Bomarc and Safeguard CWDB issues

Matrix Games Forums

Forums Register Login Photo Gallery Member List Search Calendars FAQ

My Profile Inbox Address Book My Subscription My Forums Log Out

Bomarc and Safeguard CWDB issues

View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest

Users viewing this topic: none

Printable Version

All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Command: Modern Operations series >> Tech Support >> Bomarc and Safeguard CWDB issues

Page: [1]

Message

<< Older Topic Newer Topic >>

Bomarc and Safeguard CWDB issues - 1/5/2022 9:45:11 PM

Redeye43

Posts: 6
Joined: 1/5/2022
Status: offline

Three major problems here.
#1: Bomarc missiles have passive instead of active terminal guidance. They should fire up their own seeker to track the enemy: as is, they have to be command-guided all the way to the target. The missiles already have an active radar seeker in the DB, so this shouldn't be too much of an issue.
#2: Sprint missiles cannot be directed at all; since they're track-via-missile and the Safeguard unit has no fire control radar, they're unusable. The unit is missing its MSR.
#3: Safeguard sites are equipped with the Bomarc MISSILE datalink, not the command datalink.

Please forgive me if I said anything improper- I couldn't find the rules page or a thread to report CWDB issues in.

< Message edited by Redeye43 -- 1/5/2022 9:51:01 PM >

Post #: 1

RE: Bomarc and Safeguard CWDB issues - 1/5/2022 10:54:07 PM

Scorpion86

Posts: 239
Joined: 2/26/2017
Status: offline

Hi there! Welcome to the forums!
To report CWDB issues, you can use this thread, in the "Mods and Scenarios" subforum. When you do, I suggest you indicate the database number of the units you refer to, it makes the DB editors' job easier!

(in reply to Redeye43)

Post #: 2

RE: Bomarc and Safeguard CWDB issues - 1/6/2022 12:08:12 AM

Redeye43

Posts: 6
Joined: 1/5/2022
Status: offline

Yo, thanks, I went looking and I thought it was for requests only. I'll go ahead and add the DB numbers of the units in question, then post there.

Mods feel free to close

(in reply to Scorpion86)

Post #: 3