Aquiring rights to boardgames

Matrix Games Forums

Forums Register Login Photo Gallery Member List Search Calendars FAQ

My Profile Inbox Address Book My Subscription My Forums Log Out

Aquiring rights to boardgames

View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest

Users viewing this topic: none

Printable Version

All Forums >> [General] >> General Discussion >> Aquiring rights to boardgames

Page: [1]

Message

<< Older Topic Newer Topic >>

Aquiring rights to boardgames - 9/27/2000 4:47:00 AM

marcusjm

Posts: 21
Joined: 9/26/2000
From: Gothenburg, Sweden
Status: offline

Ok most of here might agree that Avalon Hill has some of the best game designs ever for war & strategy games. In fact some of the best game designs over all exists on boards and not computers (at least I can't think of one computer game that beats my fave boardgames). The only problem is no AI with boardgames. In other words we need these designs on cpu:s AND kickass A/I. Why not buy a couple of rights to some key boardgames? (ie games that Hasbro doesn't plan to do anything about). Another option might be to look for smaller boardgame manufacturers not in hands of the evil empire. Who own's SPI:s titles for instance? I have an idea that might make this feasible (just thinking). How about selling stocks for each game you buy the rights to? If for instance 2000 buys stocks for let's say 100$ each (or more) and get's a small chance at profit from the games (ok very small ). If the snowball get's rolling there might be more wargamers willing to invest. Yes I'm not talking about matrixgames stocks but in the games they buy the rights to do. It probably wont be enough for the big ones (Hasbro again), but it might be enough to buy the rights to some SPI titles for instance. Matrixgames could start a small stockexchange and see which game is the most interesting etc, kinda gives incentive right away

. If I invest in something i'm more likelly to buy it also. Just some (crazy?) thoughts

. Marcus

_____________________________

marcusjm

Post #: 1

- 9/27/2000 5:10:00 AM

laurent Favre

Posts: 35
Joined: 4/25/2000
From: France
Status: offline

SPI: Decision Games for the most part. Hasbro: seems as they bought AH for the titles of the boardgames. And the first to be used for a computer game without any similarity with the boardgame is the upcoming "Squad leader". I guess Hasbro would sell titles for much money... [This message has been edited by laurent Favre (edited September 26, 2000).]

_____________________________

When I think about TS, I'm suffocating. And you?

(in reply to marcusjm)

Post #: 2

- 9/30/2000 2:33:00 PM

marcusjm

Posts: 21
Joined: 9/26/2000
From: Gothenburg, Sweden
Status: offline

Ok but what about the stock exchange idea? Would it work or is it totally unrealistic? Marcus

_____________________________

marcusjm

(in reply to marcusjm)

Post #: 3

- 10/1/2000 2:08:00 AM

Bonzo

Posts: 676
Joined: 9/3/2000
From: Peace River, AB, Canada
Status: offline

I would have to say that a stock exchange in probably unrealistic & perhaps illegal in some jurasdictions. Stocks have value based on the continued earning power of the company. Games have a limited money earning life. As sales decline over time, only a complete idiot would buy your stock in that game. Most jurasdictions have laws to protect the mentally incompetent. Bonzo ------------------ Robert (Bonzo) Lindsay, Coordinator 28th (North-west) Battalion Headquarters http://dreadnaught.home.icq.com [email]nwbattalion@icqmail.com[/email]

_____________________________

Robert (Bonzo) Lindsay, Webmaster 28th (North-west) Battalion Headquarters Main http://www.nwbattalion.com E-mail

(in reply to marcusjm)

Post #: 4

- 10/1/2000 2:46:00 AM

marcusjm

Posts: 21
Joined: 9/26/2000
From: Gothenburg, Sweden
Status: offline

Well I wasn't thinking of stocks in the traditional sence but rather options or something. As you probably know options have a limited expiry time. I think it could work and I don't see anything illegal with investing in products. Marcus

_____________________________

marcusjm

(in reply to marcusjm)

Post #: 5