit more costly than most.

_____________________________

Erik Rutins
CEO, Matrix Games LLC




For official support, please use our Help Desk: http://www.matrixgames.com/helpdesk/

Freedom is not Free.

(in reply to GloriousRuse)
Post #: 36
RE: Panzers vs The Bear: A WitE2 MP AAR (Soviet Perspec... - 3/7/2021 1:20:48 AM   
GloriousRuse

 

Posts: 906
Joined: 10/26/2013
Status: offline
T11

The view from halfyway down.

As the first ten weeks of Germania Invictus start to wear off, it's a good time to look at the state of the overall war in terms of VPs and where it might go. Particularly as in six to weight weeks the mud season will be begin in earnest. It's also a good week to talk this as other than the disaster at Orienbaum, there was nut much in the way of unexpected occurences. What had been four to five division forts were abandoned as little two-fers, just enough to force a real assault - the relative flexibility of having a fort in place is useful at time, and life goes on.

So, as the behemoth rolls forward (at least the damn thing is slowing down) where do we stand?



My basic theory is that '41 plays out in three waves of potential VP for the Germans. The opening 4 weeks where it's a guarantee they'll take their targets, but maybe a few points shift here or there, the mid range targets in weeks 10-15 that they will mostly get but have a wide range of time bonuses that can happen, and then their reach goals for the season where they might pick up an extra city or two, but they also might fall a city or two short. Right now, Bobo is playing strong into the second phase, so despite not being across the safety line this could turn out badly for me.

In the north, he cleaned up everywhere ahead of schedule for 41 points - and worse, he might legitimately threaten Leningrad. This isn't WitE1 where Leningrad is by any means a given, so that is a very, very serious threat. Consider that the Germans need to gain 380 VP to get a decisive win in '42. They are "scheduled" historically to get 324 of those, leaving a gap of 56 points the heer never got to get across the line. Leningrad is 36 of those 56. So while the rewards for Bobo's excellent northern campaign so far have been modest in terms of VP, they still have the potential to unlock a whole lot of that final gap for victory...which is really what the Leningrad decision is all about. It's hard fighting, and maybe you think you can use those forces better elsewhere, but taking Leningrad is essentially the equivalent of the entire '41 campaign going 2 to 3 weeks ahead of schedule. Only Moscow lands a bigger blow of "unexpected" points and most Russians will fight to the death for Moscow...the fate of Leningrad as we go into the fall may very potentially determine the outcome of the game.

Along the Moscow Axis, Smolensk held out for the VPs so there are only 23 here, but it fell a little earlier than I would have liked. As a result I have to concede that Rzhev willl probably be an early threat, and Kalinin will also be in play. This is disheartening, as often it is possible to keep Kalinin off the front lines if the swamps near Smolensk can hold the Germans long enough. Even scarier, Moscow is still in play. At a whopping 66 points and serving as the national supply source that feeds the entire northern half of the map, pressure on Moscow almost always has to be answered - which pulls forces from elsewhere. And god forbid you lose it, because you probably just lost the game.

On the Guderian plan, we're still fighting in front of Orel. I'm cautiously optimistic that city can hold, but Kursk is effectively dead already - there's no way it's holding until week 20 with PG2 heading due east instead of coming down south; we just have to play it out. The cities alongs the Okra are also a major concern, as after Orel falls it is possible to make a lunge at Tula-Rzayhan-Tambov, all of which are never takens. So I expect to see 29 points here at a minimum, followed by a real chance for another 16. Ouch.

And then we go south. In my opinion Kiev and Odessa are doomed to fall significantly before their historical dates if the German player is dynamic, and Bobo certainly is, so those are and unfortunate but expected 32 to add to Lvov's 14. The real problem is that with the D-town line turned, D-town might hold past history but Zapo certainly won't, and Kharkov will also be hard pressed to be anything but a maximum bonus. Which means the fight at Stalino actually has a chance to end o time, Rostov is still on the cards, and Sevastopol is unfortunately possible...That being said, I am less concerned about Sevastopol's likely 36 points than Leningrad's. Sevastopol is assumed to fall as a pre-req for the axis. So a few months of a few weeks early is all the same in many ways - a sort of fatalistic acknowledgement that the 30 points don't matter so much as the 0-6, much as for Stalingrad.

Anyhow, rambling. Long story short, despite the low looking numbers, Bobo is in position to possibly push this into the low 600s this year, beating the German historical record. If he gets it into the mid 600s, it's basically all over except for the crying in '42. Lets hope we can keep that away at least...

(in reply to Erik Rutins)
Post #: 37
RE: Panzers vs The Bear: A WitE2 MP AAR (Soviet Perspec... - 3/7/2021 7:08:50 PM   
Blagrot

 

Posts: 9
Joined: 6/4/2014
Status: offline
I might be wrong but it looks like a lot fo your problems in the South came from the (south-east of) Lvov pocket - do you think you could have got most of those units out if you played a little differently? Similarly do you think there was more force you could have placed around Pskov to hold that a little longer? I'm slightly worried that this sort of 'perfect' German opening during the turns the Soviet players have no influence over will become standard rather than above-par just as they did in WitE1.

(in reply to GloriousRuse)
Post #: 38
RE: Panzers vs The Bear: A WitE2 MP AAR (Soviet Perspec... - 3/7/2021 8:25:13 PM   
GloriousRuse

 

Posts: 906
Joined: 10/26/2013
Status: offline
Regarding Pskov, in three other soviet games the fastest I’ve seen it fall is T5. In the three German games I’ve gotten it as early as T2 (player error) and as late as T5. The defense around Pskov really becomes a matter of how much you’re willing to risk an encirclement. Generally the less you gamble, the quicker Pskov falls. Having won one Leningrad campaign on the opposite side by essentially destroying an army on T3 that tried to hold that river line, I wasn’t in a gambling frame of mind...definitely not with Bobo and his extremely well handled panzers. The Pskov defense is definitely one of the areas where player decisions start counting on both sides, though as you might imagine if the Germans get a good kick off, it becomes much easier for them. In general, stronger openings for the Germans are going to leave the soviet player less early wiggle room, but it should be noted that unlike WitE1 it takes a bit more to get a strong opening going. We’ve had some very good WiTE1 players get stalled out in the opening six weeks...Bobo, to my misfortune but to the benefit of the crowd, is not apparently one of them.

Regarding the extended Lvov - there are some forces I could have gotten out, some that would have been trapped regardless. I made a mistake in thinking that with PG1 cut off and with a lot of it in contact and forced to start movement in a very narrow corridor they wouldn’t be able to make it. I was wrong. The flip side of this is that some pocketing is inevitable, at times even preferable. While losing units never helps, there is the reality that especially in the first ten to twelve weeks, Russian POWs are going to be a thing. I think the larger issue than an extra corps or two that could have been gotten out is that not only did he make the pocket, he managed to keep heading east at great speed at the same time. Even one or two more weeks of delay could have made the battle on the Dnepr line a five or six week affair (I’ve seen it happen), which would have been well worth a dead corps or even a dead army. The Germans really need to kill a lot of Russians or make a lot of progress to stay competitive. When they manage to do both...well, as you can see, it’s not pretty. In general in the south I vastly underestimated the initial pace of the panzers, and I paid for it until I could build up enough strength to start wearing them down.

(in reply to Blagrot)
Post #: 39
RE: Panzers vs The Bear: A WitE2 MP AAR (Soviet Perspec... - 3/8/2021 4:52:48 PM   
Blagrot

 

Posts: 9
Joined: 6/4/2014
Status: offline
In the South I was mostly thinking those extra troops could have plugged the space on the Dnepr that the Wehrmacht found but it's good to know it was primarily delibrate choice and a trade-off rather than an inevitablity of the game that got those troops captured . Since I didn't say it before either I really love the fact a good counter-attack can mess up over stretched Panzers, i'll probably be a little over aggressive with those in the first few games just for the sheer joy of breaking my opponenets toys in 1941 for a change

(in reply to GloriousRuse)
Post #: 40
RE: Panzers vs The Bear: A WitE2 MP AAR (Soviet Perspec... - 3/10/2021 5:21:10 PM   
GloriousRuse

 

Posts: 906
Joined: 10/26/2013
Status: offline
Well, there were two major plays the Germans could have made. They could have barged full speed ahead, looking to make quick work of Orel and other nearby cities like Voronzeh and Tula on PG2's axis while PG3 drove a line to Moscow that would have made for a very scary September and possibly a desperate November, though at the cost of ever increasing resistance making it a razor edge bet. Or they could take the safer option to try to pocket the Bryansk area forces and accept that the campaign as a whole would slow down, but that November would be a more measured affair. I bet on them doing the former, and they did the latter.

Can't say I'm happy to have 18 divisions in pockets, but on the other hand they exist to buy time and many of them have been reduced to half strength (or worse) shells by continuous fighting. So if they've been made into a forced sacrifice, let's make that sacrifice worthwhile. A pocket of that size will take two weeks to clean up if all goes well, so the time has come to make it a three week pocket and drain the panzers as best we can in the process. Initial plans to cut off PG3 entirely have to be abandoned when the forces inside the pocket cannot force their way past regiments, but we are still capable of routing a panzer division left alone at the extreme edge of PG3's reach, opening the pocket and allowing the extraction of several HQs and loads of artillery. The rest will have to die well when the Germans close it again.



Down south the weather is fine and the Germans are running on fumes. You can feel it in your bones, and more importantly, read it in the combat reports when only a handful of tanks out of a notional 150 actually end up firing. Counterattack forces are released and push back several German fast divisions, trashing their potential for next week and hopefully extending the battle for Stalino into late September or even the mud season.



As you might have noticed, after week 10 or so the tempo of the war starts to change. The Germans can still make explosive lunges, particularly after preparation, but the ceaseless linked offensives of the early days give way to gradual pressure punctuated by big moves and reorganization - or if the German player prefers, continued pressure with much lower potential per week. Either way its a welcome relief. There is still a big threat. You can still lose badly. But maybe, just maybe, you can hold on...

(in reply to Blagrot)
Post #: 41
RE: Panzers vs The Bear: A WitE2 MP AAR (Soviet Perspec... - 3/10/2021 11:09:19 PM   
MAS

 

Posts: 48
Joined: 9/25/2015
Status: offline
You're an awesome writer and should win the "Matrix Cross", or the "Grand Order of the Matrix" award, for your excellent AARs and analysis. Thanks much - I'm learning a lot here!

(in reply to GloriousRuse)
Post #: 42
RE: Panzers vs The Bear: A WitE2 MP AAR (Soviet Perspec... - 3/12/2021 2:08:26 AM   
GloriousRuse

 

Posts: 906
Joined: 10/26/2013
Status: offline
Thanks! Glad to hear it. If only my play merited the same...

T13

Up north, the surprising German pivot from last turn begins to grind forward and threatens an encirclement. At this point we've kept the land routes to the city open later than history, but that's not any sort of guarantee for Leningrad. There are still several ways it can fall, particularly if I lose more divisions this week. I don't know which way Bobo will ultimately move, but I know that my forces in a pocket won't help one way or another, so it's time to extract. Out we go, and maybe we can keep the land ways open for another two weeks if all goes well. Then it will all be shipping over Ladoga until the freeze...

Elsewhere. the Germans are back on the move. Only a little bit in the south where they are still recovering form the counterattacks, but as a corollary to the germans moving slower, I also have much less ground to give. Some hungarian armor is left tantalizingly open and is sent packing. Not As useful as breaking panzers, but every fast unit that can't be relied on later is a win.

More importantly, PG2 has exploded east even though the pocket is still being closed. It can't be undone completely, but it exposes a lot of units, especially the ones in regimental packets. The better part of two panzer divisions are routed and the Das Reich are cut off. The Germans may have have a good '41, but damned if it's going to be a cheap one...



(in reply to MAS)
Post #: 43
RE: Panzers vs The Bear: A WitE2 MP AAR (Soviet Perspec... - 3/15/2021 2:48:39 PM   
GloriousRuse

 

Posts: 906
Joined: 10/26/2013
Status: offline
T14

Not much to say that you haven't seen in the German AAR. Counterattacks break open the path to Kursk and the Stalino pocket, cut off a couple panzer divisions down south. A recent Beta update makes showing those battles hard (the old version reports don't show names), but suffice to say the lines are not much shifted. We are still on track to have Tula challenged (and likely lost), Leningrad down to lake only supply, a dangerous run near Moscow/Kalinin, and Stalino lost by October. The game now is about where this will all go in November, the last few weeks of tolerable campaign weather. Well, unless a few early blizzards come out of hihg pressure fronts from the east - you know, the same ones keeping the ground dry right now. Fingers crossed for karma.

But let's look at something else: Production. I've attached both the Soviet screen for this turn and the German screen from one of my other games at roughly the same point.





For those new, the production model is reasonably complex for a game that is not at it's core an economic simulator. Raw resources get shipped to industrial centers, where they are turned into intermediate products - tank or aircraft chassises of a certain model at the right plant, the generic Armaments, generic Supplies, Industry, trucks at truck plants, etc., and manpower gets shipped in from the various population centers under your control. All of those are subject to national modifiers representing the war effort (Germany takes a moment to scale up, the Russians are pretty committed from the start but start to run dry-er by the end of the war), as well as restrictions - the Germans might use captured Russian manpower in "Hiwi" support units, but they won't be driving Tigers. which in turn get welded together into elements. An element can be a rifle squad an IL-2 and anything in between. Those elements cost a set amount of Industry, Supplies, Armaments, Manpower, and an appropriate chassis. A T-34 for example needs a chassis (built at a T-34 plant for a certain industry cost), armaments for its guns (built at an arms plant), an initial fielding cost of supplies, and of course its crew comes out of manpower. And as a final catch, there are certain hard limits on things like artillery to represent historical production rates even if soecific plants for each 82mm mortar aren't modeled.

But those elements don't go straight to the front. They and returning damaged elements are put into a national pool of ready squads, tanks, aircraft, 152mm field pieces and so forth. Those then get drawn on based on need at the front. But not so fast...they still have to get there. These elements are assumed to be at a National Supply Source (the Ruhr, Berlin, Moscow, some near Ural cities and other similar other major centers) and then have to be shipped forward a Freight via the rail or port system, end up in a depot, and eventually get trucked (or horse'd if close enough) the last gap. Those replacement troops are competing with fuel, ammo, and supplies to get to the front and even then their arrival is subject to administrative quality checks for units not specifically designated to refit.

So you have to have the resources industrial and transport links to actually get the things and then the capacity to actually deliver them, and then units postured to actually receive them. By late '41 (or crossing out of Poland the other way in the late war), this chain can get long and tenuous. Especially if you're burning past your production rate to begin with.

Lets look at a few key items:

Manpower
. In '41 and through part of '42, this is the effective limit on the Red Army. Even though I am routinely throwing more than 100k conscripts into the force weekly, you may also notice I am losing more than 100k conscripts weekly. Other than reserve formations mobilizing and units arriving from Siberia and Iran, the weekly manpower number vs weekly losses is a pretty good sign as to where the Red Army is going. Every town, every city, even the small ones, slowly chops into this number. Much like history, those losses won't be fatal to the State unless I lose so much of Russia I'm already dead, but they sure don't help.

Getting my happy peasants to the front is relatively easy - I'm being forced right back onto my industrial and population centers - is reasonably easy. Processing enough of them to keep up with the losses is less so. The Germans almost have the reverse of this problem - while their rate of replacements is low as Hitler promises the war will be over soon (it goes up in '42), their real issue is that those replacements have to travel over a shaky rail net, across Russia, and arrive at units that desperately need more fuel and ammo. In many cases a lost squad will stay lost until the owning unit takes an operational pause. That is the other reason you'll see the Germans fall into their historical pattern of lunge, peter out, and recover.

Artillery. Arming those 150k peasants and workers with anything heavier than mortars and machineguns is, thanks to my nascent artillery industry, a desperate affair. Yet another reason early war soviet formations have a rough time. I produce maybe 70x 122mm howitzers a week at the moment, and unlike WitE1 I can't magically decide I want more by converting arms points. You'll have probably guessed I'm losing more than 70x 122mm howitzers each week. Which means that even as my patriots march to the front, they are suffering from a historically accurate shortage of heavy weapons for now. Indeed, one of the biggest effects of saving or losing "regular army" units is that they usually have their full complement of guns, something your new formations absolutely won't.

The Germans are in similar straits. No one saw the war going long, and the artillery industry isn't in full gear yet. So long as they roll forward victorious, it can keep up, if only barely. Once units start retreating and batteries of guns get left behind, der Fuehrer's efforts to keep the civilian population happy are going to start leaving semi-permanent holes in the strength of units as the artillery industry just can't keep up.

Trucks Trucks are life. They carry supplies. You need them in depots to keep They are a pre-req for motorized units like panzers and tank corps actually having their full movement potential. HQ units almost all have a complement for their own movement and final stage logistics. THEY CARRY SUPPLIES. Right now, both sides are getting massive truck influxes. The soviets are basically mobilizing them off the economy. Unfortunately, the Germans are capturing lots of them off the soviets. But the day is coming when each side will be down to a couple thousand trucks a week - and then the relentless toll on these vehicles is going to start becoming a bigger and bigger issue. The trucks you lose in '41 will have real effects on '42.

Fuel The German fuel position is, for the first time ever in a WitX series, real. Suffice to say that while they can run amok now, it'll become painfully clear by the summer of '42 why they went for the oil fields. Assuming the war lasts that long...





(in reply to GloriousRuse)
Post #: 44
RE: Panzers vs The Bear: A WitE2 MP AAR (Soviet Perspec... - 3/16/2021 2:00:52 AM   
ranknfile

 

Posts: 155
Joined: 2/9/2021
From: New Orleans
Status: offline
This AAR is both very interesting and very informative. I am curious to see the continuation of it; for another nine days anyway!

(in reply to GloriousRuse)
Post #: 45
RE: Panzers vs The Bear: A WitE2 MP AAR (Soviet Perspec... - 3/16/2021 2:49:54 AM   
M60A3TTS


Posts: 4014
Joined: 5/13/2011
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: GloriousRuse
Artillery. Arming those 150k peasants and workers with anything heavier than mortars and machineguns is, thanks to my nascent artillery industry, a desperate affair. Yet another reason early war soviet formations have a rough time.


A lot of the Soviet artillery support units also start the war with experience in the 30's. Units at this experience level will have a hard time providing meaningful results.

Players will need to decide how much if any that they want to send to the reserves for additional training.

(in reply to GloriousRuse)
Post #: 46
RE: Panzers vs The Bear: A WitE2 MP AAR (Soviet Perspec... - 3/17/2021 3:00:39 PM   
GloriousRuse

 

Posts: 906
Joined: 10/26/2013
Status: offline
T15

I somehow lost my T15 files when transferring between a laptop to a desktop - I have 14 and 16 EoTs, but not 15, so this will be a pictureless update.

So. Sevastopol. Ouch. And after I went out of my way to break the naval isolation too...

This case mostly a result of play decisions: I simply couldn't get enough divisions in there fast enough to deal with the breakout into the Crimea. As you also may have noticed, I got sloppy in what was inside the city fort. The fortress itself is not a unit so much as a holding counter that allows you to stack units inside of it - and those units are still under the command of whichever HQ they originally belonged to. In this case, several different armies with the attendant combat penalties for different commands fighting side by side.

However, there are two other factors that have since been addressed and you will see in the final game. Here Sevastopol counts as a "Clear" hex, albeit one with extremely high initial fortification levels. After a review of the local terrain (its a bunch of north-south running ridges that shield the port), it has become a "Rough" hex. This effectively multiplies the base defensive value of units in the hex by three, and combined with up to five for levels means in your games it is quite likely you'll see defenders with 9x(!) their defensive value present. You are far less likely to see a coup main than what you see here.

The other is that the heavy guns present in the fortress were added to the OOB after this game began. Most Axis players are going to bring their siege artillery to a fight like this, but the big guns should help offset their effects in the early artillery duel, leading to more squads being in action at the range of SMGs and hand grenades; as a rule of thumb, that will favor the soviets and drive up losses amongst the attackers.

Elsewhere, the drive in the center is slowing down with the pocket, but the Germans have taken so much ground so early (alas, my efforts to stop them mostly got shoved aside) that even a slow drive can add up to problems. We have maybe two to three more weeks of good operations in the center and north before the mud season, and then maybe four weeks in November before the snow is too deep. At the ranges we're at now, two to three hexes a turn in those six or seven turns can become a very big deal.

The north reflects that as well, as we are now out of ground to give. From here it is all massive slugging battles in crap terrain where I hope for a hold...but failing that, I hope to reduce the battle to slow, sequential siegework that runs out the clock and leaves Germans freezing to death in northern swamps.

And to my great detriment, the same is now true of Rostov. Only the weather down south is milder...and mud season may never completely manifest. I don't have high hopes for Rostov.


(in reply to M60A3TTS)
Post #: 47
RE: Panzers vs The Bear: A WitE2 MP AAR (Soviet Perspec... - 3/17/2021 5:50:22 PM   
M60A3TTS


Posts: 4014
Joined: 5/13/2011
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: GloriousRuse

T15


Sevastopol. Ouch. And after I went out of my way to break the naval isolation too...

This case mostly a result of play decisions: I simply couldn't get enough divisions in there fast enough to deal with the breakout into the Crimea. As you also may have noticed, I got sloppy in what was inside the city fort. The fortress itself is not a unit so much as a holding counter that allows you to stack units inside of it - and those units are still under the command of whichever HQ they originally belonged to. In this case, several different armies with the attendant combat penalties for different commands fighting side by side.


Yeah, you don't want to get careless with this. Have an army or corps HQ standing by the fort city and switch your garrison units over to the HQ before assigning them to the fort unit. Once everyone is in, the HQ joins them in the hex. Just be aware in some cases the leader may die when the fort falls so be careful who you choose to command the garrison.

Players should also be aware that units inside a city fort do not add to the fortification value in the hex so just building a city fort where there is no fortified value will just be that much easier for your opponent to take down.



(in reply to GloriousRuse)
Post #: 48
RE: Panzers vs The Bear: A WitE2 MP AAR (Soviet Perspec... - 3/17/2021 7:56:51 PM   
Ynglaur_slith

 

Posts: 12
Joined: 2/27/2021
Status: offline
Wait, units assigned to a City Fort do not contribute their construction values to increasing / maintaining the fortification level?

(in reply to M60A3TTS)
Post #: 49
RE: Panzers vs The Bear: A WitE2 MP AAR (Soviet Perspec... - 3/17/2021 8:41:27 PM   
Joel Billings


Posts: 32265
Joined: 9/20/2000
From: Santa Rosa, CA
Status: offline
IIRC we had a bug at one time not too long ago where units in the city fort would not add to the fort level. I just ran a quick test and confirmed that units in city forts due add their construction values to building forts in the hex.

_____________________________

All understanding comes after the fact.
-- Soren Kierkegaard

(in reply to Ynglaur_slith)
Post #: 50
RE: Panzers vs The Bear: A WitE2 MP AAR (Soviet Perspec... - 3/17/2021 8:44:19 PM   
Ynglaur_slith

 

Posts: 12
Joined: 2/27/2021
Status: offline
Thanks! This game is complex enough I'm sure the remaining defects will be amusing.

(in reply to Joel Billings)
Post #: 51
RE: Panzers vs The Bear: A WitE2 MP AAR (Soviet Perspec... - 3/18/2021 12:24:54 AM   
ranknfile

 

Posts: 155
Joined: 2/9/2021
From: New Orleans
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Ynglaur_slith

Thanks! This game is complex enough I'm sure the remaining defects will be amusing.


Complexities - such as revised logistics and air war management, the addition of command preparation points, combat delay, etc., etc., etc. and even more "etc." is what has me hyped for this game. I trust what flaws may exist will be minor and easily ignored.

(in reply to Ynglaur_slith)
Post #: 52
RE: Panzers vs The Bear: A WitE2 MP AAR (Soviet Perspec... - 3/22/2021 2:08:17 PM   
GloriousRuse

 

Posts: 906
Joined: 10/26/2013
Status: offline
So here we are, mud season on the horizon...what does that mean for WitE2?

Unlike WitE1 this is not a single momentous flip where the map suddenly becomes sticky mud on T17. Instead, the dominant weather for most of Russia turns into Heavy Rain, which is to say that unless a weather front rolls through an area the basic weather there will be Heavy Rain. That is not in any way a guarantee - fronts do come through - but it's a good indicator. On top of which, you may notice that the climate zone in southern Russia (Humid Warm) is much delayed on this, and has a shorter Heavy Rain period.



Heavy Rain in itself does not automatically lock down the map. The first week of it usually produces a mix of Light Mud and Heavy Mud; the latter is a mobility killer and makes all but the most lopsided attacks a bad idea, but the former is fightable for the Germans. So that first week of Heavy Rain still has some potential in it, though a second week will leave the Rodina a mire of muck and misery (aside from a handful of good roads.)

On top of which, the weather actually flips on the soviet half of the turn. So here in T16, it's just bog standard rain with a mix of light mud and even clear hexes. That means the Germans will have that for T17. A projected Heavy Rain period then means the Germans will get their last summer swings in on T18 (except for the south), and only finally by T19 and T20 can I really say "safe!" until the November freeze.

That said, November is also subject to fronts, and lies right on a meteorological fault line so to speak, so it's a bit of a grab bag on whether it'll be a murderous sunny chill, a mix of sleet and rain, blizzards or anything in between. A real hope for the best, plan for the worst situation. Anyhow...

Up north, the last bastions on the Neva fall. Now it's a matter of whether or not the Germans can effect an assault crossing (they almost certainly can at the tip there), and more importantly if they can fight out enough space after the crossing to make a dangerous November. Given the north traditionally has the worst weather, I am confident that we can hold until the mud and then funnel in reinforcements.



Kalinin and Tula are a bit more worrisome. Despite cutting off the lead panzer division, there's no getting around the fact that I just don't have the forces left to hold Tula, and the Germans have just enough time to take it before the real mud begins. Kalinin at least is in better condition. Being part of the immediate Moscow defense, it can absorb more forces and still help check any drive on the capital, which in turn means I think I can make this hold until Novemmber. If my weather luck in November is good, it may even end up being the counterweight to Tula in terms of VP.

Most importantly, PG3 heading to Kalinin means any November fight for Moscow will be starting to the west of the major swamp and forest lines, and will still have the Oka to absorb an initial shock from the south. Things may yet get dicey, but we've got a more than fighting chance to keep the spires of the Kremlin out of German field glasses.





Down south is the area of greatest concern. Mud season will come later, and a bad front might mean it never comes at all. Divisions pile into Rostov, but there's just so much time (and an inbound 11th Army) that it's pretty clear the weather won't be my savior. At least my beleaguered defenders routed some Romanians as a parting shot...



(in reply to ranknfile)
Post #: 53
RE: Panzers vs The Bear: A WitE2 MP AAR (Soviet Perspec... - 3/25/2021 1:54:43 AM   
GloriousRuse

 

Posts: 906
Joined: 10/26/2013
Status: offline
T17

Here comes the rain...



Which is useful, because the Germans are getting frisky with the seizure of Tula and also the assault crossing of the Neva. A bad week here could have had fatal consequences for the whole campaign.

Given what we talked about above, what is just as important is that the heavy rains will continue unabated across everything except the south next week as well. That is the real clincher that will ensure continuous heavy mud and seal the mud season into actuality.



Why is that important, really? Because as mentioned, one week of heavy rain still leaves "light mud" in various locations, and "light mud" will still give you opportunities to attack. And while I'm happy to knock about regiments and the odd division, the Germans can do a lot more with it...



I mentioned that Rostov is really at risk, right? So is poor surrounded Kursk.

(in reply to GloriousRuse)
Post #: 54
RE: Panzers vs The Bear: A WitE2 MP AAR (Soviet Perspec... - 3/28/2021 2:26:59 AM   
GloriousRuse

 

Posts: 906
Joined: 10/26/2013
Status: offline
T18

The first screenshots taken in the retail version of the game! Hurrah!

Rain, Rain, everywhere except Rostov where I could realllllly use some. In lieu of heavy mud, I put five divisions into the city. Part of me want to believe this will be an invincible bastion, but unlike Smolensk I won't have the benefit of exhausted German infantry needing a moment to catch it's breath. I am very wary of a coup main taking the city at cost, but the need to prevent a grand encirclement doesn't leave me many options...



May they be guardians of the motherland to the end.

Elsewhere, the mud signals a shift in the nature of the game. I get a chance to catch my breath and grow the Red Army, and the Germans finally get to try to piece together the heer.

More importantly, up until this point the game is largely tactical-operational. You might make a big decision or two, but it is a game of playing the hand you're dealt as well as you can. Bobo, as you may have noticed, has done that quite well. I...could have done better. You fight your fights and whoever fights them better is rewarded.

But as you cross October, the nature of the game changes. It becomes a true operational game; you're presented the outcome of the summer campaign and it is now very much a matter of deciding what you want to do and how you're going to resource that. For the first time the Red Army will start getting enough forces to make real decisions besides "don't lose Moscow".

And for the first time the German player starts picking what it is he wants to do rather than rushing fangs out hair on fire for the initial objectives. He also gets a moment to really rest his panzers (sigh).

As for where we're going - an assault on Rostov seems obvious. It's loss seems probable. Kalinin will hold through the mud and time out the bonus, but if they want it, it's theirs. Leningrad will turn on a fine line, namely what the Germans can accomplish in the three weeks or so before the snow piles up too deep.

The real question is whether or not November other than that will be spent fortifying a line for the winter or pushing on. Both have their advantages - even an offense that takes little ground can help provide one last cull of the Red Army, perhaps taking half a million men off the board before winter. Digging in both makes it harder to shift and makes surviving the blizzards away from immediate depots much more practical. We shall see...



(in reply to GloriousRuse)
Post #: 55
RE: Panzers vs The Bear: A WitE2 MP AAR (Soviet Perspec... - 3/28/2021 8:51:40 PM   
Ynglaur_slith

 

Posts: 12
Joined: 2/27/2021
Status: offline
Really good AAR so far. Thanks for writing it!

Where do you tend to use your support units? It seems like you don't add them to the city forts. Do the various motorcycle battalions, tank regiments, mortar battalions, etc. make a difference elsewhere?

(in reply to GloriousRuse)
Post #: 56
RE: Panzers vs The Bear: A WitE2 MP AAR (Soviet Perspec... - 3/28/2021 9:30:53 PM   
GloriousRuse

 

Posts: 906
Joined: 10/26/2013
Status: offline
That’s a great topic for the next mud turn, but generally speaking SUs for the Soviets are best used directly attached to the rifle divisions for direct combat units like tank BDEs, used to weight certain army level HQs for artillery ( production is so limited that trying to give every HQ SUs just means that nobody is rich in the early war, and that trying to put too many up front means gutting your divisions of artillery - mortars often become poor man’s arty), or in many cases as mobile replacement pools to bring tattered divisions back up to strength.

Generally, battalions are not worth the squeeze for the Soviets. A few hundred extra riflemen or a couple dozen light tanks are often better put into the force or formed into the regimental or brigade level SUs that can actually tip the scales. Engineer BNs for digging assistance might be the only exception, and even then there is some culling you can do

(in reply to Ynglaur_slith)
Post #: 57
RE: Panzers vs The Bear: A WitE2 MP AAR (Soviet Perspec... - 3/31/2021 5:55:30 PM   
GloriousRuse

 

Posts: 906
Joined: 10/26/2013
Status: offline
T19

I expected Rostov to fall. I didn't expect it to fall in one assault, I really didn't. I was hoping that this would be a battering series of assaults that drained a lot of readiness out of AGS and delayed their winter preparations. Besides the obnoxious VP effect, the new railyard, depot, and time to dig mean AGS will be sitting pretty when the snow comes. Since the south traditionally has the best weather anyhow, that's not great.

Elsewhere, the big news is building up forces. Most places this is a fairly straightforward business of refitting units on depots and selecting refit options in the strategic reserve. The latter is very valuable in that units there are prioritized for fill, do not take operational attrition, and regain experience and morale to a point. The down side is that units coming out the SR arrive 10 hexes back from the front at best, with 0 CPP, and often having failed enough checks that they arrive with limited MP until assigned to a command. So a unit coming out of the reserve needs roughly two weeks (including arrival) to get into some degree of fighting shape AND where you want them. More if you plan on using them for serious offensive operations.

Leningrad, however is different. Under siege, the peninsula is entirely being supplied by the port at Osinovets after the east shore ports ship supplies in.



The supply can be helped by an NKPS (it arrives in Leningrad, so its a natural assignment), but in real reinforcement means shipping units across the lake. Limited port capacity and ships means that I am caught between shipping in new divisions, shipping over brigades to be merged into weak units (one of the soviets better ways of refurbing a priority unit), and letting the lake shipping deliver what it needs.

Now, what I would have liked to do is keep about 24 divisions on the far side of the Neva, a nice six division fort in Leningrad and a double layer of three divisions per hex in the terrain, with the rear set to reserves. Wishes and fishes...because there is another way to kill Leningrad. If the Germans can fight east to the ports or their supplying rail lines, everything in the peninsula will choke to death and collapse. So those approaches need hefty defenses as well. The Germans are in a very dynamic position, capable of starting a three to four week campaign whenever the mud ends pushing in either direction. Had I been able to preserve the one crossing on the Neva, this would be much less dangerous, but now...


(in reply to GloriousRuse)
Post #: 58
RE: Panzers vs The Bear: A WitE2 MP AAR (Soviet Perspec... - 3/31/2021 6:53:38 PM   
loki100


Posts: 10920
Joined: 10/20/2012
From: Utlima Thule
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: GloriousRuse

.. shipping over brigades to be merged into weak units (one of the soviets better ways of refurbing a priority unit), ...



there is an alternative to this get the brigade into Stavka as a SU (other Fronts will work as well), transfer to Leningrad Front as a SU (here I'm assuming you do have LF in the city region?), to map, move to unit, merge. Takes 3 turns but it can be a lot easier than rail/sea and frees up a little bit of cross-lake capacity

_____________________________


(in reply to GloriousRuse)
Post #: 59
RE: Panzers vs The Bear: A WitE2 MP AAR (Bobo vs GR) - 3/31/2021 7:50:45 PM   
GaryD44

 

Posts: 5
Joined: 3/28/2021
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: GloriousRuse

It was in the low 30s I think, and started in just the right place. As a whole the soviet mech and tank forces are far more dangerous than WitE1. Your BT-7s will still die hideously, but the Germans can’t just ignore the mobility. And when T-34s and KV-1s meet panzer IIIs you might see a lot more German individual tank losses even if the soviet division collapses.

You’ll see it later in the AAR, but WITE2 realizes that by mid summer the Soviets were counterattacking locally in many places, and this had real effects on the German operational pace. The capability of the TDs and mech to offer some nasty surprises is part of that. It’s a far more dynamic fight than just trying to redress the line every week.

This is great news. If the Soviet player has opportunities for counterattacking, it'll make for a very interesting game.

(in reply to GloriousRuse)
Post #: 60
Page:   <<   < prev  1 [2] 3 4 5   next >   >>
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Gary Grigsby's War in the East 2 >> After Action Reports >> RE: Panzers vs The Bear: A WitE2 MP AAR (Soviet Perspective) Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3 4 5   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

0.906