Suggestions or strategies for a new player?

Matrix Games Forums

Forums Register Login Photo Gallery Member List Search Calendars FAQ

My Profile Inbox Address Book My Subscription My Forums Log Out

Suggestions or strategies for a new player?

View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest

Users viewing this topic: none

Printable Version

All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> The Operational Art of War IV >> Suggestions or strategies for a new player?

Page: [1]

Message

<< Older Topic Newer Topic >>

Suggestions or strategies for a new player? - 2/8/2022 6:17:14 PM

MonagFam

Posts: 8
Joined: 2/1/2022
Status: offline

While I enjoy the game a lot, I feel I am not getting as much out of it as I could. My approach is sometimes, in simplistic terms, to just send big stacks of tiles against the opponent and hope I win.

I feel like I am not making enough of different unit types or maximizing their strengths. After all, I apparently sent unarmed civilians (rumor has it they did have access to rocks) into battle in Grenada.

I told you I was bad at wargaming.

Post #: 1

RE: Suggestions or strategies for a new player? - 2/8/2022 7:04:20 PM

Curtis Lemay

Posts: 12969
Joined: 9/17/2004
From: Houston, TX
Status: offline

I always recommend my detailed AAR here:

https://www.matrixgames.com/forums/tm.asp?m=1546619

I also have an article on the User Interface here:

https://www.matrixgames.com/forums/tm.asp?m=4380544

And, if interested, an article on the Editor here:

https://www.matrixgames.com/forums/tm.asp?m=4387350

< Message edited by Curtis Lemay -- 2/8/2022 7:31:27 PM >

_____________________________

My TOAW web site:

Bob Cross's TOAW Site

(in reply to MonagFam)

Post #: 2

RE: Suggestions or strategies for a new player? - 2/9/2022 2:33:07 AM

MonagFam

Posts: 8
Joined: 2/1/2022
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Curtis Lemay

I always recommend my detailed AAR here:

I also have an article on the User Interface here:

And, if interested, an article on the Editor here: