gamer78
Posts: 536
Joined: 8/17/2011 Status: offline
|
From the article: "But the Mahommedan religion increases, instead of lessening, the fury of intolerance. It was originally propagated by the sword, and ever since, its votaries have been subject, above the people of all other creeds, to this form of madness. In a moment the fruits of patient toil, the prospects of material prosperity, the fear of death itself, are flung aside. The more emotional Pathans are powerless to resist. All rational considerations are forgotten. Seizing their weapons, they become Ghazis—as dangerous and as sensible as mad dogs: fit only to be treated as such. While the more generous spirits among the tribesmen become convulsed in an ecstasy of religious bloodthirstiness, poorer and more material souls derive additional impulses from the influence of others, the hopes of plunder and the joy of fighting. Thus whole nations are roused to arms. Thus the Turks repel their enemies, the Arabs of the Soudan break the British squares, and the rising on the Indian frontier spreads far and wide. In each case civilisation is confronted with militant Mahommedanism. The forces of progress clash with those of reaction. The religion of blood and war is face to face with that of peace. Luckily the religion of peace is usually the better armed." Well all nations have some kind of "above the people of all other creeds" titles. Whether it can be Ghazis, Ataman or a Queen,King or Sultan -Ertuğrul was called Gazi (Ghazi) or Ataman Ertuğrul; Ottoman founder- and all generous spirits needs to obey in before, problem here whether about their religion, religious fanaticsm or because they were poor. M.Kemal Atatürk advised Amānullāh Khān about women rights: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amanullah_Khan https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/117928
|