Slitherine

quote:

ORIGINAL: tm1

Hi
love the commentary and your posts and tactics are meticulous in detail.

Your opponent is fighting hard I commend him too.

Looking forward to viewing both sides producing maximum effort in this titanic clash.

Myself, i am but a humble PVE player who gets a occasional clip behind the ears by the Soviet AI if I don't pay close attention.

quote:

ORIGINAL: HardLuckYetAgain

Turn 9 End of Turn

Baltic Shipping

Here is the import port, Riga. Then this is shipped inwards by rail. Although in this picture no supply was received by Ship but by rail.

My other import ports further north didn't get any receipt by ship.

So to me it looks like I turn Riga into an export port and set the 2 smaller ports shown above to import would draw supply faster to Riga. Will try that next turn.

Anyone else experimented with this? If so let me know. I am all ears playing with the Baltic supply

quote:

ORIGINAL: Sammy5IsAlive

quote:

ORIGINAL: HardLuckYetAgain

Turn 9 End of Turn

Baltic Shipping

Here is the import port, Riga. Then this is shipped inwards by rail. Although in this picture no supply was received by Ship but by rail.

My other import ports further north didn't get any receipt by ship.

So to me it looks like I turn Riga into an export port and set the 2 smaller ports shown above to import would draw supply faster to Riga. Will try that next turn.

Anyone else experimented with this? If so let me know. I am all ears playing with the Baltic supply

Maybe you could drop all of those ports one step in terms of priority? At the moment Riga can only send freight on to your priority 4 depots and can collect freight by rail from your priority 2 ones inland (if you have any?). If you dropped it to 2 (and the export ports to 1) it might have more destinations to send freight out to and will mostly be taking freight by sea? If you left your northern ports on 3 then they might also start receiving freight from your export ports ahead of Riga if that is what you want?

quote:



OrIGINAL: HardLuckYetAgain

quote:

ORIGINAL: DesertedFox


quote:

ORIGINAL: HardLuckYetAgain


quote:

ORIGINAL: DesertedFox


quote:

ORIGINAL: vvs007

But aviation, unfortunately, needs to be seriously rebuilt.


+1.



I guess this conversation if going to go how great the Soviets are in the Air and how the 109's are too invincible in the game. I hope not but I am sure it will go that way :(



Wrong in that case for me HL.

I feel that direct air support in ground combat could be beefed up a bit.

I am not sure how effective interdiction actually is in the game, but the German airforce gave the Soviets deploying for the attack at Brody a big workover.


:)

Jubjub is doing pretty good Ground attacks to my 1941 Germans. So I hope it isn't beefed up anymore since I am losing 150-300 men per bombing run and he is making up to 3 runs on a hex before attacking. So lord I hope not from that perspective. I will post some of his bombings in my AAR when I get back from grabbing a sandwich for lunch.

I know I don't use the German airforce much in 41 because I want the supply for ground forces. Thus I have not done much Ground Attacking. But interdiction in the early stages of beta was crazy that I saw. Now it might be a bit low but I am still on the fence on interdiction.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Sammy5IsAlive

How come your AA is not firing?

quote:

ORIGINAL: HardLuckYetAgain

quote:



OrIGINAL: HardLuckYetAgain

quote:

ORIGINAL: DesertedFox


quote:

ORIGINAL: HardLuckYetAgain


quote:

ORIGINAL: DesertedFox


quote:

ORIGINAL: vvs007

But aviation, unfortunately, needs to be seriously rebuilt.


+1.



I guess this conversation if going to go how great the Soviets are in the Air and how the 109's are too invincible in the game. I hope not but I am sure it will go that way :(



Wrong in that case for me HL.

I feel that direct air support in ground combat could be beefed up a bit.

I am not sure how effective interdiction actually is in the game, but the German airforce gave the Soviets deploying for the attack at Brody a big workover.


:)

Jubjub is doing pretty good Ground attacks to my 1941 Germans. So I hope it isn't beefed up anymore since I am losing 150-300 men per bombing run and he is making up to 3 runs on a hex before attacking. So lord I hope not from that perspective. I will post some of his bombings in my AAR when I get back from grabbing a sandwich for lunch.

I know I don't use the German airforce much in 41 because I want the supply for ground forces. Thus I have not done much Ground Attacking. But interdiction in the early stages of beta was crazy that I saw. Now it might be a bit low but I am still on the fence on interdiction.

I copied this over from another AAR to show the Ground Attacks that Jubjub has been doing with good efficiency. Why do you think I made that comment in post #542 of this AAR? Here are some of the bombing runs that Jubjub did and please realize that the MP's after these bombings & attack had only 8MP's avail.

This was turn 9 at the beginning of the turn in one hex.

Bomb run 1 of 3 for that hex.

quote:

ORIGINAL: HardLuckYetAgain

quote:

ORIGINAL: Sammy5IsAlive

How come your AA is not firing?

No AA in an infantry division :) The bombers were at 9,000 ft for the bombing btw. That is why I kind of laugh when people attack Armor with lots of AA(when people put it there). Attack the Infantry division like I said in my WITE1 Soviet AAR's :) Just FYI the hex was attacked because there was an Armor regiment in this hex. That has been Jubjub's modus operandi for his level bombers.

Granted I can put some AA in there with SU's. But until I get to my final destination that isn't going to happen. (SU's take up supply. The more supply I get to my units, instead of my SU's, the better.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Sammy5IsAlive

quote:

ORIGINAL: HardLuckYetAgain

quote:

ORIGINAL: Sammy5IsAlive

How come your AA is not firing?

No AA in an infantry division :) The bombers were at 9,000 ft for the bombing btw. That is why I kind of laugh when people attack Armor with lots of AA(when people put it there). Attack the Infantry division like I said in my WITE1 Soviet AAR's :) Just FYI the hex was attacked because there was an Armor regiment in this hex. That has been Jubjub's modus operandi for his level bombers.

Granted I can put some AA in there with SU's. But until I get to my final destination that isn't going to happen. (SU's take up supply. The more supply I get to my units, instead of my SU's, the better.

Oh that makes sense then - it is one of those decisions where you have do work out where the balance lies I guess. Have you gone as far as to take the AA out of the Corps HQs also? I can't remember the rules for HQs committing AA to protect the units under them.

quote:

To me the Ground Attack bombing seems to be just fine. Unless you are meaning that less planes do more damage? Most people won't run Ground Support during the opposing turn since it is open to "gaming" the system. Now that does need attention. I feel that Ground Support should be allocated, I know how much people wanted to hear that more micro management is needed, just like Ground Attack. That way gaming the system isn't as possible.

quote:

ORIGINAL: HardLuckYetAgain

No AA in an infantry division :) The bombers were at 9,000 ft for the bombing btw. That is why I kind of laugh when people attack Armor with lots of AA(when people put it there). Attack the Infantry division like I said in my WITE1 Soviet AAR's :) Just FYI the hex was attacked because there was an Armor regiment in this hex. That has been Jubjub's modus operandi for his level bombers.

Granted I can put some AA in there with SU's. But until I get to my final destination that isn't going to happen. (SU's take up supply. The more supply I get to my units, instead of my SU's, the better.

quote:

ORIGINAL: jubjub

quote:

To me the Ground Attack bombing seems to be just fine. Unless you are meaning that less planes do more damage? Most people won't run Ground Support during the opposing turn since it is open to "gaming" the system. Now that does need attention. I feel that Ground Support should be allocated, I know how much people wanted to hear that more micro management is needed, just like Ground Attack. That way gaming the system isn't as possible.

I know if I leave GS on somewhere, the entire fleet can be wiped out. One of my favored tactics as soviets is to figure out where the bombers outrange the 109's and hit as many units in that area as possible lol. If you have fighter cover everywhere, it's pretty safe to leave it on as the axis though.

All they need is to add a 'minimum fighter' requirement option, just like every other air directive has. They could also just add a 'fly with no escort' button.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Beethoven1

quote:

ORIGINAL: HardLuckYetAgain

No AA in an infantry division :) The bombers were at 9,000 ft for the bombing btw. That is why I kind of laugh when people attack Armor with lots of AA(when people put it there). Attack the Infantry division like I said in my WITE1 Soviet AAR's :) Just FYI the hex was attacked because there was an Armor regiment in this hex. That has been Jubjub's modus operandi for his level bombers.

Granted I can put some AA in there with SU's. But until I get to my final destination that isn't going to happen. (SU's take up supply. The more supply I get to my units, instead of my SU's, the better.

From that perspective, you should be happy that his bombing kills your men. If you have fewer men, your men will consume less supply each turn. So then there will be more supply remaining for the ones who are left.