jchastain
Posts: 2164
Joined: 8/8/2003 From: Marietta, GA Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: ojnab_bob Hopefully it will resemble Clash of Steel more than Strategic Command.... I thought CoS, though quite dated, was the more realistic, elegant and interesting simulation. In any case, i am excited! I too love Clash of Steel. In my mind, despite its age it is still the best WWII Grand Strategy design produced. Unlike pasternakski, I do not have a spare machine for running DOS games, but I did teach myself to make a bootable DOS CD just so that I can continue to play CoS. I put it in the drive, reboot, and tada - it loads DOS and starts COS for me. Anyway, while I think CoS was a great WWII system Strategic Command might be the better example of what a World War I game should be like. What makes CoS so great is the impulse system with combined combat and movement. That really allows the fluidity, breakthroughs, and encirclements that was WWII. WWI, in the other hand, was far more static with standoffs that ran across an entire front. Guns of August was actually an Avalon Hill board game. I actually found my old copy not long ago. Anyone know if there is any relationship between these titles other than the name?
|