Matrix Games Forums

Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

Name This...(155)

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [Current Games From Matrix.] >> [World War II] >> War In The Pacific - Struggle Against Japan 1941 - 1945 >> Name This...(155) Page: [1] 2   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
Name This...(155) - 8/29/2004 8:50:45 PM   
Brady


Posts: 10701
Joined: 10/25/2002
From: Oregon,USA
Status: offline
???









_____________________________





Beta Team Member for:

WPO
PC
CF
AE
WiTE

Obi-wan Kenobi said it best: A lot of the reality we perceive depend on our point of view
Post #: 1
RE: Name This...(155) - 8/29/2004 9:11:50 PM   
stonefoot


Posts: 32
Joined: 2/7/2004
Status: offline
Appears to be 3 British Carrier Pilots with their Corsairs

(in reply to Brady)
Post #: 2
RE: Name This...(155) - 8/29/2004 9:12:16 PM   
Clipper1968


Posts: 445
Joined: 7/22/2004
From: LA, Ca
Status: offline
British pilots of a Corsair squadron based on the HMS Illustrious, isn't it?

(in reply to Brady)
Post #: 3
RE: Name This...(155) - 8/29/2004 9:38:52 PM   
Genisis


Posts: 28
Joined: 4/2/2004
From: Bournemouth.UK
Status: offline
Its the modern HMS Illustrious,the Sea Harriers are being retired
and the new VTOL planes are not ready.Plus its probably all we can afford anyway.
Maybe the MOD could buy back HMS Hermes from India.

_____________________________

Put it away it might rain!

(in reply to Clipper1968)
Post #: 4
RE: Name This...(155) - 8/29/2004 10:03:36 PM   
Clipper1968


Posts: 445
Joined: 7/22/2004
From: LA, Ca
Status: offline
French Navy can not afford much more with our single CVN Charles de Gaulle only sailing 6 months per year although the Rafale M based on it are pretty efficient fighters. May be should we reactivate the CV Clemenceau who is waiting at Toulon for her destruction, too sad... Oh, I forgot we have picked up her screw-propellers to equip the first one.
Our both government have planned to build CV in cooperation, isn't it? But when it will be done...one day...

More seriously I really think it is british pilots of a Corsair squadron based on the HMS Illustrious may be after operations over Sumatra...I guess...

(in reply to Genisis)
Post #: 5
RE: Name This...(155) - 8/29/2004 10:56:48 PM   
dr. smith

 

Posts: 221
Joined: 6/30/2004
From: lost in space
Status: offline
The middle one is Clive Wayne, uncle of Bruce Wayne, showing off his concept of a "Bat Vest".

(in reply to Clipper1968)
Post #: 6
RE: Name This...(155) - 8/30/2004 12:05:55 AM   
Brady


Posts: 10701
Joined: 10/25/2002
From: Oregon,USA
Status: offline
Normaly I would not offer up a Hint but in this case I will make an exception, one of three men shown is a Famious Canadian, his fame is tied to the planes in the background.

_____________________________





Beta Team Member for:

WPO
PC
CF
AE
WiTE

Obi-wan Kenobi said it best: A lot of the reality we perceive depend on our point of view

(in reply to dr. smith)
Post #: 7
RE: Name This...(155) - 8/30/2004 12:06:57 AM   
hithere

 

Posts: 432
Joined: 4/13/2004
From: Atlanta
Status: offline
the one on the right is the famous Ace , Louie Corsair!!

< Message edited by hithere -- 8/29/2004 5:07:27 PM >


_____________________________

Quote from one of my drill sergeants, "remember, except for the extreme heat, intense radiation, and powerful blast wave, a nuclear explosion is just like any other explosion"

(in reply to Brady)
Post #: 8
RE: Name This...(155) - 8/30/2004 6:26:26 PM   
Brady


Posts: 10701
Joined: 10/25/2002
From: Oregon,USA
Status: offline
It is, Lt. Don Sheppard(Far Right).


..................


Lt. Don Shepard was the RN's Only all Cousare ace, interestingly he was actualy in the RCNVR.

_____________________________





Beta Team Member for:

WPO
PC
CF
AE
WiTE

Obi-wan Kenobi said it best: A lot of the reality we perceive depend on our point of view

(in reply to hithere)
Post #: 9
RE: Name This...(155) - 8/30/2004 6:41:52 PM   
UncleBuck

 

Posts: 633
Joined: 10/31/2003
From: San Diego, CA, USA
Status: offline
I wonder why the French or British don't just buy one of our old Carriers off teh shelf? They are not Nuclear but they are modern, up to date Conventionals sitting in various ports, in ready reserve. We sell off old ships to countries all the time, hell we Have teh Midway in San Diego right now, and she is a museum. She fought in teh Gulf War I and had more sorties off of here than any other ship. We have the Constelation which was on Active duty 'till this past OCtober. SHe is slated for Scrap so I know that coudl be sold. Oh well, I guess they jsut don't want American castoff's? oh, and our carriers woudl be larger and carry more aircraft than your new "ight" ships. Maybe that is why? But if that is the case we have several old LHD's (Tarawa class) that you coudl turn into Jump/Helo carriers very easily. Just an idea.

If we can sell ships to Turkey, and Lybia (long ago) we should be able to sell them to GB and France.

UB

_____________________________


(in reply to Brady)
Post #: 10
RE: Name This...(155) - 8/30/2004 6:53:21 PM   
tsimmonds


Posts: 5498
Joined: 2/6/2004
From: astride Mason and Dixon's Line
Status: offline
The retired ships are old, tired, expensive to operate and badly in need of expensive upgrades to electronics and probably other systems as well. I think Midway was retired at a point in her life where it would require another SLEP (costing several hundred million dollars) just to keep her running. At that point she is a liability rather than an asset.

BTW, what exactly is the French aircraft carrier's raison d'etre?

_____________________________

Fear the kitten!

(in reply to UncleBuck)
Post #: 11
RE: Name This...(155) - 8/30/2004 6:57:12 PM   
UncleBuck

 

Posts: 633
Joined: 10/31/2003
From: San Diego, CA, USA
Status: offline
Thats completley Irrelevant! (sorry I couldn't resist!)

I agree the Midway woudl have been expensive, but eh Connie woudl not be that bad. She was up to date for her last WESTPAC. Ther are several others I am sure that woudl fit the bill, and be cheaper to refit than to build from Keel up.

UB

_____________________________


(in reply to tsimmonds)
Post #: 12
RE: Name This...(155) - 8/30/2004 7:33:27 PM   
Clipper1968


Posts: 445
Joined: 7/22/2004
From: LA, Ca
Status: offline
Thanks for your generous suggestion.
The next French Navy CV should be bigger than the current one but she will not be built and put in active service before 2014.(should be able to carry 40 Rafale M).
We don't need your old LHD as we have already 2 LHD in construction which will be in active service in 2005 and 2006 and
the Mistral and Tonnerre will carry our AH Tiger.

(in reply to UncleBuck)
Post #: 13
RE: Name This...(155) - 8/30/2004 7:39:01 PM   
tsimmonds


Posts: 5498
Joined: 2/6/2004
From: astride Mason and Dixon's Line
Status: offline
quote:

Thats completley Irrelevant! (sorry I couldn't resist!)


You couldn't resist? That's just passing the buck, Uncle.

_____________________________

Fear the kitten!

(in reply to UncleBuck)
Post #: 14
RE: Name This...(155) - 8/31/2004 1:41:53 AM   
freeboy

 

Posts: 9088
Joined: 5/16/2004
From: Colorado
Status: offline
We could use them,old carriers. in a massive real time test of soviet shipbuster and our anti shipbuster missiles... What is that huge air launched mf they developed?

< Message edited by freeboy -- 8/31/2004 7:42:33 AM >

(in reply to tsimmonds)
Post #: 15
RE: Name This...(155) - 8/31/2004 3:24:40 AM   
Fallschirmjager


Posts: 6793
Joined: 3/18/2002
From: Chattanooga, Tennessee
Status: offline
Europe cant afford to mantain a CV much less build one. Selling one would do no good.

_____________________________


(in reply to freeboy)
Post #: 16
RE: Name This...(155) - 8/31/2004 4:25:42 PM   
UncleBuck

 

Posts: 633
Joined: 10/31/2003
From: San Diego, CA, USA
Status: offline
Thats right I forgot they lost all of there Defense Budget when they stopped gettign all teh money form Iraq for arms sales.

_____________________________


(in reply to Fallschirmjager)
Post #: 17
RE: Name This...(155) - 8/31/2004 4:55:37 PM   
dday


Posts: 64
Joined: 7/9/2004
Status: offline
hmmm, he Tim Horton, eh. First onboard "Coffee Vest", not Mae West.

(in reply to UncleBuck)
Post #: 18
RE: Name This...(155) - 8/31/2004 7:09:36 PM   
steveh11Matrix


Posts: 944
Joined: 7/30/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Fallschirmjager

Europe cant afford to mantain a CV much less build one. Selling one would do no good.
Psst!!! Don't tell the Royal Navy, they've got 2 new carriers being built...
Of course, they'll need aircraft to fly off of them, so you guys had best hurry up with the new VSTOL fighter!

Steve.

_____________________________

"Nature always obeys Her own laws" - Leonardo da Vinci

(in reply to Fallschirmjager)
Post #: 19
RE: Name This...(155) - 8/31/2004 7:22:24 PM   
Lex Talionis


Posts: 32
Joined: 2/11/2004
From: United Kingdom of Great Britain
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: steveh11Matrix

quote:

ORIGINAL: Fallschirmjager

Europe cant afford to mantain a CV much less build one. Selling one would do no good.
Psst!!! Don't tell the Royal Navy, they've got 2 new carriers being built...
Of course, they'll need aircraft to fly off of them, so you guys had best hurry up with the new VSTOL fighter!

Steve.


Of course... I forgot that dear old blighty designed and built the Harrier VTOL aircraft. AND we gave the Harrier it to the Americans for free who could then copy and build it for free without paying us a penny, which I thought was jolly decent of us as we're cannon fodder... I mean Allies. Who then shafted us something rotten by making us have to pay for each and every C130 Hercules we commisioned for the RAF. Without Harrier your much vaunted Marines would not have had the perfect air support weapons platform.

_____________________________

"Time is an adversary that suffers no casualties and never retreats; only advances."

(formerly "Skeletor" until the hack attack)

(in reply to steveh11Matrix)
Post #: 20
RE: Name This...(155) - 8/31/2004 7:24:54 PM   
tsimmonds


Posts: 5498
Joined: 2/6/2004
From: astride Mason and Dixon's Line
Status: offline
quote:

the perfect air support weapons platform.


Gotta say I've heard the Harrier called many things before, but never that....

_____________________________

Fear the kitten!

(in reply to Lex Talionis)
Post #: 21
RE: Name This...(155) - 8/31/2004 7:49:23 PM   
UncleBuck

 

Posts: 633
Joined: 10/31/2003
From: San Diego, CA, USA
Status: offline
Thats ok, we will forget the Destroyers, Aircraft of All types, and Arms from teh past.

If I am not mistaken we took the Harrier and started workign on it, and it became a joint venture wich has culminated in teh Latest Harrier II project, and is truly a great Attack plane. You also gave us Chaubum Armor, but then we gave you sighting systems. As for you being Cannon fodder, I don't understand. I thought that we supported you and you us, and sicne you are good fighters we don't coddle you but treat you as equals. Now owing to your size and such we normally do not ask you to be the Vangaurd but do ask you to take vital and tough positions like Basra recently.

In fact I woudl accuse our governemnt of using our troops for fodder to ensure Allied casualties are very low, so we can keep our allies.

UB

_____________________________


(in reply to Lex Talionis)
Post #: 22
RE: Name This...(155) - 8/31/2004 8:12:15 PM   
DrewMatrix


Posts: 1429
Joined: 7/15/2004
Status: offline
quote:

Thats ok, we will forget the Destroyers, Aircraft of All types, and Arms from teh past


You didn't mention all that tea we dumped in the Boston Harbor. I think we still owe the Crown for that.

_____________________________


Beezle - Rapidly running out of altitude, airspeed and ideas.

(in reply to UncleBuck)
Post #: 23
RE: Name This...(155) - 8/31/2004 8:25:36 PM   
tsimmonds


Posts: 5498
Joined: 2/6/2004
From: astride Mason and Dixon's Line
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Beezle

quote:

Thats ok, we will forget the Destroyers, Aircraft of All types, and Arms from teh past


You didn't mention all that tea we dumped in the Boston Harbor. I think we still owe the Crown for that.


We'll just offset that against the cost of repainting the Capitol and the White House; fire damage you know....

_____________________________

Fear the kitten!

(in reply to DrewMatrix)
Post #: 24
RE: Name This...(155) - 8/31/2004 8:44:43 PM   
rhohltjr


Posts: 536
Joined: 4/27/2000
From: When I play pacific wargames, I expect smarter AI.
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: steveh11Matrix

...so you guys had best hurry up with the new VSTOL fighter!

Steve.


We're trying! Retooling a fighter factory is a huge undertaking.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lex Talionis
Of course... I forgot that dear old blighty designed and built the Harrier VTOL aircraft. AND we gave the Harrier it to the Americans for free who could then copy and build it for free without paying us a penny, which I thought was jolly decent of us as we're cannon fodder... I mean Allies.

Yes we are allies, and working very hard on that new VSTOL fighter!
Actually the list of (US and our )allies working on it is a mile(1.609344 km) long.

"old blighty" ????

(in reply to Lex Talionis)
Post #: 25
RE: Name This...(155) - 8/31/2004 8:58:33 PM   
rhohltjr


Posts: 536
Joined: 4/27/2000
From: When I play pacific wargames, I expect smarter AI.
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: UncleBuck

As for you being Cannon fodder, I don't understand. I thought that we supported you and you us, and sicne you are good fighters we don't coddle you but treat you as equals. UB


I remember watching one of our great allies reacquire someplace called the Faulklands, and I believe they borrowed some 'tankers' from one of their allies. While we remained neutral. Jolly good.

(in reply to UncleBuck)
Post #: 26
RE: Name This...(155) - 8/31/2004 9:02:06 PM   
DrewMatrix


Posts: 1429
Joined: 7/15/2004
Status: offline
The US tried to look neutral (not wanting to be at war with a western hemisphere power) but gave the UK an upgrade to their air to air missles (ie gave them a newer model) and quietly fed lots of satellite data to the UK (while the Soviets fed satellite data to the Argentines and the French sold the the Argentines missles).

< Message edited by Beezle -- 8/31/2004 7:02:31 PM >


_____________________________


Beezle - Rapidly running out of altitude, airspeed and ideas.

(in reply to rhohltjr)
Post #: 27
RE: Name This...(155) - 8/31/2004 9:21:50 PM   
Clipper1968


Posts: 445
Joined: 7/22/2004
From: LA, Ca
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Beezle

the French sold the the Argentines missles).


Unfortunately for the Royal Navy these Exocet missiles were quite deadly...

(in reply to DrewMatrix)
Post #: 28
RE: Name This...(155) - 8/31/2004 11:42:07 PM   
kaleun

 

Posts: 5145
Joined: 5/29/2002
From: Colorado
Status: offline
quote:

Unfortunately for the Royal Navy these Exocet missiles were quite deadly...


Not deadly enough otherwise they would be called the Malvinas!

_____________________________

Appear at places to which he must hasten; move swiftly where he does not expect you.
Sun Tzu

(in reply to Clipper1968)
Post #: 29
RE: Name This...(155) - 8/31/2004 11:45:09 PM   
DrewMatrix


Posts: 1429
Joined: 7/15/2004
Status: offline
I have this great T Shirt (from the time of the Falklands war).

it has a picture of the islands with "Islas Malvinas" crossed out and says

"FALKLANDS: The Empire Strikes Back"

_____________________________


Beezle - Rapidly running out of altitude, airspeed and ideas.

(in reply to kaleun)
Post #: 30
Page:   [1] 2   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Current Games From Matrix.] >> [World War II] >> War In The Pacific - Struggle Against Japan 1941 - 1945 >> Name This...(155) Page: [1] 2   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

5.594