Matrix Games Forums

Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

Pearl Harbor

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> Pearl Harbor Page: [1]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
Pearl Harbor - 12/7/2021 4:03:20 PM   
jedwardpita

 

Posts: 68
Joined: 1/19/2021
Status: offline
In honor of Pearl Harbor day. I wanted to share an interesting article. "The Second Wave Attack on Battleship Row" by Alan Zimm December 2021 Naval History magazine. The second wave was 78 D3A Val dive bombers. The targets of the second wave was first hit the carriers even if they were sunk to make them unsalvageable. Second the cruisers. "Their type 99 Number 25 Model 1 554-pound bomb could penetrate only 2 inches of armor, insufficient to inflict more than superficial damage to the behemoths [battle ships]."

Only 15 hits were obtained and only one on a cruiser, (and only 10% hit rate at the ship aimed at). In practice they had obtained a 60% hit rate (for stationary targets). The author gave three causes. First, a low hanging cloud cover appeared, and forced them out of their trained technique. Second, the radio quality was so low many pilots tore them out as useless. This prevented a systematic adjustment.. The flak was very heavy by this time 14 planes were shot down and 14 were written off after return to the carrier.

"After the battle, Fuchida collated the hits for a report to Emperor Hirohito. The commander had been orbiting the harbor and observing the attack. The number of hits reported exactly matched the number of hits expected in his pre-battle calculations."
Post #: 1
RE: Pearl Harbor - 12/8/2021 1:37:22 AM   
mind_messing

 

Posts: 3393
Joined: 10/28/2013
Status: offline
quote:

"After the battle, Fuchida collated the hits for a report to Emperor Hirohito. The commander had been orbiting the harbor and observing the attack. The number of hits reported exactly matched the number of hits expected in his pre-battle calculations."


The same Fuchida, who's notorious misstatements have required significant reconstruction of the historical understanding of the Pacific War?

Quell surprise. Hadn't heard that one.

(in reply to jedwardpita)
Post #: 2
RE: Pearl Harbor - 12/8/2021 2:50:39 AM   
RangerJoe


Posts: 13450
Joined: 11/16/2015
From: My Mother, although my Father had some small part.
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: mind_messing

quote:

"After the battle, Fuchida collated the hits for a report to Emperor Hirohito. The commander had been orbiting the harbor and observing the attack. The number of hits reported exactly matched the number of hits expected in his pre-battle calculations."


The same Fuchida, who's notorious misstatements have required significant reconstruction of the historical understanding of the Pacific War?

Quell surprise. Hadn't heard that one.


This was about the Vals in the second wave - however only one hit the secondary targets which were the cruisers in port. The primary targets were the carriers even if they had been sunk so they could not be easily salvaged if at all.

_____________________________

Seek peace but keep your gun handy.

I'm not a complete idiot, some parts are missing!

“Illegitemus non carborundum est (“Don’t let the bastards grind you down”).”
― Julia Child


(in reply to mind_messing)
Post #: 3
RE: Pearl Harbor - 12/8/2021 5:32:08 AM   
Ian R

 

Posts: 3420
Joined: 8/1/2000
From: Cammeraygal Country
Status: offline
If you hit a carrier, that is already "bottomed" in harbour, and only has a (relatively easily repairable) largely wooden structure above the strength deck, how much more damage is a 500 odd pound bomb going to do?

It's obviously going to have some blast/skockwave effect going off under water, but short of fracturing the hull, if the carrier is already burned out, everything above (and lot of stuff below) the armour deck is going to most likely be replaced anyway.

Incidentally, the USN even salvaged the Oklahoma (in 1943??), but determined that it wasn't worth repairing it - only because they had more than enough old BBs without it. If, say, the Lexington had been bottomed, you can see it coming back with the permanent list corrected, the 8" swapped for more 5"/38 in EBR mounts, the elevators re-built in more useful deck edge spots, etc. They would probably even re-boiler it and sort out the fuel consumption.

I suppose that if your exit plan is to do enough damage to make it all too hard for your opponent to rebuild and come back at you, a little more incremental damage might help, but the exit plan was flawed ab initio.



< Message edited by Ian R -- 12/8/2021 5:33:59 AM >


_____________________________

"I am Alfred"

(in reply to RangerJoe)
Post #: 4
RE: Pearl Harbor - 12/8/2021 3:34:35 PM   
mind_messing

 

Posts: 3393
Joined: 10/28/2013
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: RangerJoe


quote:

ORIGINAL: mind_messing

quote:

"After the battle, Fuchida collated the hits for a report to Emperor Hirohito. The commander had been orbiting the harbor and observing the attack. The number of hits reported exactly matched the number of hits expected in his pre-battle calculations."


The same Fuchida, who's notorious misstatements have required significant reconstruction of the historical understanding of the Pacific War?

Quell surprise. Hadn't heard that one.


This was about the Vals in the second wave - however only one hit the secondary targets which were the cruisers in port. The primary targets were the carriers even if they had been sunk so they could not be easily salvaged if at all.


My point was that anything claimed by Fuchida needs to be taken with a 250kg bomb-load of salt. Many of his post-war claims have been the subject of substantial challenge by the actual evidence.

(in reply to RangerJoe)
Post #: 5
RE: Pearl Harbor - 12/8/2021 3:40:48 PM   
RangerJoe


Posts: 13450
Joined: 11/16/2015
From: My Mother, although my Father had some small part.
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Ian R

If you hit a carrier, that is already "bottomed" in harbour, and only has a (relatively easily repairable) largely wooden structure above the strength deck, how much more damage is a 500 odd pound bomb going to do?

It's obviously going to have some blast/skockwave effect going off under water, but short of fracturing the hull, if the carrier is already burned out, everything above (and lot of stuff below) the armour deck is going to most likely be replaced anyway.

Incidentally, the USN even salvaged the Oklahoma (in 1943??), but determined that it wasn't worth repairing it - only because they had more than enough old BBs without it. If, say, the Lexington had been bottomed, you can see it coming back with the permanent list corrected, the 8" swapped for more 5"/38 in EBR mounts, the elevators re-built in more useful deck edge spots, etc. They would probably even re-boiler it and sort out the fuel consumption.

I suppose that if your exit plan is to do enough damage to make it all too hard for your opponent to rebuild and come back at you, a little more incremental damage might help, but the exit plan was flawed ab initio.


I was referring to what I read as far as the plan was. Either make the aircraft carriers unsalvageable or that much more damage to repair.

_____________________________

Seek peace but keep your gun handy.

I'm not a complete idiot, some parts are missing!

“Illegitemus non carborundum est (“Don’t let the bastards grind you down”).”
― Julia Child


(in reply to Ian R)
Post #: 6
Page:   [1]
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> Pearl Harbor Page: [1]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

1.156