Matrix Games Forums

 Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

RE: A tale from '42 - AlbertN vs MSAG

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Gary Grigsby's War in the East 2 >> After Action Reports >> RE: A tale from '42 - AlbertN vs MSAG Page: <<   < prev  2 3 [4] 5 6   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: A tale from '42 - AlbertN vs MSAG - 12/11/2021 1:45:05 PM   
AlbertN

 

Posts: 3693
Joined: 10/5/2010
From: Italy
Status: offline 		T60 - Leningrad Tango

I suspect Leningrad will remain firmly held in Russian hands. Or well - I do not know how many stocks they've in there but now that Air Supply is coming in I am very confident I cannot seize the City as the garrison will remain fully operational.

I'll have some long range plane scout the Soviet Airfields, to detect where the Li-2 take off from!

But as the strategic plan was to cut the other railline, I hope to at least put under crisis the present frontline there and seize the ports... Even if ports right now are redundant as 500+ Freight comes via the air.

I just assume the Russians do not have enough to supply adequately the whole garrison, these folks must eat and all!

Edit: Reiterating it is fine though as I feel I had my fair share of non intercepted Air Supply missions over winter right off to the frontlines! This prolly serves MSAG back with interests but it's all good!




Attachment (1)

< Message edited by AlbertN -- 12/11/2021 1:52:06 PM >

(in reply to Erik Rutins)
Post #: 91
RE: A tale from '42 - AlbertN vs MSAG - 12/11/2021 1:55:48 PM   
AlbertN

 

Posts: 3693
Joined: 10/5/2010
From: Italy
Status: offline 		T60 - 'Cut the rail' Operation Follow up

Here the Soviet counterattacks to liberate their two trapped corps ultimately failed.

I believe a sore point was struck as there was a neat lack of reserves for meaningful attacks as well.

A tired and worn German infantry got retreated by superior forces but follow up attacks fell short. The fresh motorized division that just marched yawned at the Soviet attack and suffered 0 permanent losses and a measly handful of damaged ones. (But that was a full CCP unit that was resting in reserve behind Moscow line and has not fought at all - was just there to help secure the pocket).

A shy attack in the northern line was made, but that too was blunted easily by the German defenders in the wildlands.

System of depots and airbases is being created in case that will turn into a winter line.
Ideally - the Furher would want that, there is a Resource hex there, and resources should be needed for our industries to produce more guns, more ammunitions and whatnot! (I assume they'll just go in stock as by the logistic report there are already enough resources to feed all the factories that Germany has).








Attachment (1)

(in reply to AlbertN)
Post #: 92
RE: A tale from '42 - AlbertN vs MSAG - 12/11/2021 2:03:12 PM   
AlbertN

 

Posts: 3693
Joined: 10/5/2010
From: Italy
Status: offline 		T60 - The other Soviet attack?

Here air recon too happened, but one of the 'icons' signaling it is right ontop of one of the lurking Panzer Divisions - of which I had a few.

I deliberately choosed not to counterattack - as already explained - in the hope to lure the Soviets further. But whilst they've been bold in the south, here they played wise.

Content of their firsthand victory, they returned to their positions (Or even started to relocate the mobile forces to the new threat north of Moscow).

Soviet defensive numbers in the sector are not really encouraging an attack at all. Khimki has some airplane factories, but it's U2 ... and I am far from sure how useful these planes are in this game!




Attachment (1)

(in reply to AlbertN)
Post #: 93
RE: A tale from '42 - AlbertN vs MSAG - 12/11/2021 2:15:58 PM   
AlbertN

 

Posts: 3693
Joined: 10/5/2010
From: Italy
Status: offline 		T60 - Caucasus Operations

On a relevant note - the screenshots are before to move anything, as I just got the turn.

Here I am quite satisfied that the encirclement of Krasnodar has not been broken. It seems I am roughly on a historical timetable there, the VP bonus being just a +3 IF I seize it now.

And I am far from sure I can achieve that this turn!

My logistic line there is not exceptional at all - but as Romanians also crossed the Kerch strait and seized a port there, I believe things may turn pinker and that the desired results will be achieved by the end of the summer. Or will it be wishful thinking?

At this stage if I was MSAG I'd probably evacuate the potentially trapped zone because his air-lift is needed for Leningrad, and I can devote some planes there too to interdict ports. But that's just me.

There are only 2 things that I believe are precious enough as intrinsic geographical assets.
The VP city and the Factories / Manpower.

But let's forget of the 'Manpower' because one can lose both the manpower produced in future turns AND the manpower in troops garrisoning there.

Probably I'd take the route to retreat toward the ports and evacuate via sea, at the risk of losing some assets but unless things changed, sea losses are minimal.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to AlbertN)
Post #: 94
RE: A tale from '42 - AlbertN vs MSAG - 12/11/2021 2:32:55 PM   
Stamb

 

Posts: 1030
Joined: 10/26/2021
Status: offline 		Getting display number of damaged elements in addition to destroyed one on the main battle screen would be awesome.

(in reply to AlbertN)
Post #: 95
RE: A tale from '42 - AlbertN vs MSAG - 12/11/2021 2:44:11 PM   
loki100


Posts: 10920
Joined: 10/20/2012
From: Utlima Thule
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: AlbertN

T60 - 'Cut the rail' Operation Follow up

Here the Soviet counterattacks to liberate their two trapped corps ultimately failed.

I believe a sore point was struck as there was a neat lack of reserves for meaningful attacks as well.

A tired and worn German infantry got retreated by superior forces but follow up attacks fell short. The fresh motorized division that just marched yawned at the Soviet attack and suffered 0 permanent losses and a measly handful of damaged ones. (But that was a full CCP unit that was resting in reserve behind Moscow line and has not fought at all - was just there to help secure the pocket).

A shy attack in the northern line was made, but that too was blunted easily by the German defenders in the wildlands.

System of depots and airbases is being created in case that will turn into a winter line.
Ideally - the Furher would want that, there is a Resource hex there, and resources should be needed for our industries to produce more guns, more ammunitions and whatnot! (I assume they'll just go in stock as by the logistic report there are already enough resources to feed all the factories that Germany has).

...


interesting to see the gains here, Gunulf has done similar and my instinct is it will make a complete mess of attempts to keep the Leningrad/Volkhov forces in supply - so well worth clinging to if you can


_____________________________


(in reply to AlbertN)
Post #: 96
RE: A tale from '42 - AlbertN vs MSAG - 12/11/2021 2:50:59 PM   
AlbertN

 

Posts: 3693
Joined: 10/5/2010
From: Italy
Status: offline 		T60 - How deep are Soviets in trouble?

From my perspective they're not that deep in trouble, they've a hefty gain of troops on the map each turn and we're still in an Axis initiative and offensive phase.

With the hindsight that since the latest patch I can barely do much offensively and that most of the results are due to the bulk of the game being played with 'Artillery Patch' on.

Here the OOBs at the end of my turn (Which is already part of a collage of screenshots at page 3) and the OOBs at the start of my turn here (I've just ran the air missions).

The Soviets gained roughly 300.000 men on the map. In -one- turn.
I assume they're also getting a bucket of disabled and 'damaged' (Hospitalized) soldiers back to the frontline.
I do not know if this is a regular pattern as I've never sharply observed it but also MSAG is being more conservative with his forces there compared to how he was at May-June when he mustered 5M men on the map.

The Axis for how well set and positioned roughly kept the same numbers, as per in a not too active phase I am barely floating where I am right now.

I've still to play the turn so I expect two Corps to surrender at least which should be a decent chunk of soldiers raising arms!








Attachment (1)

(in reply to Stamb)
Post #: 97
RE: A tale from '42 - AlbertN vs MSAG - 12/11/2021 2:57:33 PM   
AlbertN

 

Posts: 3693
Joined: 10/5/2010
From: Italy
Status: offline 		T60 - Post Recon revelations

Here how Recon took place and where the enemy forces are.

The Soviets are shielding Yarsolav I feel and a longer type of encirclment about Moscow (which I do not consider feasible at all).

Nonetheless they mustered aplenty of troops over there quickly to patch the situation!

But there is another possibility I am caressing - I deliberately included the last railroad that serves the Leningrad zone / front of operations. It is definitely a daring operations but I suspect Soviet trucks will suffer immensely to keep supplied that region IF that railroad is severed!




Attachment (1)

(in reply to AlbertN)
Post #: 98
RE: A tale from '42 - AlbertN vs MSAG - 12/11/2021 3:23:33 PM   
AlbertN

 

Posts: 3693
Joined: 10/5/2010
From: Italy
Status: offline 		T60 - Counter Encirclement?

The Axis forces counterattacked. I decided to rout as well a Guard Tank Army (Well in truth hoped to retreat it in the right direction but it proved impossible, the GD Division crashed into it with a deliberate assault. One may argue I could have done it 'hasty' though).

Nonetheless I have the gut feeling the Russians will open the pocket in turn as the frontal shield is pretty much what was there already of mine, and that was trapped and thus low on supply. Air supply will be flown there and some Stukas relocated in the region already but I do not plan to leave ground support up for the Russian turn.

On the other hand the dozen of extra divisions (albeit still somehow fatigued) the 11th Army brought definitely crippled any Soviet wishful thinking of grand offensives - whereas without the 11th Army I am still confident I'd have stalled the attack but without the capability of punishing the initiative adequately.

What I am to evaluate is a push from the 1st Panzergruppe (that has only 1 Panzerkorp here at operational level) from the south in direction of Stalingrad. That may force the Soviets to divert attentions BUT I am far from sure of that. The air recon reveals that the Russians have a double layer of Infantry divisions deployed as chessboard to shield the approach to their industrial City. - May take a bit of time to think and ponder, that PzK has 2 good motorized divisions and 2 panzer divisions that are panzer by name only and are glorified motorized regiments with a tank battallion attachment in truth...




Attachment (1)

< Message edited by AlbertN -- 12/11/2021 3:31:25 PM >

(in reply to AlbertN)
Post #: 99
RE: A tale from '42 - AlbertN vs MSAG - 12/11/2021 3:58:14 PM   
AlbertN

 

Posts: 3693
Joined: 10/5/2010
From: Italy
Status: offline 		T60 - Caucasus Progress

Elected not to attack Krasnodar this turn. Bombers were issued to the region ... Goering said he has no bombers to spare, unless they're removed from other theathers (Which is well doable due to theathers being overloaded with bombers).

But Romanian Bombers were issued (yes don't laugh at me) as they had plenty to spare, and some of them are already 'training' by bombing partisans. (Note the ' ' - pilots ought not to train i nthe Garrison box).

The eastern side of the front is ... manned by a bunch of Romanians. What could ever go wrong?
Another reason for which I am sensibly refraining from using the reserve PzK up north - it works also as an emergency intervention for the south.

But I took already a decision of a half-arsed commitment, a frontal attack the 2 MOT divisions to a single Soviet RD that as predicted routed having only 1 Fort level and in open plain.

That keeps the 2 'Panzer Divisions' by name at the ready to fend off infiltrations of cavalry and the like at the expence of the Romanians (interlocked by a dispersed German ID admittedly).

It's a thin veil but I believe Russian punches are elsewhere, so here it is just the 'war of the poors' pretty much!

If I was in the Soviet side though, I'd have launched here the counteroffensive. BUT it is also to be said, the supply of Soviets here may be tenuous too considering the only have 1 railline and I think the Caspian ports for.

Now, time to unplug myself from the PC and go sort chores and the like. Turn will have to wait.






Attachment (1)

(in reply to AlbertN)
Post #: 100
RE: A tale from '42 - AlbertN vs MSAG - 12/11/2021 4:14:48 PM   
Jango32

 

Posts: 307
Joined: 3/15/2021
Status: offline 		I've started noticing that hasty attacks with Panzer divisions no longer produce satisfactory results even against small Soviet units in clear terrain (early 1941).

They just seem to retreat a few hexes with relatively minor losses.

< Message edited by Jango32 -- 12/11/2021 4:21:03 PM >

(in reply to AlbertN)
Post #: 101
RE: A tale from '42 - AlbertN vs MSAG - 12/11/2021 4:49:38 PM   
Jango32

 

Posts: 307
Joined: 3/15/2021
Status: offline 		Never mind, it seems it's hasty attacks in general.

(in reply to Jango32)
Post #: 102
RE: A tale from '42 - AlbertN vs MSAG - 12/11/2021 4:55:08 PM   
Erik Rutins

 

Posts: 37503
Joined: 3/28/2000
From: Vermont, USA
Status: offline 		I'm not seeing that - if you think you've found an issue, please start a new thread and report it with a save to reproduce it, but I just tried again quickly and hasty attacks with reasonable force are working well for me as the Axis in 1941.

_____________________________

Erik Rutins
CEO, Matrix Games LLC



For official support, please use our Help Desk: http://www.matrixgames.com/helpdesk/

Freedom is not Free.

(in reply to Jango32)
Post #: 103
RE: A tale from '42 - AlbertN vs MSAG - 12/11/2021 5:56:22 PM   
Jango32

 

Posts: 307
Joined: 3/15/2021
Status: offline 		I've started a new thread and if needed I will send the PBEM save file in a private email so as not to reveal the password.

I've also collected some data by attacking a division over which I had complete intelligence (no breaking FOW rules) in a server game and will post them in the thread if needed.

(in reply to Erik Rutins)
Post #: 104
RE: A tale from '42 - AlbertN vs MSAG - 12/11/2021 11:23:42 PM   
AlbertN

 

Posts: 3693
Joined: 10/5/2010
From: Italy
Status: offline 		T60 - Moscow with Numbers: Mission Impossible

An impregnable fortress by now.

Even before the 'attack nerf' patch it was a difficult business. I've discovered that the digging civilians are insane, noticed Soviet hexes going from no trenches to 2+ fortifications in 1 turn.

But right now the problem is that no matter how much I can throw at a Soviet Corp, it is not going to budge I feel. Not with these numbers at least.

They're fresh, rested and amazingly supplied.

I can write off Moscow and pretty much half of summer of efforts in this direction.

But right now even in the most pinkest ever assumption that I've 6 divisions (2 Corps) of good quality (Let's take the 14-15 CV ones) I muster 15 * 6 = 90 CV. These X means it's over 100. Am I to start a deliberate attack with under 1:1 ratio?
In previous patch it was something doable, one knew the quality of the troops and the mass of numbers would manage.
Now by what I have seen I am certain I won't.

For science I will attack the 29 defending stack. Yes, the weakmost. Using the divisions closeby plus one to have 6 divisions attacking. I know they're not rested and all - but to move up will take time, fatigue the new formations, etcetera.

Let's see how it goes, I think I may barely take it OR fail even.

That will be just to gain a single hex! Where ... I won't even be able to advance into it (and even if I advance it leads nowhere).






Attachment (1)

(in reply to Jango32)
Post #: 105
RE: A tale from '42 - AlbertN vs MSAG - 12/11/2021 11:32:47 PM   
AlbertN

 

Posts: 3693
Joined: 10/5/2010
From: Italy
Status: offline 		T60 - German Formations

For the show.
Supply is what it is. I am in front of Moscow and they get what they get. They're not lavishly supplied as Soviet troops certainly are.

On the other hand you can see the experience the troops have (and in general to get there, they must have had morale that high somewhen).

The 106th Division belongs to the Model Corp, an undefeated unit (for now!). It has some attachments and thus is bolstered, but has no maxed CCPs.

The 23rd is a more mundane division, that reached 80~ Morale before the plummet and dropped some since. It is still an excellent unit, 90% TOE so definitely healthy - and with 100 CCP, with an abysmal amount of fatigue.
Consider this unit has been sitting there doing nothing except digging its own fortification for turns by now.

You know then you need build up of let's say 3 turns if not more to get there. Do nothing 3 turns, attack in one turn. A month of gameplay.

It won't lead to the fall of Moscow with the present numbers. Not even the encirclement of Moscow.

Guards I believe have +10 NM compared to the normal Russians. So they'd have 60, maybe 65 NM. Infantry Guard Corps. And here they're with their defensive X!




Attachment (1)

(in reply to AlbertN)
Post #: 106
RE: A tale from '42 - AlbertN vs MSAG - 12/11/2021 11:44:45 PM   
AlbertN

 

Posts: 3693
Joined: 10/5/2010
From: Italy
Status: offline 		T60 - The attack 'for science'

Well - the forts were not present - and the Soviet formations got bested. But retreated in good order and with pratically non existant retreat losses.

Numbers down below.

I shall perform a tactical retreat, as I do not plan to advance further here and the local spot is ... unhealthy to linger at.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to AlbertN)
Post #: 107
RE: A tale from '42 - AlbertN vs MSAG - 12/12/2021 12:13:23 AM   
AlbertN

 

Posts: 3693
Joined: 10/5/2010
From: Italy
Status: offline 		T60 - Leningrad Tango

The dance may be over soonish there due to increasing Soviet numbers too.

I wished to play 'smart' and got hammered. The first attack was made with just one hex instead of two so that the other hex could advance and maybe the motorized and panzer division present there even advance further.
There was the rather nasty surprise that within the Guard Corps there were extra troops in sheer abundance making it very puffed and inflated.

Thus in the second attack I had to use 3 fresh (from the turn) infantry divisions and the other hex, and used 3 other infantry divisions to occupy the just vacated hex.

It does not seem a sustainable pace here either.

Present forecast? Probable sitzkrieg to happen soon. Winning tactic? With current patch, probably so.
Fun match? Doubt so. If the idea is to play trench warfare there are WW1 games for that.

I am open to suggestions if anyone has any. Sentiment is extreme frustration right now.






Attachment (1)

(in reply to AlbertN)
Post #: 108
RE: A tale from '42 - AlbertN vs MSAG - 12/12/2021 12:45:45 AM   
AlbertN

 

Posts: 3693
Joined: 10/5/2010
From: Italy
Status: offline 		T60 - Theather Boxes Tips / Explaining

Here you can see Finland and Italy respectively.

TBs are particular - each type has a base value given by the most prominent type of unit required for it.

So that for Ground, it counts as 'BASE' your line ground units (Infantry, Cavalry, Armour, etc).
For Air, it is Fighters for instance but once you grasp the Ground it is the same repeated for the other concepts.

Look at Italy (The right one). The total I presently have are pratically 65 out of a need of 68. That translates to a 95%. I am at a measly risk of losing 1 VP and 1 AP because of that right now.

Then there is a base value - that is the sum of the CVs of all the 'line' units (Infantry, Armour, Cavalry, etc). In general a player can see a number expressed in CV if they hoover on the relevant units, when on the 'Ground' screen showing all the units in the Theather.

Then we've the list of 'specialties' that can contribute. In a percentage that is relative to your BASE value.
Check out the Bomber line. It says 10% - that is the maximum bombers can contribute for the Ground Factors! 10% of your base.
I am explaining this because when I checked the manual I've not found it in the Theather Boxes, so I think it may help other players.

Bombers, they give me 4.77 (Exactly the 10% of my BASE) - but ... there is a 46.11 to the right? what's that? That's the value of all my bombers. I am wasting here 40+ points pretty much! [Though before one rips heads off, bombers are needed as well in larger amount for the Patrol Value]

Fighters too seem to be in abundance (But they shape the BASE value for the Day-Air percentages!).

In other sectors well under the percentages that limits our maximum. And by all means there is no need to reach the caps. Theathers are here to allow the Axis player optimize a bit their own play with what they've at hand, since the Soviets can just create all their optimal / most performing type of SUs and avoid the ones that instead underperform or sucks truck from the pool.

Then if we look at Finland ... we've a strong BASE there of 184 pratically. But we only use a small portion of our Bomber allocation. 10 points out of 18. By taking a Bomber squadron from Italy and sending it to Finland we won't damage Italy (with due check for Naval values but as we're at 178% I am not fussed... whilst these extra bombers (German ones obviously, Italians cannot go there) can top the missing %! Maybe 2 squadrons of bombers may allow us to whisk away a mountain regiment from there that can come handy on the front too!

And in general IF your value in brackets for the Specialties is higher than the one non in brackets, it means you have excess of them there. Unless you are to raise your BASE value, you can shift around stuff in excess. For instance in Finland there are too many Construction Units - presently: the 11.24 total value they would contribute is simply limited and thus they give 9.19.

Now, if I was to do the grand plan of 'send bombers, whisk away mountain regiment' I'd incur in a domino effect. Bombers may give me some more BUT as I remove a line unit, my BASE value will drop some - which in turn lowers all the percentages calculated on the BASE value.

Do I min-max it?
No.
But I play with it some, especially as I like to get this or that battallion and regiment to tuck in this or that Axis Minor unit to boost them some. I ended up having Italian Alpini as frontline units, even if in the Caucasus. But even a German battallion if not even a regiment there can help. OR if one needs extra push somewhere...
See what MSAG did. Fill your corps with SUs where needed to bolster locations without stressing your command chain.

Now going to finish the turn, air supply and other boring stuff. Active operations are over!





Attachment (1)

(in reply to AlbertN)
Post #: 109
RE: A tale from '42 - AlbertN vs MSAG - 12/12/2021 2:35:14 AM   
Gunnulf


Posts: 686
Joined: 10/31/2012
Status: offline 		Cutting him down to a single rail track will be hurting I'm sure. It might not be the magic bullet to make the city fall but it will reduce the relief forces ability to break the siege, and focus his attentions on shifting you off those heavily wooded blocking positions. I think I would worry a little about truck attrition, despite a couple of north-south roads, especially when winter comes. Overall though despite being held in sight of Moscow seems like its looking pretty good all round, especially with his overall OOB at 5.5m. I'm at a similar time with the Red Army at 7m and now I'm worried that somehow there I am facing 100+ extra divisions out there somewhere with the express intention of doing harm. I'd say you have drained him pretty well all told while keeping your own forces in pretty good shape and have less to worry about a serious counter-attack in the near future and can maintain the initiative. Nice work.

_____________________________

"Stay low, move fast"

(in reply to AlbertN)
Post #: 110
RE: A tale from '42 - AlbertN vs MSAG - 12/12/2021 2:56:49 AM   
AlbertN

 

Posts: 3693
Joined: 10/5/2010
From: Italy
Status: offline 		In '42 a 7M Red Army seems awfully wrong - and way too large.

I am struggling against a 4.5 M Red Army - and I feel that's about right for Summer '42 tbh.
I admit I am short of figures and numbers there though and probably even these are 'differing' from this to that historical and scholar.

(in reply to Gunnulf)
Post #: 111
RE: A tale from '42 - AlbertN vs MSAG - 12/12/2021 3:12:14 AM   
Gunnulf


Posts: 686
Joined: 10/31/2012
Status: offline 		Two very different Soviet strategies for sure which is interesting to see. Looks like MSAG has been contesting more terrain it seems which is costing him numbers, but subsequently has many many more battle hardened Guards which is why you are maybe starting to feel the pressure from better quality of troops as well as numbers now. Still looks like you are in a solid position to give him trouble and are deeper into his key terrain in the north particularly. If you can cut off Novorossiyk with naval patrols too you can clear out a big pocket there eventually too and shorten your lines considerably.

_____________________________

"Stay low, move fast"

(in reply to AlbertN)
Post #: 112
RE: A tale from '42 - AlbertN vs MSAG - 12/12/2021 3:28:20 AM   
AlbertN

 

Posts: 3693
Joined: 10/5/2010
From: Italy
Status: offline 		That's the idea yes. I've enough planes to get that sorted, especially as Naval Patrol Values in TBs are pretty high.

I believe it affects as well the fact the game was played for the most of its turns (of present) with the 'artillery might' or whatever we can call it!
And yes MSAG contested terrain rather fiercely.
I like his playstyle in general because it keeps me on the toes too.

The pointe he made - move in, hammer some divisions and pull back - in the Tambov zone I think it has been a smart thing, and certainly an operational success.
At the same time he has instead pushed on with the armour around Stalingrad - it may be a wrong move, due to how I moved the 11th Army mostly - BUT that also means he decides by situation and has no specific operational pattern.

(in reply to Gunnulf)
Post #: 113
RE: A tale from '42 - AlbertN vs MSAG - 12/12/2021 4:52:09 PM   
AlbertN

 

Posts: 3693
Joined: 10/5/2010
From: Italy
Status: offline 		T61 - The Battle for Don River Bend

The Soviets freed their armoured corps easily and in the process butchered some Axis divisions that surredered heinous losses.

My bad there I suspect - I should have just routed the pocketed armoured corps of the Soviets during my turn and moved in troops replace the ones that were isolated by the Soviets instead!

Some German divisions are barely able to fight on right now after said pounding, being a shadow of their own self. May evaluate to retreat them to the Reserve or Western Europe to have them lick the wounds.

This time there are no encirclements made here so it seems the combat will take the echo of front assaults if needs to be.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to AlbertN)
Post #: 114
RE: A tale from '42 - AlbertN vs MSAG - 12/12/2021 5:03:31 PM   
AlbertN

 

Posts: 3693
Joined: 10/5/2010
From: Italy
Status: offline 		T61 - Leningrad Tango

There are buckets of Air Transport squadrons on the Soviet end operating here too - and with some air missions they just deliver the needed to prevent Leningrad to be isolated.

I am unsure how much freigh the Li-2 ships in, and if it can help sustaining a defence. Their AA fires like madmen at each sortie the bombers do outside their port.

The Soviet also are churning out airfields like no tomorrow, at a way faster speed than the Germans.

Right now I am not feeling any limit on the Russian operational capability there despite their being supplied by a single track railroad.

My own Flak does not seem to cut it, at preventing the Li-2 from shipping the needed stuff!

I'll post air losses of the last turn now before my air phase as the Soviets are also fiercely operating with fighters over the Ladoga Lake.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to AlbertN)
Post #: 115
RE: A tale from '42 - AlbertN vs MSAG - 12/12/2021 5:10:00 PM   
AlbertN

 

Posts: 3693
Joined: 10/5/2010
From: Italy
Status: offline 		T61 - Air Losses (mostly over Leningrad)

Axis bombers operate just here. A 1:1 losses with the Soviets is not acceptable for the Germans at all.

Especially when the sacrifice of hundreds of planes a turn does not even isolate Leningrad.

Supposedly the -single- port they've still drains from the very same single railroad that the whole front there relies on SO supposedly I could entirely stop air operations AND their issues should somehow persist.

I am pretty confident though the Russian logistics are massively ace and they won't even budge at all.
I mean, their numbers have not dropped at all there and their front seem massively solid to me anywhere they've not brought fresh troops (not sure what these two new divisions are, the 1-8 stack)

Now I shall proceed to study what to do in the air this turn ... which may take a while too.

The issue is that the bombers go on and on and on as they've more mileage, even if there is no escort at hand (not sure if I can fine tune that via setting). I've in the area both fighters associated as escorts to the bombers, and fighters flying air superiority mission to have a double layer yet in many occasions the Level Bombers got caught unescorted at all and got butchered.

Other news from the front:

Krasnodar has been left to its fate and thus is isolated.

Where the 'Attack for Science' was made the Soviets counterattacked. A panzer division in reserve triggered the intervention. It turned into a bloody massacre for the Soviets attacking.

Two German leaders gained skill point... one of them alas was in Political Rating.





Attachment (1)

< Message edited by AlbertN -- 12/12/2021 5:12:34 PM >

(in reply to AlbertN)
Post #: 116
RE: A tale from '42 - AlbertN vs MSAG - 12/12/2021 6:45:39 PM   
AlbertN

 

Posts: 3693
Joined: 10/5/2010
From: Italy
Status: offline 		T61 - Leningrad Air Tactics?

I tried something different which produced better air to air results (still sub optimal I think) but definitely failed at delivering the needed interdiction level. (Needed between brackets since the air supply business keeps Leningrad afloat from isolation).

Pratically I decided to run Air Superiority the first 3 days with the FW190s, that supposedly should have cleared the air from most of the enemy airplanes assuming they operate all the days. Then the last four days of the week the German bombers went in to produce interdiction but failed at producing the needed amount in that window of time, to sever the supply path.

Ulterior Luftwaffe assets are being shifted in the sector but it seems they're more devouring freight than producing results.

The last resource is to hunt the Li-2 airbases and try to destroy them on the ground. But I feel the Soviets by now have plenty of them in stock/pool to replace the losses no matter what.





Attachment (1)

(in reply to AlbertN)
Post #: 117
RE: A tale from '42 - AlbertN vs MSAG - 12/12/2021 7:19:52 PM   
AlbertN

 

Posts: 3693
Joined: 10/5/2010
From: Italy
Status: offline 		T61 - Don River Bend Battle

It seems the battle of who gets exhausted than else.

The Soviet troops that were victorious in their own turn were tired and worn and fatigued; and German divisions that are not exactly that fresh either in terms of fatigue and still sapped in strenght from the Voronhez assault push and shove back.

Both tried to encircle at first and simply -- it was fruitless.

In the screenshot here the GD Elite division (loaded with SU) crashes a tired Cavalry Corp of the Russians. The division it was with retreated from a previous combat and in fact its combat value is insignificant.

Now that the middle stack got all the hexes around German controlled, it will rout if I win a battle against it.

Stukas are being used in the battle too BUT they're useless. The Air Patch should come and come fast as right now the system has holes and mostly rewards Soviets for all I remember when it comes to bombing - or at least the Il2.

Nonetheless - the combat factors in the zone are just exceedinly low for German units too. After they fought 1-2 battles they're exhauested and logistics are a problem on German end.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to AlbertN)
Post #: 118
RE: A tale from '42 - AlbertN vs MSAG - 12/12/2021 7:26:00 PM   
AlbertN

 

Posts: 3693
Joined: 10/5/2010
From: Italy
Status: offline 		T61 - Don River Bend Battle

It seems the Soviet units 'routed' in exceptional order and with measly losses!

But here the Stukas at least produced some numbers that are not just 0 and 1s! I spy some 2s on Soviet Artilleries (and disruptions too).

Somehow the German commanders expected a more successful aggression here ...




Attachment (1)

(in reply to AlbertN)
Post #: 119
RE: A tale from '42 - AlbertN vs MSAG - 12/12/2021 8:14:22 PM   
AlbertN

 

Posts: 3693
Joined: 10/5/2010
From: Italy
Status: offline 		T61 - Battle for the Don River Bend

Final sketch barring reserve movements - but the offensive operations here have been finished.

I decided to unleash also the 1st Panzergruppe corp in reserve, convinced that the Soviet offensive soaked the large bulk of the mobile Soviet forces in the region and the screen at my right flank should not be in immediate threat.

Plus the sector is receiving reinforcements (1 Romanian division *coughs coughs*) freshly restored in force from sitting in the Axis reserves, and trained up!

I believe both sides are relatively exhausted though but to capture a few Rifle Divisions is not to be disdained if the Soviets keep the position.

Mostly IF for any reason Stalingrad is encircled - will the Soviets have enough Air Transports for both Stalingrad and Leningrad?

But I doubt I've the operational capability to encircle Leningrad even if I lighten up Moscow front.






Attachment (1)

(in reply to AlbertN)
Post #: 120
Page:   <<   < prev  2 3 [4] 5 6   next >   >>
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Gary Grigsby's War in the East 2 >> After Action Reports >> RE: A tale from '42 - AlbertN vs MSAG Page: <<   < prev  2 3 [4] 5 6   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

0.922