RE: Comprehensive Port bombing testing (98 B-29's vs. 50 ships in day and night)...

Matrix Games Forums

Forums Register Login Photo Gallery Member List Search Calendars FAQ

My Profile Inbox Address Book My Subscription My Forums Log Out

RE: Comprehensive Port bombing testing (98 B-29's vs. 50 ships in day and night)...

View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest

Users viewing this topic: none

Printable Version

All Forums >> [Current Games From Matrix.] >> [World War II] >> War In The Pacific - Struggle Against Japan 1941 - 1945 >> RE: Comprehensive Port bombing testing (98 B-29's vs. 50 ships in day and night)...

Page: << < prev 5 6 7 8 [9]

Message

<< Older Topic Newer Topic >>

RE: Comprehensive Port bombing testing (98 B-29's vs. 5... - 1/4/2005 3:00:59 PM

Apollo11

Posts: 24082
Joined: 6/7/2001
From: Zagreb, Croatia
Status: offline

Hi all,

quote:

ORIGINAL: Halsey

Your testing shows that the results against ships and land facilities should be reversed. Making it harder to hit shipping and easier to hit facilities. Nice work.

Amended
Credits: Apollo 11

So in an earlier thread players were asked to do some testing on their own. Will any of this pertinent data be evaluated for change? The TF strike co-ordination rule also comes to mind.

I am 100% sure that Matrix/2By3 most certainly read this whole thread (and test results) and will do something about it... they are great and reasonable guys who always listen us when we properly document and test stuff...

Thus I have high hopes!

Leo "Apollo11"

_____________________________

Prior Preparation & Planning Prevents Pathetically Poor Performance!

A & B: WitW, WitE, WbtS, GGWaW, GGWaW2-AWD, HttR, CotA, BftB, CF
P: UV, WitP, WitP-AE

(in reply to Halsey)

Post #: 241

RE: Comprehensive Port bombing testing (98 B-29's vs. 5... - 1/4/2005 8:59:01 PM

dtravel

Posts: 4533
Joined: 7/7/2004
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Halsey
So in an earlier thread players were asked to do some testing on their own. Will any of this pertinent data be evaluated for change? The TF strike co-ordination rule also comes to mind.

I can plug further runs into my spreadsheet, no problem. Or email a copy to anyone who wants it. (Not that its all that complicated, just a little tedious counting ship hits to input.)

_____________________________

This game does not have a learning curve. It has a learning cliff.

"Bomb early, bomb often, bomb everything." - Niceguy

Any bugs I report are always straight stock games.

(in reply to Halsey)

Post #: 242

RE: Comprehensive Port bombing testing (98 B-29's vs. 5... - 1/4/2005 9:01:15 PM

dtravel

Posts: 4533
Joined: 7/7/2004
Status: offline

I'm surprised there isn't more response. No one has any comments? Disagrees with my conclusions? Is just having a bad day and wants to pick a fight? (Well, maybe not that last one.

)

_____________________________

This game does not have a learning curve. It has a learning cliff.

"Bomb early, bomb often, bomb everything." - Niceguy

Any bugs I report are always straight stock games.

(in reply to dtravel)

Post #: 243

RE: Comprehensive Port bombing testing (98 B-29's vs. 5... - 1/5/2005 12:03:12 AM

Halsey

Posts: 5069
Joined: 2/7/2004
Status: offline

Keep it up!

_____________________________

(in reply to dtravel)

Post #: 244

RE: Comprehensive Port bombing testing (98 B-29's vs. 5... - 1/5/2005 2:09:38 PM

Apollo11

Posts: 24082
Joined: 6/7/2001
From: Zagreb, Croatia
Status: offline

Hi all,

quote:

ORIGINAL: dtravel

I'm surprised there isn't more response. No one has any comments? Disagrees with my conclusions? Is just having a bad day and wants to pick a fight? (Well, maybe not that last one. )

I think this week is still counted as part of XMax & New Year vacation...

Leo "Apollo11"

_____________________________

Prior Preparation & Planning Prevents Pathetically Poor Performance!

A & B: WitW, WitE, WbtS, GGWaW, GGWaW2-AWD, HttR, CotA, BftB, CF
P: UV, WitP, WitP-AE

(in reply to dtravel)

Post #: 245