RE: 6-Player Friendly PBEM Global War

Matrix Games Forums

Forums Register Login Photo Gallery Member List Search Calendars FAQ

My Profile Inbox Address Book My Subscription My Forums Log Out

RE: 6-Player Friendly PBEM Global War

View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest

Users viewing this topic: none

Printable Version

All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> World in Flames >> After Action Report >> RE: 6-Player Friendly PBEM Global War

Page: << < prev 33 34 [35] 36 37 next > >>

Message

<< Older Topic Newer Topic >>

RE: 6-Player Friendly PBEM Global War - 11/14/2021 6:20:59 PM

rkr1958

Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline

Turn 17. May/June 1942. Economics. Use Oil - Germany.

Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)

Post #: 1021

RE: 6-Player Friendly PBEM Global War - 11/14/2021 6:21:21 PM

rkr1958

Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline

Turn 17. May/June 1942. Economics. Use Oil - Vichy.

Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)

Post #: 1022

RE: 6-Player Friendly PBEM Global War - 11/14/2021 6:22:12 PM

rkr1958

Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline

Turn 17. May/June 1942. EOT(fd). Build Spiral.

EOT(fd) = end of turn, factory destruction phase.

Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)

Post #: 1023

RE: 6-Player Friendly PBEM Global War - 11/14/2021 6:22:45 PM

rkr1958

Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline

Turn 17. May/June 1942. EOT(fd). Control.

EOT(fd) = end of turn, factory destruction phase.

Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)

Post #: 1024

RE: 6-Player Friendly PBEM Global War - 11/14/2021 6:23:10 PM

rkr1958

Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline

Turn 17. May/June 1942. EOT(fd). Units.

EOT(fd) = end of turn, factory destruction phase.

Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)

Post #: 1025

RE: 6-Player Friendly PBEM Global War - 11/14/2021 6:23:34 PM

rkr1958

Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline

Turn 17. May/June 1942. EOT(fd). Active Axis.

EOT(fd) = end of turn, factory destruction phase.

Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)

Post #: 1026

RE: 6-Player Friendly PBEM Global War - 11/14/2021 6:23:57 PM

rkr1958

Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline

Turn 17. May/June 1942. EOT(fd). Active Allied.

EOT(fd) = end of turn, factory destruction phase.

Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)

Post #: 1027

RE: 6-Player Friendly PBEM Global War - 11/14/2021 6:24:20 PM

rkr1958

Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline

Turn 17. May/June 1942. EOT(fd). Victory Points.

EOT(fd) = end of turn, factory destruction phase.

Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)

Post #: 1028

RE: 6-Player Friendly PBEM Global War - 12/3/2021 4:16:06 PM

rkr1958

Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline

Turn 18. Jul/Aug 1942. Weather & Actions Summary.

Notes:
(1) L* = O-chit player during a land with an HQ to double land combat factors.
(2) German played a L* on impulse 1 and the USSR played a L* on impulse 2.

Attachment (1)

< Message edited by rkr1958 -- 12/3/2021 4:18:07 PM >

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)

Post #: 1029

RE: 6-Player Friendly PBEM Global War - 12/3/2021 4:28:04 PM

rkr1958

Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline

Turn 18. Jul/Aug 1942. War Logs Summary.

Notes:
(1) 12 theaters are currently configured; however, only 11 of the 12 are combat theaters. That is, N/A is not.
(2) A total of 143 events were logged, of which 120 (84%) were combat events. This turn saw the most combat events logged so far this game.
(3) 9 of the 11, or 82%, of all combat theaters saw action (i.e., at least 1 combat).
(4) The most active theater was the Eastern Front which saw almost 40% (i.e., 47/120) of all the combat logged.
(5) Japan was also very active with a total of 35 events, of which 34 (97%) were combat events, logged across 4 theaters (Asian, CBI, Pacific & East African). Japan was involved in 28% of all combat events logged this turn.

Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)

Post #: 1030

RE: 6-Player Friendly PBEM Global War - 12/3/2021 4:31:32 PM

rkr1958

Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline

Turn 18. Jul/Aug 1942. Start of Turn. War Logs.

Note:
(1) Global event #996, in which we agreed to update to MWiF version 4.4.0 (debug), was not at the start of the turn but happened at the beginning of axis impulse #7.
(2) The axis wanted to move first and had to request a re-roll to win the initiative.

Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)

Post #: 1031

RE: 6-Player Friendly PBEM Global War - 12/3/2021 4:32:03 PM

rkr1958

Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline

Turn 18. Jul/Aug 1942. Start of Turn. Resource Lending.

Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)

Post #: 1032

RE: 6-Player Friendly PBEM Global War - 12/3/2021 4:34:52 PM

rkr1958

Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline

Turn 18. Jul/Aug 1942. Asian Front. War Logs.

Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)

Post #: 1033

RE: 6-Player Friendly PBEM Global War - 12/3/2021 4:35:36 PM

rkr1958

Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline

Turn 18. Jul/Aug 1942. Asian Front. Axis #1. Strat.

Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)

Post #: 1034

RE: 6-Player Friendly PBEM Global War - 12/3/2021 4:54:53 PM

rkr1958

Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline

Turn 18. Jul/Aug 1942. Asian Front. Axis #1. Kunming, China.

1. The Nationalist hold again!
2. This time Japan had better than a 96% chance of taking the city (and factory) but failed to do so!

Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)

Post #: 1035

RE: 6-Player Friendly PBEM Global War - 12/3/2021 4:57:32 PM

rkr1958

Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline

Turn 18. Jul/Aug 1942. Asian Front. Axis #1. China CCP.

1. The IJA in the north successful push on towards the last of two remaining cities (i.e., remaining factories) needed for the total conquest of China.

Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)

Post #: 1036

RE: 6-Player Friendly PBEM Global War - 12/3/2021 4:59:13 PM

rkr1958

Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline

Turn 18. Jul/Aug 1942. Asian Front. Axis #3. China CCP. Ground Strike vs Mao.

Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)

Post #: 1037

RE: 6-Player Friendly PBEM Global War - 12/3/2021 5:00:13 PM

rkr1958

Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline

Turn 18. Jul/Aug 1942. Asian Front. Axis #5. China CCP. Ground Strike Try #2 vs Mao.

Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)

Post #: 1038

RE: 6-Player Friendly PBEM Global War - 12/3/2021 5:01:10 PM

rkr1958

Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline

Turn 18. Jul/Aug 1942. Asian Front. Axis #5. China CCP. IJA Land Combat.

Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)

Post #: 1039

RE: 6-Player Friendly PBEM Global War - 12/3/2021 5:02:10 PM

rkr1958

Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline

Turn 18. Jul/Aug 1942. Asian Front. Axis #7. China CCP 74, 132.

Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)

Post #: 1040

RE: 6-Player Friendly PBEM Global War - 12/3/2021 5:05:21 PM

rkr1958

Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline

Turn 18. Jul/Aug 1942. Asian Front. Axis #9. Lanchow, China (CCP).

(1) Unbelievable! The Japanese player again "rolls" low on a critical land combat this turn.
(2) This time, the CCP holds Lanchow in a combat in which Japan had a 87% chance of taking the city.

Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)

Post #: 1041

RE: 6-Player Friendly PBEM Global War - 12/3/2021 5:08:46 PM

rkr1958

Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline

Turn 18. Jul/Aug 1942. Asian Front. Axis #9. China, CCP 73,123.

(1) A tactical mistake by the Soviet player I dare say costs them Mao.
(2) Maybe he was caught up in the win of the last land combat in which he held onto Lanchow.
(3) Or maybe, he just didn't think this land combat through fully.
(4) If fought on the blitz with these "rolls" Mao would have survived and forced to retreat. Japan would not have lost a unit and would have seen 2 of the 4 surviving attackers flipped vs all. All of this irrelevant because ...
(5) The Soviet player elected to fight this combat on the assault table and not the blitz.