Matrix Games Forums

Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

RE: Namlea falls - B-29 make their debute!

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [Current Games From Matrix.] >> [World War II] >> War In The Pacific - Struggle Against Japan 1941 - 1945 >> After Action Reports >> RE: Namlea falls - B-29 make their debute! Page: <<   < prev  82 83 [84] 85 86   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Namlea falls - B-29 make their debute! - 6/27/2006 12:22:36 PM   
Speedysteve

 

Posts: 15998
Joined: 9/11/2001
From: Reading, England
Status: offline
Mynok - Archaeology will forever be in the past for me Still an interesting subject mind you.

Pauk - there are no personal connotations on my username Second your question though - PzB. Why that username?

PzB - Thanks. Have been in IT Sales as is for over 2 years. This new job has immense potential and is a great opportunity.

_____________________________

WitE 2 Tester
WitE Tester
BTR/BoB Tester

(in reply to PzB74)
Post #: 2491
RE: Namlea falls - B-29 make their debute! - 6/27/2006 6:36:50 PM   
PzB74


Posts: 5076
Joined: 10/3/2000
From: No(r)way
Status: offline
Sounds like you're in for it Duke!  WitP need a few house rules, especially in 44-45 if you ask me...running the show
without em would be like playing Doom 3 on nightmare level I guess

You can check out the IT site I work for Speedy: www.soludyne.com
The system documents and helps optimalize work processes.

Hehe, so you wanna know the most deeply kept secret of them all
Back in 1997 I ran the Steel Panthers Ladder in the Generals Guild Wargaming Club.
First tournament included 64 players and we were even sponsored by SSI!

My nick illustrated my armored doctrine philosophy - the PanzerBlitz.
Can even be deployed in the Pacific - Schneller Heinz was quite right!-)

_____________________________



"The problem in defense is how far you can go without destroying from within what you are trying to defend from without"
- Dwight D. Eisenhower

(in reply to Speedysteve)
Post #: 2492
RE: Namlea falls - B-29 make their debute! - 6/27/2006 7:29:41 PM   
PzB74


Posts: 5076
Joined: 10/3/2000
From: No(r)way
Status: offline
Been waiting for my Jill factories to upgrade to the Grace...2 days into May
and still nothing

77th Div unloading at Saipan, 22th Div will arrive at Tinian tomorrow while the 55th
will reach Guam in a few days. Releasing a crack regiment for Pagan tomorrow.
Should bring all these bases up to ca 1000 AP.

147k supplies enroute from Japan

Ulithi got 1000 AP, Yap 500 and Palau 600. The last two bases are constantly reinforced
by airlifting units from PNG.

3 repair ships (AR) arrived in Japan, will move them to my repair yards.
2 more days and a fleet carrier arrives in Tokyo.

The rewards of delaying the enemy: more of everything to defend with in the final phase
of the war

AFTER ACTION REPORTS FOR 05/02/44

Air Combat

Todays good news! Andy turned the Idaho around, and it was nailed by a small
force of Betties
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Day Air attack on TF at 42,73

Japanese aircraft
G4M2 Betty x 4

Japanese aircraft losses
G4M2 Betty: 2 destroyed

Allied Ships
BB Idaho, Torpedo hits 1, on fire

Aircraft Attacking:
2 x G4M2 Betty launching torpedoes at 200 feet
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Todays annoying news: a flight out of Timor decided to committ suicide on the carriers in
Darwin instead of attacking unescorted transports. Is there no check against this?

Day Air attack on TF, near Darwin at 36,84

Japanese aircraft
A6M5 Zeke x 8
P1Y Frances x 8

Allied aircraft
FM-2 Wildcat x 35
F6F Hellcat x 51
F4U-1 Corsair x 6
Corsair IV x 14
Boomerang II x 4
Spitfire VIII x 9
P-38J Lightning x 4

Japanese aircraft losses
A6M5 Zeke: 6 destroyed
P1Y Frances: 8 destroyed

Allied aircraft losses
F4U-1 Corsair: 1 damaged
Boomerang II: 1 damaged
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Day Air attack on TF, near Darwin at 36,84

Japanese aircraft
A6M5 Zeke x 26
P1Y Frances x 3

Allied aircraft
FM-2 Wildcat x 29
F6F Hellcat x 49
F4U-1 Corsair x 6
Corsair IV x 14
Boomerang II x 3
Spitfire VIII x 14
P-38J Lightning x 4

Japanese aircraft losses
A6M5 Zeke: 14 destroyed
P1Y Frances: 3 destroyed

Allied aircraft losses
FM-2 Wildcat: 2 destroyed
F6F Hellcat: 1 destroyed, 2 damaged
F4U-1 Corsair: 2 damaged
Corsair IV: 1 damaged
Spitfire VIII: 1 damaged
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


_____________________________



"The problem in defense is how far you can go without destroying from within what you are trying to defend from without"
- Dwight D. Eisenhower

(in reply to PzB74)
Post #: 2493
RE: Namlea falls - B-29 make their debute! - 6/27/2006 8:37:31 PM   
pauk


Posts: 4162
Joined: 10/21/2001
From: Zagreb,Croatia
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: PzB

Been waiting for my Jill factories to upgrade to the Grace...2 days into May
and still nothing


i guess you have enough supply 20K +.

Don't worry it will upgrade in next few weeks. Dice roll i guess. Make sure that your Jill factories are set on repair (don't know if it is important, but...)


_____________________________


(in reply to PzB74)
Post #: 2494
RE: Namlea falls - B-29 make their debute! - 6/27/2006 9:00:14 PM   
PzB74


Posts: 5076
Joined: 10/3/2000
From: No(r)way
Status: offline
Not a lot to report - 25 'routine' milk runs by Andy's bombers.
Very quiet, enemy probably re-grouping for another push. Will this be the big one?

Saipan up to 1300 assault points!

Should be plenty of supplies Pauk...just a bit impatient

AFTER ACTION REPORTS FOR 05/03/44

Kasagi

Let me present the latest adition to the KB, carrier Kasagi!
In 10 days the Aso will arrive and after another 16 we got a powerful carrier TF
based around the Taiho and 3 Katsuragi class carriers. The light carrier Chioyda
left Hong Kong today to join the fleet at Naha.






Attachment (1)

_____________________________



"The problem in defense is how far you can go without destroying from within what you are trying to defend from without"
- Dwight D. Eisenhower

(in reply to pauk)
Post #: 2495
RE: Namlea falls - B-29 make their debute! - 6/27/2006 9:04:34 PM   
Mike Solli


Posts: 15792
Joined: 10/18/2000
From: the flight deck of the Zuikaku
Status: offline
Wow, commanded by a 2LT. Very strange.

Nice AA.

(in reply to PzB74)
Post #: 2496
RE: Namlea falls - B-29 make their debute! - 6/27/2006 9:14:35 PM   
pauk


Posts: 4162
Joined: 10/21/2001
From: Zagreb,Croatia
Status: offline
nice ratings of the commander... he have strange rank... i guess it shows our determination to defend the Empire!

Good to get brand new CV with "future" upgrade! 1116 AA is respectable rating...

... one thing just crossed my mind right now... nothing important and nothing decisive but if you have more than enough supply you could store this supply on some island nearby HI and latter send to HI when Andy ruin your's AF and industry in the HI. Such stored supply will be saved in Ikitsuki island - dont believe that Andy would attack this island. If you do it, expand Ikitsuki island to negate supply leaking...




Attachment (1)

_____________________________


(in reply to PzB74)
Post #: 2497
RE: Namlea falls - B-29 make their debute! - 6/27/2006 9:18:41 PM   
veji1

 

Posts: 1019
Joined: 7/9/2005
Status: offline
to bad you don't have the rest of the KB... .You could really use all the extra CVs for harassment missions...

(in reply to Mike Solli)
Post #: 2498
RE: Namlea falls - B-29 make their debute! - 6/27/2006 10:17:38 PM   
PzB74


Posts: 5076
Joined: 10/3/2000
From: No(r)way
Status: offline
Rank doesn't matter, so I decided to keep the young 2nd Lt
The British cv's had a similar AA rating all the way back in 42

I don't have THAT much supplies Pauk, expanding lots of factories and re-supplying
my frontier bases. Will consider 'stashing' supplies in a rear area though.
DA PLAN is still to prevent Andy from knocking out the Home Islands

It's possible to dream of what could have been, but on the other side: the Empire
has never been as powerful as now - and woe to the one who underestimates it

The plan is to use the fast KB carriers to threaten Andy's supply train and replenishment
carriers. Imagine sinking the lot while the big boys are engaged with a LBA strike ala
the one shown attacking Kweiyang below.

Oh yeeess!

AFTER ACTION REPORTS FOR 05/04/44

Day Air attack on Kweiyang , at 41,35

Japanese aircraft
A6M5 Zeke x 458
N1K1-J George x 24
J2M Jack x 141
D4Y Judy x 119
B6N Jill x 181
Ki-44-IIb Tojo x 70

No Japanese losses

Allied ground losses:
47 casualties reported

Airbase hits 41
Airbase supply hits 2
Runway hits 490
------------------------------------------------------


_____________________________



"The problem in defense is how far you can go without destroying from within what you are trying to defend from without"
- Dwight D. Eisenhower

(in reply to veji1)
Post #: 2499
RE: Namlea falls - B-29 make their debute! - 6/27/2006 11:32:04 PM   
PzB74


Posts: 5076
Joined: 10/3/2000
From: No(r)way
Status: offline
Released a Heavy AA Rgt from Kwantung - want one on each of my major bases.

Training in China is proceeding well, lots of units will soon be ready.
If only the Frank would arrive next month we could upgrade all the obsolent
Tojos. Now that would be something. Will train them all and avoid 'using' them
until they've been upgraded.

AFTER ACTION REPORTS FOR 05/05/44

Invasions

After months of bombardment Andy decides to invade Admiralty Islands.
With no supplies and only 17 AP the island will fall quickly enough...even
with 7 forts. The mines are still functional though!

TF 1105 encounters mine field at Admiralty Islands (58,84)
TF 1105 troops unloading over beach at Admiralty Islands, 58,84

Allied Ships
DD Crane
LCVP 534M, Mine hits 1, on fire, heavy damage
AK Needwood, Mine hits 1
AK Cape Isabel, Mine hits 1, on fire

Allied ground losses:
21 casualties reported
Guns lost 1
Vehicles lost 1

Allied ground losses:
211 casualties reported

Air Combat

Hit a transport and sank an AVD today! Betty's evaded the small Corsair CAP.
If this trait only remained intact when a large number of ac were involved....

Day Air attack on TF at 53,78

Japanese aircraft
P1Y Frances x 6

Japanese aircraft losses
P1Y Frances: 2 damaged

Allied Ships
AK Steel Scientist, Torpedo hits 1, on fire
AK Vermont
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Day Air attack on TF, near Namlea at 38,73

Japanese aircraft
G4M2 Betty x 9

Allied aircraft
F4U-1 Corsair x 6
F4U-1D Corsair x 3

Japanese aircraft losses
G4M2 Betty: 3 damaged

Allied Ships
AVD Ballard, Torpedo hits 2, on fire, heavy damage *sinks*
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------




_____________________________



"The problem in defense is how far you can go without destroying from within what you are trying to defend from without"
- Dwight D. Eisenhower

(in reply to PzB74)
Post #: 2500
RE: Namlea falls - B-29 make their debute! - 6/27/2006 11:37:24 PM   
Honda


Posts: 953
Joined: 5/5/2004
From: Karlovac, Croatia
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: PzB


Day Air attack on TF at 53,78

Japanese aircraft
P1Y Frances x 6

Japanese aircraft losses
P1Y Frances: 2 damaged

Allied Ships
AK Steel Scientist, Torpedo hits 1, on fire
AK Vermont


I think you owe us a smiley


_____________________________


(in reply to PzB74)
Post #: 2501
RE: Namlea falls - B-29 make their debute! - 6/27/2006 11:49:10 PM   
PzB74


Posts: 5076
Joined: 10/3/2000
From: No(r)way
Status: offline
Must be one of the patches, or a miracle 
Just got 130 more competent naval bombers in the Imperial arsenal!


_____________________________



"The problem in defense is how far you can go without destroying from within what you are trying to defend from without"
- Dwight D. Eisenhower

(in reply to Honda)
Post #: 2502
RE: Namlea falls - B-29 make their debute! - 6/28/2006 12:46:36 AM   
veji1

 

Posts: 1019
Joined: 7/9/2005
Status: offline
this is great !!!! I mean the Frances being able to launch torps !!!

(in reply to PzB74)
Post #: 2503
RE: Namlea falls - B-29 make their debute! - 6/28/2006 1:38:07 AM   
PzB74


Posts: 5076
Joined: 10/3/2000
From: No(r)way
Status: offline
Yes it's amazing!

AFTER ACTION REPORTS FOR 05/06/44

A more formal report this time:

Air Combat

Andy launches paras on small dot bases on Satawal. 20 men on the one without troops
and 2000 on the one with forts and a construction unit.

The men came from Wasile - recons report 700+ ac there now.
Guess he's going to 'air bridge' in a division after moving Corsairs in...

Pretty smug tactics, but somehow I'm neither impressed nor delighted.
Probably a most annoying diversion for some other major offensive. So I'll let him play around.

Morotai and Menando tried to organize a coordinated strike by 100 bombers and 200 fighters
on Wasile, but despite of 2 Air HQs, lots of supplies and fewer than 200 rested ac on each field,
a mere 4 bombers and 40 fighters take of from Menando...That 4 bombers got through only shows what
could have been achieved if orders were followed.

Pretty agonizing that I can't get my air units to fly with any regularity.

Ground Combat

Otherwise the Admiralty Islands fell in the first attack.

Enemy para attack from Wasile




Attachment (1)

_____________________________



"The problem in defense is how far you can go without destroying from within what you are trying to defend from without"
- Dwight D. Eisenhower

(in reply to veji1)
Post #: 2504
RE: Namlea falls - B-29 make their debute! - 6/28/2006 1:40:48 AM   
Fishbed

 

Posts: 1822
Joined: 11/21/2005
From: Beijing, China - Paris, France
Status: offline
Yep, a worth Frances, that rocks

(in reply to veji1)
Post #: 2505
RE: Namlea falls - B-29 make their debute! - 6/28/2006 12:42:15 PM   
Monter_Trismegistos

 

Posts: 1359
Joined: 2/1/2005
From: Gdansk
Status: offline
Does anybody seen what user Frank said in Andy's AAR?

It's second or third time, when just after PzB told us that he is planning CV raid on Andy's convoys, Frank is "asking" about security of convoy line and about knowing positions of Jap CVs and "giving advices" to watch Allied rears...

I also read both AARs, but I think that giving ANY info for second side is plain unfair. It kills the best thing in this game - effect of surprise.

_____________________________

Nec Temere Nec Timide
Bez strachu ale z rozwagą

(in reply to Fishbed)
Post #: 2506
RE: Namlea falls - B-29 make their debute! - 6/28/2006 1:02:28 PM   
pauk


Posts: 4162
Joined: 10/21/2001
From: Zagreb,Croatia
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: PzB


The men came from Wasile - recons report 700+ ac there now.
Guess he's going to 'air bridge' in a division after moving Corsairs in...


There is no reasons to be afraid of it, i agree. If he moves Corsairs in that base that will allow you destroying them.

One fast BB and couple of CA on the bombardment run will negate this extravagant move:

a) you will destroy his ac on the ground
b) you will close this AF and no reinforcements could be sent via air..

I've tried that against him in Marshalls area and Akyab and, believe me, he didn't try something like that again

As for Frank's "advices" (i do not read Andy's part of AAR so i don't know if it is true), but if is true someone must warn him!

_____________________________


(in reply to PzB74)
Post #: 2507
RE: Namlea falls - B-29 make their debute! - 6/28/2006 1:13:48 PM   
Sneer


Posts: 2654
Joined: 10/29/2003
Status: offline
i'm reading both too that's why i try not to give any advices to any side - just ask ;-)
but i will check Mr "Frank" - maybe some kind of disciplining will be needed

as far as strategic situation
losing wasile and sooner or later Morotai open doors in the region to allies - number of options increases
From map I see that even dot places are guarded


_____________________________


(in reply to pauk)
Post #: 2508
RE: Namlea falls - B-29 make their debute! - 6/28/2006 1:40:13 PM   
String


Posts: 2661
Joined: 10/7/2003
From: Estonia
Status: offline
It's going to be really hard to bombard Tomini. Due to the geography there PzB has to move his bombardment fleets within 4-5 hexes of Wasile.

(in reply to Sneer)
Post #: 2509
RE: Namlea falls - B-29 make their debute! - 6/29/2006 7:52:49 AM   
Fishbed

 

Posts: 1822
Joined: 11/21/2005
From: Beijing, China - Paris, France
Status: offline
Maybe overwhelming the places with naval forces may do it...
Or is an approach from the west impossible too?

(in reply to String)
Post #: 2510
Paras at Tomini and Makale - 6/30/2006 12:18:15 AM   
PzB74


Posts: 5076
Joined: 10/3/2000
From: No(r)way
Status: offline
I'm not too worried about small 'intel leaks' - sure Andy doesn't really need em!
My carrier operations are quite covert anyway. There are lots of enemy shipping on the East
Coast of PNG, but I've held my cve's back cause I thought it might be a trap.

Releasing them tomorrow in order to hit one of the troop convoys that were hit by Frances
bombers today. And yes, the Frances is truly valuable asset

Regarding Andy's para drops: These are highly annoying and will undermine the defense of the
DEI and perhaps even the PI. I'm not going to use massive resources to counter this threat though.
Rear area bases will be strengthened to sustain a para attack. They all got fort levels already,
so it shouldn't be a problem. Released an engineer regiment from China today that will move to
Borneo.

A powerful bombing attack by 100+ Army bombers today caused little damage, even from 5000 feet.
I think it should have closed a dirt-strip like Makale completely. The level bombing ability of
Japan is pretty much zero

By mistake I landed 350 paras at Tomini instead of Makale - seems like Andy got in enough reinforcements
to dupe any counter by air though. He tells me that he needs new air fields for all his ac and that
over-stacking is inefficient

Still, Andy's only using minor resources in the region. No carriers to follow up and the road to Japan is
long and painful from Suwalesi. So I will continue to strengthen the Marianas/Palaus with a secondary effort
on the DEI. As I said, it's impossible to be strong everywhere, so why not invite Andy to take the long road?

India is strongly held, Malaya less so - perhaps I have to reshuffle some of our troops. A but reluctant since
the deployment in India is just strong enough to thwart an enemy invasion. Weaken it and the garrison will be
fighting a loosing battle if invaded. Still, I don't think Andy can afford such a detour, would actually be
doing us a great favor. So I will have to consider this more closely.

Still, Frances bombes scored a lot of hits today and even sank a transport loaded with a Base Force unit.
Hopefully more will go down tomorrow. Ordered another strike on Tomini and expect to take some losses.

AFTER ACTION REPORTS FOR 05/07/44

Air Combat

Day Air attack on Tomini , at 34,65

Japanese aircraft
Ki-43-IIa Oscar x 33
Ki-21 Sally x 117
Ki-49 Helen x 23

Allied aircraft
Spitfire VIII x 9

Japanese aircraft losses
Ki-43-IIa Oscar: 3 destroyed
Ki-21 Sally: 6 destroyed, 3 damaged

Allied aircraft losses
Spitfire VIII: 1 destroyed, 3 damaged

Airbase hits 6
Airbase supply hits 10
Runway hits 48
Port hits 1
Port supply hits 4

Aircraft Attacking:
All Helen and Ki-21 Sally bombing at 5000 feet
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Day Air attack on 503rd USA Para Regiment, at 34,65

Japanese aircraft
D4Y Judy x 27
Ki-30 Ann x 8

Allied aircraft
Spitfire VIII x 9

Japanese aircraft losses
D4Y Judy: 5 destroyed
Ki-30 Ann: 2 damaged

Allied ground losses:
11 casualties reported

Aircraft Attacking:
22 x D4Y Judy bombing at 2000 feet
8 x Ki-30 Ann bombing at 2000 feet
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Day Air attack on 2nd Naval Construction Battalion, at 34,65

Japanese aircraft
A6M5 Zeke x 7
Ki-43-IIa Oscar x 31

Allied aircraft
P-38J Lightning x 9

Japanese aircraft losses
Ki-43-IIa Oscar: 8 destroyed

Allied aircraft losses
P-38J Lightning: 1 destroyed, 3 damaged
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Day Air attack on TF at 38,68

Japanese aircraft
G4M1 Betty x 6
Ki-43-IIa Oscar x 7

Japanese aircraft losses
G4M1 Betty: 1 destroyed, 2 damaged

Allied Ships
DD Capps
DE Manlove
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Day Air attack on TF at 38,68

Japanese aircraft
G4M2 Betty x 6
P1Y Frances x 9

Japanese aircraft losses
G4M2 Betty: 1 destroyed, 4 damaged
P1Y Frances: 8 damaged

Allied Ships
DE Cloues
DD Burns, Torpedo hits 1, on fire, heavy damage
DE Reynolds
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Day Air attack on TF at 49,76

Japanese aircraft
P1Y Frances x 15

Japanese aircraft losses
P1Y Frances: 4 damaged

Allied Ships
AK Empire Ridley, Torpedo hits 1, on fire
AK James Gordon Bennett, Torpedo hits 3, on fire, heavy damage
AK Henry Dearborn, Torpedo hits 1

Allied ground losses:
145 casualties reported
Guns lost 2
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Ground Combat

Ground combat at Admiralty Islands

Allied Shock attack

Attacking force 3722 troops, 20 guns, 54 vehicles, Assault Value = 135

Defending force 620 troops, 0 guns, 0 vehicles, Assault Value = 21

Allied max assault: 188 - adjusted assault: 89

Japanese max defense: 11 - adjusted defense: 1

Allied assault odds: 89 to 1

Japanese ground losses:
105 casualties reported

Allied ground losses:
66 casualties reported
Guns lost 4
Vehicles lost 1
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ground combat at Tomini

Japanese Shock attack

Attacking force 748 troops, 7 guns, 0 vehicles, Assault Value = 44

Defending force 1992 troops, 20 guns, 0 vehicles, Assault Value = 109

Japanese max assault: 34 - adjusted assault: 0

Allied max defense: 84 - adjusted defense: 91

Japanese assault odds: 0 to 1 (fort level 0)

Japanese ground losses:
375 casualties reported
Guns lost 4
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ground combat at Tomini

Allied Shock attack

Attacking force 802 troops, 11 guns, 0 vehicles, Assault Value = 109

Defending force 966 troops, 0 guns, 0 vehicles, Assault Value = 4

Allied max assault: 42 - adjusted assault: 11

Japanese max defense: 1 - adjusted defense: 1

Allied assault odds: 11 to 1

Japanese ground losses:
8 casualties reported
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Japanese Unit(s) surrounded at Tomini - now this is a new kind of msg!?

Counter-attack by IJA bombers!

Contemplating a counter landing at Makale, this can be done easily by a Bde from Java.
Tomini is another matter as you can see. Reinforced it only a month ago with a construction
unit and some supplies. There is one more size 0(1) dot base without defenses on next to Makale.
I really don't have enough units to defend them all.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________



"The problem in defense is how far you can go without destroying from within what you are trying to defend from without"
- Dwight D. Eisenhower

(in reply to Fishbed)
Post #: 2511
RE: Paras at Tomini and Makale - 6/30/2006 12:22:46 AM   
veji1

 

Posts: 1019
Joined: 7/9/2005
Status: offline
don't you have peggies now ?

(in reply to PzB74)
Post #: 2512
RE: Paras at Tomini and Makale - 6/30/2006 12:26:06 AM   
PzB74


Posts: 5076
Joined: 10/3/2000
From: No(r)way
Status: offline
Peggies are 8/44 me thinks...don't think they'll be more efficient thant Sallys though!?

_____________________________



"The problem in defense is how far you can go without destroying from within what you are trying to defend from without"
- Dwight D. Eisenhower

(in reply to veji1)
Post #: 2513
RE: Paras at Tomini and Makale - 6/30/2006 12:35:20 AM   
Mynok


Posts: 12108
Joined: 11/30/2002
Status: offline

You are flying your Oscars as untrained bait, right?

(in reply to PzB74)
Post #: 2514
RE: Paras at Tomini and Makale - 6/30/2006 12:44:35 AM   
Sneer


Posts: 2654
Joined: 10/29/2003
Status: offline
if i'm not wrong Peggy can carry a torp :-)

_____________________________


(in reply to Mynok)
Post #: 2515
RE: Paras at Tomini and Makale - 6/30/2006 12:44:40 AM   
PzB74


Posts: 5076
Joined: 10/3/2000
From: No(r)way
Status: offline
Of course - but most of these were LRCAP and couldn't defend the attacking bombers.
The few Spits had a good day....afraid there will be more tomorrow. Hopefully Andy will be low on
supplies and the field damage reduce their effectiveness.


_____________________________



"The problem in defense is how far you can go without destroying from within what you are trying to defend from without"
- Dwight D. Eisenhower

(in reply to Mynok)
Post #: 2516
RE: Paras at Tomini and Makale - 6/30/2006 1:44:45 AM   
PzB74


Posts: 5076
Joined: 10/3/2000
From: No(r)way
Status: offline
Fairly good turn! A bit strange to see so many enemy convoys without air cover or naval
support. All these para drops makes this look like a huge decoy operation, cause Andy
doesn't 'work' like this. Hope I'm not wrong, cause that would be bad....

The Combined Fleet - except Strike Force I and II - are gathering at Naha and completing repairs.
The bulk of our Air Force is getting ready to strike back at the enemy and soon 128 George and 128
Jack's will be fully trained together with 1500 Zekes.

In a few days the first Jill Daitai will upgrade to the Grace - and even better: the Frank has been
accelerated another month, 06/44 now With 320 ac researched and 150 Tojos that will convert, this
means that we will be producing 450 Franks in 3 weeks. In 2 months there will be 400 trained operational
ac available. This will strengthen our LBA CAP immensly.

1300 AP at Saipan, 1200 at Guam, 1100 at Tinian and 700 at Pagan. Will move the Imp Div to Pagan to complete
the defenses there. 1000-700 AP in all the Palau islands. If Andy does not invade these islands, he will make
a big mistake. The way I'm going to defend them will also mean that an attack will be a big mistake
A true Catch 22 for you Andy! Remember this line when you read my AAR when the guns fell silent!

AFTER ACTION REPORTS FOR 05/08/44

Air Combat

Nigh air attacks are SO inefficient, very realistic for once and uncomparable to
the night attacks by level bombers. Good thing we banned those.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Night Air attack on Makale , at 32,67

Japanese aircraft
J1N1-S Irving x 28

No Japanese losses

Aircraft Attacking:
28 x J1N1-S Irving bombing at 2000 feet
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Preparations for another para drop....

Day Air attack on 48th Construction Battalion, at 32,69

Allied aircraft
PB4Y Liberator x 6

No Allied losses

Japanese ground losses:
25 casualties reported

Aircraft Attacking:
6 x PB4Y Liberator bombing at 8000 feet
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Day Air attack on TF at 40,71

Japanese aircraft
G4M1 Betty x 3
Ki-43-IIa Oscar x 15

Japanese aircraft losses
G4M1 Betty: 3 damaged

Allied Ships
DE Cloues
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
First of 2 carrier strikes on enemy shipping of PNG!

Day Air attack on TF at 46,74

Japanese aircraft
D4Y Judy x 25
B6N Jill x 22

Allied aircraft
Beaufighter Mk 21 x 5

Japanese aircraft losses
D4Y Judy: 3 destroyed, 1 damaged
B6N Jill: 3 damaged

Allied Ships
AK Kwangtung, Bomb hits 1, Torpedo hits 1, on fire, heavy damage
AK Ralph Barnes
AK Seaman A. Knapp, Torpedo hits 1, on fire
AK Johanne Justesen, Bomb hits 3, on fire, heavy damage
AK William Dunbar
AK Henry Dearborn
AK Empire Ridley, Torpedo hits 2, on fire, heavy damage

Allied ground losses:
234 casualties reported
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Day Air attack on TF at 47,75

Japanese aircraft
D4Y Judy x 20
B6N Jill x 17

Allied aircraft
Beaufighter Mk 21 x 6

Japanese aircraft losses
D4Y Judy: 5 destroyed, 1 damaged
B6N Jill: 3 damaged

Allied Ships
AK Alamosa, Torpedo hits 1, on fire, heavy damage
AK Francisco Coronado
SC SC-705
SC SC-1063, Bomb hits 2, on fire, heavy damage
AK Frederick Billings, Bomb hits 1, on fire
AK George Vancouver, Torpedo hits 1, on fire, heavy damage
AK Henry C. Payne
AK Beltrami

Allied ground losses:
53 casualties reported
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Day Air attack on TF at 44,72

Japanese aircraft
G4M1 Betty x 2

Allied aircraft
P-38J Lightning x 5

No Japanese losses

No Allied losses

Allied Ships
AK Wallingford
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Day Air attack on TF at 38,75

Japanese aircraft
G4M2 Betty x 4
P1Y Frances x 3

No Japanese losses

Allied Ships
AK Ben B. Lindsey, Torpedo hits 1
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Day Air attack on TF at 34,74

Japanese aircraft
P1Y Frances x 18

Japanese aircraft losses
P1Y Frances: 2 damaged

Allied Ships
AK Alcoa Pennant, Torpedo hits 5, on fire, heavy damage *sinks*
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Ground Combat

I've built almost all size 0 and 1 dot bases to contain 3-4 fort levels. Planned to
move small garrisons here to prevent airborne landings. Of course Andy found a couple
of weak spots that he exploited. Todays airborne landing was thwarted though and I'm
moving in some reinforcements by air. Just enough to keep the place safe.

Ground combat at Admiralty Islands

Allied Shock attack

Attacking force 3677 troops, 16 guns, 54 vehicles, Assault Value = 131

Defending force 508 troops, 0 guns, 0 vehicles, Assault Value = 17

Allied max assault: 214 - adjusted assault: 76

Japanese max defense: 9 - adjusted defense: 1

Allied assault odds: 76 to 1

Japanese ground losses:
104 casualties reported

Allied ground losses:
50 casualties reported
Guns lost 1
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ground combat at Tomini

Allied Shock attack

Attacking force 771 troops, 10 guns, 0 vehicles, Assault Value = 107

Defending force 806 troops, 0 guns, 0 vehicles, Assault Value = 3

Allied max assault: 52 - adjusted assault: 11

Japanese max defense: 2 - adjusted defense: 4

Allied assault odds: 2 to 1

Allied ground losses:
13 casualties reported
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ground combat at Pomala

Allied Shock attack

Attacking force 2372 troops, 19 guns, 0 vehicles, Assault Value = 41

Defending force 1328 troops, 0 guns, 0 vehicles, Assault Value = 5

Allied max assault: 34 - adjusted assault: 8

Japanese max defense: 3 - adjusted defense: 9

Allied assault odds: 0 to 1 (fort level 3)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Strike Force II of PNG!

Landed 2 good strikes on 2 enemy convoys today




Attachment (1)

_____________________________



"The problem in defense is how far you can go without destroying from within what you are trying to defend from without"
- Dwight D. Eisenhower

(in reply to PzB74)
Post #: 2517
RE: Paras at Tomini and Makale - 6/30/2006 1:53:43 AM   
Speedysteve

 

Posts: 15998
Joined: 9/11/2001
From: Reading, England
Status: offline
Nice strikes John

_____________________________

WitE 2 Tester
WitE Tester
BTR/BoB Tester

(in reply to PzB74)
Post #: 2518
RE: Paras at Tomini and Makale - 6/30/2006 2:04:03 AM   
PzB74


Posts: 5076
Joined: 10/3/2000
From: No(r)way
Status: offline
Thx Speedy! A bit too easy if you ask me...not been a lot of easy kills thus far.

Question: does Andy's invasion of Tomini trigger Kamikaze missions!?
If it does he may have miscalculated!

How was it again: any invasion of a base 16? hexes from Formosa and/or which bases?
will trigger Kamikaze missions!?

Just checked...15 hexes from Tokyo, Takao (Formosa) or Saigon after 1/44 will trigger kamikazes.
Tomini is 20 hexes from Saigon, but an attack on any base NORTH of Tomini will.

< Message edited by PzB -- 6/30/2006 2:08:45 AM >


_____________________________



"The problem in defense is how far you can go without destroying from within what you are trying to defend from without"
- Dwight D. Eisenhower

(in reply to Speedysteve)
Post #: 2519
RE: Paras at Tomini and Makale - 6/30/2006 2:49:41 AM   
PzB74


Posts: 5076
Joined: 10/3/2000
From: No(r)way
Status: offline
More enemy paras have been landed...Andy must be running out of chutes by now!
2 more days and carrier Aso arrives in Tokyo. Then the 3rd Car Div will be reformed at Naha.

Enemy carriers haven't been observed for a several weeks. Must be getting a badly needed
refit in preparations for new offensives. How long will this take? Knowing Andy, a month at most.

AFTER ACTION REPORTS FOR 05/09/44

Air Combat

A slightly more effective strike on Tomini!

Day Air attack on Tomini , at 34,65

Japanese aircraft
Ki-43-IIa Oscar x 52
Ki-21 Sally x 110
Ki-49 Helen x 21

Allied aircraft
Spitfire VIII x 3

Japanese aircraft losses
Ki-43-IIa Oscar: 1 destroyed
Ki-21 Sally: 2 damaged

Allied aircraft losses
Spitfire VIII: 1 destroyed, 2 damaged

Allied ground losses:
105 casualties reported

Airbase hits 5
Airbase supply hits 5
Runway hits 39
Port hits 1
Port supply hits 1
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Day Air attack on Sorong , at 42,74

Japanese aircraft
no flights

Allied aircraft
Beaufighter Mk 21 x 3
P-38J Lightning x 12
B-29 Superfortress x 14

Japanese aircraft losses
No Japanese losses

Allied aircraft losses
B-29 Superfortress: 2 damaged

Airbase hits 1
Runway hits 6
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
It's possible that Ponape will be invaded. I've withdrawn the crack regiment there.
Out of supply and of strategically little value I decided those troops were more needed
elsewhere.

Day Air attack on Ponape , at 71,79

Allied aircraft
Liberator VI x 12
P-40N Warhawk x 9
B-25J Mitchell x 42

No Allied losses

Airbase hits 3
Airbase supply hits 1
Runway hits 34
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Day Air attack on Ponape , at 71,79

Allied aircraft
F-5C Lightning x 5
B-25J Mitchell x 5
PB4Y Liberator x 16
B-24J Liberator x 74

No Allied losses

Airbase hits 7
Airbase supply hits 2
Runway hits 131
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Ground Combat

Ground combat at Tomini

Allied Bombardment attack

Attacking force 1678 troops, 19 guns, 0 vehicles, Assault Value = 105

Defending force 806 troops, 0 guns, 0 vehicles, Assault Value = 3

Japanese ground losses:
15 casualties reported
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Japanese Unit(s) surrounded at Admiralty Islands


_____________________________



"The problem in defense is how far you can go without destroying from within what you are trying to defend from without"
- Dwight D. Eisenhower

(in reply to PzB74)
Post #: 2520
Page:   <<   < prev  82 83 [84] 85 86   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Current Games From Matrix.] >> [World War II] >> War In The Pacific - Struggle Against Japan 1941 - 1945 >> After Action Reports >> RE: Namlea falls - B-29 make their debute! Page: <<   < prev  82 83 [84] 85 86   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

1.533