Matrix Games Forums

Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

RE: Von Paulus

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [General] >> General Discussion >> RE: Von Paulus Page: <<   < prev  1 [2]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Von Paulus - 8/27/2004 4:31:34 AM   
Error in 0


Posts: 248
Joined: 7/19/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: dinsdale

quote:

ORIGINAL: a19999577
<I have corrected some of your spelling mistakes, btw>

Good for you, hope it was an interesting task.


quote:

Not quite. I am not comparing 1945 Hitler with Bush, I am comparing 1933-1938 Hitler's foreign policies with Bush only as far as their General's 'moral duty' to depose them is concerned. I insist that it is unfair to give German Generals the ability to foresee what was going to happen and thus hold them morally responsible for not preventing it.

So none of them read Mein Kampf, knew about the Nuremburg Laws, or knew of any attrocity carried out in Germany, Austria or The Sudentenland. Must have been a very lazy set of officers to be so unaware of their leader's grand design and the actions being carried out by their troops.

quote:

Right now we can debate our heads off on whether Bush is going to lead this world into an age of Atomic 'terrorism' due to his warmongering policies, but we don't know he will, just as anyone in 1938 didn't know Hitler would lead the world into another World War.

No, no one was aware of the Z-plan, or had partaken in militarist expansion between 1936 and 1938 at all I'm sure the war came as a huge surprise to the German military, somehow less of a surprise than to Britain and France who began war preparations before the ink on Munich was dry.

quote:

Sure, with the information available in 1938 or early 39 they could have argued that he would, but at the time it was mere speculation. ... Would it be fair of me to DEMAND Colin Powell lead a military insurrection against Bush in order to prevent what I speculate might happen?

It was most certainly more than mere speculation in 1938. If the scenario you propose today were as clear-cut as that, then it would be a duty of Powell et al to prevent it from happening.

quote:

Heinz Guderian couldn't escape his context any more than Colin Powell can.

No, I suppose Guderian had no idea what would happen when war was threatened in 1938, how could he possibly forsee a war one year later.

Perhaps the findings of the Nuremburg Tribunal puts it better than I can

[referring to General Staff and High Command of the German Armed Forces] They have been responsible in large measure for the miseries and suffering that have fallen on millions of men, women and children. They have been a disgrace to the honourable profession of arms. Without their military guidance the aggressive ambitions of Hitler and his fellow Nazis would have been academic and sterile. Although they were not a group falling within the words of the Charter they were certainly a ruthless military caste. The contemporary German militarism flourished briefly with its recent ally, National Socialism, as well as or better than it had in the generations of the past

Apologies for my part in derailing the thread. I care nothing for what others may think of Bush, but whenever the comparison to Nazi Germany is made it cheapens the suffering of that regieme's victims, and the cost in lives to remove them from the earth.


There is a (some?) steps between a war and holocaust. Nobody here believe the German generals were surprised that the war broke, but that does not mean they understood how insane Hitler and the Naziz were. The same can be applied today and USA to some extend. Bush and his old fathers buddies attacked Iraq by lying to the entire US population, and world, put people in prisons way below any human right standards merely on suspicion, officially convicted them long before any trail. Tortured these soldiers, both in Iraq and on guatamola base (or whatever it is called). He was allowd to do so because of 11. sept. Now, the german situation after WW1 was far worse for the germans, and likewise the opposition against war was not strong.

As to passing jugdement: it the case you refer to, allies pass jugdement on germans. Today, americans pass jugdement on americans. Biased? Of cource. I wonder what the world make of Bush and his buddies in 60 years time


JT

< Message edited by JallaTryne -- 8/27/2004 2:34:50 AM >

(in reply to dinsdale)
Post #: 31
RE: Von Paulus - 8/27/2004 4:44:48 AM   
dinsdale


Posts: 384
Joined: 5/1/2003
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: JallaTryne
There is a (some?) steps between a war and holocaust. Nobody here believe the German generals were surprised that the war broke, but that does not mean they understood how insane Hitler and the Naziz were.

Mein Kampf and the occurences within Germany, Austria and Sudentenland should have been a very large clue. So too the planning for war, including the well known Plan Z. I suggest if any of these items are a mystery to you then a simple google search should at least help. Then you can judge for yourself how much the German army knew in 1938.

quote:

<SENSELESS RANT SNIPPED>

I have absolutely no intention of being baited into a discussion which is both incorrect and irrelevant. If you believe the situation in Nazi Germany circa 1938 is similar to that of America in 2004 then I suggest our differences are so great as to be a waste of time discussing the issue. Obviously the full extent of German crimes during the era are either no longer taught, or conveniently forgotten.

(in reply to Error in 0)
Post #: 32
RE: Von Paulus - 8/27/2004 4:49:47 AM   
Error in 0


Posts: 248
Joined: 7/19/2004
Status: offline
Sensless rant? What did I say that was wrong? Was not the Iraqi war based on a lie? Has there been no torture of prisoners? I think it is rather that you are an american, and you feel I express hate towards your country.


JT

(in reply to dinsdale)
Post #: 33
RE: Von Paulus - 8/27/2004 5:17:34 AM   
a19999577

 

Posts: 118
Joined: 3/31/2004
From: Lima, Peru
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: dinsdale



quote:

Not quite. I am not comparing 1945 Hitler with Bush, I am comparing 1933-1938 Hitler's foreign policies with Bush only as far as their General's 'moral duty' to depose them is concerned. I insist that it is unfair to give German Generals the ability to foresee what was going to happen and thus hold them morally responsible for not preventing it.

So none of them read Mein Kampf, knew about the Nuremburg Laws, or knew of any attrocity carried out in Germany, Austria or The Sudentenland. Must have been a very lazy set of officers to be so unaware of their leader's grand design and the actions being carried out by their troops.

quote:

Right now we can debate our heads off on whether Bush is going to lead this world into an age of Atomic 'terrorism' due to his warmongering policies, but we don't know he will, just as anyone in 1938 didn't know Hitler would lead the world into another World War.

No, no one was aware of the Z-plan, or had partaken in militarist expansion between 1936 and 1938 at all I'm sure the war came as a huge surprise to the German military, somehow less of a surprise than to Britain and France who began war preparations before the ink on Munich was dry.

quote:

Sure, with the information available in 1938 or early 39 they could have argued that he would, but at the time it was mere speculation. ... Would it be fair of me to DEMAND Colin Powell lead a military insurrection against Bush in order to prevent what I speculate might happen?

It was most certainly more than mere speculation in 1938. If the scenario you propose today were as clear-cut as that, then it would be a duty of Powell et al to prevent it from happening.

Apologies for my part in derailing the thread. I care nothing for what others may think of Bush, but whenever the comparison to Nazi Germany is made it cheapens the suffering of that regieme's victims, and the cost in lives to remove them from the earth.



I repeat, I am not comparing Nazi Germany to any other regime.

I am pointing out that most German Generals [except, of course, Beck] had a more 'sensible' [at the time] reading of Hitler's future. His anti-communist and anti-semitic rhetoric was seen as posturing that wouldn't go much further. If they had been convinced of what was going to happen, then sure, hold them responsible, but talking about genocide and whole-scale war and war crimes in 1938 would, at the time, seem mostly alarmist exaggeration.

As for 'comparing' the Nazis with anyone else being off-limits, I do realize that that is what people think now, but it is far from the way it has to be. I, as a historian, don't have anything off limits for dissection, and I don't need to say that Genghis Khan was a 'big, bad, meanie' when talking about his statesmanship.

I, too, apologize for derailing the thread, and don't have much more to say on the topic. If anyone wants to continue blaming us for not getting rid of anyone we think might develop destructive tendencies in the future, that's ok with me.

(in reply to dinsdale)
Post #: 34
RE: Von Paulus - 8/27/2004 5:27:09 AM   
dinsdale


Posts: 384
Joined: 5/1/2003
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: a19999577
I am pointing out that most German Generals [except, of course, Beck] had a more 'sensible' [at the time] reading of Hitler's future. His anti-communist and anti-semitic rhetoric was seen as posturing that wouldn't go much further. If they had been convinced of what was going to happen, then sure, hold them responsible, but talking about genocide and whole-scale war and war crimes in 1938 would, at the time, seem mostly alarmist exaggeration.


Alarmist? Not so for the Allied prosecutors at Nuremburg who indicted the entire General Staff and attempted to have it named as a criminal organization equivalent to the SS. By 1938 the persecution of Jews had already begun, the widespread use of concentration camps for German citizens was underway, Austria had been conquered, and Czechoslovakia threatened with war. I find no excuse but willful blindness for the Wehrmacht.

quote:

As for 'comparing' the Nazis with anyone else being off-limits, I do realize that that is what people think now, but it is far from the way it has to be. I, as a historian, don't have anything off limits for dissection, and I don't need to say that Genghis Khan was a 'big, bad, meanie' when talking about his statesmanship.

I agree, but when it's used as a blanket insult then it loses it's meaning to the point of worthlessness.

(in reply to a19999577)
Post #: 35
RE: Von Paulus - 8/27/2004 5:29:56 AM   
dinsdale


Posts: 384
Joined: 5/1/2003
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: JallaTryne

Sensless rant? What did I say that was wrong? Was not the Iraqi war based on a lie? Has there been no torture of prisoners? I think it is rather that you are an american, and you feel I express hate towards your country.


Yes senseless rant, much like your interuption of the thread about "allied" generals. In your rush to spout venom you were not even aware that the discussion centred on 1991.

In case you're unaware, I'm not American, and could not for one second care what you express for my country.

I suggest if you want to discuss these issues, find a venue for them, any discussion of modern politics usually results in a closed thread on this one, and I fail to see how your allegations are in any way pertinent to either Von Paulus, or the theoretical pre-war culpability of the German army.

(in reply to Error in 0)
Post #: 36
RE: Von Paulus - 8/27/2004 2:39:56 PM   
Error in 0


Posts: 248
Joined: 7/19/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: dinsdale

quote:

ORIGINAL: JallaTryne

Sensless rant? What did I say that was wrong? Was not the Iraqi war based on a lie? Has there been no torture of prisoners? I think it is rather that you are an american, and you feel I express hate towards your country.


Yes senseless rant, much like your interuption of the thread about "allied" generals. In your rush to spout venom you were not even aware that the discussion centred on 1991.

In case you're unaware, I'm not American, and could not for one second care what you express for my country.

I suggest if you want to discuss these issues, find a venue for them, any discussion of modern politics usually results in a closed thread on this one, and I fail to see how your allegations are in any way pertinent to either Von Paulus, or the theoretical pre-war culpability of the German army.


Yes, this is getting too political, so I will not press the issue much further. I believe it is very difficult to know how the future will be. And when we speculate on it, we tend to improve it. If you Dinsdale think the german generals schould have got ridden of hitler prior -38, I dont believe you have a basic understanding of germany in these times. Also, as has been done here, we can point to similar situations elsewhere in history, past and maybe present. USA is not Nazi germany, but what they have done in order to start a war is worrying. Who knows what they can do in the future? I dont expect US generals to even officially question this, so why on earth do YOU believe german generals schould have done much more? And as to what was said of germans after the war: it was the victor passing jugdement on the defeated. You are naive to believe that view is not biased.


JT

(in reply to dinsdale)
Post #: 37
RE: Von Paulus - 8/27/2004 3:16:48 PM   
dinsdale


Posts: 384
Joined: 5/1/2003
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: JallaTryne
If you Dinsdale think the german generals schould have got ridden of hitler prior -38, I dont believe you have a basic understanding of germany in these times.


I've dealt with this in replies to another poster. Obviously neither myself, nor the allied prosecutors at Nuremburg have a basic understanding of Germany in 1938. There was IIRC a plot on Hitlers life that year, perhaps by some uniquely enlightened beings? Several of them would resurface in 1944 and try again, did they have no grasp of life in Germany in 1938

quote:

Also, as has been done here, we can point to similar situations elsewhere in history, past and maybe present. USA is not Nazi germany, but what they have done in order to start a war is worrying. Who knows what they can do in the future?

Yes, the US obviously stands on the brink of genocide, has active concentration camps, a manifesto to destroy one religion, war plans to invade each of it's neighbours and no means of replacing it's executive.

(in reply to Error in 0)
Post #: 38
RE: Von Paulus - 8/28/2004 2:37:23 AM   
IronDuke_slith

 

Posts: 1595
Joined: 6/30/2002
From: Manchester, UK
Status: offline
quote:


ORIGINAL: dinsdale


I've dealt with this in replies to another poster. Obviously neither myself, nor the allied prosecutors at Nuremburg have a basic understanding of Germany in 1938. There was IIRC a plot on Hitlers life that year, perhaps by some uniquely enlightened beings? Several of them would resurface in 1944 and try again, did they have no grasp of life in Germany in 1938



If memory serves, this was a lone gunman. He planted a bomb in the BurgerBraukellar timed to go off during one of Hitler's speeches the following week. The speech was a yearly event marking the Putsch I think (but don't quote me). Hitler left early (I think because one of his current foreign policy ventures was coming to the boil) and the bomb went off on time but didn't get him.

The NAZIs caught the Guy but didn't really know what to do with him. He lived in a concentration camp until 1945 when he was summarily executed as the liberation neared. I should be able to dig out better detail if you're interested.

Regards,
IronDuke

(in reply to dinsdale)
Post #: 39
RE: Von Paulus - 8/28/2004 2:58:16 AM   
dinsdale


Posts: 384
Joined: 5/1/2003
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: IronDuke
If memory serves, this was a lone gunman. He planted a bomb in the BurgerBraukellar timed to go off during one of Hitler's speeches the following week. The speech was a yearly event marking the Putsch I think (but don't quote me). Hitler left early (I think because one of his current foreign policy ventures was coming to the boil) and the bomb went off on time but didn't get him.

The NAZIs caught the Guy but didn't really know what to do with him. He lived in a concentration camp until 1945 when he was summarily executed as the liberation neared. I should be able to dig out better detail if you're interested.

Regards,
IronDuke

Believe it or not, that was yet another assasination attempt The one I refer to is known as the Oster Plot, which alledgedly also included Canaris and Halder, immediately prior to the Munich conference.

(in reply to IronDuke_slith)
Post #: 40
Page:   <<   < prev  1 [2]
All Forums >> [General] >> General Discussion >> RE: Von Paulus Page: <<   < prev  1 [2]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

1.392