How is the game coming along?

Matrix Games Forums

Forums Register Login Photo Gallery Member List Search Calendars FAQ

My Profile Inbox Address Book My Subscription My Forums Log Out

How is the game coming along?

View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest

Users viewing this topic: none

Printable Version

All Forums >> [General] >> General Discussion >> How is the game coming along?

Page: [1]

Message

<< Older Topic Newer Topic >>

How is the game coming along? - 7/1/2000 2:30:00 PM

varjager

Posts: 358
Joined: 3/25/2000
From: sweden
Status: offline

Just nosy how the game is coming along?

_____________________________

Post #: 1

- 2/16/2001 1:55:00 PM

chanman

Posts: 84
Joined: 1/4/2001
From: Westminster, Colorado, U.S.A.
Status: offline

I thought that I would renew the question of "how is the game going?" I understand UV is apparently on the front burner so to speak, but I haven't seen any updates.

_____________________________

"As God is my witness, I thought that turkeys could fly"

(in reply to varjager)

Post #: 2

- 2/16/2001 3:11:00 PM

Ed Cogburn

Posts: 1979
Joined: 7/24/2000
From: Greeneville, Tennessee - GO VOLS!
Status: offline

quote:

Originally posted by chanman: I thought that I would renew the question of "how is the game going?" I understand UV is apparently on the front burner so to speak, but I haven't seen any updates.

It'll be ready when its ready. Let them work on it.

_____________________________

(in reply to varjager)

Post #: 3

- 2/17/2001 4:06:00 AM

silkworm

Posts: 135
Joined: 8/18/2000
From: Walnut Creek, CA
Status: offline

Some how I can imagine Matrix putting up a better PR effort.

_____________________________

Kirby Zhang
Creator of Cityscape,
Online City Simulation

(in reply to varjager)

Post #: 4

- 2/17/2001 4:37:00 AM

Joel Billings

Posts: 32265
Joined: 9/20/2000
From: Santa Rosa, CA
Status: offline

Development is going full steam ahead. I wouldn't expect there will be anything more to show for at least 1-2 months, but that's my personal opinion and Matrix may have something in mind that I don't know about. Uncommon Valor is definitely on the front burner and we're making progress (even if that's not publicly visible at the moment). Joel

_____________________________

All understanding comes after the fact.
-- Soren Kierkegaard

(in reply to varjager)

Post #: 5

- 2/17/2001 3:34:00 PM

Ed Cogburn

Posts: 1979
Joined: 7/24/2000
From: Greeneville, Tennessee - GO VOLS!
Status: offline

quote:

Originally posted by silkworm: Some how I can imagine Matrix putting up a better PR effort.

You mean answering the regular "How's it coming along guys" question that shows up over and over again? Thats not PR, its a waste of time, time better spent writing UV code.

_____________________________

(in reply to varjager)

Post #: 6

- 2/18/2001 11:43:00 AM

silkworm

Posts: 135
Joined: 8/18/2000
From: Walnut Creek, CA
Status: offline

It's a question of how you relate to your customer base, and where customer service, pre-release as well as post-release, fits into your corporate philosophy. Is Matrix about putting code into users' hands, and nothing more? Or is it about giving gamers a comprehensive experience, beginning with anticipation for the product?

_____________________________

Kirby Zhang
Creator of Cityscape,
Online City Simulation

(in reply to varjager)

Post #: 7

- 2/18/2001 11:57:00 AM

silkworm

Posts: 135
Joined: 8/18/2000
From: Walnut Creek, CA
Status: offline

quote:

Originally posted by Joel Billings: Development is going full steam ahead. I wouldn't expect there will be anything more to show for at least 1-2 months, but that's my personal opinion and Matrix may have something in mind that I don't know about. Uncommon Valor is definitely on the front burner and we're making progress (even if that's not publicly visible at the moment). Joel

Thank you, Joel.

_____________________________

Kirby Zhang
Creator of Cityscape,
Online City Simulation

(in reply to varjager)

Post #: 8

- 2/18/2001 8:16:00 PM

Ed Cogburn

Posts: 1979
Joined: 7/24/2000
From: Greeneville, Tennessee - GO VOLS!
Status: offline

quote:

Originally posted by silkworm: It's a question of how you relate to your customer base, and where customer service, pre-release as well as post-release, fits into your corporate philosophy. Is Matrix about putting code into users' hands, and nothing more? Or is it about giving gamers a comprehensive experience, beginning with anticipation for the product?

Huh? What customer service exists before the product itself even exists? Building "Anticipation for the product" sounds like advertising (not a "customer service" in my book), which is what much of Matrix's website is for, except that the forums are changing daily, meaning the developers have to monitor the forums daily. That is time the developers could be working on the products they're website is "advertising". However, advertising is not some radically new idea. Any computer game magazine is stuffed with advertising for mediocre products. I don't want Matrix to go the old tired route. Hire some PR dude to do the handholding on the forums and please keep the developers WORKING ON THE GAME. This is in Matrix's best interest, and thus our best interest, as they need positive cash flow. [This message has been edited by Ed Cogburn (edited February 18, 2001).]

_____________________________

(in reply to varjager)

Post #: 9

- 2/18/2001 11:13:00 PM

David Heath

Posts: 3274
Joined: 3/29/2000
From: Staten Island NY
Status: offline

Guys Let me jump in here. There is no doubt the our site is to help promote our games. It also serves as a place were gamers can find out information about our games. On the forum issue we feel as a company and as developers it is VERY important that we go to the forums. We get good ideas, let the gamers know what we are working on. In a way it really allows the public to help us develop the game. SPWaW is a great example of this. We are behind on some new screenshots and we are working on this. I hope this clears that up and keep your posts coming. David Heath

_____________________________

(in reply to varjager)

Post #: 10

- 2/18/2001 11:40:00 PM

Supervisor

Posts: 5166
Joined: 3/2/2004
Status: offline

I don't think you can fault people for being anxious about a new game coming out. I know you guys are very busy & don't want to take away from your valuable time but this might be a relatively painless suggestion. How about including in the individual forum sections a thread under the heading of "Updates"? This way the designers could keep us informed (when there's something worthwhile to post) & the unread post will show up when the reader logs on. Maybe this way the designers (& others!) won't be getting bugged all the time asking for updates. Then again, maybe all this is covered in the the "News" section, but I usually jump right into the forums before I look at the news section. Thanks for listening.

_____________________________

(in reply to varjager)

Post #: 11

- 2/19/2001 12:46:00 AM

Paul Goodman

Posts: 198
Joined: 7/5/2000
From: Portsmouth, VA, USA
Status: offline

Ed, I have to disagree with you. In order to produce a product, whether it is a Widget or a design or software, it is necessary to define when it is finished. Otherwise, I assure you, it will never be finished. It is also necessary to be goal oriented, particularly in so large a project. That goal must include a completion date. I find it perfectly reasonable to ask "what is your completion goal?" I am sure that Matrix would be more than happy to respond to these questions, if they could. But, lets face it, GG is now the driving force for these games. And GG, for better or for worse, does not correspond with the teeming masses. One might reasonably question whether GG corresponds with Matrix. He might just say "It will be ready when its ready." Paul

_____________________________

(in reply to varjager)

Post #: 12

- 2/19/2001 2:46:00 AM

David Heath

Posts: 3274
Joined: 3/29/2000
From: Staten Island NY
Status: offline

Paul Your a little off here. Our staff talks to not only Gary, but Joel and Keith almost daily. Let me also say that any release date or delays in the game are MY choice. I have made a policy that I will not state a release date until I am ready. When am I ready? About 60 days or less from public release. I will give you a clue and say late summer early fall and then only if I feel its ready. We will be updating the site as soon as we nail down a few more issues. If you are one of those gamers that have played a game designed by Gary before you know the level of detail that goes into his designs. This game by far exceeds any of his older games. So please give us the space we need to give you want you want. We are not saying anything because we don't want to but more because we are still under the hood working. David [This message has been edited by David Heath (edited February 18, 2001).]

_____________________________

(in reply to varjager)

Post #: 13

- 2/19/2001 6:35:00 PM

Recon_slith

Posts: 116
Joined: 4/3/2000
From: Adelaide, Australia
Status: offline

The regular responses by Matrix to the board are what makes it the place it is today - an interesting place to visit. If lack of response on noticeboards is an indication of effort then Talonsoft must have the hardest grafting boys in the business(!) Lets not start down that route by discouraging replies. ------------------ Reality sucks, but it's all we have. Recon

_____________________________

Let me make the superstitions of a nation and I care not who makes its laws or its songs either.
-- Mark Twain

(in reply to varjager)

Post #: 14

- 2/19/2001 9:41:00 PM

Ed Cogburn

Posts: 1979
Joined: 7/24/2000
From: Greeneville, Tennessee - GO VOLS!
Status: offline

quote:

Originally posted by Paul Goodman: Ed, I have to disagree with you. In order to produce a product, whether it is a Widget or a design or software, it is necessary to define when it is finished.

Paul, we're not talking about goals here. The ones asking the "how's it going" question aren't interested in goals, only when the game will be released. They don't care about design issues, or the methodology behind when David declares a game ready to ship. If David can manage his time to do the important work, along with answering these repeated questions in about a dozen forums he has to monitor then great. I know how much time this is taking because like you I bet, I visit 4-6 forums on a daily basis. If the time becomes tight though, I hope they'll choose to put the game over making regular visits to the forums just to keep us talkative types happy.

[This message has been edited by Ed Cogburn (edited February 19, 2001).]

_____________________________

(in reply to varjager)

Post #: 15

- 2/20/2001 12:50:00 AM

Elvis1965

Posts: 46
Joined: 2/2/2001
Status: offline

Mr David Heath, If I read you right, I like your approach-- "ready when it's ready." FAR TOO MANY PC GAMES in today's world are driven by the marketing department and not the developers! Thus, we get games that DO NOT have all their "advertised" bells-and-whistles, crash constantly, or generally suck. Loading patch version 43.17g about eight months after the release date is a little tedious. Patches will always exist; but most companies sell products that are more "beta" level crap than "gold" level polish.

_____________________________

(in reply to varjager)

Post #: 16

- 2/20/2001 11:45:00 AM

David Heath

Posts: 3274
Joined: 3/29/2000
From: Staten Island NY
Status: offline

Thanks... I must say we do release a lot of patches but that is because I do not think the public should wait months for us to make a BIG patch. Gamers are trying to play the game NOW. They need the patch now to get the most out of the game. If it takes 3 patches of three months compared to 1 big patch three months later. I will always go for the patch a month route. David

_____________________________

(in reply to varjager)

Post #: 17

- 2/21/2001 3:34:00 AM

chanman

Posts: 84
Joined: 1/4/2001
From: Westminster, Colorado, U.S.A.
Status: offline

Didn't mean to raise a ruckus. A simple "we are on schedule" type of answer was all I was looking for. I certainly wasn't asking for a detailed breakdown of progress to date, accompanied by gant charts and deliverables. I was concerned by the "staleness" of the News link on the UV main page.

_____________________________

"As God is my witness, I thought that turkeys could fly"

(in reply to varjager)

Post #: 18

- 2/22/2001 8:30:00 PM

Paul Goodman

Posts: 198
Joined: 7/5/2000
From: Portsmouth, VA, USA
Status: offline

Chanman No backing down from your reasonable question! You know very well that a statement of "we are on schedule" imparts absolutely no information if you don't know the schedule. All we are looking for is an expected availability, 2nd quarter, 2005 or such. What for? It'll be ready when its ready. Better late than buggy. Hey, I heard all this for 4 years with RtM. The bottom line is that if this is 2 years away, we might agitate for another update of PW. Paul

_____________________________

(in reply to varjager)

Post #: 19

- 2/23/2001 12:46:00 AM

David Heath

Posts: 3274
Joined: 3/29/2000
From: Staten Island NY
Status: offline

HAHAH ok guys... look this is a fun forum for wargamers. We are very close to being on time. We are working on the interface and some advance features. None of this is done. Gary is back in the code and Mike is improving the interface. I will have some new screen shots shortly. Lets now forget about the time line and go back to talking about questions on the game. We will be having a live chat soon to talk about this and War in the Pacific.... and no date has been set.

_____________________________

(in reply to varjager)

Post #: 20