Matrix Games Forums

Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

RE: THEY WERE EXPENDABLE: Nagumo vs Spruance PBEM

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [Current Games From Matrix.] >> [World War II] >> War In The Pacific - Struggle Against Japan 1941 - 1945 >> After Action Reports >> RE: THEY WERE EXPENDABLE: Nagumo vs Spruance PBEM Page: <<   < prev  11 12 [13] 14 15   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: THEY WERE EXPENDABLE: Nagumo vs Spruance PBEM - 8/28/2005 3:13:45 AM   
racndoc


Posts: 2519
Joined: 10/29/2004
From: Newport Coast, California
Status: offline
SITUATION REPORT: 11-12-43


SEAC: BATTLE FOR BANDOU

75,000 Allied troops launch a deliberate attack on 22,000 IJA. At 3:1 odds, the fortifications are reduced to level one and another attack is ordered for tomorrow.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to Capt. Harlock)
Post #: 361
RE: THEY WERE EXPENDABLE: Nagumo vs Spruance PBEM - 8/29/2005 5:38:21 AM   
racndoc


Posts: 2519
Joined: 10/29/2004
From: Newport Coast, California
Status: offline
SITUATION REPORT: 11-13-43


SEAC:

Allies liberate Bandou in a 12:1 attack and force the IJA to retreat towards Songkhia. Meanwhile IJA units manage to cross the river from Bangkok to invest Allied units without having to conduct a shock attack.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to racndoc)
Post #: 362
RE: THEY WERE EXPENDABLE: Nagumo vs Spruance PBEM - 8/30/2005 7:12:52 AM   
racndoc


Posts: 2519
Joined: 10/29/2004
From: Newport Coast, California
Status: offline
SITUATION REPORT: 11-19-43 SWPAC: INVASION OF WOLEAI...D-DAY MINUS 2


CV and land based aircraft blast Japanese troops on Woleai as the assault ships plod forward from New Guinea.







Attachment (1)

(in reply to racndoc)
Post #: 363
RE: THEY WERE EXPENDABLE: Nagumo vs Spruance PBEM - 8/30/2005 6:12:43 PM   
racndoc


Posts: 2519
Joined: 10/29/2004
From: Newport Coast, California
Status: offline
SWPAC WARPLANS: WINTER 1943


SWPAC will be conducting an offensive into the Ulithi/Palau island group as we approach the end of 1943. To provide air support for this offensive, SWPAC goes ashore at Woleia tomorrow to secure a forward airbase.

Palau will be used as a staging area for the SWPAC offensive into the PI currently scheduled for summer 1944. Ulithi will provide a forward airbase to cover the CENTPAC advance into the Marianas currently scheduled for spring 1944.




Attachment (1)

< Message edited by AdmSpruance -- 8/30/2005 8:35:39 PM >

(in reply to racndoc)
Post #: 364
RE: THEY WERE EXPENDABLE: Nagumo vs Spruance PBEM - 8/30/2005 9:32:38 PM   
racndoc


Posts: 2519
Joined: 10/29/2004
From: Newport Coast, California
Status: offline
SITUATION REPORT: 11-21-43


SWPAC: INVASION OF WOLEAI


After 48 hours of naval bombardment by 12 BBs and 15 CAs and 2 weeks of nearly continuous aerial bombardment by 600+ heavy bombers, the Allies storm ashore today with 2 Infantry Divisions, 2 Infantry Brigades and 2 Armored Batallions. Both sides suffer 1000+ casualties in the resulting shock attack and the Japanese retain control of the base. Allied naval losses are heavy in the assault:






Attachment (1)

(in reply to racndoc)
Post #: 365
RE: THEY WERE EXPENDABLE: Nagumo vs Spruance PBEM - 8/30/2005 10:17:48 PM   
Capt. Harlock


Posts: 5358
Joined: 9/15/2001
From: Los Angeles
Status: offline
quote:

Both sides suffer 1000+ casualties in the resulting shock attack and the Japanese retain control of the base. Allied naval losses are heavy in the assault:


After that kind of pre-invasion pounding? I'm starting to wonder about game's modeling of coast defences.

_____________________________

Civil war? What does that mean? Is there any foreign war? Isn't every war fought between men, between brothers?

--Victor Hugo

(in reply to racndoc)
Post #: 366
RE: THEY WERE EXPENDABLE: Nagumo vs Spruance PBEM - 8/30/2005 10:49:51 PM   
Widell


Posts: 913
Joined: 4/27/2005
From: Trollhättan, Sweden
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Capt. Harlock
After that kind of pre-invasion pounding? I'm starting to wonder about game's modeling of coast defences.


I think the problem is in the modelling of hexes and unit stacking. A hex is a hex is a hex (well, almost at least), and if there´s plenty of troops in the hex, the model won´t care if it´s a piece of rock in the middle of the ocean, or if it´s 60 x 60 km of jungle or grass fields. This also means that the pounding is equal for the piece of rock as well as the jungle hex

Unfortunate but not likely to change(?) with the current game engine. This was discussed in a couple of other threads where the French Frigate Shoals had been turned into somehting close to the De La Guardia Airport and had a large number of B-29 formations based there. There was also a thread where more than 50,000 troops had been based on a barren atoll somewhere . Not only that, but they where being attacked by another 50,000 troops -> More than 100,000 fighting soldier on a coral reef

/Robert

(in reply to Capt. Harlock)
Post #: 367
RE: THEY WERE EXPENDABLE: Nagumo vs Spruance PBEM - 8/31/2005 2:12:40 AM   
Belphegor


Posts: 2209
Joined: 5/10/2004
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Capt. Harlock

quote:

Both sides suffer 1000+ casualties in the resulting shock attack and the Japanese retain control of the base. Allied naval losses are heavy in the assault:


After that kind of pre-invasion pounding? I'm starting to wonder about game's modeling of coast defences.


The pre-invasion pounding did a lot of damage you aren't seeing there. That kind of shipping damage is nothing to the Allied player at this stage of the war. The results of the pre-pounding is the loss of Woleai in two turns.

(in reply to Capt. Harlock)
Post #: 368
RE: THEY WERE EXPENDABLE: Nagumo vs Spruance PBEM - 8/31/2005 8:48:21 PM   
racndoc


Posts: 2519
Joined: 10/29/2004
From: Newport Coast, California
Status: offline
I know that playing the Japanese at this stage in the war is very difficult and its got to be a bummer to be constantly losing bases and retreating......but I think it would be helpful for the readers to see the relative damage caused by both sides weapons in the bombardment model.

My recon showed that the Japanese had 3 units (17,000 troops) on Woleai. Only one unit was a ground unit...the 1st South Seas Detachment . The other 2 units were probably engineer or base units.

Lets start with the naval bombardment first. The Japanese had maybe 6-12 4" and 5" guns max. The Allies had 12 BBs with 100-105 14", 15" and 16" guns. The Allies had 15 CAs with 125-130 8" guns. On the 1st day of bombardment, it looked like the Allied bombardment TFs were getting some pretty good hits.

Here is how my bombardments looked on the 2nd day which was D-Day:

Naval bombardment of Woleai, at 57,72 - Coastal Guns Fire Back!

19 Coastal gun shots fired in defense.
Allied Ships
CA Australia
CA San Francisco
CA Astoria, Shell hits 1
CA Louisville
CA Northampton
BB Alabama
BB Massachusetts
BB Indiana, Shell hits 5
BB Washington

Japanese ground losses:
6 casualties reported

Airbase hits 1
Runway hits 16
Port supply hits 2

Naval bombardment of Woleai, at 57,72

Allied Ships
CL Mauritius
CA Suffolk
CA Salt Lake City
CA Chicago
CA Houston
CA Indianapolis
BC Repulse
BB Warspite
BB Pennsylvania
BB Colorado

Japanese ground losses:
15 casualties reported
Guns lost 2

Airbase supply hits 1
Runway hits 10
Port hits 1
Port supply hits 1

Naval bombardment of Woleai, at 57,72 - Coastal Guns Fire Back!

20 Coastal gun shots fired in defense.
Allied Ships
CL Newcastle
CL Emerald
CL Java
CA Frobisher
CA Cornwall
CA Devonshire
CA Shropshire, Shell hits 8
BB Resolution
BB Royal Sovereign
BB Revenge
BB Valiant

Japanese ground losses:
124 casualties reported
Guns lost 1

Airbase hits 4

So my bombarment TFs killed about 149 troops and 3 guns.

I thought that the Japanese losses were low because there was nothing left but then here was the Japanese coastal defense response:

Coastal Guns at Woleai, 57,72, firing at TF 1292
TF 1292 troops unloading over beach at Woleai, 57,72


614 Coastal gun shots fired in defense.
Allied Ships
DD Nicholas, Shell hits 2, on fire
DD Farenholt
AP Van Cloon
CL Raleigh, Shell hits 2
CL De Ruyter, Shell hits 12
AP Empire Pride
DD Tjerk Hiddes
AP Mount McKinley, Shell hits 1
LCI LCI-331, Shell hits 4
MSW Grebe, Shell hits 8, on fire, heavy damage
LCI LCI-85, Shell hits 3, on fire, heavy damage
LST LST-450, Shell hits 9, on fire, heavy damage
LST LST-34
LST LST-30, Shell hits 1
AP Latimer
AP Wanganella, Shell hits 5, on fire
AP Arthur Middleton, Shell hits 4
AP Crescent City
DD Hammann, Shell hits 4, on fire
AP President Fillmore


Allied ground losses:
4039 casualties reported
Guns lost 7

And again:

Coastal Guns at Woleai, 57,72, firing at TF 1292
TF 1292 troops unloading over beach at Woleai, 57,72


283 Coastal gun shots fired in defense.
Allied Ships
AP Zealandia, Shell hits 1, on fire
AP Dardanus, Shell hits 8, on fire
AP Empire Chivalry
DD Nicholas, Shell hits 2
LST LST-450, Shell hits 1, on fire, heavy damage
AP Westralia
AP Wanganella, Shell hits 8, on fire
DD Arunta, Shell hits 1
AP Sumter, Shell hits 7, on fire, heavy damage

Japanese ground losses:
26 casualties reported

Allied ground losses:
949 casualties reported
Guns lost 4
Vehicles lost 2

At least this time the 17 6", 40 5" and 150 4" and 3" guns in my assault TF caused 26 Japanese casualties.


Now this all occured after 2 weeks of aerial bombardment by 600+ heavy bombers. I forgot to mention that the last 2 days prior to the invasion there were also 450 CV bombers. So on 10/19/43 and 10/20/43 there were 1000+ plane raids......that is starting to get up there with the fire bombing of Hamburg and Dresden and certainly much more than the carpet bombing that preceded Operation Cobra, Operation Goodwood and the assault on Monte Cassino.


The Allies lost 25+ DDs, MSWs, APs and LSTs when they assaulted 30,000 IJA at Port Moresby in May 1943. I can only imagine what awaits at much more heavily defended islands such as Ulithi, Palau, Guam, Tinian, Saipan, Iwo Jima and Okinawa.

Nevertheless, the Allies WILL assault right into the teeth of the Japanese defenses.

(in reply to Belphegor)
Post #: 369
RE: THEY WERE EXPENDABLE: Nagumo vs Spruance PBEM - 8/31/2005 9:23:44 PM   
racndoc


Posts: 2519
Joined: 10/29/2004
From: Newport Coast, California
Status: offline
SITUATION REPORT: 11-22-43


SWPAC: INVASION OF WOLEAI

In another shock attack, 8200 IJA were killed and the Allies took control of the bases on Woleai. A deliberate attack is ordered for tomorrow to mop up.


SEAC:

The Japanese have formed a 50,000 man roadblock at Songkhia. Major air battles rage overhead as both sides fight for air supremacy.

AFTER ACTION REPORTS FOR 11/22/43

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Coastal Guns at Woleai, 57,72, firing at TF 1292
TF 1292 troops unloading over beach at Woleai, 57,72


9 Coastal gun shots fired in defense.
Allied Ships
LST Empire Battleaxe


Allied ground losses:
35 casualties reported

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Naval bombardment of Woleai, at 57,72

Allied Ships
CA Australia
CA San Francisco
CA Astoria
CA Louisville
CA Northampton
BB Alabama
BB Massachusetts
BB Indiana
BB Washington

Japanese ground losses:
57 casualties reported
Guns lost 1

Runway hits 21
Port hits 2
Port supply hits 1

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Naval bombardment of Woleai, at 57,72

Allied Ships
CL Mauritius
CA Suffolk
CA Salt Lake City
CA Chicago
CA Houston
CA Indianapolis
BC Repulse
BB Warspite
BB Pennsylvania
BB Colorado

Japanese ground losses:
20 casualties reported

Airbase supply hits 1
Runway hits 10
Port hits 2
Port supply hits 2

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Naval bombardment of Woleai, at 57,72

Allied Ships
CL Newcastle
CL Emerald
CL Java
CA Frobisher
CA Cornwall
CA Devonshire
CA Shropshire
BB Resolution
BB Royal Sovereign
BB Revenge
BB Valiant

Japanese ground losses:
10 casualties reported

Runway hits 11
Port supply hits 2

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Day Air attack on Woleai , at 57,72


Allied aircraft
F-5C Lightning x 2


No Allied losses

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Day Air attack on 38th Division, at 24,43

Japanese aircraft
A6M5 Zeke x 8
Ki-43-IIa Oscar x 21
Ki-44-IIb Tojo x 3
Ki-61 KAIc Tony x 5

Allied aircraft
Blenheim IV x 20
Liberator VI x 39
P-40N Warhawk x 36
B-25J Mitchell x 26

Japanese aircraft losses
A6M5 Zeke: 1 destroyed, 1 damaged
Ki-43-IIa Oscar: 6 destroyed, 4 damaged
Ki-61 KAIc Tony: 4 destroyed

Allied aircraft losses
Blenheim IV: 3 damaged
Liberator VI: 4 damaged
P-40N Warhawk: 9 destroyed, 3 damaged
B-25J Mitchell: 3 damaged

Japanese ground losses:
158 casualties reported
Guns lost 5


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Day Air attack on 46th Division, at 24,43

Japanese aircraft
A6M5 Zeke x 7
Ki-43-IIa Oscar x 16
Ki-44-IIb Tojo x 3
Ki-61 KAIc Tony x 3

Allied aircraft
Spitfire VIII x 14
Thunderbolt II x 14
Vengeance I x 48
Beaufighter VIC x 44
Beaufort V-IX x 6
P-40N Warhawk x 21

Japanese aircraft losses
A6M5 Zeke: 3 destroyed
Ki-43-IIa Oscar: 15 destroyed
Ki-44-IIb Tojo: 3 destroyed
Ki-61 KAIc Tony: 3 destroyed

Allied aircraft losses
Vengeance I: 2 destroyed, 4 damaged
Beaufighter VIC: 2 destroyed, 3 damaged
P-40N Warhawk: 1 destroyed

Japanese ground losses:
43 casualties reported
Guns lost 1

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Day Air attack on 46th Division, at 24,43

Japanese aircraft
A6M5 Zeke x 4

Allied aircraft
Liberator VI x 24
P-40N Warhawk x 4

Japanese aircraft losses
No Japanese losses

Allied aircraft losses
Liberator VI: 2 damaged

Japanese ground losses:
57 casualties reported


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Day Air attack on 1st South Seas Det. , at 57,72


Allied aircraft
Liberator VI x 11
P-38J Lightning x 55
PB4Y Liberator x 66
B-24D Liberator x 13
B-24J Liberator x 48


No Allied losses

Japanese ground losses:
228 casualties reported
Guns lost 2

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Day Air attack on 1st South Seas Det. , at 57,72


Allied aircraft
P-38J Lightning x 75
F-5C Lightning x 3
PB4Y Liberator x 61
B-24J Liberator x 62


No Allied losses

Japanese ground losses:
212 casualties reported
Guns lost 2

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Day Air attack on 1st South Seas Det. , at 57,72


Allied aircraft
PB4Y Liberator x 16
B-24D Liberator x 23
B-24J Liberator x 62


No Allied losses

Japanese ground losses:
133 casualties reported


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Day Air attack on Woleai , at 57,72


Allied aircraft
F4F-4 Wildcat x 2
FM-2 Wildcat x 4
F6F Hellcat x 74
Hellcat II x 12
F4U-1 Corsair x 6
Barracuda x 6
TBM Avenger x 171
Avenger II x 7


No Allied losses

Japanese ground losses:
5 casualties reported

Port hits 4
Port supply hits 3

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Day Air attack on Woleai , at 57,72


Allied aircraft
F-5C Lightning x 1


Allied aircraft losses
F-5C Lightning: 1 damaged

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Day Air attack on Kwajalein , at 79,79


Allied aircraft
B-24J Liberator x 43


No Allied losses

Japanese ground losses:
39 casualties reported

Port fuel hits 2
Port supply hits 2


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Day Air attack on Ponape , at 71,79

Japanese aircraft
no flights

Allied aircraft
P-38J Lightning x 15
B-25J Mitchell x 98

Japanese aircraft losses
No Japanese losses

Allied aircraft losses
B-25J Mitchell: 2 destroyed, 15 damaged

Japanese ground losses:
80 casualties reported
Guns lost 4

Airbase hits 10
Airbase supply hits 9
Runway hits 71


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Day Air attack on Rabaul , at 61,88


Allied aircraft
F6F Hellcat x 5
P-38J Lightning x 24
A-20G Havoc x 51


Allied aircraft losses
A-20G Havoc: 1 damaged

Japanese ground losses:
20 casualties reported

Runway hits 10
Port hits 4
Port fuel hits 1



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ground combat at Songkhia

Allied Bombardment attack

Attacking force 32735 troops, 313 guns, 0 vehicles

Defending force 50870 troops, 404 guns, 105 vehicles


Japanese ground losses:
99 casualties reported


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ground combat at Woleai

Allied Shock attack

Attacking force 26252 troops, 223 guns, 148 vehicles

Defending force 9739 troops, 2 guns, 0 vehicles

Allied assault odds: 219 to 1 (fort level 1)

Allied forces CAPTURE Woleai base !!!


Japanese ground losses:
8239 casualties reported
Guns lost 5

Allied ground losses:
192 casualties reported
Guns lost 7






Attachment (1)

(in reply to racndoc)
Post #: 370
RE: THEY WERE EXPENDABLE: Nagumo vs Spruance PBEM - 8/31/2005 10:18:26 PM   
Capt. Harlock


Posts: 5358
Joined: 9/15/2001
From: Los Angeles
Status: offline
quote:

The pre-invasion pounding did a lot of damage you aren't seeing there. That kind of shipping damage is nothing to the Allied player at this stage of the war. The results of the pre-pounding is the loss of Woleai in two turns.


As Adm. Spruance points out, he used truly massive firepower -- much more than in any historical invasion. There shouldn't have been much of ANYTHING left. (Note that by the time of the invasion of Okinawa, the Japanese decided not even to contest the landings, since their assets would be chewed up by pre-invasion bombardment.) One question: did Spruance's bombardments reduce the fort level?

_____________________________

Civil war? What does that mean? Is there any foreign war? Isn't every war fought between men, between brothers?

--Victor Hugo

(in reply to Belphegor)
Post #: 371
RE: THEY WERE EXPENDABLE: Nagumo vs Spruance PBEM - 8/31/2005 10:35:05 PM   
AmiralLaurent

 

Posts: 3351
Joined: 3/11/2003
From: Near Paris, France
Status: offline
From my recent experience in PH, vs a base heavily damaged by CD guns:

_ bombardment TFs seem to be engaged first in a battle against CD units. Only if the CD are too weak they may bomb the base and hit ships, AC, base forces and so on.

_ if you have 6 BBs and CD defences are moderate or allready well hurt, it is better to send two bombardment TF in the same phase: one will engage the CD guns only will the other will most of the times "get trough" and blast the base.

_ as shown by experiments reported on this forum sometimes ago, LCUs are not really affected by naval bombardments. The problem is that when you land troops in an enemy hex every gun (CD or not) will fire on ships and troops. So you can pound an island for days and no more draw CD gun fire and then land in face of two divisions and receive 2000 shells...

By the way in the Woelai example, AdmSpruance BB probably didn't receive now ammo after the first day of bombarment. IJN BBs have nine "shells" per big gun and will fire 6 on the first bombardment run, and then their firepower will be greatly reduced. I guess Allied BB do the same.

The main bonus of naval (or air bombardment) is to destroy supply and support squads in the attacked base, then LCUs need extra support squads and supplies to fight efficiently.

(in reply to Capt. Harlock)
Post #: 372
RE: THEY WERE EXPENDABLE: Nagumo vs Spruance PBEM - 9/1/2005 4:06:38 AM   
Belphegor


Posts: 2209
Joined: 5/10/2004
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Capt. Harlock

quote:

The pre-invasion pounding did a lot of damage you aren't seeing there. That kind of shipping damage is nothing to the Allied player at this stage of the war. The results of the pre-pounding is the loss of Woleai in two turns.


As Adm. Spruance points out, he used truly massive firepower -- much more than in any historical invasion. There shouldn't have been much of ANYTHING left. (Note that by the time of the invasion of Okinawa, the Japanese decided not even to contest the landings, since their assets would be chewed up by pre-invasion bombardment.) One question: did Spruance's bombardments reduce the fort level?


It did not reduce the fort level. On the other hand it didn't need to (not saying it should or should not have, just providing info). I have a fort level 9. I had at least an entire Bde on the island. IN the first turn Allied landing shock attack the fort was reduced to level 1 and I lost all units completely except for the Bde which was pretty much completely disrupted and demoralized, and over 1/2 disabled troops of all elements.

(in reply to Capt. Harlock)
Post #: 373
RE: THEY WERE EXPENDABLE: Nagumo vs Spruance PBEM - 9/1/2005 5:10:31 PM   
racndoc


Posts: 2519
Joined: 10/29/2004
From: Newport Coast, California
Status: offline
SITUATION REPORT: 11-27-43


SWPAC:

SWPAC bombers start working over the next amphibious assault targets at Palau and Ulithi by taking out the airfields:

Day Air attack on Palau , at 52,67

Japanese aircraft
no flights

Allied aircraft
PBY Catalina x 5
P-38J Lightning x 23
PB4Y Liberator x 20
B-24D Liberator x 25
B-24J Liberator x 83

Japanese aircraft losses
C5M Babs: 4 destroyed
E13A1 Jake: 1 destroyed

Allied aircraft losses
B-24J Liberator: 4 damaged

Japanese ground losses:
53 casualties reported
Guns lost 2

Airbase hits 10
Airbase supply hits 3
Runway hits 66

Day Air attack on Ulithi , at 55,67


Allied aircraft
PB4Y Liberator x 105
B-24J Liberator x 69


Allied aircraft losses
PB4Y Liberator: 1 destroyed, 1 damaged

Japanese ground losses:
99 casualties reported
Guns lost 1

Airbase hits 9
Airbase supply hits 10
Runway hits 68


SEAC:

After getting thrown out of Krung Thep and back across the river a few weeks ago, SEAC forces cross the river upstream from Krung Thep and now 9 divisions threaten an end run around Japanese defenses to cut off Bangkok. Only the IJA 104th Division stands in the way. SEAC bombers hit the 104th:

Day Air attack on 104th Division, at 30,40


Allied aircraft
Beaufighter VIC x 28
P-40N Warhawk x 23
B-25J Mitchell x 63


No Allied losses

Japanese ground losses:
211 casualties reported
Guns lost 7

And again:

Day Air attack on 104th Division, at 30,40


Allied aircraft
Liberator VI x 9
Beaufighter Mk 21 x 58


No Allied losses

Japanese ground losses:
186 casualties reported
Guns lost 4

The 104th Division attempts a desperate counterattack only to suffer heavy losses:

Ground combat at 30,40

Japanese Shock attack

Attacking force 17966 troops, 95 guns, 0 vehicles

Defending force 22529 troops, 173 guns, 0 vehicles

Japanese assault odds: 0 to 1


Japanese ground losses:
910 casualties reported
Guns lost 11

Allied ground losses:
7 casualties reported

In Malaya, the Japanese try to slow the SEAC offensive by sending a surface TF into Victoria Point harbor to work over Allied shipping. Allied shipping retreats out of harms way but Allied bombers from Victoria Point and Tavoy make the IJN surface raiders pay the next day as a CL and 6 DDs are heavily damaged:

Day Air attack on TF at 24,40


Allied aircraft
Blenheim IV x 3
Liberator VI x 11
B-25J Mitchell x 9


Allied aircraft losses
Blenheim IV: 1 damaged
Liberator VI: 2 damaged

Japanese Ships
CL Isuzu, Bomb hits 2

And again:

Day Air attack on TF at 24,40


Allied aircraft
Blenheim IV x 23
Liberator VI x 53
B-25J Mitchell x 26


Allied aircraft losses
Blenheim IV: 2 damaged
Liberator VI: 5 damaged
B-25J Mitchell: 2 damaged

Japanese Ships
CL Isuzu, Bomb hits 9, on fire, heavy damage
DD Satsuki, Bomb hits 2, on fire, heavy damage
DD Akebono
DD Asagiri
DD Kamikaze
DD Makinami

And again:
Day Air attack on TF at 24,40


Allied aircraft
Blenheim IV x 3
Liberator VI x 34
B-25J Mitchell x 30


Allied aircraft losses
Liberator VI: 1 damaged
B-25J Mitchell: 1 destroyed, 1 damaged

Japanese Ships
DD Akebono, Bomb hits 6, on fire, heavy damage
DD Asagiri, Bomb hits 1
DD Kamikaze, Bomb hits 1, on fire
DD Hamakaze, Bomb hits 3, on fire
DD Makinami, Bomb hits 1, on fire

And again:

Day Air attack on TF at 24,40


Allied aircraft
Blenheim IV x 9


No Allied losses

Japanese Ships
CL Isuzu, Bomb hits 1, on fire, heavy damage

Aircraft Attacking:
1 x Blenheim IV bombing at 6000 feet
4 x Blenheim IV bombing at 6000 feet
4 x Blenheim IV bombing at 6000 feet

Both sides reinforce at Songkhia for the upcoming battle as the Allies have now massed 7 arty regiments and 6 armored regiments:

Ground combat at Songkhia

Allied Bombardment attack

Attacking force 53724 troops, 488 guns, 959 vehicles

Defending force 51201 troops, 419 guns, 114 vehicles


Japanese ground losses:
153 casualties reported
Guns lost 1






Attachment (1)

(in reply to racndoc)
Post #: 374
RE: THEY WERE EXPENDABLE: Nagumo vs Spruance PBEM - 9/1/2005 6:15:28 PM   
spence

 

Posts: 5400
Joined: 4/20/2003
From: Vancouver, Washington
Status: offline
It is too bad that naval bombardment was modelled upon a single bombardment by IJN BBs at Guadalcanal. I can't name any instance where the IJN actually conducted an assault landing upon a well fortified beach under cover of naval guns.
IJN landings hit essentially undefended or very weakly held coastline, suffering only the perils of the wind and seas in opposition. Almost by the same token CD effects seem to have been modelled on Wake's brief moment of glory (12/11/41) wherein the American defenders dinged up an IJN bombardment/invasion force which itself possessed little firepower and no direct air support.
Naval bombardment should have been modelled on the Allied methods wherein large numbers of ships engaged in suppressive fire and FO's called in direct fire by ships and a/c on particularly troublesome enemy positions. Correct me if I am wrong but in one of the hardest fought assault landings Tarawa's 8" guns were unable to inflict any harm on the invasion fleet itself. It's CD units knocked out lots of LTVs and landing craft but no large ships. The Japanese CD artillery positions were all but completely suppressed. Thus the Marines were able to reinforce their tenuous beachhead and eventually overcome the defense.

Since (probably) large amounts of code would have to be completely rewritten I guess there is no chance of seeing a better model for either situation.


(in reply to racndoc)
Post #: 375
RE: THEY WERE EXPENDABLE: Nagumo vs Spruance PBEM - 9/1/2005 10:14:01 PM   
Capt. Harlock


Posts: 5358
Joined: 9/15/2001
From: Los Angeles
Status: offline
quote:

Correct me if I am wrong but in one of the hardest fought assault landings Tarawa's 8" guns were unable to inflict any harm on the invasion fleet itself. It's CD units knocked out lots of LTVs and landing craft but no large ships. The Japanese CD artillery positions were all but completely suppressed.


You are not wrong, but it was by no means a sure thing. One of the American BB's (possibly Maryland) managed to put an armor-piercing shell into the magazine serving all of the 8-inchers on that side of the island. Some historians consider it the luckiest bombardment shot of WWII.

_____________________________

Civil war? What does that mean? Is there any foreign war? Isn't every war fought between men, between brothers?

--Victor Hugo

(in reply to spence)
Post #: 376
RE: THEY WERE EXPENDABLE: Nagumo vs Spruance PBEM - 9/2/2005 6:25:18 AM   
Belphegor


Posts: 2209
Joined: 5/10/2004
Status: offline


more history from my perspective

I had no dedicated CD units on Woleai. Only the organic guns of the base forces. These were in supply, but definitely not at peak fighting trim because of the constant air attacks. I think the number of hits on the capital ships bombarding and then the number of hits on the actual invasion TF was reasonable (for this attack) as I did no lasting damage to the capital ships (paint scratches, a little minor damage to the upper works) and did a bit more to the invasion TF which can be assumed to be closer. I'd love to have done more damage than I did, but that wasn't the case. I was also hoping that a level 9 fort might hold out longer. Pounding or no pounding the troops were well supplied and protected. Mostly I was overwhelmed. I had a South Seas Bde, and two base forces only, so not enough fighting defence once the Allies landed.

(in reply to AmiralLaurent)
Post #: 377
RE: THEY WERE EXPENDABLE: Nagumo vs Spruance PBEM - 9/2/2005 5:02:39 PM   
Bradley7735


Posts: 2073
Joined: 7/12/2004
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Capt. Harlock

quote:

Correct me if I am wrong but in one of the hardest fought assault landings Tarawa's 8" guns were unable to inflict any harm on the invasion fleet itself. It's CD units knocked out lots of LTVs and landing craft but no large ships. The Japanese CD artillery positions were all but completely suppressed.


You are not wrong, but it was by no means a sure thing. One of the American BB's (possibly Maryland) managed to put an armor-piercing shell into the magazine serving all of the 8-inchers on that side of the island. Some historians consider it the luckiest bombardment shot of WWII.


IIRC, a ship put a shell directly into the muzzle of a large calibre gun during the Normandy landings. The resulting explosion blew up that gun and at least one more, but I think it was something like 4 in total. The guns were very large, and couldn't be seen from the sea. It was a very lucky shot. At least that's what I read in the book "D-Day" written by that guy who writes a lot of books. (helpful, aren't I?) He also wrote "Citizen Soldiers". I'm sure a few of you know the guy's name.

_____________________________

The older I get, the better I was.

(in reply to Capt. Harlock)
Post #: 378
RE: THEY WERE EXPENDABLE: Nagumo vs Spruance PBEM - 9/3/2005 5:00:40 AM   
Belphegor


Posts: 2209
Joined: 5/10/2004
Status: offline
ASW patrols make good pilots. And sink subs... Today's feature shows the Taichu boys. They just keep getting better...




Attachment (1)

(in reply to Bradley7735)
Post #: 379
RE: THEY WERE EXPENDABLE: Nagumo vs Spruance PBEM - 9/3/2005 6:37:57 AM   
racndoc


Posts: 2519
Joined: 10/29/2004
From: Newport Coast, California
Status: offline
Bradley...

I believe the author you are referring to is Stephen Ambrose.


SITUATION REPORT: 11-29-43


SEAC:

Led by the 3rd and 5th Indian Divisions, SEAC assaults the IJA 104th Division 60 miles east of Bangkok and forces it to retreat back into the city. The Allies are now in a position to cut off IJA forces in Bangkok and Krung Thep.

SEAC will lauch a huge deliberate attack at Songkhia tomorrow.





Attachment (1)

(in reply to racndoc)
Post #: 380
RE: THEY WERE EXPENDABLE: Nagumo vs Spruance PBEM - 9/3/2005 6:48:18 AM   
racndoc


Posts: 2519
Joined: 10/29/2004
From: Newport Coast, California
Status: offline
SITUATION REPORT: 11-30-43


SEAC:

All Allied planes within range of Songkhia are sent to bomb ground units inSongkhia:
Day Air attack on 43rd Division, at 24,43


Allied aircraft
Thunderbolt II x 14
Vengeance I x 50
Beaufighter VIC x 14
P-40N Warhawk x 42


Allied aircraft losses
Vengeance I: 1 damaged
Beaufighter VIC: 1 damaged
P-40N Warhawk: 2 damaged

Japanese ground losses:
64 casualties reported
Guns lost 6
Vehicles lost 1

And again:

Day Air attack on 43rd Division, at 24,43


Allied aircraft
Thunderbolt II x 14
Beaufighter VIC x 42
Beaufort V-IX x 7
P-40N Warhawk x 9
B-25J Mitchell x 39


Allied aircraft losses
Beaufighter VIC: 3 damaged
B-25J Mitchell: 3 damaged

Japanese ground losses:
39 casualties reported
Guns lost 4

And again:

Day Air attack on 43rd Division, at 24,43


Allied aircraft
Blenheim IV x 20
Liberator VI x 107
B-25J Mitchell x 9


Allied aircraft losses
Blenheim IV: 1 destroyed
Liberator VI: 2 damaged

Japanese ground losses:
77 casualties reported
Guns lost 6

And again:
Day Air attack on 46th Division, at 24,43


Allied aircraft
Liberator VI x 2
B-25J Mitchell x 18


Allied aircraft losses
B-25J Mitchell: 2 damaged

Japanese ground losses:
19 casualties reported



SEAC throws 126,000 troops, 2357 vehicles(largest Allied tank action of the war) and 977 guns against the 51,000 IJA defending Songkhia. The Allies suffer 1400 casualties vs 903 IJA and reduce fortifications to level 5.

Ground combat at Songkhia

Allied Deliberate attack

Attacking force 126638 troops, 977 guns, 2357 vehicles

Defending force 50871 troops, 405 guns, 115 vehicles

Allied engineers reduce fortifications to 5

Allied assault odds: 1 to 1 (fort level 5)

Allied Assault reduces fortifications to 5


Japanese ground losses:
903 casualties reported
Guns lost 44
Vehicles lost 12

Allied ground losses:
1423 casualties reported
Guns lost 63
Vehicles lost 21






Attachment (1)

< Message edited by AdmSpruance -- 9/3/2005 6:51:23 AM >

(in reply to racndoc)
Post #: 381
RE: THEY WERE EXPENDABLE: Nagumo vs Spruance PBEM - 9/3/2005 7:37:33 PM   
racndoc


Posts: 2519
Joined: 10/29/2004
From: Newport Coast, California
Status: offline
SITUATION REPORT: 12-2-43


SEAC:

SEAC bombers continue to soften up Songkhia as the fighting rages on below:

Day Air attack on 43rd Division, at 24,43


Allied aircraft
Thunderbolt II x 11
Vengeance I x 48
Beaufighter VIC x 13
P-40N Warhawk x 41


No Allied losses

Japanese ground losses:
100 casualties reported
Guns lost 1

Day Air attack on 43rd Division, at 24,43


Allied aircraft
Blenheim IV x 8
Liberator VI x 24
B-25J Mitchell x 2


No Allied losses

Japanese ground losses:
60 casualties reported
Guns lost 1

Day Air attack on 46th Division, at 24,43


Allied aircraft
Blenheim IV x 21
Liberator VI x 43
B-25J Mitchell x 28


Allied aircraft losses
Blenheim IV: 1 damaged

Japanese ground losses:
96 casualties reported
Guns lost 1

In 3 days of continuous fighting at Songkhia both sides have suffered about 5000 casualties. The fortifications have now been reduced to level 3:

Ground combat at Songkhia

Allied Deliberate attack

Attacking force 121045 troops, 808 guns, 2319 vehicles

Defending force 44736 troops, 271 guns, 81 vehicles

Allied engineers reduce fortifications to 3

Allied assault odds: 1 to 1 (fort level 3)

Allied Assault reduces fortifications to 3


Japanese ground losses:
1759 casualties reported
Guns lost 23
Vehicles lost 10

Allied ground losses:
1752 casualties reported
Guns lost 77
Vehicles lost 12



SWPAC:

Several days of bombing the airfields at Palau and Ulithi have left them totally suppressed. Targeting has now been changed over to prepare for the amphibious assaults. SWPAC Army Air Force (which now has greater bomb carrying capability than 8th Air Force in England) sends nearly 700 bombers against the 2 atolls.

Ulithi has only 2 units of which 1 is a combat unit....the 3rd South Seas Detachment. The targeting strategies have changed Woleia due to the ineffectiveness of the previous aerial bombardment. At Ulithi, SWPAC will only target the ground unit until the invasion...the bombardment TFs will be responsible for suppressing any CD guns on the atoll.

Day Air attack on 3rd South Seas Det. , at 55,67


Allied aircraft
F4U-1 Corsair x 10
B-25J Mitchell x 138


Allied aircraft losses
B-25J Mitchell: 3 damaged

Japanese ground losses:
201 casualties reported
Guns lost 1

Day Air attack on 3rd South Seas Det. , at 55,67


Allied aircraft
PB4Y Liberator x 107
B-24D Liberator x 25
B-24J Liberator x 65


Allied aircraft losses
PB4Y Liberator: 2 damaged

Japanese ground losses:
400 casualties reported
Guns lost 2

Palau is a different story. Pre-war intelligence reports the existence of several well entrenced 8" CD guns so SWPAC will bombard Palau for a much longer period of time than Woleia was and will concentrate on port bombing at first to knock out the CD guns before suppressing the ground units:

Day Air attack on Palau , at 52,67


Allied aircraft
PBY Catalina x 5
P-38J Lightning x 23
PB4Y Liberator x 9
B-24D Liberator x 21
B-24J Liberator x 122


Allied aircraft losses
PBY Catalina: 2 damaged
B-24J Liberator: 1 damaged

Japanese ground losses:
48 casualties reported
Guns lost 1

Port hits 10
Port fuel hits 1
Port supply hits 2

Day Air attack on Palau , at 52,67


Allied aircraft
F-5C Lightning x 3
PB4Y Liberator x 65
B-24J Liberator x 66


No Allied losses

Japanese ground losses:
36 casualties reported

Port hits 11
Port fuel hits 2
Port supply hits 7





Attachment (1)

(in reply to racndoc)
Post #: 382
RE: THEY WERE EXPENDABLE: Nagumo vs Spruance PBEM - 9/4/2005 3:30:20 AM   
racndoc


Posts: 2519
Joined: 10/29/2004
From: Newport Coast, California
Status: offline
SITUATION REPORT: 12-5-43



SWPAC:

SWPAC bombers continue to pound the ground units at Ulithi:

Day Air attack on 3rd South Seas Det. , at 55,67


Allied aircraft
F4U-1 Corsair x 6
B-25J Mitchell x 95


Allied aircraft losses
B-25J Mitchell: 2 damaged

Japanese ground losses:
183 casualties reported
Guns lost 1

Day Air attack on 152nd IJA Base Force, at 55,67


Allied aircraft
F4U-1 Corsair x 3
B-25J Mitchell x 40


Allied aircraft losses
B-25J Mitchell: 1 damaged

Japanese ground losses:
124 casualties reported
Guns lost 1


SEAC:

RAF Bomber Command continues to support the ground offensive into Songkhia which has now lasted almost a week:

Day Air attack on 43rd Division, at 24,43


Allied aircraft
Thunderbolt II x 14
Vengeance I x 52
Beaufighter VIC x 14


Allied aircraft losses
Vengeance I: 2 damaged
Beaufighter VIC: 1 damaged

Japanese ground losses:
143 casualties reported
Guns lost 1

Day Air attack on 43rd Division, at 24,43


Allied aircraft
Thunderbolt II x 16
Beaufighter VIC x 48
Beaufort V-IX x 15
B-25J Mitchell x 79


No Allied losses

Japanese ground losses:
245 casualties reported
Guns lost 8

Day Air attack on 43rd Division, at 24,43


Allied aircraft
Blenheim IV x 14
Liberator VI x 28
B-25J Mitchell x 8


Allied aircraft losses
Liberator VI: 1 damaged

Japanese ground losses:
173 casualties reported
Guns lost 3


Day Air attack on 46th Division, at 24,43


Allied aircraft
Blenheim IV x 13
Liberator VI x 48
B-25J Mitchell x 26


No Allied losses

Japanese ground losses:
188 casualties reported
Guns lost 3

For the 6th day in a row the Allies conduct a deliberate assault on Songkhia and finally break through pushing the Japanese back to Alor Star.


Ground combat at Songkhia

Allied Deliberate attack

Attacking force 108397 troops, 608 guns, 2276 vehicles

Defending force 38734 troops, 155 guns, 33 vehicles

Allied assault odds: 3 to 1 (fort level 1)

Allied forces CAPTURE Songkhia base !!!


Japanese ground losses:
1484 casualties reported
Guns lost 8
Vehicles lost 8

Allied ground losses:
1085 casualties reported
Guns lost 12
Vehicles lost 12


Defeated Japanese Units Retreating!







Attachment (1)

(in reply to racndoc)
Post #: 383
RE: THEY WERE EXPENDABLE: Nagumo vs Spruance PBEM - 9/4/2005 3:45:48 AM   
Belphegor


Posts: 2209
Joined: 5/10/2004
Status: offline
Finally I get to strike back with some hitting power.

This combat report is I think low on the losses. I believe the true count was 68 Allied planes destroyed on the ground. All I know is nothing flew from Bandou this turn

Naval bombardment of Bandou, at 25,41


Allied aircraft
no flights


Allied aircraft losses
P-40N Warhawk: 10 destroyed
Vengeance I: 15 destroyed
Thunderbolt II: 4 destroyed
Beaufighter VIC: 4 destroyed
Boomerang II: 2 destroyed

Japanese Ships
DD Kisaragi
DD Hatsuyuki
DD Kishinami
CL Kuma
CL Naka
CL Agano
CA Furutaka
CA Aoba
CA Ashigara
CA Haguro
CA Atago
BB Musashi
BB Yamato
BB Haruna
BB Kongo


Allied ground losses:
1023 casualties reported
Guns lost 13
Vehicles lost 3

Airbase hits 10
Airbase supply hits 14
Runway hits 111
Port supply hits 1

(in reply to racndoc)
Post #: 384
RE: THEY WERE EXPENDABLE: Nagumo vs Spruance PBEM - 9/4/2005 9:19:47 PM   
racndoc


Posts: 2519
Joined: 10/29/2004
From: Newport Coast, California
Status: offline
SITUATION REPORT: 12-8-43 INVASION OF ULITHI


The day started with a predawn bombardment by the BBs:

Naval bombardment of Ulithi, at 55,67

Allied Ships
CA Australia
CA San Francisco
CA Astoria
CA Louisville
CA Northampton
BB Alabama
BB Massachusetts
BB Indiana
BB Washington

Japanese ground losses:
559 casualties reported
Guns lost 1

Airbase hits 2
Airbase supply hits 2
Runway hits 50
Port hits 8
Port supply hits 13

This was followed by some minesweeping:

TF 1275 encounters mine field at Ulithi (55,67)

Allied Ships
MSW Courtenay
MSW Lockeport
MSW Ungava
MSW Lark
MSW Vigilance
MSW Motive
MSW Impeccable
MSW Herald
MSW Swallow
MSW Wollongong
MSW Wagga
MSW Strahan
MSW Lithgow

And

TF 1223 encounters mine field at Ulithi (55,67)

TF 1223 troops unloading over beach at Ulithi, 55,67


Allied Ships
DD Norman
DD Frazier, Mine hits 1, on fire
DD Van Galen

And then came the invasion:

TF 1292 encounters mine field at Ulithi (55,67)

TF 1292 troops unloading over beach at Ulithi, 55,67


Allied Ships
MSW Eland Dubois
MSW Wasaga
MSW Cairns
MSW Townsville
MSW Deloraine
MSW Tern
MSW Turkey
MSW Tumult
MSW Token
MSW Chief
MSW Pursuit
MSW Whyalla
MSW Lismore
MSW Launceton
MSW Gladstone
MSW Cootamundra
MSW Ararat
MSW Pirie
DMS Southard
DD Banckert
DD Barker
DD Bancroft
AP Tasker H. Bliss, Mine hits 1, on fire

Coastal Guns at Ulithi, 55,67, firing at TF 1292
73 Coastal gun shots fired in defense.
Allied Ships
CL De Ruyter
DD Laffey, Shell hits 1
LCI LCI-448
DD Rapid
LST LST-459, Shell hits 2
DD Relentless
DD Duncan, Shell hits 1, on fire
DD Welles
CL Raleigh

Japanese ground losses:
11 casualties reported

Allied ground losses:
2262 casualties reported

TF 1292 encounters mine field at Ulithi (55,67)

TF 1292 troops unloading over beach at Ulithi, 55,67


Allied Ships
MSW Eland Dubois
MSW Wasaga
MSW Cairns
MSW Townsville
MSW Deloraine
MSW Tern
MSW Turkey
MSW Tumult
MSW Token
MSW Chief
MSW Pursuit
MSW Whyalla
MSW Lismore
MSW Launceton
MSW Gladstone
MSW Cootamundra
MSW Ararat
MSW Pirie
DMS Southard
DD Inconstant
DD Banckert
DD Isaac Sweers
DD Rotherham
DD Rapid
DD Barker
DD Duncan

Coastal Guns at Ulithi, 55,67, firing at TF 1292
31 Coastal gun shots fired in defense.
Allied Ships
DD Laffey
DD Woodworth


Allied ground losses:
704 casualties reported

Overhead the sky was full of Allied bombers:

Day Air attack on 3rd South Seas Det. , at 55,67


Allied aircraft
F6F Hellcat x 69
TBM Avenger x 144


No Allied losses

Japanese ground losses:
96 casualties reported
Guns lost 2

Day Air attack on 3rd South Seas Det. , at 55,67


Allied aircraft
FM-2 Wildcat x 6
TBM Avenger x 21


No Allied losses

Japanese ground losses:
13 casualties reported

Day Air attack on 3rd South Seas Det. , at 55,67


Allied aircraft
PB4Y Liberator x 104
B-24D Liberator x 32
B-24J Liberator x 67


No Allied losses

Japanese ground losses:
361 casualties reported
Guns lost 1

And then more BBs fired on the hapless atoll:

Naval bombardment of Ulithi, at 55,67

Allied Ships
CL Newcastle
CL Emerald
CL Java
CA Frobisher
CA Cornwall
CA Devonshire
CA Shropshire
BB Resolution
BB Royal Sovereign
BB Revenge
BB Valiant

Japanese ground losses:
265 casualties reported
Guns lost 1

Airbase hits 2
Airbase supply hits 1
Runway hits 65
Port hits 7
Port supply hits 9


The Japanese defenders were so stunned by the display of firepower they could hardly fight back:

Ground combat at Ulithi

Allied Shock attack

Attacking force 32803 troops, 391 guns, 124 vehicles

Defending force 2649 troops, 0 guns, 0 vehicles

Allied assault odds: 1248 to 1 (fort level 2)

Allied forces CAPTURE Ulithi base !!!


Japanese ground losses:
6623 casualties reported
Guns lost 24

Allied ground losses:
104 casualties reported
Guns lost 4
Vehicles lost 1

Ulithi was secured before the transports could unload all their troops and the Allies suffer much fewer casualties than at Woleai.








Attachment (1)

(in reply to racndoc)
Post #: 385
RE: THEY WERE EXPENDABLE: Nagumo vs Spruance PBEM - 9/4/2005 10:19:22 PM   
Belphegor


Posts: 2209
Joined: 5/10/2004
Status: offline
A return of the IJN bombardment forces to the Malay peninsula went much worse this time. Kongo blundered into one of my own mines and had to turn for home and repairs. The remaining force continued on with the bombardment, only to find the Allies have removed 3/4 of the troops from the area. And they aren't headed south. My view is they are moving around the bay to Bangkok in order to overwhelm the defenders there...

Allied air attack on the wounded Kongo beaten back and disrupted. No hits on the battleship and a few kills for IJN pilots.

(in reply to racndoc)
Post #: 386
RE: THEY WERE EXPENDABLE: Nagumo vs Spruance PBEM - 9/5/2005 12:24:48 AM   
racndoc


Posts: 2519
Joined: 10/29/2004
From: Newport Coast, California
Status: offline
SITUATION REPORT: 12-9-43


SEAC:

In a scene eerily reminiscient of December 1941(but the colors are reversed) the Allies mass in Songkhia while the Japanese desperately dig in at Alor Star.

The IJN attempts to bombard Songkhia but runs into one of their own Type 93 mines(I bet the mine was laid on the west coast but was struck on the east coast).

Naval bombardment of Songkhia, at 24,43

Japanese Ships
DD Hatsuyuki
DD Kishinami
CL Kuma
CL Naka
CL Agano
CA Furutaka
CA Aoba
CA Ashigara
CA Haguro
CA Atago
BB Musashi
BB Yamato
BB Haruna


Allied ground losses:
406 casualties reported
Guns lost 7

Poor weather grounds several hundred Allied naval bombers from striking the bombardment TF and the ones that get through are remarkable ineffectual.

Meanwhile, the Allied end run or "left hook" that crossed the river north of Krung Thep has reached the coast and invested Bangkok from the landward side. Conveniently. the Japanese defenders of Bangkok commit Hari Kari by counterattacking and lose 4000 troops to 4 Allied.


Ground combat at Bangkok

Japanese Shock attack

Attacking force 25664 troops, 182 guns, 0 vehicles

Defending force 54519 troops, 414 guns, 0 vehicles

Japanese assault odds: 0 to 1


Japanese ground losses:
4116 casualties reported
Guns lost 50

Allied ground losses:
4 casualties reported
Guns lost 1

3 SEAC Divisions are expected to cross the river into Bangkok from the NW tomorrow so ALL SEAC forces in Bangkok are ordered to shock attack.







Attachment (1)

(in reply to racndoc)
Post #: 387
RE: THEY WERE EXPENDABLE: Nagumo vs Spruance PBEM - 9/5/2005 3:43:47 AM   
racndoc


Posts: 2519
Joined: 10/29/2004
From: Newport Coast, California
Status: offline
12-11-43 ALLIES LIBERATE BANGKOK


SEAC unleashes a furious aerial bombarbment on Bangkok:

Day Air attack on 34th Heavy AA Battalion, at 29,40

Japanese aircraft
Ki-43-IIa Oscar x 12
Ki-44-IIb Tojo x 5

Allied aircraft
Blenheim IV x 6
Liberator VI x 27
B-25J Mitchell x 6

Japanese aircraft losses
Ki-43-IIa Oscar: 1 destroyed, 1 damaged
Ki-44-IIb Tojo: 5 damaged

Allied aircraft losses
Blenheim IV: 1 destroyed, 1 damaged
Liberator VI: 7 damaged
B-25J Mitchell: 2 damaged

Japanese ground losses:
111 casualties reported

Day Air attack on 18th Hvy Field Artillery Regiment, at 29,40

Japanese aircraft
Ki-44-IIb Tojo x 5

Allied aircraft
Beaufighter VIC x 8
B-25J Mitchell x 33

Japanese aircraft losses
Ki-44-IIb Tojo: 3 damaged

Allied aircraft losses
Beaufighter VIC: 2 destroyed, 1 damaged
B-25J Mitchell: 2 destroyed, 5 damaged

Japanese ground losses:
117 casualties reported
Guns lost 4

Day Air attack on 29th Ind.Mixed Brigade, at 29,40

Japanese aircraft
Ki-44-IIb Tojo x 5

Allied aircraft
Blenheim IV x 20
Liberator VI x 46
B-25J Mitchell x 4

Japanese aircraft losses
Ki-44-IIb Tojo: 5 damaged

Allied aircraft losses
Blenheim IV: 1 destroyed, 1 damaged
Liberator VI: 4 damaged

Japanese ground losses:
95 casualties reported
Guns lost 2

Day Air attack on 29th Ind.Mixed Brigade, at 29,40

Japanese aircraft
Ki-44-IIb Tojo x 2

Allied aircraft
Spitfire VIII x 8
Beaufighter VIC x 42
B-25J Mitchell x 53

Japanese aircraft losses
Ki-44-IIb Tojo: 1 destroyed

Allied aircraft losses
Beaufighter VIC: 1 destroyed, 1 damaged
B-25J Mitchell: 2 damaged

Japanese ground losses:
133 casualties reported
Guns lost 2

Day Air attack on 29th Ind.Mixed Brigade, at 29,40

Japanese aircraft
Ki-44-IIb Tojo x 2

Allied aircraft
Spitfire VIII x 22
Thunderbolt II x 38
Beaufighter VIC x 10
P-40N Warhawk x 25

Japanese aircraft losses
Ki-44-IIb Tojo: 10 destroyed

Allied aircraft losses
Spitfire VIII: 2 destroyed
Thunderbolt II: 1 destroyed

Japanese ground losses:
35 casualties reported
Guns lost 1

Day Air attack on 29th Ind.Mixed Brigade, at 29,40

Japanese aircraft
Ki-44-IIb Tojo x 1

Allied aircraft
Beaufighter Mk 21 x 35
P-40N Warhawk x 17

No Japanese losses

Allied aircraft losses
P-40N Warhawk: 1 damaged

Japanese ground losses:
12 casualties reported

Then nearly 100,000 SEAC troops lauch a deliberate attack on Bangkok and force the Japanese defenders to retreat to Krung Thep:

Ground combat at Bangkok

Allied Shock attack

Attacking force 95636 troops, 854 guns, 0 vehicles

Defending force 29365 troops, 86 guns, 0 vehicles

Allied engineers reduce fortifications to 1

Allied assault odds: 16 to 1 (fort level 1)

Allied forces CAPTURE Bangkok base !!!


Japanese aircraft
no flights

Japanese aircraft losses
Ki-43-IIa Oscar: 4 destroyed

Japanese ground losses:
1630 casualties reported
Guns lost 24

Allied ground losses:
507 casualties reported
Guns lost 14

35,000-40,000 IJA are now cut off in Krung Thep and the road is open to Saigon.






Attachment (1)

(in reply to racndoc)
Post #: 388
RE: THEY WERE EXPENDABLE: Nagumo vs Spruance PBEM - 9/7/2005 7:53:17 AM   
racndoc


Posts: 2519
Joined: 10/29/2004
From: Newport Coast, California
Status: offline
SITUATION REPORT: 12-19-43


80,000 SEAC troops are left behind at Krung Thep to reduce the pocket there. Another 50,000 troops led by most of the armor overrun the Japanese roadblock 60 mi SE of Bangkok causing over 1000 casualties and forcing the remnants back to Siemrem Reap.

SEAC forces now stand on the border of Indochina and have staged AC to forward bases at Bandou, Songkhia and Bangkok.






Attachment (1)

(in reply to racndoc)
Post #: 389
RE: THEY WERE EXPENDABLE: Nagumo vs Spruance PBEM - 9/8/2005 4:43:01 AM   
racndoc


Posts: 2519
Joined: 10/29/2004
From: Newport Coast, California
Status: offline
SITUATION REPORT: 12-21-43


SEAC:

Led by the Indian Armored Brigades, SEAC forces enter Siemrem Reap and are ordered to shock attack IJA defenders tomorrow.

Japanese Bombardment TF is spotted moving in for another bombardment run in the Gulf of Siam. All Allied bombers in range are put on alert for possible naval attacks.






Attachment (1)

(in reply to racndoc)
Post #: 390
Page:   <<   < prev  11 12 [13] 14 15   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Current Games From Matrix.] >> [World War II] >> War In The Pacific - Struggle Against Japan 1941 - 1945 >> After Action Reports >> RE: THEY WERE EXPENDABLE: Nagumo vs Spruance PBEM Page: <<   < prev  11 12 [13] 14 15   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

1.281