Matrix Games Forums

Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

RE: Uncertainty

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> World in Flames >> RE: Uncertainty Page: <<   < prev  14 15 [16] 17 18   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Uncertainty - 3/1/2008 12:05:15 PM   
ezzler

 

Posts: 863
Joined: 7/4/2004
Status: offline
Just out of interest which WIF ' extras' and 'adds' do people enjoy the most/least.

i am in the Norman42 camp for DOD 1+2 [ never tried3]. It was  great fun but we stopped using it pretty quickly and substituted politics in flames if we were to use anything.

Planes in flames .. A must have + carriers planes in flames too
mech in flames .. have it but have never used it { was this asia in flames ? ]
Patton in flames only played once and was the best ww3 strategy game ever.. would love that as an add  on
Leaders in flames .. too much chrome
Cruisers in flames dont have
convoys don't have , but did used to like the sub system from wif historical.
+ plenty of good house rules on that site http://home.earthlink.net/~devinc/wifhouse.htm
Sif ++

+ i'm sure there are more


(in reply to panzers)
Post #: 451
RE: Uncertainty - 3/1/2008 5:50:14 PM   
Shannon V. OKeets

 

Posts: 22095
Joined: 5/19/2005
From: Honolulu, Hawaii
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: ezz

Just out of interest which WIF ' extras' and 'adds' do people enjoy the most/least.

i am in the Norman42 camp for DOD 1+2 [ never tried3]. It was  great fun but we stopped using it pretty quickly and substituted politics in flames if we were to use anything.

Planes in flames .. A must have + carriers planes in flames too
mech in flames .. have it but have never used it { was this asia in flames ? ]
Patton in flames only played once and was the best ww3 strategy game ever.. would love that as an add  on
Leaders in flames .. too much chrome
Cruisers in flames dont have
convoys don't have , but did used to like the sub system from wif historical.
+ plenty of good house rules on that site http://home.earthlink.net/~devinc/wifhouse.htm
Sif ++

+ i'm sure there are more



From your list, ...

MWIF product 1:
Planes in Flames and Ships in Flames are mandatory, not optional.
Mech in Flames (Asia Aflame), Cruisers in Flames, and Convoys in Flames (optional rules)

Future MWIF products (in no particular order):
DOD III,
Politics in Flames,
America in Flames,
Patton in Flames,
Leaders in Flames.

I am very reluctant to add house rules, since they are so numerous and often go directly against the intent of the WIF game designers.

There are also a whole host of issues that I categorize as "WIF design kit".

_____________________________

Steve

Perfection is an elusive goal.

(in reply to ezzler)
Post #: 452
RE: Uncertainty - 3/1/2008 9:11:35 PM   
panzers

 

Posts: 635
Joined: 5/19/2006
From: Detroit Mi, USA
Status: offline
Based pn everything I have read here: Why DODIII and not I or II?

(in reply to Shannon V. OKeets)
Post #: 453
RE: Uncertainty - 3/1/2008 10:16:06 PM   
jcprom

 

Posts: 36
Joined: 5/1/2007
Status: offline
quote:

From your list, ...

MWIF product 1:
Planes in Flames and Ships in Flames are mandatory, not optional.
Mech in Flames (Asia Aflame), Cruisers in Flames, and Convoys in Flames (optional rules)

Future MWIF products (in no particular order):
DOD III,
Politics in Flames,
America in Flames,
Patton in Flames,
Leaders in Flames.


Carrier planes in flames is in MWIF 1 ?
And Africa Aflame possibly in MWIF 2 ?

(in reply to Shannon V. OKeets)
Post #: 454
RE: Uncertainty - 3/1/2008 10:20:27 PM   
Shannon V. OKeets

 

Posts: 22095
Joined: 5/19/2005
From: Honolulu, Hawaii
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: panzers

Based pn everything I have read here: Why DODIII and not I or II?

When the time comes, we'll have a discussion about that.

For now, I am using DOD III as a placeholder since that is ADG's latest and greatest. The same logic was used to build MWIF based on WIF FE instead of WIF 5.

_____________________________

Steve

Perfection is an elusive goal.

(in reply to panzers)
Post #: 455
RE: Uncertainty - 3/1/2008 11:04:12 PM   
jcprom

 

Posts: 36
Joined: 5/1/2007
Status: offline
quote:

Based on everything I have read here: Why DODIII and not I or II?


DODIII is an evolution of DODII.

DODI is one design. DODII/DODIII is another design (DODIII improves on DODII).

If DOD is implemented in MWIF2, there is no other choice but DODIII because DODI is discontinued and not fully compatible with WIF:FE. (DODI was designed to be compatible with WIF 5th edition ; they both have 6 sided dies for instance, unlike DODIII and WIF:FE).

Harry Rowland once wrote DODI has millions of possibilities whereas DODII/III has billions. Play-testing such games is a real challenge.

I think MWIF product 2 or 3 (including DODIII) should include some "system" (not a "design kit") to allow players to "act" should something unacceptable happen. In our games of DOD, we encountered a few "game bugs". This was rare but if it happened in MWIF, many hours of play could be spoiled.

(in reply to panzers)
Post #: 456
RE: Uncertainty - 3/1/2008 11:15:35 PM   
Shannon V. OKeets

 

Posts: 22095
Joined: 5/19/2005
From: Honolulu, Hawaii
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: jcprom

quote:

Based on everything I have read here: Why DODIII and not I or II?


DODIII is an evolution of DODII.

DODI is one design. DODII/DODIII is another design (DODIII improves on DODII).

If DOD is implemented in MWIF2, there is no other choice but DODIII because DODI is discontinued and not fully compatible with WIF:FE. (DODI was designed to be compatible with WIF 5th edition ; they both have 6 sided dies for instance, unlike DODIII and WIF:FE).

Harry Rowland once wrote DODI has millions of possibilities whereas DODII/III has billions. Play-testing such games is a real challenge.

I think MWIF product 2 or 3 (including DODIII) should include some "system" (not a "design kit") to allow players to "act" should something unacceptable happen. In our games of DOD, we encountered a few "game bugs". This was rare but if it happened in MWIF, many hours of play could be spoiled.

Autosave at the end of each phase is the current solution in MWIF. You can also save manually whenever you like.

_____________________________

Steve

Perfection is an elusive goal.

(in reply to jcprom)
Post #: 457
RE: Uncertainty - 3/2/2008 11:05:55 AM   
Froonp


Posts: 7995
Joined: 10/21/2003
From: Marseilles, France
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: jcprom
Carrier planes in flames is in MWIF 1 ?
And Africa Aflame possibly in MWIF 2 ?

Both are in MWiF right now.

(in reply to jcprom)
Post #: 458
RE: Uncertainty - 3/3/2008 6:09:57 PM   
composer99


Posts: 2923
Joined: 6/6/2005
From: Ottawa, Canada
Status: offline
The Mech in Flames counter set was radically modified in 2007, and I believe that the revised version is going to be in MWiF 1. As far as I know Leaders in Flames has been discontinued, since the units that came with that set were shipped over to the 2007 Mech in Flames kit.

_____________________________

~ Composer99

(in reply to Froonp)
Post #: 459
RE: Uncertainty - 3/6/2008 4:13:09 PM   
Mziln


Posts: 1107
Joined: 2/9/2004
From: Tulsa Oklahoma
Status: offline
The Mindwire-V5 would be excelent for making players finish their turns quickly.

_____________________________


(in reply to composer99)
Post #: 460
RE: Uncertainty - 6/2/2008 5:33:39 AM   
Odysseus

 

Posts: 91
Joined: 11/21/2007
Status: offline
Am I the only DOD/WiF veteran who actually prefer 5th ed to FE? Back in those days, before the complexity craziness, you

* could finish 2 summer turns in 6 hrs! As opposed to 1 summer turn in 12 hrs for FE.
* did not have to actually study law to get into the rules. How many pages are the FE rules+Errata+Optionals? 500?

I'm just worried that incorporating ALL packs into a computer pbem game will make it so complex that it will be virtually unplayable, because of the total overload of counters and little stuff you'll need to remember...

But I'm still looking forward to it

(in reply to Mziln)
Post #: 461
RE: Uncertainty - 6/2/2008 6:18:20 AM   
Shannon V. OKeets

 

Posts: 22095
Joined: 5/19/2005
From: Honolulu, Hawaii
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Odysseus

Am I the only DOD/WiF veteran who actually prefer 5th ed to FE? Back in those days, before the complexity craziness, you

* could finish 2 summer turns in 6 hrs! As opposed to 1 summer turn in 12 hrs for FE.
* did not have to actually study law to get into the rules. How many pages are the FE rules+Errata+Optionals? 500?

I'm just worried that incorporating ALL packs into a computer pbem game will make it so complex that it will be virtually unplayable, because of the total overload of counters and little stuff you'll need to remember...

But I'm still looking forward to it

I use to play 5th edition a lot and I have had to overcome many of my hard-wired understanding of the rules while writing code to WIF FE (Final Edition). By now, I have a pretty thorough grasp of the WIF FE rules, though there are some areas that I have trouble keeping in the forefront of my memory.

Rules as Coded (RAC) runs 150 pages in its PDF form, and that is with a larger font, single column, and paragraph spacing. So you will not have to read 500. Indeed, many of the pages are for the index or concern optional rules, so I think the total for the basic game is under 100. A mere couple of hours of light reading!

Seriously, the tutorials should help a lot. The various tables can be accessed using drop down memus and every form, phase & subphase within the sequence of play, and optional rule has a separate dedicated form to help exlpain things if you experience memory lapses. David Heath (Matrix Games) wants me to do several short videos of people playing the game, with a voice-over explaining what is going on.

All-in-all I am not worrying about learning the game being a problem. Of course there is a lot more work to be done on completing the list I gave above, but it is mostly writing straight forward text with a lot of cut and paste involved. Look at the tutorial threads to get a better understanding of what I mean.

_____________________________

Steve

Perfection is an elusive goal.

(in reply to Odysseus)
Post #: 462
RE: Uncertainty - 6/2/2008 1:35:33 PM   
Shannon V. OKeets

 

Posts: 22095
Joined: 5/19/2005
From: Honolulu, Hawaii
Status: offline
June 1, 2008 Status Report for Matrix Games’ MWIF Forum

Accomplishments of May

Project Management
December 2008 is the scheduled release date for MWIF product 1.

David Heath (Matrix Games) has persuaded me to not attend Origins 2008 since the players that attend Origins are principally there to play in tournaments and purchase existing products. Their interest in demos is limited to existing products - to see if they want to immediately buy the game or not. The upside to this is that it gives me another week of productive time to work on the game and saves me several thousand dollars.

Communications
Rob Armstrong finished the splash screens with a flourish, providing me with a dozen, twice what I had been expecting.

Dan (NetPlay) has been tied up supporting his largest customer for the last couple of months. He and I are working on rebuilding the schedule for NetPlay based on his availability.

I monitored all the threads in the MWIF World in Flames forum daily and uploaded versions 8.03 and 8.04 to the beta testers.

Patrice, amongst other things, sent me the latest and greatest rules decisions/clarifications from Harry Rowland.

Peter Skoglund continues to help with developing scripts for the AI Opponent.

Robert Nebel uploaded a new version of test plans, incorporating Jimm’s contributions. They are pretty close to having all the portions of the sequence of play covered by test plans through the end of land movement. Lend lease of air units is the current thorny issue.

Robert Jenkins has sent me dozens of new and revised writeups for the naval units and Andy is almost 90% of the way through revising the air units writeups (1150 done out of 1300).

No information from Matrix about getting a price on a printed copy of the map.

No communications with Chris Marinacci.

Hardware and Software Development Tools
My new notebook arrived a week early which threw me into disarray for a couple of days. It runs Vista, which adds to my learning curve (I’ve used XP exclusively since I started on MWIF). To give you a sense of how busy I am on MWIF, all I have been able to really do with the new computer is transfer a copy of MWIF to it to see what it looks like on the notebook’s 17 inch monitor. That blew me away. The higher pixel density make the graphics look awesome. Especially when zooming in to highest resolution on the coastline hexes.

I have not installed ThemeEngine July/2007 yet. However, I might get to that before NetPlay is done since I can use the notebook computer to test whether the Theme Engine update fixes program bugs when running Vista in native mode.

Beta Testing
I uploaded versions 8.03 and 8.04 to the beta testers this month. Version 8.03 included my revisions to the code for deciding about scrapping units that are destroyed during a turn. I have these set up as Digressions from the sequence of play. So far I have 4 of them coded: air-to-air combat losses, anti-air combat losses, carpet bombing losses, and naval combat losses. New ones will be easy to add and only take 5 to 10 minutes each. When I am done there will be 14 references to the Scrap Units digression; then I can eliminate the ‘phase’ Destroy Units from CWIF.

Version 8.04 includes my revisions to the sequence of play in support of NetPlay up through air transport. It covers the air missions: port attacks, strategic bombing, carpet bombing, and ground strikes as well as naval air missions, naval movement, naval combat, land movement, and overruns.

I brought my records on who the beta testers are up-to-date. This took me some effort since I had previously been relying on Greyshaft to recruit, oversee, and coordinate the beta testers. Alas! family and work has taken him away from us. But I now have a fairly good spreadsheet on who currently is, or has been, a beta tester, with several columns of information on each person (e.g., real name and email address). Once I got a handle on that I was able to solicit new beta testers to bring the active group back up to 30. That solicitation will remain open until June 5th and I expect we’ll be adding 9 new beta testers to the group.

To accommodate the influx of new beta testers I have reviewed the various documents we have for them, principally “Beta Testing 101.PDF”, and Patrice then brought it up-to-date.

Currently each beta tester is responsible for 5 optional rules and 2 scenarios. I want to add to those responsibilities 20-30 test scripts, as prepared by Robert and Jimm. There are 11 scenarios, 81 optional rules, and 400+ test scripts. With a little math you can see that I am looking for double coverage or better on each of these items.

Units
As I reported last month, the ADG 2008 Annual for WIF included new units and rules and 3 new add-on modules, but they will not be part of MWIF product 1. More changes in the product definition I do not need.

Unit writeups are continuing, with steady progress on both air and naval units.

Map
Patrice added labels under each of the 100+ anonymous resources so they can be identified as Coal, Iron, Tin, Rubber, etc.. These have no impact on game play but look real nice and give the map more credibility.

A forum member asked me to post current images of the entire map, since many earlier posts are over a year old. This month I was able to find time to post current screen shots of North America. That was a success, in that forum members were able to point out several places where improvements could be made to make the map more accurate/realistic.

At my instigation (foolish me!), Patrice asked the forum for comments on the European portion of the map. The forum members went bonkers discussing the possibility and ramifications of changing the country borders in the Lowlands. It is so controversial I’ve decided to leave it as is and let Harry Rowland & ADG take whatever blame/credit is to be had.

Scenario Setup
I found one unit (captured French sub) that should have been included in Missed the Bus, and Harry Rowland agreed that it’s absence was a mistake.

Optional Rules
I went through the source listings reviewing the code for another dozen optional rules. For the most part they were all fine. I primarily added comments and in a few places made minor changes for clarity.

Player Interface
I took Rob’s splash screen image of the HMS Repulse and incorporated it into the opening screen. That turned out real nice. I still need to do something similar for when the game data is loading.

I methodically went through all 100+ forms and increased the size of the unit depictions from zoom 4 to zoom 6, when room permitted. This makes the units much easier to read. I also changed the font for any text that ‘floats’ on the textured theme engine backgrounds to bold, again for clarity. What prompted this was that I removed some old CWIF code related to forms, which invalidated several dozen of them. I needed to check them all and make a couple simple edits to those that were ‘damaged’ by the removal of the CWIF code. While I was making those changes I did the others at the same time.

Internet - NetPlay
No progress at all on this. Dan and I are working on a revised schedule for NetPlay.

CWIF Conversion
I wrote more of the code to recalculate supply for units. Once I get the sequence of play revisions for NetPlay completed through the end of an impulse, I’ll finish the supply routines. The new supply calculations use an optimal search strategy so determining supply will execute much faster than it did in CWIF, which did a blind search. I need this to be faster so the AI Opponent can examine hundreds of supply lines when evaluating whether units can be put out of supply.

MWIF Game Engine
I implemented Digressions for scrapping units, which really made me happy. They are a clean way to resolve the problems that come up when another player has to make a decision in the middle of a phase. WIF was intentionally designed to have this occur frequently. In over the board play it keeps the players on the other side involved in the game, rather than have them sitting there watching the ‘phasing’ side move all its units or otherwise make decisions. From a programming point of view this is a nightmare, because code has to be written to accommodate these interruptions in the ‘normal’ sequence of play.

Other digressions, besides scrapping units, are for correcting overstacking at the end of a phase, and forced movement of units due to political upheavals, such as conquest and liberation. Actually the possibility of forced movement occurs often, and code has to be written to implement it at each place it might occur in the sequence of play.

Saved Games
I keep this functioning at all times. However, some of the changes to the map data will cause games saved prior to version 9.00 to become obsolete - once I release version 9.00. When the new beta testers arrive, I’ll upload version 9.00 so they start with a new release.

Player’s Manual
I revised the RAC (Rules as Coded) document to incorporate Harry Rowland’s most recent revisions, including the ones listed as errata in the WIF 2008 Annual magazine. This is version 14 of RAC and the beta testers have a copy of it to review and critique. Patrice has already used a software program to identify all the edits I made since version 13, and he commented on a couple of places when the changes could be improved.

PBEM
Nothing new. This is scheduled for early summer.

Historical Detail, Animations, and Sound
Nothing new, scheduled for fall.

Help System and Tutorials
Matrix Games is working on a mechanism for downloading the 10 slide shows for the introductory tutorials, that Patrice created. These are PPS files which can be viewed using a free viewer available from Microsoft for PowerPoint presentations.

AI Opponent
Peter Skoglund and I made a first pass on encoding the strategic plans for internal storage and reference by other AIO decisions points. That is about 50% done. Right now we are working on encoding War Plans for the conquest of minor countries by the USSR. Once we iron out a few wrinkles in that we’ll post some of them for critique by forum members. I am hopeful that other forum members will be able to, and want to, encode war plans for the conquest of other minors.

I finally finished typing in my handwritten notes for the AI Opponent from last May, when I was in Europe. This represents all my thoughts on decision making by the AIO that is not specific to major powers’ strategic plans. This ‘general’ decision making document is close to 100 pages. The 8 strategic plans for the major powers average 25 pages each. So, there are roughly 300 pages of pretty focused information on how AIO decision making.

I took the strategic plans for France and broke the single file into separate data files for each decision point. For instance, French production decisions are now MC 02 Fr, Decide on Production Plan, and MC 03 Fr, Decide on Production for the Turn. MC 02 worries about gearing and the like, laying out general guidelines for production priorities. MC 03 makes the actual production decisions, based on available BPs.

After I do the same thing for the other 7 major powers’ strategic plans, in combination with the decisions, universal for all major power, I will have a full set of scripts for the AIO. I put together a spreadsheet listing all the separate scripts needed for the AIO, a mere 263.

Other
Due to a head cold I missed singing in the annual Spring Show this year. This is the first show performance I have missed in 11 years, very annoying. Yesterday, at the quarterly meeting of the Pan Pacific Convention we are hosting in late October, I presented my detailed spreadsheet on attendee flow for the 4 days of the convention. The piece de resistence was the movement for each the 18 competing choruses through 10 stages, timed so a chorus arrives on stage every 10 minutes. The tricky bit was the 20 minute bus trip across town from the convention hotel to the Hawaii Theatre.

The hospital next door has almost completed the vertical columns for the 2nd floor and have attached & buried the building’s plumbing into the basement.
====================================================================
May summary: I regret not being able to get a new version of the program to the beta testers every week. Graphics are now done, which is nice. All the work Peter and I do on the AIO is ahead of schedule, but I like to keep Peter amused (and working). RAC is once more checked off my task list as finished - I hope it stays that way.
====================================================================


Tasks for June

Communications
Continue monitoring the forum threads.

Map and Units
Make any corrections to the map on the 10th.

Beta Testing
Upload versions weekly. [est. 2 hours]

Redesign of MWIF Game Engine
Work through the sequence of play giving each phase its own module. [est. 150 hours]

CWIF Conversion
Convert CWIF style internet formats to Game Record Log Formats. [est. 40 hours]

Test the new random number generator. [est. 5 hours in October]

Player Interface
Finish the code for determining and displaying supply lines. [est. 10 hours]

Display the sequence of play (SOP) on the screen so the player knows where he is within the SOP and what is coming up next. [est. 20 hours in July]

Fix small bugs with player interface. [est. 20 hours]

Complete the Task Forces forms. Implement Task Forces as a new “unit type”. [est. 40 hours in July]

Create Unit and hex lists for air missions. [est 20 hours in October]

Optional Rules
Review, comment, modify, and create code for optional rules [est. 40 hours]

NetPlay
Implement the bidding capability using NetPlay. [est. 10 hours]
Incorporate the Indy10 code for the two player system into MWIF. [est. 10 hours]
Incorporate the multi-player (more than 2) system into MWIF. [est. 20 hours in July & August]

AI Opponent
Define LAIO variables with their supporting functions. Write a parser for LAIO. Create a few more rules as text and encode them for testing the parser. [est. 210 hours in July - August]

Help System and Tutorials
Nothing scheduled until October.

Player’s Manual
Nothing scheduled until September.

Historical Detail, Animations, and Sound
Nothing scheduled until September.

Other
Things are a little slow outside of working on MWIF, which is for the best.
================================================================
June summary: Keep the beta testers busy and respond to their bug reports. Continue work on Game Record Log conversions to support NetPlay for entire sequence of play.
================================================================


_____________________________

Steve

Perfection is an elusive goal.

(in reply to Shannon V. OKeets)
Post #: 463
RE: Uncertainty - 6/2/2008 9:41:27 PM   
Odysseus

 

Posts: 91
Joined: 11/21/2007
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Shannon V. OKeets


quote:

ORIGINAL: Odysseus

Am I the only DOD/WiF veteran who actually prefer 5th ed to FE? Back in those days, before the complexity craziness, you

* could finish 2 summer turns in 6 hrs! As opposed to 1 summer turn in 12 hrs for FE.
* did not have to actually study law to get into the rules. How many pages are the FE rules+Errata+Optionals? 500?

I'm just worried that incorporating ALL packs into a computer pbem game will make it so complex that it will be virtually unplayable, because of the total overload of counters and little stuff you'll need to remember...

But I'm still looking forward to it

I use to play 5th edition a lot and I have had to overcome many of my hard-wired understanding of the rules while writing code to WIF FE (Final Edition). By now, I have a pretty thorough grasp of the WIF FE rules, though there are some areas that I have trouble keeping in the forefront of my memory.

Rules as Coded (RAC) runs 150 pages in its PDF form, and that is with a larger font, single column, and paragraph spacing. So you will not have to read 500. Indeed, many of the pages are for the index or concern optional rules, so I think the total for the basic game is under 100. A mere couple of hours of light reading!

Seriously, the tutorials should help a lot. The various tables can be accessed using drop down memus and every form, phase & subphase within the sequence of play, and optional rule has a separate dedicated form to help exlpain things if you experience memory lapses. David Heath (Matrix Games) wants me to do several short videos of people playing the game, with a voice-over explaining what is going on.

All-in-all I am not worrying about learning the game being a problem. Of course there is a lot more work to be done on completing the list I gave above, but it is mostly writing straight forward text with a lot of cut and paste involved. Look at the tutorial threads to get a better understanding of what I mean.


Lol. You've put down how many hours of full time work coding the stuff, and now you have a "pretty thorough" grasp of the rules. That just says alot about the complexity issues of FE right there. IIRC, 5th ed had about 100 pages in total including all optionals, errata AND DoD1. So tutorials will certainly be welcome!

At least I'll have the chance to play the game again without having to through the hazzle of finding 3 other players with matching schedules. Things were just so much easier to co-ordinate in the tweens...

(in reply to Shannon V. OKeets)
Post #: 464
RE: Uncertainty - 6/2/2008 11:53:27 PM   
Sewerlobster


Posts: 330
Joined: 5/7/2007
From: Reading, Pa. USA
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Odysseus
Am I the only DOD/WiF veteran who actually prefer 5th ed to FE? Back in those days, before the complexity craziness, you
* could finish 2 summer turns in 6 hrs! As opposed to 1 summer turn in 12 hrs for FE.
* did not have to actually study law to get into the rules. How many pages are the FE rules+Errata+Optionals? 500?
I'm just worried that incorporating ALL packs into a computer pbem game will make it so complex that it will be virtually unplayable, because of the total overload of counters and little stuff you'll need to remember...
But I'm still looking forward to it


I've played both 5th edition and FE and I agree there was a sleekness to 5th ed. I too thought FE was a "fun killer" of extra details. It reminded me of another simple, simply fun game that went rules nuts: Starfleet Battles.
There's an arguement for some simplicity -- but I think most of that is handled by the optional rules choices. When I play WifFE I no longer even bother with pilots or SiF or most of the options; not because they're too complicated but because it streamlines the game. Having the computer help handle some of the details and the counter mess should make them more palatable.


_____________________________

Why choose the lesser evil: Vote Cthulhu.

(in reply to Odysseus)
Post #: 465
RE: Uncertainty - 6/3/2008 12:31:24 AM   
Shannon V. OKeets

 

Posts: 22095
Joined: 5/19/2005
From: Honolulu, Hawaii
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: SewerStarFish

quote:

ORIGINAL: Odysseus
Am I the only DOD/WiF veteran who actually prefer 5th ed to FE? Back in those days, before the complexity craziness, you
* could finish 2 summer turns in 6 hrs! As opposed to 1 summer turn in 12 hrs for FE.
* did not have to actually study law to get into the rules. How many pages are the FE rules+Errata+Optionals? 500?
I'm just worried that incorporating ALL packs into a computer pbem game will make it so complex that it will be virtually unplayable, because of the total overload of counters and little stuff you'll need to remember...
But I'm still looking forward to it


I've played both 5th edition and FE and I agree there was a sleekness to 5th ed. I too thought FE was a "fun killer" of extra details. It reminded me of another simple, simply fun game that went rules nuts: Starfleet Battles.
There's an arguement for some simplicity -- but I think most of that is handled by the optional rules choices. When I play WifFE I no longer even bother with pilots or SiF or most of the options; not because they're too complicated but because it streamlines the game. Having the computer help handle some of the details and the counter mess should make them more palatable.


MWIF has pilots as an optional rule. but the Ships in Flames counters are always included (not optional). On the other hand, Cruisers in Flames and Convoys in Flames, are optional, and they can double the number of naval units if you choose to select them.

_____________________________

Steve

Perfection is an elusive goal.

(in reply to Sewerlobster)
Post #: 466
RE: Uncertainty - 6/3/2008 12:40:41 AM   
Sewerlobster


Posts: 330
Joined: 5/7/2007
From: Reading, Pa. USA
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Shannon V. OKeets
MWIF has pilots as an optional rule. but the Ships in Flames counters are always included (not optional). On the other hand, Cruisers in Flames and Convoys in Flames, are optional, and they can double the number of naval units if you choose to select them.

That makes great sense as SiF really won't add a lot of complexity to MWiF. I really appreciate the choices offered in MWiF because as a primarily solitaire player I'm not always in the mood for all the detail but other times I want it ALL. Thanks for all your effort.



_____________________________

Why choose the lesser evil: Vote Cthulhu.

(in reply to Shannon V. OKeets)
Post #: 467
RE: Uncertainty - 6/5/2008 12:23:55 AM   
Orm


Posts: 22154
Joined: 5/3/2008
From: Sweden
Status: offline
I am a fan for statistics so it would be nice to have a comprehensive statistics page.

MWIF could have extensive statistics over killed units. And who killed what.

We could have things like

Total killed/losses in the units BP cost per country from the start of the game until now

Ex
Total killed/losses 1939(Sep/Oct)-1941(Jan/Feb)
Germany 131 BP/20BP
Italy 31 BP/10BP
Japan 51 BP/23BP
CW 25 BP/12BP
China 23 BP/51BP
France 8/131
US 0/0
USSR 0/0


BP production/loss (units BP value) per turn

Germany
Sep/Oct 39 16/2
Nov/Dec 39 14/0

Separation of destroyed Naval- Air- Land- BP cost would also be nice.

Ships sunk history

Nov/Dec 43
Repulse sunk in Baltic Sea
Scanhorst sunk in Baltic Sea
Tirpitz sunk in Baltic sea
Akagi sunk in Singapore port

To handle multiple countries on the same side and the distribution of kills a solution could be that the countries involved shares the killed BPs.

Sorry if this is a subject that already has been extensively discussed.


(in reply to Sewerlobster)
Post #: 468
RE: Uncertainty - 6/5/2008 1:16:55 AM   
Froonp


Posts: 7995
Joined: 10/21/2003
From: Marseilles, France
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Orm
Ships sunk history

Nov/Dec 43
Repulse sunk in Baltic Sea
Scanhorst sunk in Baltic Sea
Tirpitz sunk in Baltic sea
Akagi sunk in Singapore port

For the ships, I'd also like what is above, and for the whole losses, I'd prefer something like that (not BP, actual units) :





Attachment (1)

(in reply to Orm)
Post #: 469
RE: Uncertainty - 6/5/2008 1:57:54 AM   
peskpesk


Posts: 2347
Joined: 7/17/2003
From: Stockholm, Sweden
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Froonp

quote:

ORIGINAL: Orm
Ships sunk history

Nov/Dec 43
Repulse sunk in Baltic Sea
Scanhorst sunk in Baltic Sea
Tirpitz sunk in Baltic sea
Akagi sunk in Singapore port

For the ships, I'd also like what is above, and for the whole losses, I'd prefer something like that (not BP, actual units) :






Both the above are excellent improvements to the enjoyment of the game, almost a must have!

(in reply to Froonp)
Post #: 470
RE: Uncertainty - 6/5/2008 2:18:22 AM   
Orm


Posts: 22154
Joined: 5/3/2008
From: Sweden
Status: offline
I like your table with units Froonp.

I would nonetheless like to have some sort of BPs destroyed count. It is a simple tool to see if a nations strength is growing... or not.

(in reply to Froonp)
Post #: 471
RE: Uncertainty - 6/5/2008 8:33:27 AM   
peskpesk


Posts: 2347
Joined: 7/17/2003
From: Stockholm, Sweden
Status: offline
A how killed what table would be nice too. 



Read the tables as Italy has sunk two CW Battleship and lost one.

If several nations participated in the same air/naval/land battle kills could be calculated as they all get ½ a kill for each killed unit.






Attachment (1)

(in reply to Orm)
Post #: 472
RE: Uncertainty - 6/5/2008 8:39:54 AM   
Shannon V. OKeets

 

Posts: 22095
Joined: 5/19/2005
From: Honolulu, Hawaii
Status: offline
MWIF Product 1 will not contain any After Action Reports.

However, every decision and event that happens in the game will be placed in the Game Record Log for post processing by players who want to analyze what happened. There are currently around 500 unique record types. Each entry starts with the record type and I'll include the format for each type as part of the game 'documentation'.

_____________________________

Steve

Perfection is an elusive goal.

(in reply to peskpesk)
Post #: 473
RE: Uncertainty - 6/5/2008 3:58:32 PM   
IrishGuards


Posts: 542
Joined: 12/7/2006
Status: offline
Patrice, amongst other things, sent me the latest and greatest rules decisions/clarifications from Harry Rowland.

... ...

I revised the RAC (Rules as Coded) document to incorporate Harry Rowland’s most recent revisions, including the ones listed as errata in the WIF 2008 Annual magazine. This is version 14 of RAC and the beta testers have a copy of it to review and critique. Patrice has already used a software program to identify all the edits I made since version 13, and he commented on a couple of places when the changes could be improved.

Are these the same ..????


Are these the rule changes and or eratta from the 2008 Annual or are there other changes .... And if so .. where would I find these please ...
A listing would be helpful ...
IDG

(in reply to Shannon V. OKeets)
Post #: 474
RE: Uncertainty - 6/5/2008 7:02:49 PM   
Shannon V. OKeets

 

Posts: 22095
Joined: 5/19/2005
From: Honolulu, Hawaii
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: IrishGuards

Patrice, amongst other things, sent me the latest and greatest rules decisions/clarifications from Harry Rowland.

... ...

I revised the RAC (Rules as Coded) document to incorporate Harry Rowland’s most recent revisions, including the ones listed as errata in the WIF 2008 Annual magazine. This is version 14 of RAC and the beta testers have a copy of it to review and critique. Patrice has already used a software program to identify all the edits I made since version 13, and he commented on a couple of places when the changes could be improved.

Are these the same ..????


Are these the rule changes and or eratta from the 2008 Annual or are there other changes .... And if so .. where would I find these please ...
A listing would be helpful ...
IDG


I get all my information second hand from Patrice who is in direct touch with Harry Rowland. As I understand it, Harry wants to be absolutely sure about his decisions before making them available to the general public.

The vast majority of the 380+ items in the list have been published previously in various venues - but again my ignorance as to the details is profound. Harry is in charge of releasing this information in the form of a listing of clarifications/corrections. Despite that, I have made sure to incorporate his decisions into Rules as Coded (RAC), which I use as a reference when writing code. In a few places I decided to not abide by Harry's recommendations and those are clearly marked as 'Deviations' in RAC.

The 2008 WIF Annual is available for purchase - I assume from the Australian Design Group website, among other places.

EDIT: I have made RAC available to the beta testers, but they are bound by a non-disclosure agreement to not release anything they receive about MWIF. Sorry, but you will just have to wait until Harry makes everything official.

< Message edited by Shannon V. OKeets -- 6/5/2008 7:05:06 PM >


_____________________________

Steve

Perfection is an elusive goal.

(in reply to IrishGuards)
Post #: 475
RE: Uncertainty - 6/5/2008 9:07:44 PM   
IrishGuards


Posts: 542
Joined: 12/7/2006
Status: offline
Thx .. I have been through the WiF 2008 Annual so have that info ...
I appreciate the reply and have np waiting ..
IDG

(in reply to Shannon V. OKeets)
Post #: 476
RE: Uncertainty - 6/27/2008 4:54:57 PM   
Edfactor


Posts: 106
Joined: 6/13/2008
From: Dallas
Status: offline
mostly i want a good AI -

but one thing that might be fun would be a "retro" MWiF of version 1 - maybe that could be done as an option later on- you guys remember the one with the generic air units and no pilot rules, headquaters were the only divisional sized units, cruisers were "light ships" and there were 2 carriers per counter (with built in air units) - probably too many rules have changed over the years but i would love to see that brought back - it played so much faster then the current versions of WiF.

(in reply to IrishGuards)
Post #: 477
RE: Uncertainty - 6/27/2008 5:02:36 PM   
SamuraiProgrmmr

 

Posts: 353
Joined: 10/17/2004
From: Paducah, Kentucky
Status: offline
That would be interesting... Instead of an expansion pack, it could be a contraction pack.  :)


WiF Classic - WOOHOO

I realy liked the divisional HQs.  It seems to me you lose a considerable amount of flexibility with the HQs being embedded in a unit.  I hope that wasn't done just to save counters for something else during a production run.



_____________________________

Bridge is the best wargame going .. Where else can you find a tournament every weekend?

(in reply to Edfactor)
Post #: 478
RE: Uncertainty - 6/28/2008 6:01:46 AM   
Klingon


Posts: 52
Joined: 5/18/2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: SamuraiProgrammer

That would be interesting... Instead of an expansion pack, it could be a contraction pack. :)


WiF Classic - WOOHOO

I realy liked the divisional HQs. It seems to me you lose a considerable amount of flexibility with the HQs being embedded in a unit. I hope that wasn't done just to save counters for something else during a production run.

Well, the neat thing about it being a computer game, is that counter production is a bit less of a problem.

_____________________________

"That which does not kill me, had better run quickly."

(in reply to SamuraiProgrmmr)
Post #: 479
RE: Uncertainty - 6/29/2008 3:17:27 PM   
panzers

 

Posts: 635
Joined: 5/19/2006
From: Detroit Mi, USA
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Shannon V. OKeets


quote:

ORIGINAL: Odysseus

Am I the only DOD/WiF veteran who actually prefer 5th ed to FE? Back in those days, before the complexity craziness, you

* could finish 2 summer turns in 6 hrs! As opposed to 1 summer turn in 12 hrs for FE.
* did not have to actually study law to get into the rules. How many pages are the FE rules+Errata+Optionals? 500?

I'm just worried that incorporating ALL packs into a computer pbem game will make it so complex that it will be virtually unplayable, because of the total overload of counters and little stuff you'll need to remember...

But I'm still looking forward to it

I use to play 5th edition a lot and I have had to overcome many of my hard-wired understanding of the rules while writing code to WIF FE (Final Edition). By now, I have a pretty thorough grasp of the WIF FE rules, though there are some areas that I have trouble keeping in the forefront of my memory.

Rules as Coded (RAC) runs 150 pages in its PDF form, and that is with a larger font, single column, and paragraph spacing. So you will not have to read 500. Indeed, many of the pages are for the index or concern optional rules, so I think the total for the basic game is under 100. A mere couple of hours of light reading!

Seriously, the tutorials should help a lot. The various tables can be accessed using drop down memus and every form, phase & subphase within the sequence of play, and optional rule has a separate dedicated form to help exlpain things if you experience memory lapses. David Heath (Matrix Games) wants me to do several short videos of people playing the game, with a voice-over explaining what is going on.

All-in-all I am not worrying about learning the game being a problem. Of course there is a lot more work to be done on completing the list I gave above, but it is mostly writing straight forward text with a lot of cut and paste involved. Look at the tutorial threads to get a better understanding of what I mean.

No you're not, steve. With all the expansions in that edition, that's the only one I know and love

(in reply to Shannon V. OKeets)
Post #: 480
Page:   <<   < prev  14 15 [16] 17 18   next >   >>
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> World in Flames >> RE: Uncertainty Page: <<   < prev  14 15 [16] 17 18   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

0.719