Matrix Games Forums

Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Empires in Arms the Napoleonic Wars of 1805 - 1815 >> Page: [1]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
- 10/14/2003 6:11:14 AM   
Black Hat

 

Posts: 30
Joined: 9/24/2002
Status: offline
As GB I try to trade as much as possible. Nothing will send Countries running to the French alliance quicker then a GREEDY GB. In Games where GB has been wrecked, it was because they wouldn’t trade and didn’t spread around any $$.

(in reply to Wellington12347)
Post #: 1
Let get my "boots" on. - 10/14/2003 7:00:54 AM   
Le Tondu


Posts: 564
Joined: 10/2/2001
From: Seattle, WA
Status: offline
[QUOTE=Wellington12347]I must respectfully disagree with the last post.

If you are France then you can and probably should thumb your nose at GB in every way possible.

If you are any other country, a de facto rule that you should oppose GB will almost always have the result of you becoming a client state of France. I say "amost always" because there is always the possibility of a French player who has an objective other than accruing victory points (and thus winning the game).

One important (and realistic) factor of the game is that the level of VPs France needs to win (especially when compared to the other powers) is so high that the French player must employ a strategy that meets her voracious need for those victory points. Thus, more often than not, the French player will be forced to adopt Napoleon's axiom that he'd "rather fight allies than be one."

The period of 1805 was primarily about the power structure between France and GB, and to a lesser extent Russia. The other countries were important but Prussia was the only one of those 5 that wasn't in the midst of a long decline (though she had declined from the time of Frederick the Great she would eventually be the cornerstone of 20th centruy Germany). Thus the game models the bi-polar GB-France world and players would do well to understand that dynamic.

Typically, not always, players must work to bring down France (not GB) if they want a shot at winning the VP race.

Jason[/QUOTE]

Poppycock! ;)

Are we forgetting that this is a multiplayer game????

LOL! The real Napoleonic Wars were won by a coalition of nations and NOT by any single nation. (Don't let the propoganda fool you.) It is clear that not one single nation could win it all by themselves, most of all England.

That is my dear friends, a [COLOR=Navy]group of nations[/COLOR] gathered together to defeat their chosen enemy. There is no reason why a different kind of coalition that could even include France cannot happen. Whoever plays this game can choose their own bad guy to beat up on and it doesn't always have to be France. [COLOR=DarkSlateBlue][B][U][I]YOU DON'T HAVE TO ALWAYS PLAY HISTORICALLY.[/I][/U][/B][/COLOR]

You get have your diplomacy go in any direction that you want.

As for me, when I will play this game, I won't care so much about winning ---as a seperate player. I will care about the coalition that I am part of. There is a BIG distinction there.

Some other player can have the most VPs. As long as I'm allied to him/her, I will be a winner too.

Anyways, what does it really matter if you are having fun playing the game?????

_____________________________

Vive l'Empereur!

(in reply to Wellington12347)
Post #: 2
Page:   [1]
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Empires in Arms the Napoleonic Wars of 1805 - 1815 >> Page: [1]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

0.844