Matrix Games Forums

Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

Escort vs. Sweep vs. Long Range CAP

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [Current Games From Matrix.] >> [World War II] >> War In The Pacific - Struggle Against Japan 1941 - 1945 >> Escort vs. Sweep vs. Long Range CAP Page: [1] 2   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
Escort vs. Sweep vs. Long Range CAP - 7/6/2004 8:36:03 PM   
WiTP_Dude


Posts: 1434
Joined: 7/3/2004
Status: offline
Which one of these do I use to fly fighters on patrol above my bases or carriers? I believe Escort is only used to protect bombers, otherwise the fighters stay on the ground. What is the difference between Sweep and LRC though?
Post #: 1
RE: Escort vs. Sweep vs. Long Range CAP - 7/6/2004 8:41:11 PM   
Fallschirmjager


Posts: 6793
Joined: 3/18/2002
From: Chattanooga, Tennessee
Status: offline
Escort is for escorting bombers. You will see something called CAP level. This is the % of fighters you want providing CAP above your base.
Sweep is to send fighters out to strafe enemy airfields. It also has a CAP level.
Long Rong CAP auto sets CAP level to 100% and provide CAP above your own convoys up to several hexes away.

Hope this helps.

< Message edited by Fallschirmjager -- 7/6/2004 1:41:30 PM >


_____________________________


(in reply to WiTP_Dude)
Post #: 2
RE: Escort vs. Sweep vs. Long Range CAP - 7/6/2004 8:42:13 PM   
Xargun

 

Posts: 3690
Joined: 2/14/2004
From: Near Columbus, Ohio
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: WiTP_Dude

Which one of these do I use to fly fighters on patrol above my bases or carriers? I believe Escort is only used to protect bombers, otherwise the fighters stay on the ground. What is the difference between Sweep and LRC though?


Fighters on normal CAP will protect the base and to a lesser degree things around it up to 2 hexes (I think).. LRCAP allows you to station fighters at a certain location (or TF) for as long as they are within range. Very good idea when sending TFs into enemy air cover when you don't have a CV to send with them.

This has saved several of my Transport TF near Malaya when Singapore belches forth its aircraft.

Xargun

(in reply to WiTP_Dude)
Post #: 3
RE: Escort vs. Sweep vs. Long Range CAP - 7/6/2004 8:44:12 PM   
Onime No Kyo


Posts: 16842
Joined: 4/28/2004
Status: offline
Pick one, any one. No matter which one you pick, there will be a "CAP Level" clicker below the mission types.

_____________________________

"Mighty is the Thread! Great are its works and insane are its inhabitants!" -Brother Mynok

(in reply to WiTP_Dude)
Post #: 4
RE: Escort vs. Sweep vs. Long Range CAP - 7/6/2004 8:46:36 PM   
WiTP_Dude


Posts: 1434
Joined: 7/3/2004
Status: offline
Yes, but if you have an escort CAP, will those fighters automatically engage enemy fighters when they come into an area? Or will they look to protect non-existent bombers?

(in reply to Onime No Kyo)
Post #: 5
RE: Escort vs. Sweep vs. Long Range CAP - 7/6/2004 8:47:56 PM   
Xargun

 

Posts: 3690
Joined: 2/14/2004
From: Near Columbus, Ohio
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: WiTP_Dude

Yes, but if you have an escort CAP, will those fighters automatically engage enemy fighters when they come into an area? Or will they look to protect non-existent bombers?


Escort CAP ? Please clarify

Xargun

(in reply to WiTP_Dude)
Post #: 6
RE: Escort vs. Sweep vs. Long Range CAP - 7/6/2004 8:49:56 PM   
WiTP_Dude


Posts: 1434
Joined: 7/3/2004
Status: offline
Escort mission with a CAP level of some percentage.

(in reply to Xargun)
Post #: 7
RE: Escort vs. Sweep vs. Long Range CAP - 7/6/2004 8:51:42 PM   
hithere

 

Posts: 432
Joined: 4/13/2004
From: Atlanta
Status: offline
if i understand correctly and from UV.....the percentage of CAP is left behind...ie; 10 fighters and escort and 50% CAP..5 fighters escort 5 stay at the base (this is with no modifiers)

_____________________________

Quote from one of my drill sergeants, "remember, except for the extreme heat, intense radiation, and powerful blast wave, a nuclear explosion is just like any other explosion"

(in reply to WiTP_Dude)
Post #: 8
RE: Escort vs. Sweep vs. Long Range CAP - 7/6/2004 8:52:17 PM   
Xargun

 

Posts: 3690
Joined: 2/14/2004
From: Near Columbus, Ohio
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: WiTP_Dude

Escort mission with a CAP level of some percentage.


OK... Lets say you have 30 Zeros set to escort with 30% set to CAP. What this means is that 21 of the Zeros will fly the escort mission while 9 (30%) will sit at home flying CAP.. It lets you get twice the usefulness out of larger groups of fighters.

Xargun

(in reply to WiTP_Dude)
Post #: 9
RE: Escort vs. Sweep vs. Long Range CAP - 7/6/2004 8:53:37 PM   
hithere

 

Posts: 432
Joined: 4/13/2004
From: Atlanta
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Xargun

quote:

ORIGINAL: WiTP_Dude

Escort mission with a CAP level of some percentage.


OK... Lets say you have 30 Zeros set to escort with 30% set to CAP. What this means is that 21 of the Zeros will fly the escort mission while 9 (30%) will sit at home flying CAP.. It lets you get twice the usefulness out of larger groups of fighters.

Xargun

sorry Xargun, wasn't looking at the times of the post

_____________________________

Quote from one of my drill sergeants, "remember, except for the extreme heat, intense radiation, and powerful blast wave, a nuclear explosion is just like any other explosion"

(in reply to Xargun)
Post #: 10
RE: Escort vs. Sweep vs. Long Range CAP - 7/6/2004 8:54:26 PM   
Xargun

 

Posts: 3690
Joined: 2/14/2004
From: Near Columbus, Ohio
Status: offline
I think we posted at the same time

Xargun

(in reply to hithere)
Post #: 11
RE: Escort vs. Sweep vs. Long Range CAP - 7/6/2004 8:58:00 PM   
WiTP_Dude


Posts: 1434
Joined: 7/3/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Xargun

OK... Lets say you have 30 Zeros set to escort with 30% set to CAP. What this means is that 21 of the Zeros will fly the escort mission while 9 (30%) will sit at home flying CAP.. It lets you get twice the usefulness out of larger groups of fighters.



So the mission and CAP are two different things? I was thinking they were related. Thanks for your help, I need to change some settings then.

(in reply to Xargun)
Post #: 12
RE: Escort vs. Sweep vs. Long Range CAP - 7/6/2004 9:01:28 PM   
Mr.Frag


Posts: 13410
Joined: 12/18/2002
From: Purgatory
Status: offline
For those that don't want to read the manual:

Escort = Planes that fly along with Bombers to protect them. No Bombers fly, no Escort flies.

Sweep = Planes that fly to a target and attempt to engage CAP at the target. Low Altitudes will result in strafing of the runway.

CAP = Planes that fly over their own base to protect it. They can wander into hexes beside their base if not busy.

LR-CAP = Identical to CAP, but fly over a specific destination instead of their own base.

Add a little complication to this:

Aircraft that are not ordered to do something else will join the CAP if the base is attacked, but they rely on early warning (radar/sound detection) to take off and climb to intercept the attackers.

(in reply to Xargun)
Post #: 13
RE: Escort vs. Sweep vs. Long Range CAP - 7/6/2004 9:58:23 PM   
Banquet

 

Posts: 1184
Joined: 8/23/2002
From: England
Status: offline
Soooo.. does that mean that a squadron set an escort mission with 30% CAP will leave 30% back at base to fly CAP.. or, does it mean that 30% of the squadron will fly escort and the other 70% rest?

I seem to remember from UV (been a while) that setting CAP 40% meant 40% of the squadron were on standing CAP while the rest rotated (and rested) but the concept here of setting an escort mission, with a percentage CAP is a tad confusing.

(in reply to Mr.Frag)
Post #: 14
RE: Escort vs. Sweep vs. Long Range CAP - 7/6/2004 10:01:01 PM   
Tanaka


Posts: 4378
Joined: 4/8/2003
From: USA
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Mr.Frag

For those that don't want to read the manual:

Escort = Planes that fly along with Bombers to protect them. No Bombers fly, no Escort flies.

Sweep = Planes that fly to a target and attempt to engage CAP at the target. Low Altitudes will result in strafing of the runway.

CAP = Planes that fly over their own base to protect it. They can wander into hexes beside their base if not busy.

LR-CAP = Identical to CAP, but fly over a specific destination instead of their own base.

Add a little complication to this:

Aircraft that are not ordered to do something else will join the CAP if the base is attacked, but they rely on early warning (radar/sound detection) to take off and climb to intercept the attackers.



ok so which is better if i want my fighters to attack an airfield???

sweep or airfield attack???

(in reply to Mr.Frag)
Post #: 15
RE: Escort vs. Sweep vs. Long Range CAP - 7/6/2004 10:19:38 PM   
Mr.Frag


Posts: 13410
Joined: 12/18/2002
From: Purgatory
Status: offline
quote:

ok so which is better if i want my fighters to attack an airfield???

sweep or airfield attack???


That really depends on whether there is CAP protecting the airfield you want to attack. If you send them as airfield attack, then you better send some *escort*.

(in reply to Tanaka)
Post #: 16
RE: Escort vs. Sweep vs. Long Range CAP - 7/6/2004 10:22:25 PM   
Mr.Frag


Posts: 13410
Joined: 12/18/2002
From: Purgatory
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Banquet

Soooo.. does that mean that a squadron set an escort mission with 30% CAP will leave 30% back at base to fly CAP.. or, does it mean that 30% of the squadron will fly escort and the other 70% rest?

I seem to remember from UV (been a while) that setting CAP 40% meant 40% of the squadron were on standing CAP while the rest rotated (and rested) but the concept here of setting an escort mission, with a percentage CAP is a tad confusing.



Huh? What? Eeek!

Who said anything about rest? Where'd that one come from? Rest is what you do after being KIA

READ READ READ!

(in reply to Banquet)
Post #: 17
RE: Escort vs. Sweep vs. Long Range CAP - 7/6/2004 10:24:37 PM   
Tanaka


Posts: 4378
Joined: 4/8/2003
From: USA
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Mr.Frag

quote:

ok so which is better if i want my fighters to attack an airfield???

sweep or airfield attack???


That really depends on whether there is CAP protecting the airfield you want to attack. If you send them as airfield attack, then you better send some *escort*.



so if i send some on sweep and some on airfield attack the ones on sweep will escort? is this what you mean? why not just send them all on sweep and they will escort themselves and attack the airfield.

(in reply to Mr.Frag)
Post #: 18
RE: Escort vs. Sweep vs. Long Range CAP - 7/6/2004 10:25:27 PM   
Banquet

 

Posts: 1184
Joined: 8/23/2002
From: England
Status: offline
hehe. ok, back to the manual for me!

(in reply to Mr.Frag)
Post #: 19
RE: Escort vs. Sweep vs. Long Range CAP - 7/6/2004 10:26:26 PM   
tsimmonds


Posts: 5498
Joined: 2/6/2004
From: astride Mason and Dixon's Line
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Banquet

Soooo.. does that mean that a squadron set an escort mission with 30% CAP will leave 30% back at base to fly CAP.. or, does it mean that 30% of the squadron will fly escort and the other 70% rest?

I seem to remember from UV (been a while) that setting CAP 40% meant 40% of the squadron were on standing CAP while the rest rotated (and rested) but the concept here of setting an escort mission, with a percentage CAP is a tad confusing.

An squadron with an Escort mission with CAP set at 30% will fly 30% of its planes on CAP over its own base. The other 70% will either:
1) be available to fly Escort for strike missions against targets within its range (note: there is no guarantee that they actually will do so, they are available to do so), or
2) if no such missions exist, the remaining 70% will rest

CAP is set exactly as it was in UV, by picking an Escort mission and adjusting the CAP percentage. No change.

_____________________________

Fear the kitten!

(in reply to Banquet)
Post #: 20
RE: Escort vs. Sweep vs. Long Range CAP - 7/6/2004 10:27:35 PM   
von Murrin


Posts: 1760
Joined: 11/13/2001
From: That from which there is no escape.
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Tanaka

quote:

ORIGINAL: Mr.Frag

quote:

ok so which is better if i want my fighters to attack an airfield???

sweep or airfield attack???


That really depends on whether there is CAP protecting the airfield you want to attack. If you send them as airfield attack, then you better send some *escort*.



so if i send some on sweep and some on airfield attack the ones on sweep will escort? is this what you mean? why not just send them all on sweep and they will escort themselves and attack the airfield.



Fighter sweep + bombers on airfield attack + escorting fighters = chewed up CAP.

_____________________________

I give approximately two fifths of a !#$% at any given time!

(in reply to Tanaka)
Post #: 21
RE: Escort vs. Sweep vs. Long Range CAP - 7/6/2004 10:28:49 PM   
Mr.Frag


Posts: 13410
Joined: 12/18/2002
From: Purgatory
Status: offline
quote:

so if i send some on sweep and some on airfield attack the ones on sweep will escort? is this what you mean? why not just send them all on sweep and they will escort themselves and attack the airfield.


If you tell fighters to BOMB, they become BOMBERS and need their own ESCORT.

If you want to kill fighters, send SWEEP.

If you want to kill aircraft on the ground, send LOW SWEEP.

If you want to hurt the troops/airbase, send BOMBERS.

If you send BOMBERS or LOW SWEEP, they will get eaten by CAP so send ESCORTS.

If you want all of the above, look closely at the mission orders for the PH attack group.

(in reply to Tanaka)
Post #: 22
RE: Escort vs. Sweep vs. Long Range CAP - 7/6/2004 10:31:43 PM   
Banquet

 

Posts: 1184
Joined: 8/23/2002
From: England
Status: offline
ty irrelevant.. my memory of UV has faded a bit (too much HoI and Victoria in between) I knew there was something about setting 100% CAP would raise fatigue in pilots.. this must be because (in the case of escort) the pilots can at least rest on the days where no escort mission is flown.

(in reply to tsimmonds)
Post #: 23
RE: Escort vs. Sweep vs. Long Range CAP - 7/6/2004 11:08:30 PM   
Charles2222


Posts: 3993
Joined: 3/12/2001
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Mr.Frag

For those that don't want to read the manual:

Escort = Planes that fly along with Bombers to protect them. No Bombers fly, no Escort flies.

Sweep = Planes that fly to a target and attempt to engage CAP at the target. Low Altitudes will result in strafing of the runway.

CAP = Planes that fly over their own base to protect it. They can wander into hexes beside their base if not busy.

LR-CAP = Identical to CAP, but fly over a specific destination instead of their own base.

Add a little complication to this:

Aircraft that are not ordered to do something else will join the CAP if the base is attacked, but they rely on early warning (radar/sound detection) to take off and climb to intercept the attackers.


Ah so, but what about a base that has no bombers but has float planes going out. Do the escort fighters escort the floaters or recon planes then?

(in reply to Mr.Frag)
Post #: 24
RE: Escort vs. Sweep vs. Long Range CAP - 7/6/2004 11:11:57 PM   
Mr.Frag


Posts: 13410
Joined: 12/18/2002
From: Purgatory
Status: offline
quote:

Ah so, but what about a base that has no bombers but has float planes going out. Do the escort fighters escort the floaters or recon planes then?


Can you convert that into a question?

(in reply to Charles2222)
Post #: 25
RE: Escort vs. Sweep vs. Long Range CAP - 7/6/2004 11:38:27 PM   
Grognerd

 

Posts: 15
Joined: 6/15/2002
From: Virginia Beach, VA
Status: offline
Pardon me, but I'm ROTF right now....great thread...

(in reply to Mr.Frag)
Post #: 26
RE: Escort vs. Sweep vs. Long Range CAP - 7/7/2004 12:10:21 AM   
Charles2222


Posts: 3993
Joined: 3/12/2001
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Mr.Frag

quote:

Ah so, but what about a base that has no bombers but has float planes going out. Do the escort fighters escort the floaters or recon planes then?


Can you convert that into a question?


Suppose I have a fighter squadron one turn one that claims it is escorting (has fatigue after turn one anyway), and yet there are no bombers there. Does that mean that they escorted some of the recon and search planes that were there when they went out?

(in reply to Mr.Frag)
Post #: 27
RE: Escort vs. Sweep vs. Long Range CAP - 7/7/2004 12:12:48 AM   
Mr.Frag


Posts: 13410
Joined: 12/18/2002
From: Purgatory
Status: offline
More details. What was CAP set to?

(in reply to Charles2222)
Post #: 28
RE: Escort vs. Sweep vs. Long Range CAP - 7/7/2004 12:37:45 AM   
Charles2222


Posts: 3993
Joined: 3/12/2001
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Mr.Frag

More details. What was CAP set to?


In other words, default turn one has all fighters doing some amount of CAP, even though many of them have escort duty, correct? The ones who don't have bombers to excort are just pulling off the CAP duty correct?

I don't wan to load the game up all over again just to find out for sure. On my save game, the 2-3 cities where this occurs, Osaka being one, I've already changed their missions and CAP levels. Funny thing. I did an upgrade on one squadron, and yet when I reloaded the save game here, it had switched to the Tojo, and their 9 planes are "ready". Same turn, just a save inbetween them.

(in reply to Mr.Frag)
Post #: 29
RE: Escort vs. Sweep vs. Long Range CAP - 7/7/2004 12:41:49 AM   
Mr.Frag


Posts: 13410
Joined: 12/18/2002
From: Purgatory
Status: offline
quote:

The ones who don't have bombers to excort are just pulling off the CAP duty correct?


Yep.

(in reply to Charles2222)
Post #: 30
Page:   [1] 2   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Current Games From Matrix.] >> [World War II] >> War In The Pacific - Struggle Against Japan 1941 - 1945 >> Escort vs. Sweep vs. Long Range CAP Page: [1] 2   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

2.203