RE: AAR vs Opponent Nr.2

Matrix Games Forums

Forums Register Login Photo Gallery Member List Search Calendars FAQ

My Profile Inbox Address Book My Subscription My Forums Log Out

RE: AAR vs Opponent Nr.2

View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest

Users viewing this topic: none

Printable Version

All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Gary Grigsby's War in the East 2 >> After Action Reports >> RE: AAR vs Opponent Nr.2

Page: << < prev 1 2 [3]

Message

<< Older Topic Newer Topic >>

RE: AAR vs Opponent Nr.2 - 9/8/2021 4:07:13 PM

AlbertN

Posts: 3693
Joined: 10/5/2010
From: Italy
Status: offline

T6 Summary

This has been roughly a 'consolidating' and 'catch up for Infantry' turn.

Some Infantry formations lagged behind to clean up the pockets of T1 -AND- my opponent withdrew more than the usual.
I do not feel I've accomplished much this turn and I may have some formations exposed to enemy retaliation. I may have potentially understimated the enemy reserves in the North.

The Smolensk sector is mostly tranquil, having finalized a pocket for 4 enemy division that were ZoC'ed before.

A Sicherung Division is being delayed for its migration to the Garrison TB due to being busy in cleaning the Baltic Islands then it will reach its designated allocation.

A leader gained in rating but it was Political...

(in reply to AlbertN)

Post #: 61

RE: AAR vs Opponent Nr.2 - 9/12/2021 9:45:10 PM

AlbertN

Posts: 3693
Joined: 10/5/2010
From: Italy
Status: offline

AAR Closed.

I decided to not play Axis anymore til moves are made in terms of balance.

As explained to my opponents both my AAR posting turned into almost an incessant streak of complaints on the game, and a general vibe of frustration and lack of enjoyment through doing the turns. Due to perception of a wrong 'narrative' of the Barbarossa.

Graciously - both opponents understood the sentiment.
Looking forward to see positive changes and to be able to play - enjoying the game.

(in reply to AlbertN)

Post #: 62