Matrix Games Forums

Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

RE: Japan a Superpower!!!

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [Current Games From Matrix.] >> [World War II] >> War In The Pacific - Struggle Against Japan 1941 - 1945 >> RE: Japan a Superpower!!! Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Japan a Superpower!!! - 9/2/2004 3:52:56 PM   
tsimmonds


Posts: 5498
Joined: 2/6/2004
From: astride Mason and Dixon's Line
Status: offline
quote:

I'm sorry you feel that when someone disagrees with you it is whining.


Don't worry, it's only whining if it sounds like whining.

_____________________________

Fear the kitten!

(in reply to tigercub)
Post #: 31
RE: Japan a Superpower!!! - 9/2/2004 4:08:08 PM   
mogami


Posts: 12789
Joined: 8/23/2000
From: You can't get here from there
Status: offline
Hi, TIgercub. Japanese pilot training did decrease. This is a known fact. We have posted many times the number of hours Japanese pilots flew in training by year. We also posted the number of hours Allied plilots flew in training by year.

The result is that late war Allied pilots flew more training hours then prewar Japanese pilots. Japanese late war pilots flew less then 100 hours in training. Our pilots have told us that it requires 300 hours to get a pilot to where he can do things other then just fly. (Like look out the window for enemy aircraft)
Japanese training has to be tied to Japanese supply levels. I mean it has to be on map. The pilot pool is not intended as the source for trained pilots but to augment it. (The pilot pool is where pilots for your shipboard/submarine float planes come from) Combat groups arrive on map trained. Replacements for these groups are supposed to come from training on map. By raising the pool numbers you've bypassed the need for the Japanese to train pilots.
There were good Japanese pilots all through the war. However by 1943 the Japanese had placed pilots with less then 1/3 the experiance into combat. With a 60 per month rate onto top of free pilots in groups they should have in pool a sizeable surplus going into 1943. (The IJN would have to lose over 2k pilots to not have a surplus)
60 per month would be correct if we had new groups draw pilots from pool when they first arrive on map.
Once and for all. I'm never going to involve myself in this debate again. The pool and new group pilots are freebies. They are not and never were the Japanese training program. The game as designed requires the Japanese player to conduct his training on map. How many pilots and to what level of training is up to him. The Japanese player must do several things.

He has to plan Operations based on his training numbers.
He has to supply his training programs. It costs supply to train pilots they don't train for free. They require aircraft to train and they require base support and space to train. They suffer loss while training. He does not simply pull them out of his hat.

The Japanese player has to adjust all his plans according to the number of pilots he has. He is limited by the number of groups ready for combat. he is limited by how long his groups can remain in combat. Pilots are not some minor detail that annoy him Pilots are a vital part of his conduct of the war.

Does everyone now understand that the pool is not the source for pilots? (It is a minor addition to help the player provide pilots to groups that are otherwise difficult to provide for.)
You have to train the pilots on map yourself. When you say the game provides too few you are revealing that you don't understand the set up because I know for a fact the game provides too many. Simply by suppling any trained pilots beyond what Japan had in the pool at start is too many. The Japanese player should in my opinion be required to train every single pilot he gets. (all groups should arrive on map with untrained pilots)

_____________________________






I'm not retreating, I'm attacking in a different direction!

(in reply to tigercub)
Post #: 32
RE: Japan a Superpower!!! - 9/2/2004 4:31:44 PM   
crsutton


Posts: 9590
Joined: 12/6/2002
From: Maryland
Status: offline
Mommy, my head hurts!

_____________________________

I am the Holy Roman Emperor and am above grammar.

Sigismund of Luxemburg

(in reply to mogami)
Post #: 33
RE: Japan a Superpower!!! - 9/2/2004 4:45:02 PM   
SpitfireIX


Posts: 264
Joined: 1/9/2003
From: Fort Wayne IN USA
Status: offline
quote:

Original: Mogami

Does everyone now understand that the pool is not the source for pilots? (It is a minor addition to help the player provide pilots to groups that are otherwise difficult to provide for.)
You have to train the pilots on map yourself. When you say the game provides too few you are revealing that you don't understand the set up because I know for a fact the game provides too many. Simply by suppling any trained pilots beyond what Japan had in the pool at start is too many. The Japanese player should in my opinion be required to train every single pilot he gets. (all groups should arrive on map with untrained pilots)


Excellent explanation, Mogami. As someone who didn't participate in any of the testing, and who tends to play the Allies, it would have taken me quite a while to figure this one out on my own. BTW, does anyone know if the AI is programmed to train Japanese pilots?

_____________________________

"I know Japanese. He is very bad. And tricky. But we Americans too smart. We catch him and give him hell."

--Benny Sablan, crewman, USS Enterprise 12/7/41

(in reply to mogami)
Post #: 34
RE: Japan a Superpower!!! - 9/2/2004 4:50:03 PM   
rogueusmc


Posts: 4583
Joined: 2/8/2004
From: Texas...what country are YOU from?
Status: offline
Highly improbable I would think.

_____________________________

There are only two kinds of people that understand Marines: Marines and the enemy. Everyone else has a second-hand opinion.

Gen. William Thornson, U.S. Army


(in reply to SpitfireIX)
Post #: 35
RE: Japan a Superpower!!! - 9/2/2004 4:59:18 PM   
mogami


Posts: 12789
Joined: 8/23/2000
From: You can't get here from there
Status: offline
Hi, Like the Japanese but unlike any human I have yet encountered the AI will disband groups in order to maintain others in fighting condition. The AI is more apt to disband front line groups or withdraw them back to safety and rebuild/train them. Humans want to leave the group at the front and still provide trained pilots without doing any actual training.
They wish to increase the size of the Japanese airforces, keep it all at the front in combat and have free trained pilots arriving by the bushel. (and put them all in nice new shiney aircraft produced by their massive aircraft industry)

In short they want to play Japan but not be Japan they want to be the USA.

< Message edited by Mogami -- 9/2/2004 10:00:45 AM >


_____________________________






I'm not retreating, I'm attacking in a different direction!

(in reply to rogueusmc)
Post #: 36
RE: Japan a Superpower!!! - 9/2/2004 5:23:10 PM   
Hard Sarge


Posts: 22741
Joined: 10/1/2000
From: garfield hts ohio usa
Status: offline
LOL
Bite Me :)

sorry tiger, that post was not pointed at you, it started at a question to Caslug, and statement to Brady

if you disagree, that is fine, the testers have told you how and why the number is there, if you still disagree with the testers, that is still fine

my point was about people who only complain about one side of the game

and just in case, the 2nd line was meant as a joke

irrelevant
:):):)

HARD_Sarge

Anti_Whine_Fanboy_Club

_____________________________


(in reply to tigercub)
Post #: 37
RE: Japan a Superpower!!! - 9/2/2004 5:36:55 PM   
Hard Sarge


Posts: 22741
Joined: 10/1/2000
From: garfield hts ohio usa
Status: offline
Hi Mogami
I think the big thing here is how most people "play" games

very, very few people ever think about reserves, or keeping troops back or in training, most see, that if I have 10000 troops, and a battle is about to start, well, Put 10000 troops into that battle

hassle is, in games in works, in real life it don't

I Mean, how many players will put 10-15 CV's into one TF and then sail it into combat, how many people put 25 PT's boats into a TF, then make 3 TF's and then when the turn runs there is combat, and the same player will complain that the PT's are over modelled

oh well
keep up the good fight

HARD_Sarge

_____________________________


(in reply to mogami)
Post #: 38
RE: Jap Carrier Pilot Replacement - too low!! - 9/2/2004 5:46:59 PM   
Brady


Posts: 10701
Joined: 10/25/2002
From: Oregon,USA
Status: offline
Mogami, The reasion it is hard to arive at is while I can go through and list all the Navy Air Units,well fighter units anyway, I can not list all the army ones, though I could go get this book I have been meaning to buy...Also I could list all the piolets trained for the Navy by class, but this is a Huge undertaking while I love to transcribe stuff the game is so not anal on this point to begine with and feal that doing so is not going to realy help. WiTP does not creat air units for Japan they way their were created in real life particularly later in the war, so I dont see that the effort will do any good...let me mull on this till tomarow when I will have more time to deal with it.

"okay, well, which one is it ?, did they have 3000 trained pilots, or did they have 4000 trained pilots ? just a little bit of a fudge factor there "

Dont forget this does not include the Army piolets which outnumbered the navy.

"Brady, I disagree with your statements, your not sure how many should be there, if the game had come with 20 a month, you would complain, if it came with 100 a month, you would complain "

I hvae posted on this topic in much more detail in the past showing numbers which Mogami and others have sean many times, so you not seeing all that they have and in the interests of time I did not do that yet again hear, I will continue to complain about this point though, but your off in that no mater what I would complain.

"like your arguement about the Ki-100, being a good 2nd Gen plane, come on man, all your info, and you trying to say it was designed ?, I would think that would be the last plane you would bring up, since the only reason it was made, was the Ki-61 couldn't be, they had frames and wings, but no engines, so they added a engine that was laying around, and it worked out much better then they thought it would, and in fact turned out to be a pretty good plane, for a hybrd "

The question was I bealve could Japan produce a second generation plane that was reliable, this showed that they did, and while it was not designed from the get go to use the radial engine, the Army had before they were forced to switched presed them to adopt a diferent engine, and they did have to redesigne the airframe to except the new engine.

"the Franks and Georges turned out to be pretty good planes too, once they were brought back to the states and tested, once they got good fuel and got the right engine work done, they turned into monsters, but the pilots who fought them, didn't see them that way, and, the test pilots hated to fly them, they never knew if they would land (which I believe that was also a complaint on the Ki-100, weak landing gear, due to poor Heat treating)"

They were good planes before they were tested, the new fuel did not realy do that much to improve their preformance adding higher octane fuel to a plane designed to run on a lower grade generaly does not improve it's preformance to a signafagant degree. Their are many combat reports from units equiped with these planes shwoing that they did very well in the field and were well liked by themen who used them. Week langing gear did plauge the earler Ki-84, and the N1K1- but this problem was not just a Japanese one other countries suffered from the same issues, and the Japanese landing geaar issues were resloved on later modles.

"so, how many do you want, 10, 20, 100 ? keep asking, Mogami will just keep showing how if you plan and play the game right, you don't need them "

Mogami has shown an efective way remove 1/3 of the empires efective combate force from the field to efect a decent leval of piolet training.

"Japanese pilots. Japanese late war pilots flew less then 100 hours in training."


This is incorect, they begain training for CV's with 150 hours late in the war, prewar and early war was 300 to 500 hours before this hapened, source Imperial Japanese Naval Avaitor 1937 to 45.

_____________________________





Beta Team Member for:

WPO
PC
CF
AE
WiTE

Obi-wan Kenobi said it best: A lot of the reality we perceive depend on our point of view

(in reply to caslug)
Post #: 39
RE: Japan a Superpower!!! - 9/2/2004 6:16:43 PM   
tigercub


Posts: 2004
Joined: 2/3/2003
From: brisbane oz
Status: offline
I don't take offence, but thanks any way.

I have only tried to point out what I believe is not right in the data. The powers that be have given us an editor so that we can make our own versions of history. I added my thoughts to this thread so that people would know what some people are doing in their games. I understand that Japan had a serious crisis with its pilots and plane production (and everything else production too) BUT I don't agree that it started as early as most folks on the forum seem to believe. But once again a player will have to go further than his historical counterpart to prevent the huge decline that Japan suffered in 1944. I don't mind having to train pilots to get them were they are needed and I know all Japanese players will be doing everything possible to teach their novice pilots and not throw them away prematurely.

Humans always want to maximise their efforts. There is plenty of room for the training faction to gather at one of the larger a/f with 250 air support. A thousand planes can be based here.

If all pilots needed to be trained by the player then new trainer types that are more durable than 22 would be needed for the hard landings. The natives could chop down the local trees so that there would be one less thing to crash into. And all planes could have a dingy in case of an emergency! (And a pig's head to throw to the shark so that a downed crew would have time to swim to the dingy).

I'll post further messages (if wanted) to let people know how the extra pilots have effected our game. (Or you might guess??!??)

tigercub

< Message edited by tigercub -- 9/2/2004 4:58:15 PM >

(in reply to Hard Sarge)
Post #: 40
RE: Japan a Superpower!!! - 9/2/2004 6:21:14 PM   
joliverlay

 

Posts: 635
Joined: 1/28/2003
Status: offline
This is all really hard to believe. I thought it had been pretty well established that:

1. The Japanese Navy did not have enought trained pilots to man all of their aircraft at the start of the war.

2. The Japanese Navy's losses in aircrew at PH and Coral SeA constituted about 1/3 of their annual output of carrier trained pilots.

This being the case the replacement rate is dead on. The Japanese had the quality and numbers availabe at the start of the Coral Sea (5/42) time frame because the VERY CAREFULLY used their aircraft prior to that time. If you engage in continuious high intensity combat from 12/41 on, you will certinly erode your pilot skill much more than the Japanese actually did.

IF YOU WANT TO MAINTAIN THE HISTORICAL QUALITY OF YOU IJN PILOTS UP TO 5/42 THE USE THEM HISTORICALLY (VERY CAREFULLY).

(in reply to tigercub)
Post #: 41
RE: Jap Carrier Pilot Replacement - too low!! - 9/2/2004 7:10:26 PM   
esteban


Posts: 618
Joined: 7/21/2004
Status: offline
Based on what Genda was saying, perhaps the answer is to take 3000 pilots, (the low end of his estimate) and subtract pilots for those planes that are operational at the beginning of the war, and put the rest in the pool. That would be a very large pool, but it would run down over time.

As for the Japanese army, how many air training divisions did they have? The source cited said 750 planes per division, and 300 graduates every quarter PER DIVISION.

Also, do we have the skill level for Japanese replacements set correctly? Is 55 for the IJA and 70 for the IJN correct? 70 seems like it might be a little high, but what are other people's ideas?

One more thing, I quit my PBEM game in large part because I couldn't get my Nell and Betty squadrons to stop sucking up IJN pilot replacements, even when I had replacements off for these units. I have an idea how to end that, and Lemurs was nice enough to tell me how to use the editor to attempt my fix, but I have not tried it yet. It is imperative that at the very least, the Japanese player be able to stop unwanted draws on his replacement pool.

(in reply to tsimmonds)
Post #: 42
RE: Jap Carrier Pilot Replacement - too low!! - 9/2/2004 7:20:37 PM   
Nikademus


Posts: 25684
Joined: 5/27/2000
From: Alien spacecraft
Status: offline
According to Pettie ("Sunburst") the JNAF started the war (12/7) without the required # of trained pilots (pre-war standards) to equip the squadrons they had active at the time so technically that would equate to "zero" in the starting pool. (the best pilots were dolled out to the carriers. land based squadrons got what was left so quality levels could very from Datai to Datai)

_____________________________


(in reply to esteban)
Post #: 43
RE: Japan a Superpower!!! - 9/2/2004 7:36:39 PM   
Bradley7735


Posts: 2073
Joined: 7/12/2004
Status: offline
Question??

Why did Zuikaku not take part in the battle of Midway? She wasn't damaged at the Coral Sea.

Answer: There weren't enough replacement piolets (thanks, Brady!!) to fill out her losses from the Coral Sea.

So, I assume Japan had pilot replacement problems as early as May 1942. Long before 1944.

I'm just trying to back up Mogami and others that the game is good when it comes to this issue.

bc

(in reply to tsimmonds)
Post #: 44
RE: Japan a Superpower!!! - 9/2/2004 8:25:19 PM   
mogami


Posts: 12789
Joined: 8/23/2000
From: You can't get here from there
Status: offline
Hi, Why were the carrier in the Midway Operation not loaded to capicity? According to my sources they were short by at least 40 aircraft and pilot/crews and they had been at home in Japan for a decent amount of time. Not to mention that they were able to carry surplus aircraft and pilots to use as replacements if such pilots had been on hand. (They had the aircraft)
Why were conditions in South Pacific so deplorable as to number of pilots and this before the Allies opened Watchtower. (Even Saki mentions this, he said the number and quality of pilots was noticably poorer then prewar. This is before Japan lost the 1000+ pilot and aircrew between Aug 42 and Feb 43.

< Message edited by Mogami -- 9/2/2004 1:27:49 PM >


_____________________________






I'm not retreating, I'm attacking in a different direction!

(in reply to Bradley7735)
Post #: 45
RE: Japan a Superpower!!! - 9/2/2004 9:34:44 PM   
DesertedFox


Posts: 314
Joined: 8/3/2004
Status: offline
I am afraid Tiger that you haven't presented any evidence about Japan not having a pilot shortage until 1944. Whilst the others have presented evidence to the contrary.

You state "why did they put an editor in the game if not to allow people to change the settings to suit themselves", sure knock your self out, make your changes. You stated that increasing the # of pilots the Japs receive will make them more competitive as the war progresses, of course it will. But, its not HISTORICAl.

The other inportant thing to consider, by making such drastic changes to the game engine, what about the end game effect on victory conditions. Having given the Japs such a hugh and ahistorical advantage, one can assume you used the editor to adjust the end game victory conditions as it will be much harder for the Allies to win against such changes.

(in reply to tsimmonds)
Post #: 46
RE: Jap Carrier Pilot Replacement - too low!! - 9/2/2004 9:39:36 PM   
Hard Sarge


Posts: 22741
Joined: 10/1/2000
From: garfield hts ohio usa
Status: offline
Hi Brady

Don't forget this does not include the army pilots which outnumbered the navy

"The strenght of JNAF at the beginning of the war was 3-4000 pilots. About 1500 were trained for carriers..."

While Col. Junji Hyashi, Chief of Staff of JAAF 51st Training Division, told Allied officers: "JAAF had appx. 2000 pilots w/ 300 hrs training in 1941....Training divisions had about 750 planes and each graduated 300 pilots every 3 mos.

I thought the JAAF was the J Army Air Force ????

but that is neither here or there

still, for the planes, it was the fuel that made the planes top rate, weak, shoddy fuel, does not make a high performence plane (lots of reports on how the ground crew, used buckets to pore gas into the planes, what ever was in the bucket, was also in the fuel tanks)

test reports in the states, were getting 30-50 MPH more, then they were seeing in combat

and the landing gear was not a hassle that was corrected later, it was a hassle that was caused by the way the planes were being made

but again, that is neither here nor there

at least 2 of the testers has stated that, you are getting too many replacement pilots to start with, looks like the designers and the testers are somewhat in the same place as to how many should be given

but

"" This is incorect, they begain training for CV's with 150 hours late in the war, prewar and early war was 300 to 500 hours before this hapened, source Imperial Japanese Naval Avaitor 1937 to 45.""

ahhh, what late war CV pilots ? why were they training CV pilots for ? you need CV's to put them on

HARD_Sarge

by the by, in my other role, I am known as BANZAI_HD_Sarge and I almost live in a George, but have been known to jump into a Tojo

hehe, I like writting to you, you spell as well as I do :)

_____________________________


(in reply to Brady)
Post #: 47
RE: Japan a Superpower!!! - 9/2/2004 9:40:28 PM   
caslug

 

Posts: 48
Joined: 8/19/2004
Status: offline
I agree that jap had problems w/ pilot replacement especially after Midway, they never got a chance for a breather. Most sources including (Okumiya, Horikoshi, & Caidin - Zero) stated that the decline started at Midway, but really hit them(JNAF) in mid 43.

"At the beginning of the war, according to 5th USAAF intelligence(studies done AFTER the war - caslug), the average Japanese naval pilot had 600+ hours of flying experience, which included training as well as experience picked up during operations; this was a formidable total by standards of the time. By August 1942(after Coral Sea & Midway - caslug) the figure dropped to 500 hours; by July 1943 to 400; by the beginning of 1944 to 300." - Fire in the Sky pg 325.

The JAAF didn't start meat grinder til Mid 42(New Guinie Campaign) and really didn't heavy losses till fall of 42 and onward. JNAF loss what? 450-500 pilots between Coral Sea & Midway. And they were still able to doing OK by their & 5th USAAF standard (500 hrs). They were able to replace those pilots by the time of the two carrier battles in the Solomons in fall of 42. So really bad pilots (35-40 exp) shouldn't be showing up till beginning of 44, if we're playing a semi-historical time line with semi-historical losses. Remember that Aug 42, the the solomon air campaign was just starting up and losses didn't start mounting up yet.

So i'm playing my Lemur's Scen as Jap vs AI, it's APRIL 14th, 1942. JNAF has loss about 350 total planes(zeros, betties, vals, etc.,) while JAAF lost about 200 planes in 4 1/2 mos. That's @80 planes a month JNAF loss to ALL causes. Playing against the AI, I have not had a major carrier battle where JNAF would lose 100+ planes(PH 10 day operation cost about 90 planes). Anyway, I use the starting pilot pool to fill out some understregnth units and replace operational losses, and STILL HAVE 50 or so pilots left. I'm using Mogami's training method use existing airgroups to replace loss then have them come back in 90 days(after disbandment) to be trained. Well those JNAF disbanded groups come back about (100-120 planes worth) in Mid March. And they start filling out with the "untrain" replacement (35 exp) while the JAAF has no such problems, there still 250 pilot in the pool(after losing 200 pilots during the same time - 4 1/2 mos). History tells us that JNAF were able to replace ther PH losses (57 pilots) plus operations against the ABDA in early 42. Even Coral Sea hasn't happened yet, so why do the JNAF seeing untrain pilots this early? I guess this was why I posted the original thread. I wouldn't be even bring this up if this was Aug 42 after the two carrier battle.

I think even with decently train pilots (55-65 exp) come late 42/early 43, the jap pilots are still going to be in a world of hurt, because that's the start of Allied ascendency with more & better planes. The game models historical effect of the attrition in the airwar very well. Put a 65 exp jap pilot in a zero/oscar against a 65 exp allied pilot in a P38 or corsair and jap is still goint to get shot down, in a one-to-one encounter. So it really doesn't matter if jap gets more "train" pilots, because no matter what they do, come late 42 an onward, the allied streamroll will just eventually overwhelm them with more & better planes. So the biggest problem the jap historically and in the game CANNOT solve, is NOT really getting enough "train" pilots(55-65exp), BUT KEEPING those guys alive in crappy planes so they can "earn" exp to become veterans(75-80 exp) either by putting in better planes sooner, ie(frank/george however that's NOT realistic for late 42 or early 43) or better strategy(easy against AI but tough against human). The allied never had this problem, because their planes were more rugged and they were not AS wasteful with their aircrews. An example of that waste, the day after the marine landing on Gudacanal, the JNAF at Rabaul were ORDERED to launch immedietly as a show of force. Their betties were loaded with bomb(GP not AP because they were going to bomb PM), they took off with their zero escort and bomb the invasion fleet, loss some planes hit nothing flew home. They would have been better serve to wait couple hrs to load up with torpedoes. But high command force overrode the commander on the scene.

< Message edited by caslug -- 9/2/2004 7:58:20 PM >

(in reply to Bradley7735)
Post #: 48
RE: Japan a Superpower!!! - 9/2/2004 9:54:17 PM   
caslug

 

Posts: 48
Joined: 8/19/2004
Status: offline
off tangent...in fantasy land

What the jap need was to fly FW190 in late 42 or early 43. Then they would be able to "open a can of whoopass" on the lightning & corsairs. Historically, newly train Luftwaffe pilots were able to survive & learn in their FW190s and ME109s. I think Hartman didn't start flying until what? Late 42 or early 43? And he was shot down a few times and survive. While a Jap pilot in a crappy zero/oscar w/o pilot armor etc., would not survive similar situation. So Jap military buts ALL that expenses to train them, but doesn't care if they make it home.

(in reply to caslug)
Post #: 49
RE: Japan a Superpower!!! - 9/2/2004 9:56:56 PM   
mogami


Posts: 12789
Joined: 8/23/2000
From: You can't get here from there
Status: offline
Hi, It was Rudel that did not begin flying combat till late 42 and he flew a Stuka. He managed to set the world record for combat sortie before the war ended. 23k+

_____________________________






I'm not retreating, I'm attacking in a different direction!

(in reply to caslug)
Post #: 50
RE: Japan a Superpower!!! - 9/2/2004 10:33:34 PM   
DrewMatrix


Posts: 1429
Joined: 7/15/2004
Status: offline
quote:

world record for combat sortie before the war ended. 23k+


Due in part to luck (not being killed) but in large part to the conditions underwhich he flew: Ground attack with a plane that was designed for and used crude Airfields very close to the front. He could rearm and get back to the action so quickly he frequently did 5+ missions a day.

Compare that to a level bomber that spends hours to get from its base to the target.

_____________________________


Beezle - Rapidly running out of altitude, airspeed and ideas.

(in reply to mogami)
Post #: 51
RE: Japan a Superpower!!! - 9/2/2004 11:04:41 PM   
mogami


Posts: 12789
Joined: 8/23/2000
From: You can't get here from there
Status: offline
Hi, Hartmann did not score his first kill till late 1942 but he was not a novice pilot. He had been in the Luftwaffe nearly 2 years when he scored his first kill and in flight training for well over a year. He was trained by combat veterans and flying an aircraft that was far better then the Soviet aircraft he encountered. If the Japanese could keep a few Dutch groups flying Brewsters then they could train pilots.......

_____________________________






I'm not retreating, I'm attacking in a different direction!

(in reply to DrewMatrix)
Post #: 52
RE: Japan a Superpower!!! - 9/2/2004 11:25:24 PM   
UncleBuck

 

Posts: 633
Joined: 10/31/2003
From: San Diego, CA, USA
Status: offline
From "The War in the PAcific from Pearl Harbor to Tokyo Bay"(ISBN 0-89141-616-1) pg. 180 Second Paragraph " Of the fifty-one planes dispatched from Rabul on D-day, only twenty-one returned" ( D-day was the 24 hours of 7August) the Use of Bombs was not to sink the transports, as they had already been reported as unloading supplies and troops. The Bombs were to attack the troops on the beach.

the Japanese lost 30 planes and Crews. Guadalcanal was a black hole for Japanese air, and to some extent USN surface power. This also gutted the Japanese army in the Solomons, caused theire failure at both Milne Bay/Gili-Gili, and Port Moresby. The forces earmarked to take both places had ben re-routed to Canal. At Milne Bay it was also another blunder, underestimation of the sizeof the allied force there, but they ahd not many more troops to commit. The Japanese also did not have enough air power to have complete supremecy in both teh Solomon islands and Papua.

UB

_____________________________


(in reply to caslug)
Post #: 53
RE: Japan a Superpower!!! - 9/3/2004 12:44:53 AM   
caslug

 

Posts: 48
Joined: 8/19/2004
Status: offline
Several historian(Eric Bergerud being one) have made a case that the Japanese biggest mistake was trying to do things on the cheap EVEN when they had the resources to commit And not taking enough risk(especially the tops guys-admirals). Always ante up just enough to stay in the game. The IJN had overwhelming superiority in surface ships(BB&CA) why didn't they commit more than 4 Fast BB to the Solomon(they had couple more at Truk)? They were so obsess with saving those units for the BIG Jutland battle. Halsey committ his only two BB in the theater to solomons and history rewarded him with a victory (sunk the 2nd Jap BB).

Nimitz understood that Midway was a calculate risk, he could easily have lost the battle or at least 2 -3 carriers(instead of 1), of course he/King knew that in 43 they would have tons of carrier anyway. But the japanese high command seems to always use just enough to get by. At Savo Island, the Mikawa didn't go for the transports, I can't help but think that Tanaka would have taking advantage of the opp't. Say what you will about the RN/USN but both had a long tradition of charging into a fight against questionable odds and going down fighting. And against conversative opp't like some German/Japanese admirals they pulled it off. Japanese had couple of admirals that were very agressive and good (tanaka & yamaguchi), but their overall commander were lacking.

(in reply to UncleBuck)
Post #: 54
RE: Japan a Superpower!!! - 9/3/2004 12:47:44 AM   
Mr.Frag


Posts: 13410
Joined: 12/18/2002
From: Purgatory
Status: offline
quote:

But the japanese high command seems to always use just enough to get by.


No choice. Japan didn't have the fuel to be creative.

#1 problem - no fuel to train pilots.
#2 problem - no fuel to use their navy as they saw fit.

Tough to be creative when you have no go-go juice.

(in reply to caslug)
Post #: 55
RE: Jap Carrier Pilot Replacement - too low!! - 9/3/2004 3:08:11 AM   
Twotribes


Posts: 6929
Joined: 2/15/2002
From: Jacksonville NC
Status: offline
So if Japan has 60 Navy flyers every month, how many American pilots to the navy did you add, they only get 60 to start, are you saying that the Japanese could replace pilots the same as the Americans?

(in reply to tsimmonds)
Post #: 56
RE: Japan a Superpower!!! - 9/3/2004 6:32:50 AM   
Brady


Posts: 10701
Joined: 10/25/2002
From: Oregon,USA
Status: offline
"The Japanese Navy's losses in aircrew at PH and Coral SeA constituted about 1/3 of their annual output of carrier trained pilots"

During the war their outpit skyrocketed,while this may of represented prewar out put it certainly did not represent war time out put.

Below are some excerpts from previous posts on this subject all are my own words or quoted passages from books:

The Myth is that the Japanese had during the war very low numbers of piolets and very porly trained ones.

The reality is that initialy they had a slow perioud during the first year of the war whear they had piolets coming off the training line at prewar pace, then later in the first year 42, we see the ramping up of the programe, and then what was for Japan large numbers of piolets becoming available..then a Boom in numbers..somthing like slow...fast...warp drive..then very slow (Late 45).

Skill leval was good Beter than the west, then on par with the west then not so good.

This is a simplifacation to be shure but prety much how it happened, like many things were fighting an uphill battle aganst what has been for many years commonly preceived to be true of somthing that has to do with Japan in WW2.

From the Book, Imperial Japanese Naval Aviator 1937-45 by Osama Tagaya:


p.9: "During the 1937-45 war , some 18,900 Yokern of all classses were killed in action out of 241,463 entering trainess. (This figure does not include the old Sohren programe priour to its incorperation into the Hei-Class Yokaren, or any of he commissioned Officer programs)

Most all Japanese Naval avators were enlistedmen.

"In retrospect the IJN maintained a rigorously exclusive policy in it's avaitor programe for to long. The otsu Yokaren admitded little more than 200men anualy up to 1938, and class size did not excead 1,000 untill may 1941. Otsu Yokaren Class No. 19 of December 1942 still had only 1,500 recutes. The figure then sudenly Jumped to 2,951 in the following Class No. 20 of May 1943. Among the Ko Yokaren by far the largest of the Yokaren programs , anual class sizes remained in the 250-260 range for most of the China War perioud. Numbers did not excead 1,000 until class No. 10 od Aprial 1942. A year later Class no. 12 counted 3,215, divided into three groups. The figure then exploded to almost 28,000 in class No. 13, divided into two groups in Otc. and Dec. 43."

"The Leveal of piolet skill remained High throught most of 1943"

"In 44 Carrier piolets were being introduced to flight deck landing with barely 150 hours flying time under their belts."

Japanese Naval Airmen who were the product of Pre war and early war traing were exceptionaly well trained, it would be fair and accurate to say that those trained in the mid war period were still very well trained and then those in the late war period were only trained. Pre war anywhear from 500(priour to the China war) to 200(during and after, up to 44 when it went down to 150) hours was normal for piolet traing priour to Being introduced to Carrier landings.

...........................

Apendix C

Naval Fighter Piolets(By Class)

1. This table shows all Naval piolets who have specialized in fighters from the day that Naval avation was boarn through the Pacific war, aranged by class. Because of the fact that the Oficial records are not complete, we enlisted the help of many other people. It was not posable to prepare a complete list as such; in adation, because of page limations, the following have been omited: 40th class [also 41st and 42nd], Avation Student Course; Hei 7th class; Ko 8th class; Otsu 14th class; and classes after the 12th class, flight reserve student course.

2. Marks following the names have the following meaning:(H) Honors reciepent, (K) Killed in actioj, and (A) Accedential deth.

3. Parentheses around a name indicate piolets who changed from specialising in one type of aircraft to another. In 1936, with the seperation of the land atack forces,a large number of personnel changed to a diferent brach.

4. Piolets who converted from other specialities to that of fighter piolet are grouped together, at the end of each class listing. from the middel od the Pacific War on their were a large number of personel who converted from seaplane fighters and from two seat recon-float planes.

5. Piolets of Night fighters and flaot fighters units are not included.

6. Designations of types of aircraft are in acordance with practices of the perioud: Carier based planes, seaplanes, ect...

..................

The book then goes into the listings for each clase example:

Hei 6th Class (flight trainee course 23rd class) (September 1942; Omura Air Groupe, graduates, twenity seven persons, Tokushima Airgroupe graduates 30 persons, Oita Air Groupe graduates, unknow number)

Hideo Iijima (K)
Tokio I-ishi (K)
Kane-ichi Ishi-i (A)
..........The list goes to name all these men...they ALL died, all but 4 in combat, the 4 were accendital deths.

This is just one class and a small one at that, another example:

54th Class (May 1941; Oita Air Groupe graduates, carrier fighter, twenity one persons)

55th Class (JUly 1941 Oita Air groupe graduates carrier fighters 9 persons)

56 th class ( (July 1941; Oita Air groupe graduates, carrier fighters, ninteen persons.)

So as you can just so far their were different names for the piolet training progame, and different clases running concurently, and as the preface above notes not all those are included hearin, and of those running not all the info is avilable.

Another example:

Otsu 11th class:

(21st class of flight trainee course; July 42 graduates 14 persons)

(23rd Class September 42 graduates Oita Air Groupe 48 persons.)

........

Ko 6th Class (July 1942 graduates of 21st class flight traniee, carrier fighters 41 persons)

All but two of this class KIA.

.......

Yo 11th Class November 43, total of all types 85 persons, and 37 Carrier fighter persons.

......

OK, as you can see it is complex and confuing at best to decifier, these clases ran concurently and their were different programes, the Yo for example were I beelave reserve piolet trainies, though asigned to front line units...Then we have the List's:


....................

Their is on several pages a totaled list of piplets trained for various periouds, example:


Ko 13(class)

28,111(graduates)

Oct. 43-July 44 (time frame)

38-42 (Classes)


Now that is one of the biger ones, their are as I say several pages of such listings.

......................

Some quick and shoty math generates a figure aproaching 2500 per month on average for the 8 years, this would of been much higher for the mid war perioud of course. And again this figure is not inclusive of all the programs in this time frame that fed piolets into the Navy, Officers came from other programs for example. These men were also funneled into the Following training programs specificaly geared toward their fininal assinements, Atack planes (Kats, Jills, ect), Dive Bombers, Fighters,Float planes, Ea planes, Land Atack Planes (Bettys, Nells,Peggys, ect...).

Some further coments on this insainly high figure:

A couple things to remember hear as we discuss this:

2500 is a rough estimate of the NAVY (Not Army)aircrew, it only refers to new inducties, not those drawn from withen the service as many were, nore the Oficers who were trained seperatly:

p.9: "During the 1937-45 war , some 18,900 Yokern of all classses were killed in action out of 241,463 entering trainess. (This figure does not include the old Sohren programe priour to its incorperation into the Hei-Class Yokaren, or any of he commissioned Officer programs"

About 20% of the entering number did not finish the programe in the prewar years, howeaver it should be noted that Pre war traing included up two 3 years of schooling before Flight traing was undertaken, during the war it was was around 1 year of classes before the flight traing was undertaken(and most admited made it). Pre war 200 to 500 hours of flight traing was the norm before the trainie was sent to a unit. During the war this was around 200 unit till 44 then it droped to about 150 hours. Also apon entering flight traing the men were divided into specific traing groups for the plane type they were to fly, Float plane, Atack, Fighter, ect...

The flight training part of their education lasted for 10 to 12 months, during which they got on avaerage 200 hours of flight time, the first 6 months was on initial flight traing whil the last 6 was on operationaly types advanced training. This was the routine in 41 (12 months on average) and in 42 and 43 (10 months on average). In 44 it droped to about 6 months of traing on average.

It should also be Noted that WiTP does not model the entire Japanese ecenomy, we dont have to bother witth the traing of Calvery troops and the nightmear that feading all those horses and acquiring them was, nore the traing of tank crews, paratroppers ect...

............


"still, for the planes, it was the fuel that made the planes top rate, weak, shoddy fuel, does not make a high performence plane (lots of reports on how the ground crew, used buckets to pore gas into the planes, what ever was in the bucket, was also in the fuel tanks) "

This is not entirely the case German planes as an example did not run on High octane fuel, their have been some very informative posts int he past regarding this Lemurs did some very good stuff on this, in a nut shell it depeneds on the fuel type the plane was designed to run on if designed to run a lower octane fuel at peak preformance a higher octaine fule is not going to realy give it a boost in preformance, do a search for the Ki-84 and Lemurs.

"test reports in the states, were getting 30-50 MPH more, then they were seeing in combat "

Again I beleave this had more to do with the condation of plane and not the fuel see the abve search tip thier is more on this their.

"and the landing gear was not a hassle that was corrected later, it was a hassle that was caused by the way the planes were being made "

Take the George for example, the N1K1 had a mid wing designe and very long landing gear that was complex and notiourios for being problem matic, the revised the airframe in the N1K2 and the landing gear changed as a result and the issue was largely stoped, thuse it was corected later...

"at least 2 of the testers has stated that, you are getting too many replacement pilots to start with, looks like the designers and the testers are somewhat in the same place as to how many should be given "

While it may be that initialy the Japanese are geting a few to many, these figurs are based to a degree on battles that the player may never fight, if you speaking from day one and refering to just those piolets available right before the war started you may well be corect, I personaly dont have a source that say they were short on day one, though I dont have reasion to question this at present, howeaver if you look above you will see that did not last to long, espichaly if you remove the losses from the batles that occured historicaly, given this they should have plenty of piolets and well trained ones at that.

"ahhh, what late war CV pilots ? why were they training CV pilots for ? you need CV's to put them on "

The Japanese had several fleat CV's in 44.


................

" flying an aircraft that was far better then the Soviet aircraft he encountered"

Many Russian fighters were Better in many ways than the The German fighters, particularly the La-5's and La-7's, if memory serves Hartman got 7 P-51's in one day at Polistie.

_____________________________





Beta Team Member for:

WPO
PC
CF
AE
WiTE

Obi-wan Kenobi said it best: A lot of the reality we perceive depend on our point of view

(in reply to tsimmonds)
Post #: 57
RE: Japan a Superpower!!! - 9/3/2004 7:03:25 AM   
joliverlay

 

Posts: 635
Joined: 1/28/2003
Status: offline
OK

Here is something from another source:

"The Imperial Navy had about 1,500 pilots in late 1941, including men who had graduated from flight school but not yet completed training. In fact in Decmeber 1941 there were not enought qualified pilots to man all available aircraft, which included about 550 on active carriers, plus another 100 or so on a new escort carrier and two light carriers still working up, plus some hundreds of floatplanes on battleships....(etc.).....for a total of about 2,210 aircraft"

"On the eve of the war a man needed a minimum of 700 hours of flight time to qualify as a full-fledged pilot in the Imperial Navy......"

"However the Japanese pilot training program was so rigorous that only about 100 men a year were being qualified, in a program that required fifty to sixty-four months to complete, depending on education on entry (high-school grads versus elementary school grads)."

"The 29 pilots lost at Pearl Harbor represented more than a quarter of the annual crop".


From Victory at Sea, Dunnigian and Nofi

OK....here is my take on this. The Japanese realized after Dec 7th (the expansion of pilot training was rejected in 1940!) to expand training. If you increase your incomming crop of new pilots you don't increase the number of graduates for MORE THAN FOUR YEARS. I don't disupt that there were large numbers of graduates from the schools you cite...what I suspect is some of these numbers in 1942 are either incomming numbers (because we know the pre war numbers) or they are graduates of the ground schools. It takes a LONG TIME to get 700 hours of training.

I think the missing pilots on the CVs heading for Midway show that they Japanese were already short of pilots before Midway. Yes they greatly increased training, but none of these new pilots could have finished before 1944, even if you drastically shortened the training program. Remember, in 1941 they were taking 50 to 64 months to train a IJN pilot!!!

(in reply to Brady)
Post #: 58
RE: Japan a Superpower!!! - 9/3/2004 7:07:00 AM   
joliverlay

 

Posts: 635
Joined: 1/28/2003
Status: offline
More Information:

Year Flying Hours to Qualify for Combat

(in reply to joliverlay)
Post #: 59
RE: Japan a Superpower!!! - 9/3/2004 7:11:17 AM   
joliverlay

 

Posts: 635
Joined: 1/28/2003
Status: offline
Sorry for incomplete post....keyboard enter error


Flying Hours to Qualfiy For Combat (from Victory at Sea)

Year USN IJN
1941 305 700
1942 305 700
1943 500 500
1944 525 275
1945 525 90

Japanese plans to drop some of the non-flying education component certinly shortened the training time in 1942 and 1942, but it would still take at least two years before the change would be felt.

(in reply to joliverlay)
Post #: 60
Page:   <<   < prev  1 [2] 3   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Current Games From Matrix.] >> [World War II] >> War In The Pacific - Struggle Against Japan 1941 - 1945 >> RE: Japan a Superpower!!! Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

1.063