Matrix Games Forums

 Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

Convoy Size

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> Convoy Size Page: [1]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
Convoy Size - 12/5/2021 11:04:21 PM   
Macquarrie1999


Posts: 57
Joined: 4/29/2021
From: California
Status: offline 		I am playing as the Allies against the Japanese. Right now I have been making my convoys large enough to dock in the port they are headed to, but I was wondering if it is better to just run massive convoys instead. Right now I can only fit one escort per convoy, but so far submarine attacks against my convoys have been very rare.
Post #: 1
RE: Convoy Size - 12/5/2021 11:21:44 PM   
RangerJoe


Posts: 13450
Joined: 11/16/2015
From: My Mother, although my Father had some small part.
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Macquarrie1999

I am playing as the Allies against the Japanese. Right now I have been making my convoys large enough to dock in the port they are headed to, but I was wondering if it is better to just run massive convoys instead. Right now I can only fit one escort per convoy, but so far submarine attacks against my convoys have been very rare.


That depends. Please describe the situation and what you are hauling plus where it is going.

_____________________________

Seek peace but keep your gun handy.

I'm not a complete idiot, some parts are missing!

“Illegitemus non carborundum est (“Don’t let the bastards grind you down”).”
― Julia Child


(in reply to Macquarrie1999)
Post #: 2
RE: Convoy Size - 12/5/2021 11:32:51 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline 		I take it you are playing the AI...then my advice is to experiment -- which is really the heart of the game.

If you are playing a pbem game, then you probably want to think about it a bit. Large convoys, really large ones, might set off intelligence reports and actually increase some risk especially if it can be intercepted by an astute IJN player.


(in reply to RangerJoe)
Post #: 3
RE: Convoy Size - 12/5/2021 11:35:31 PM   
HansBolter


Posts: 7704
Joined: 7/6/2006
From: United States
Status: offline 		Size above 15 ships increases the chance of collisions.

Don't build huge supply TFs with ships freshly commissioned with crew experience in the 17/15 range.

I like to build what I refer to as Sup Divs consisting of 40 Liberty ships with 4-8 escorts.

I tried doing this once as soon as I had stored up 40 Liberty ships at San Fran.

The first Sup Div didn't make it past Pearl before collisions forced me to limp several ships into Pearl for repairs.

That was when I finally bothered to look at crew experience.

I then split them up into TFs with 14 Liberty ships and 1 escort to ply back and forth between SF and Pearl for 6 months to gain enough crew experience to be able to handle their ships in larger TFs.

_____________________________

Hans


(in reply to RangerJoe)
Post #: 4
RE: Convoy Size - 12/5/2021 11:42:41 PM   
Macquarrie1999


Posts: 57
Joined: 4/29/2021
From: California
Status: offline 		The main convoys I have are moving supplies from SF to Sydney, Cape to Sydney, and Cape to Madras. I also have tanker convoys moving fuel from LA to Sydney and Abadan to Perth.

(in reply to RangerJoe)
Post #: 5
RE: Convoy Size - 12/5/2021 11:51:53 PM   
Macquarrie1999


Posts: 57
Joined: 4/29/2021
From: California
Status: offline 		Once you to get their experience up to you put them in larger convoys though? I have been doing it the way I have doing thinking that if they can dock they will be able to unload faster and therefore deliver more supplies over the long run.

(in reply to HansBolter)
Post #: 6
RE: Convoy Size - 12/6/2021 12:07:22 AM   
HansBolter


Posts: 7704
Joined: 7/6/2006
From: United States
Status: offline 		I'm really referring to the mid to late game situation where you need to be moving supply in the Millions.

My described Sup Divs with 40 Liberty ships carry 250k supply and 20k fuel in each run.

Last game I had 12 Sup Divs hauling supply from San Fran to the Home Islands in '45-'46 and still didn't have adequate supply for my needs. That's 3 Million supply on the move at any given time.

In the early game most ships have been at sea for some time and crew experiences are not as low as for the mass produced ships rolling out in '43.

During the early period it makes sense to tailor TF and ship size to port capacity.

Later, you will be moving so much supply you can't afford to dilly over inefficiency, but you do need the ship's crews to be able to handle the ships in large TFs.

_____________________________

Hans


(in reply to Macquarrie1999)
Post #: 7
RE: Convoy Size - 12/6/2021 12:29:18 AM   
RangerJoe


Posts: 13450
Joined: 11/16/2015
From: My Mother, although my Father had some small part.
Status: offline 		Also, if you are going to small ports from your regional supply hubs then you will want small TFs and if they are going in harm's way they will need more escorts.

_____________________________

Seek peace but keep your gun handy.

I'm not a complete idiot, some parts are missing!

“Illegitemus non carborundum est (“Don’t let the bastards grind you down”).”
― Julia Child


(in reply to HansBolter)
Post #: 8
RE: Convoy Size - 12/6/2021 1:19:01 AM   
Treetop64


Posts: 926
Joined: 4/12/2005
From: 519 Redwood City - BASE (Hex 218, 70)
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Macquarrie1999

I am playing as the Allies against the Japanese. Right now I have been making my convoys large enough to dock in the port they are headed to, but I was wondering if it is better to just run massive convoys instead. Right now I can only fit one escort per convoy, but so far submarine attacks against my convoys have been very rare.


Dependinding on how deep you are into the campaign, the composition of your convoys will vary. Early on you'll have to be very flexible, and you will not be able to afford to have escorts on every convoy. In fact, most of your escorts will be unescorted. One escort per convoy is all but pointless. Best to save multiple escorts only for your most important convoys, the rest will have to go naked.

By late '43 you will be accumulating more ships, planes, people, and everything else than you'll know what to do with. Setting up nice and neat convoys in exactly the composition you want, hauling 100k to 200k tons or more, will not be a problem. Until then, however, you'll have to wing it.

< Message edited by Treetop64 -- 12/6/2021 1:20:44 AM >

_____________________________



(in reply to Macquarrie1999)
Post #: 9
RE: Convoy Size - 12/6/2021 2:39:10 AM   
HansBolter


Posts: 7704
Joined: 7/6/2006
From: United States
Status: offline 		One escort per Tf is not pointless.

Any escort, even one without an ASW capability, is better than none.

Submarines will target escorts a high percentage of the time if they are present.

Escorts, normally being more maneuverable than most transport ships, get missed a high percentage of the time.

If said escort has an ASW capability, it may attack the sub.

One is always better than none.


_____________________________

Hans


(in reply to Treetop64)
Post #: 10
RE: Convoy Size - 12/6/2021 3:06:26 AM   
Nomad


Posts: 5905
Joined: 9/5/2001
From: West Yellowstone, Montana
Status: offline 		I also believe that having at least one escort ship will keep the sub from attacking on the surface.

(in reply to HansBolter)
Post #: 11
RE: Convoy Size - 12/6/2021 3:07:37 AM   
Ian R

 

Posts: 3420
Joined: 8/1/2000
From: Cammeraygal Country
Status: offline 		I do something similar to Hans- they convoys start at 6-8 ships plus an escort or two, and get bigger as the game progresses, and assets multiply. Even surface vessels with no ASW can provide escort against subs making surface gun attacks. If they land any sort of hit on a sub it might submerge and beat a retreat.

Two things that are useful is, first, to establish an air cover corridor from Xmas island, down the chain via Starbuck Is, to Pago Pago, along the line south of Fiji and eventually all the way to Brisbane. If you keep your TFs in the corridor, the air activity makes the subs submerge and they can't see your ships to attack them; also, when the subs are detected, the convoy will avoid them if on normal or safe routing. As a bonus, any surface raiders tend to retreat from the air threats.

Second, build Cochin into a 9 port ASAP, so you don't have to go around Ceylon to Madras (and turn Male into a flying boat base to get air coverage almost to the edge of the map).

_____________________________

"I am Alfred"

(in reply to Treetop64)
Post #: 12
RE: Convoy Size - 12/6/2021 3:12:52 AM   
Nomad


Posts: 5905
Joined: 9/5/2001
From: West Yellowstone, Montana
Status: offline 		I misread something


< Message edited by Nomad -- 12/6/2021 3:13:31 AM >

(in reply to HansBolter)
Post #: 13
RE: Convoy Size - 12/6/2021 4:27:57 AM   
Macquarrie1999


Posts: 57
Joined: 4/29/2021
From: California
Status: offline 		I already have my air corridor set up, too bad I don't get more PBYs, I could double the amount I have and still want more. Building up Cochin is a good idea.

For the Abadan-Perth route should I try and hold Christmas Island IO. I originally left it abandoned because I figured anything I had there would get bombed to shreds by bombers from Java. I am holding Cocos Island with some forces I retreated from Borneo.

(in reply to Ian R)
Post #: 14
RE: Convoy Size - 12/6/2021 5:45:59 AM   
Ian R

 

Posts: 3420
Joined: 8/1/2000
From: Cammeraygal Country
Status: offline 		You only need PBYs for the atolls where it takes a year to build the airstrip from 0(0) to 2. Xmas, Starbuck, and others can be built up to 4+ so you can base some 4Es there. Even a B-18 will make subs submerge. Also, SBDs do a reasonable job on naval search.

I'd say don't bother about Xmas IO - ship the fuel from Abadan across the far corner of the map and off it again to Capetown, then haul it straight to Adelaide. The benefits - the tankers involved use almost no fuel, have little to no wear and tear, and are mostly out of harm's way - outweighs the cost of tying up some extra hulls on the longer transits.

_____________________________

"I am Alfred"

(in reply to Macquarrie1999)
Post #: 15
RE: Convoy Size - 12/6/2021 6:25:14 AM   
Sardaukar


Posts: 9847
Joined: 11/28/2001
From: Finland/Israel
Status: offline 		I love to use CVE Long Island in convoys with SBD squadron on it, set for ASW, between SF and PH.

_____________________________

"To meaningless French Idealism, Liberty, Fraternity and Equality...we answer with German Realism, Infantry, Cavalry and Artillery" -Prince von Bülov, 1870-


(in reply to Ian R)
Post #: 16
RE: Convoy Size - 12/6/2021 7:25:53 AM   
Ian R

 

Posts: 3420
Joined: 8/1/2000
From: Cammeraygal Country
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Sardaukar

I love to use CVE Long Island in convoys with SBD squadron on it, set for ASW, between SF and PH.


Do you embed her in the convoy, or put her in a small CVE TF with a follow command?

_____________________________

"I am Alfred"

(in reply to Sardaukar)
Post #: 17
RE: Convoy Size - 12/6/2021 11:41:43 AM   
HansBolter


Posts: 7704
Joined: 7/6/2006
From: United States
Status: offline 		The AI in my current game was very aggressive around Colombo for most of '42.

This caused me to use Bombay as my main naval base in the region and Cochin for deliveries from Cape Town.

One drawback is the port size at Cochin. Unloading is slow and I would probably have been better off sending the convoys to Bombay.

< Message edited by HansBolter -- 12/6/2021 11:42:16 AM >

_____________________________

Hans


(in reply to Ian R)
Post #: 18
RE: Convoy Size - 12/6/2021 1:49:31 PM   
Sardaukar


Posts: 9847
Joined: 11/28/2001
From: Finland/Israel
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Ian R


quote:

ORIGINAL: Sardaukar

I love to use CVE Long Island in convoys with SBD squadron on it, set for ASW, between SF and PH.


Do you embed her in the convoy, or put her in a small CVE TF with a follow command?


Depends, both seem to work OK. It is 1943 in my game and IJN sub threat is minimal, but it is good training for those Marine VSBM squadrons.

_____________________________

"To meaningless French Idealism, Liberty, Fraternity and Equality...we answer with German Realism, Infantry, Cavalry and Artillery" -Prince von Bülov, 1870-


(in reply to Ian R)
Post #: 19
RE: Convoy Size - 12/6/2021 2:44:37 PM   
RangerJoe


Posts: 13450
Joined: 11/16/2015
From: My Mother, although my Father had some small part.
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Sardaukar


quote:

ORIGINAL: Ian R


quote:

ORIGINAL: Sardaukar

I love to use CVE Long Island in convoys with SBD squadron on it, set for ASW, between SF and PH.


Do you embed her in the convoy, or put her in a small CVE TF with a follow command?


Depends, both seem to work OK. It is 1943 in my game and IJN sub threat is minimal, but it is good training for those Marine VSBM squadrons.


After 90 days they are also carrier qualified. Repeat as needed.

_____________________________

Seek peace but keep your gun handy.

I'm not a complete idiot, some parts are missing!

“Illegitemus non carborundum est (“Don’t let the bastards grind you down”).”
― Julia Child


(in reply to Sardaukar)
Post #: 20
Page:   [1]
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> Convoy Size Page: [1]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

0.828