Matrix Games Forums

Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

RE: Love springs back

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [Current Games From Matrix.] >> [World War II] >> War In The Pacific - Struggle Against Japan 1941 - 1945 >> After Action Reports >> RE: Love springs back Page: <<   < prev  17 18 [19] 20 21   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Love springs back - 10/9/2005 4:36:47 PM   
Gen.Hoepner


Posts: 3645
Joined: 9/4/2001
From: italy
Status: offline
AFTER ACTION REPORTS FOR 08/02/42

Th Tojos production has begun.17 planes already in pool. In one week i should be able to equip the first Sentai at Shangai.
We've moved closer to Chungking. 30 Sallies will start a bombing campaign tomorrow from 3 hexes ( should reduce a lot the op losses.) 50 Tonies are covering the base ( Kweiyang) and soon more 100 fighters and 100 bombers will be place here to reduce Chungking to a mass of dust.
Shokaku, upgraded and fully operational, left Tokyo bay today. It will join the 3CVs at Manila.
Nothing really new to report today.
In Oz he's retiring towards Alice Spring.
In Burma he retired completely after the failed assault of the past month.
my attention is now focalized on Port Blair, where he can come. As soon as he starts bombing the island my CVs will move towards Singapore.
Subs with glens are patrolling the Bengal Bay and the NW coast of Australia.
2 more days and we'll attack Nanning.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ground combat at Nanning

Japanese Bombardment attack

Attacking force 14213 troops, 144 guns, 0 vehicles

Defending force 17574 troops, 3 guns, 0 vehicles



Allied ground losses:
48 casualties reported



_____________________________

[image]http://yfrog.com/2m70331348022314716641664j [/image]

(in reply to PzB74)
Post #: 541
RE: Love springs back - 10/9/2005 6:07:47 PM   
Gen.Hoepner


Posts: 3645
Joined: 9/4/2001
From: italy
Status: offline
Forgot to say something....

In preparation of the ASW campaign that will start in few months my float planes air army is being reunited at Manila. 100 Alfs/Jakes will start tomorrow an intense training camp( bombing San Jose Island) to be ready ( at 90 exp) to face the future allied sub threat.
Unluckly i do not have any Ida in the pool and the industry has been shot down and changed the production chain since december 41. So i will have to rely on my float planes and on my Sallies/Lilies/Anns for ASW activities in the SRA and DEI.

In the picture you can see a support team preparing a Jake near Manila for its first training mission





Attachment (1)

_____________________________

[image]http://yfrog.com/2m70331348022314716641664j [/image]

(in reply to Gen.Hoepner)
Post #: 542
New toys - 10/9/2005 7:15:21 PM   
Gen.Hoepner


Posts: 3645
Joined: 9/4/2001
From: italy
Status: offline
Waiting for the turns to come in, i'd like to give some nice shots to my AAR...just to make it less boring.

Here you can see a brand new line of Ki-44 Tojo Army Fighters, just assembled at Gumma and ready to be flown to Shangai to equip with the new modern fighters the 36th Sentai

Aren't they beautifull?




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

[image]http://yfrog.com/2m70331348022314716641664j [/image]

(in reply to Gen.Hoepner)
Post #: 543
RE: New toys - 10/9/2005 7:24:26 PM   
Gen.Hoepner


Posts: 3645
Joined: 9/4/2001
From: italy
Status: offline
And here's the Kungchang airfield in northern china. It's the first japanese base completely patrolld by the modern ki-61s Tonies.
Every day 72 Tonies are ready to take off and intercept any allied bomber that dares to pop up








Attachment (1)

_____________________________

[image]http://yfrog.com/2m70331348022314716641664j [/image]

(in reply to Gen.Hoepner)
Post #: 544
RE: New toys - 10/10/2005 1:34:13 AM   
Andy Mac

 

Posts: 15222
Joined: 5/12/2004
From: Alexandria, Scotland
Status: offline
No thoughts of trying a west coast commerce raid with KB GH ?

I would have thought he would be a lil lax in edcorts and stuff I have been caught a few times in PBEM as the allies by this tactic.

p,s whats the ave xp of KB at these days ?

(in reply to Gen.Hoepner)
Post #: 545
RE: New toys - 10/10/2005 8:53:47 AM   
Gen.Hoepner


Posts: 3645
Joined: 9/4/2001
From: italy
Status: offline
I Andy,

because i do not know where his CVs are. At the moment my plans are to play an elastic defence, using my KB as a strategic defence. Too risky and too fuel waisting.

AFTER ACTION REPORTS FOR 07-08/04/42

The KB is in perfect shape. The exp of my pilots is around 80 and even the newest CV/CVLs have now air groups with very skilled crews!

One good news and one bad news in these 2 days.
The Nanning pocket finally passed by and 30k more chinese are now marching towards the POW camps.
Tsuyung refuses to capitulate. 0-1 obtained today. The price to be paid for my impatiente!Now more units are on their way. I have to bring the assault force back to 2500 APs ( now at 1600).
6 Transports intercepted and shoot down over Lanchow
Bad weather all over china prevented any big air raid
2 smal TFs spotted going from Christmas Island to Bora Bora.
The first 12 Tojos entered in service today at Kungchang.
Nothing else, ecxept that i'm late this morning.....gotta go



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ground combat at Tsuyung

Japanese Deliberate attack

Attacking force 111932 troops, 1117 guns, 13 vehicles

Defending force 39708 troops, 57 guns, 0 vehicles

Japanese assault odds: 0 to 1 (fort level 2)


Japanese ground losses:
1288 casualties reported
Guns lost 43
Vehicles lost 2

Allied ground losses:
535 casualties reported
Guns lost 2


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ground combat at Nanning

Japanese Deliberate attack

Attacking force 17327 troops, 161 guns, 0 vehicles

Defending force 17273 troops, 2 guns, 0 vehicles

Japanese assault odds: 8 to 1 (fort level 0)

Japanese forces CAPTURE Nanning base !!!


Japanese ground losses:
162 casualties reported
Guns lost 7

Allied ground losses:
21259 casualties reported
Guns lost 8



_____________________________

[image]http://yfrog.com/2m70331348022314716641664j [/image]

(in reply to Andy Mac)
Post #: 546
RE: New toys - 10/10/2005 3:33:18 PM   
Gen.Hoepner


Posts: 3645
Joined: 9/4/2001
From: italy
Status: offline
AFTER ACTION REPORTS FOR 08/05/42


A quite day. Too quite i'd say.
Still bad weather in China, as usual, while in Burma he keeps pounding my forces with his bombers and this lets him gain some precious points.
Indian ocean is quite
Pacific ocean is pacific
A strange thing happened in Borneo. One of his empty airfield, abbandoned and never conquered by my forces, showed up the presence of planes......???? a new way to transport his squadrons from oz to Burma????

In China we're redeploying our divisions in order to complete much faster the conquest of the west.


One of my ML hit one of my own mines at Exmouth
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TF 25 encounters mine field at Exmouth (11,86)

Japanese Ships
ML Ikitsushima, Mine hits 1, on fire



Nothing else to report...I know it's boring

_____________________________

[image]http://yfrog.com/2m70331348022314716641664j [/image]

(in reply to Gen.Hoepner)
Post #: 547
What d'u think? need a help - 10/10/2005 11:59:17 PM   
Gen.Hoepner


Posts: 3645
Joined: 9/4/2001
From: italy
Status: offline
MC asked me for a new house rule:

2 hexes on the western hedge of the map for safe transports going from/to India.

I do not know...my first thought was: the edges are for both of us...so why if a Cargo TF is spotted by a sub near madagascar the KB could not be ordered to raid it? Well...i know in RL Tokyo would never have done such a thing, but...they could have

My counterproposal was: ok, but free hands for Japanese divisions attached to China HQ...seems fair to me.
If he can send thousands of men from Oz to India and overwhelm me with the US divisions why can my divs simply march from Hanoi to Bankok?...

well...i do think letting the things like they are now would be more fair...and also the gameplay would be much better...

What d'u think?
I need a suggestion here guys.
What you think would be a fair rule for both of us?

_____________________________

[image]http://yfrog.com/2m70331348022314716641664j [/image]

(in reply to Gen.Hoepner)
Post #: 548
RE: What d'u think? need a help - 10/11/2005 12:10:53 AM   
PzB74


Posts: 5076
Joined: 10/3/2000
From: No(r)way
Status: offline
I've heard a lot about how unfair it is to sink ships at the maps edge... Personally I find it to be BS!
Everyone know the map edge is there and if you send ships along it you shouldn't run crying to mama if someone
catches you with your pants down.

If the Allied player doesn't know were the KB is he shouldn't send large convoys along the map edges.
If he does he runs a calculated risk and should consider providing a strong covering force.

A limitation of the war in China is a personal house rule from me. Even if I can capture all of China I don't.
This gives the Allied player fewer grey haires and ties up the Jap divisions that belong in China for the duration of the war.
(Give or take a few that is :)

Land combat is a bit sluggish in WitP, not one of my favorite game aspects, that's for sure.




_____________________________



"The problem in defense is how far you can go without destroying from within what you are trying to defend from without"
- Dwight D. Eisenhower

(in reply to Gen.Hoepner)
Post #: 549
RE: What d'u think? need a help - 10/11/2005 1:32:34 AM   
Gen.Hoepner


Posts: 3645
Joined: 9/4/2001
From: italy
Status: offline
Thanks PzB. I do not like the "chinese gamble", but neither the Indian Ocean one....

However, we're still deciding...for the moment i collect suggestions

AFTER ACTION REPORTS FOR 08/06/42


Today we bombed Pontiak in Borneo...with no results:-( He's using this base for transporting planes ( from the huge range they must be Catalinas or 4Es) from Oz to India....we're going to invade and clear the place.

MLE arrived at Palau. Minelaying ops starting here also.
The Imperial Guard Div is moving towards Rabaul, to give the change to the S.S.D. in the Malaria zone.
No news in china...moving units and planes (see map). Another day of horrible weather prevented any air op.

In Burma he built up Ramree Island. Now he can base fighters here in range of Rangoon I'd like to come back to Rangoon with my Tonies but they're comming out of the factories very slowly.
Always in burma he keeps bombing my units with awesome results....

The only good news of the day is that i cought 7 more dakotas flying supplies to Tsuyung!



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Day Air attack on 55th/C Division, at 32,29


Allied aircraft
B-17E Fortress x 60
LB-30 Liberator x 45


No Allied losses

Japanese ground losses:
262 casualties reported
Guns lost 11
Vehicles lost 1

Aircraft Attacking:
20 x B-17E Fortress bombing at 6000 feet
20 x LB-30 Liberator bombing at 6000 feet
16 x B-17E Fortress bombing at 6000 feet
25 x LB-30 Liberator bombing at 6000 feet
11 x B-17E Fortress bombing at 6000 feet
13 x B-17E Fortress bombing at 6000 feet
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------





Attachment (1)

_____________________________

[image]http://yfrog.com/2m70331348022314716641664j [/image]

(in reply to PzB74)
Post #: 550
RE: What d'u think? need a help - 10/11/2005 1:59:00 AM   
Tom Hunter


Posts: 2194
Joined: 12/14/2004
Status: offline
Personally I prefer to play as designed without house rules. For me this is a game.

There are plenty of ways to get stuff past the edge of the map anyway.

But my attitude towards this game and games in general is a lot more bloody minded than most people. Take that into account.

(in reply to Gen.Hoepner)
Post #: 551
RE: What d'u think? need a help - 10/11/2005 2:40:40 AM   
PzB74


Posts: 5076
Joined: 10/3/2000
From: No(r)way
Status: offline
A few admitions are perhaps in its place to keep MC in the game though

India is auto supplies - the only problem is to ferry US or Oz troops into the place.
This can be done by changing HQs.. So I don't really see the problem with the map edge.
It's unavoidable!

_____________________________



"The problem in defense is how far you can go without destroying from within what you are trying to defend from without"
- Dwight D. Eisenhower

(in reply to Tom Hunter)
Post #: 552
RE: What d'u think? need a help - 10/11/2005 2:42:58 AM   
patrickl


Posts: 1530
Joined: 6/20/2002
From: Singapore
Status: offline
Hi,

I too believe that games should be played with as few houserules as possible. They inhibit creativity and make my brain work even harder trying to remember so many houserules!

_____________________________


Banner designed by rogueusmc

(in reply to Tom Hunter)
Post #: 553
RE: What d'u think? need a help - 10/11/2005 8:50:07 AM   
Gen.Hoepner


Posts: 3645
Joined: 9/4/2001
From: italy
Status: offline
Hi guys,

the more i think about the edge map problem the more i found that house rule not necessary. Hasn't he the CVs to escort his convoys??
However, still need to collect more comments...

AFTER ACTION REPORTS FOR 08/07/42

The a/cs at Pontiak in Borneo are Liberators....it means that he's trasfering them from Oz to India...so in India i must expect a strong and harsh Air campaign! 36 more tonies are getting repaired at Hanoi. They will be placed soon at Bankok.
At Ramree Island he has put 2 engeneer units...
Two big raids at Tsuyung today and one even bigger at Sining...just to let him know i haven't forgotten the last AVG's surprise
nothing else to report



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Day Air attack on Pontianak , at 24,57

Japanese aircraft
G3M Nell x 51

Allied aircraft
no flights

No Japanese losses

Allied aircraft losses
B-24D Liberator: 1 destroyed

Airbase hits 1
Airbase supply hits 1
Runway hits 9

Aircraft Attacking:
19 x G3M Nell bombing at 7000 feet
27 x G3M Nell bombing at 6000 feet
5 x G3M Nell bombing at 7000 feet
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Naval bombardment of Pontianak, at 24,57


Allied aircraft
no flights


Allied aircraft losses
B-24D Liberator: 1 destroyed

Japanese Ships
DD Minegumo
DD Yamagumo
DD Arashio
DD Tokitsukaze
DD Yukikaze
DD Makigumo
CL Natori
CL Nagara
CL Jintsu
CL Sendai
CA Nachi
BB Mutsu
BB Nagato


Allied ground losses:
613 casualties reported

Airbase hits 28
Airbase supply hits 25
Runway hits 145
Port hits 4
Port fuel hits 1




_____________________________

[image]http://yfrog.com/2m70331348022314716641664j [/image]

(in reply to patrickl)
Post #: 554
RE: What d'u think? need a help - 10/11/2005 3:45:31 PM   
Gen.Hoepner


Posts: 3645
Joined: 9/4/2001
From: italy
Status: offline
AFTER ACTION REPORTS FOR 08/08/42

Nothing really important today. It's a very quite week.
Allied Sub mining operations and counter japanese MSWs ops at Port Blair.
Usual allied bombings in Burma; usual japanese bombings at Chungking,Sining,Lanchow and Tsuyung with LRCAP in each of these bases.
13 liberators destroyed on the ground at Pontiak(sp?), while Cebu island suddenly revealed the presence of enemy planes ... a BB TF is moving from Manila to solve this problem.

The 16th Division is being loaded on APs at Darwin. It will be moved to Truk to form with the Imperial Div the bulk of the 17th Army. 1 arty unit and 1 tank unit will join this travel. So that the 17th Army will be formed by 2 divisions,2 Brigades,2 Arty units,1 eng rgt and 1 Tank rgt. Not bad.
It's taking shape in my mind a very risky operation at Bora Bora....with the newly formed 17th Army....let's see.

The 5th Division will be moved to Java to form with the 7th the 2nd Army.

The 4th and the 56th Divs will remain in oz.

One more division will stay at Darwin in order to be ready for any threat that comes up in the west part of the map ( exmouth,Java or Sumatra.)

Else? Yes...we are now 3-1....very very depressing
I wonder how many points will i get as soon as i get Tsuyung with all those 70,000 men....


in the picture you can see one of the 13 B-24 destroyed by japanese bombardments in western Borneo( Pontiyak)




Attachment (1)

< Message edited by Gen.Hoepner -- 10/11/2005 3:51:01 PM >


_____________________________

[image]http://yfrog.com/2m70331348022314716641664j [/image]

(in reply to Gen.Hoepner)
Post #: 555
SideShow - 10/12/2005 1:45:04 AM   
Gen.Hoepner


Posts: 3645
Joined: 9/4/2001
From: italy
Status: offline
AFTER ACTION REPORTS FOR 08/9-10/42

Ok, few important things to say.

He started to mine with Subs Sebang, where i'm bringing in some more forces( 2 Naval guard units and one more base force), while i clean paths and countermine the base.
In China everything is going as scheldued: 1500 more APs are comming to Tsyung, while Tonies and Tojos arrive in good number to patrol my main AFs ( Hanoi,Kweyang and Kungchang)
In the Indian Ocean yesterday one of my sub spotted with his Glen a TF moving from Oz to India. Every available sub in the area has been allerted and one AV with float planes is going to check. Nells and Betties are ready in Java and the light carrier Division(1 CV+2CVLs+2CVE) is moving from Singapore to Batavia. Today what i believe is the same TF is moving south back again...probably he knows i'm waiting for him and do not want to risk.
We bombed Pontiak and now we're landing here...8 moreliberators cought on the ground.
We bombed Cebu island too( with BBs and planes from Davao and Legaspi). He won't use anymore this gate!
The Indian ocean is closed for him, unless he brings in his CVs...but it will be risky!

What's really important is that i've studied the operation SideShow. Target: Bora Bora.
I should wait for the 16th Div to come in...but time isn't on my side now cause bora bora reached today level 2 AF....so i gotta hurry!
The Imperial guard Div and 2 Bdes, along with 1 Arty and 1 Eng rgt will move from Truk,Kwalajein and Rabaul. 3 CVs are with them, while more 4 CVs are comming from Manila. 6 BBs will be involved too.
The map shows everything even if the plan is taking shape right now....this will probably be my last push of the war....gotta be succesfull!








Attachment (1)

_____________________________

[image]http://yfrog.com/2m70331348022314716641664j [/image]

(in reply to Gen.Hoepner)
Post #: 556
RE: SideShow - 10/12/2005 2:11:28 AM   
Andy Mac

 

Posts: 15222
Joined: 5/12/2004
From: Alexandria, Scotland
Status: offline
Re transport routes im not a fan of restrictions re that map edge unlike PZB I dont like the top corner where the RN can get bottled up as he did against Wobbly.

But whatever you decide I think it should be independent of Chines Command status.

I would alwyas have a house rule re keeping IJA Chinese Divisions in China unless PP's are paid I just feel with Land Combat being so "quirky" it is still just too easy to lose as the allies in China with the changes to prep points it is possible to hold on but not easy and one defeat can mean wipeout.

Given this IMO unrealistic ability of the IJA to finish off China I feel that IJA forces assigned to Chi Com should remain in borders of China even if they eliminate the Chinese field army until PP's are paid.

Alternatively one or two Chines bases should be declared uninvadable by the IJA and then you can untie Japanese hands re Chicom units but they will always take a risk doing so that the Chinese could break out of those enclaves.

Anyway thats my tuppence worth

(in reply to Gen.Hoepner)
Post #: 557
RE: SideShow - 10/12/2005 9:00:56 AM   
Gen.Hoepner


Posts: 3645
Joined: 9/4/2001
From: italy
Status: offline
AFTER ACTION REPORTS FOR 08/11/42

Andy, i agree about china restriction. I only took that in consideration because i found absolutely obscure the reason for the new house rule proposed.

However, today another TF has been spotted in IO. the light carrier division is moving from Batavia to intercept. No sign of enemy CVs here...

Pontianak finally fell and Cebu Island recieved the attention of 4 BBs....one more day of bombings and then my BB will sail southwards, towards Palau and then Truk to partecipate to Sideshow.
Sideshow has officially started. My main CVs are a bit late( south of Davao) but i hope they will be on time for the meeting near Tarawa.
He mines Sebang and Port Blair, i minesweep them. It's a cat and mouse game.
One CD unit moving to Sebang from Darwin. Ramree island now has fighters It's going to be a bloody autumn in Burma....
2 more days and the 1st Tank Division will be available...i have enough pps to be able to send it to Malaya as soon as it comes.
one more unit appeared in Chungking...now 37 units for 170,000 men
2000 APs already present at Tsuyung. Need more 1000 APs,2 more eng rgts and some more HQ support and we'll be ready.
Tonies and Tojos keep on flowing in.

I do not understand how the points for killing enemy men are calculated...seems that 1800 allies do not worth 300 japanese killed....

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TF 147 encounters mine field at Sabang (19,41)

Japanese Ships
MSW W.12
MSW W.10
MSW W.6

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Naval bombardment of Pontianak, at 24,57

Japanese Ships
DD Minegumo
DD Yamagumo
DD Arashio
DD Tokitsukaze
DD Yukikaze
DD Makigumo
CL Natori
CL Nagara
CL Jintsu
CL Sendai
CA Nachi
BB Mutsu
BB Nagato


Allied ground losses:
74 casualties reported

Airbase hits 4
Runway hits 49
Port hits 8
Port fuel hits 6
Port supply hits 15

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TF 147 encounters mine field at Sabang (19,41)

Japanese Ships
MSW W.12
MSW W.10
MSW W.6

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ground combat at Pontianak

Japanese Deliberate attack

Attacking force 2463 troops, 10 guns, 0 vehicles

Defending force 430 troops, 0 guns, 0 vehicles

Japanese assault odds: 19 to 1 (fort level 2)

Japanese forces CAPTURE Pontianak base !!!



Allied aircraft
no flights


Allied aircraft losses
B-24D Liberator: 1 destroyed

Japanese ground losses:
11 casualties reported
Guns lost 1

Allied ground losses:
1833 casualties reported




_____________________________

[image]http://yfrog.com/2m70331348022314716641664j [/image]

(in reply to Andy Mac)
Post #: 558
RE: SideShow - 10/12/2005 2:03:45 PM   
Andy Mac

 

Posts: 15222
Joined: 5/12/2004
From: Alexandria, Scotland
Status: offline
Although on balance I probably come out against the restriction at the map edge I dont actually find it obscure for me its a finely balanced argument and I can sympathise with MC.

In reality allied convoys in the Indian Ocean had a lot more space to lose themselves in than is available in WITP i.e. they cannot turn carrier attacks on convoys into a proper stern chase as they can really only go in two directions. They had a lot more options to run for cover from East African bases if enemy carriers were at sea.

It is just a little too easy IMO for a few IJN subs to find convoys in this area and bring in CVL/CVE raiders.

On the other hand the allies did use heavy covering forces to protect these convoys and didnt ship troops or aircraft from Aus/US to India via the pacific.

Add to that the ability of the allies to send LCU's via PP point spend and the supply level of karachi make me come down on the side or no houserule on this one but I do understand why the allies could want one and the argument for me isnt one sided.

Andy

(in reply to Gen.Hoepner)
Post #: 559
RE: SideShow - 10/12/2005 2:48:49 PM   
Gen.Hoepner


Posts: 3645
Joined: 9/4/2001
From: italy
Status: offline
AFTER ACTION REPORTS FOR 08/12/42

Thanks for your comment Andy. The problem remains, because now i've spotted his convoy ( 2 ships) going from Oz to India. My light carrier division is going to intercept it....I do not know how will he react to the sinking of his ships, but i really do think the allies have many ways to send LCU and planes to Karachi( paying pp points via S.Frisco) that we do not need an house rule for that.

However, as said my CVLs are moving. Only 2 ships....mm...probably he thinks that with only 2 ships i won't care much of sending my CVs there...he will have a nasty surprise!
He's now using a new AF in western Sumatra to move his liberators to India...no way i can stop this thing in time, but i got only myself to blame not to have seen this threat on time!

Sideshow is on the way.everything is moving towards the meeting point. 2 Subs with commandos are moving towards Ha'apai and Rorotonga, two empty atolls, while a SLNF unit will be loaded on transport and sent to Tongarapu.
My 4 CVs are taking too much time to get to Truk...they won't arrive in time...but with only 3 CVs the Sideshow can be very very risky....do not know. For the moment everything remains like it is now.

Bad weather in China prevents any air operation.






_____________________________

[image]http://yfrog.com/2m70331348022314716641664j [/image]

(in reply to Andy Mac)
Post #: 560
RE: SideShow - 10/12/2005 3:13:48 PM   
String


Posts: 2661
Joined: 10/7/2003
From: Estonia
Status: offline
Allies can't send planes by turning them to SEAC in SF. They can only do it via shipping through the indian ocean.

(in reply to Gen.Hoepner)
Post #: 561
RE: SideShow - 10/12/2005 4:26:00 PM   
Andy Mac

 

Posts: 15222
Joined: 5/12/2004
From: Alexandria, Scotland
Status: offline
Or air transport accross Russia !!!! (This is gamey though)


(in reply to String)
Post #: 562
RE: What d'u think? need a help - 10/12/2005 5:51:20 PM   
Tom Hunter


Posts: 2194
Joined: 12/14/2004
Status: offline
Hey, that B24 is a medivac plane, your a WAR CRIMINAL!!!


(in reply to Gen.Hoepner)
Post #: 563
RE: What d'u think? need a help - 10/12/2005 5:54:23 PM   
Tom Hunter


Posts: 2194
Joined: 12/14/2004
Status: offline
Hoepner,

Chinese casualties are worth less than Japanese casualties

Japanese casualties are worth less than European casualties

@!!$%$!! racist game developers.

(in reply to Tom Hunter)
Post #: 564
RE: What d'u think? need a help - 10/12/2005 7:27:23 PM   
Gen.Hoepner


Posts: 3645
Joined: 9/4/2001
From: italy
Status: offline
AFTER ACTION REPORTS FOR 08/13/42

Thanks Tom...now i understand
Those chinese units are a pain in the ***!!! They keep respawning at Chungking!!!!!!!!! Now 40 units are present there...one month ago they were 31....almost 170,000 men...are becomming too much to handle...and the damned weather keep holding down my bombers...any real air campaign is almost interdicted

However, in IO now the target is clearly spotted. the DL should be quite high at the moment. At full speed ( see map) my light carrier division should intercept it tomorrow afternoon. No way he's gonna get through

Sideshow moves slowly...and Bora Bora reached level 3 Af and 4 port...by the time i will be there it's going to be at least 4-5....however the traffic in the pacific has decreased, so probably he won't spot be before i reach the Catalinas range ( 13 hexes)

His 4Es have been really quite for a while now...this scares me a bit...i wonder where he's going to hurt me next. Ledo is full of planes and i guess he's comming for a chinese AF. I have at least 130 fighters in each of my 3 major AF ( Hanoi, Kungchang and Kweyiang)..hope they'll be enough to stop any mass attack.

His subs are really becomming a danger in Bengal bay. Tons of them are placing mines everywhere and my MSWs rush from Port Blair to Sebang every turn....more MSWs are comming to Singapore.

My 4 CVs have almost reached Palau.





--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ground combat at Chungking

Japanese Bombardment attack

Attacking force 201377 troops, 2406 guns, 24 vehicles

Defending force 163149 troops, 784 guns, 49 vehicles



Allied ground losses:
29 casualties reported







Attachment (1)

_____________________________

[image]http://yfrog.com/2m70331348022314716641664j [/image]

(in reply to Tom Hunter)
Post #: 565
RE: SideShow - 10/12/2005 7:27:52 PM   
Gen.Hoepner


Posts: 3645
Joined: 9/4/2001
From: italy
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: String

Allies can't send planes by turning them to SEAC in SF. They can only do it via shipping through the indian ocean.



This is a good news indeed

_____________________________

[image]http://yfrog.com/2m70331348022314716641664j [/image]

(in reply to String)
Post #: 566
RE: SideShow - 10/12/2005 7:28:24 PM   
Gen.Hoepner


Posts: 3645
Joined: 9/4/2001
From: italy
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Andy Mac

Or air transport accross Russia !!!! (This is gamey though)





we have an house rule for that. It's forbidden since the beginning of the game

_____________________________

[image]http://yfrog.com/2m70331348022314716641664j [/image]

(in reply to Andy Mac)
Post #: 567
RE: SideShow - 10/12/2005 7:56:19 PM   
Gen.Hoepner


Posts: 3645
Joined: 9/4/2001
From: italy
Status: offline
In this rare picture you can see with which kind of troops the chinese are fighting us...they barely seem humans! ( PROPAGANDA)

this picture has been stolen from a dead officer found beyond our lines at Chungking and shows what is probably the Manchurian Chinese Division




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

[image]http://yfrog.com/2m70331348022314716641664j [/image]

(in reply to Gen.Hoepner)
Post #: 568
the quite american - 10/13/2005 1:44:08 AM   
Gen.Hoepner


Posts: 3645
Joined: 9/4/2001
From: italy
Status: offline
AFTER ACTION REPORTS FOR 08/14/42

My light carrier division managed to sink a single AP that was trying to break through the indian ocean door. Few men were still afloat when AP Wanganella went beneath the waves. Sub I-65 arrived few minutes later and the order was to shot every single american alive!( Again, propaganda...do not take my words seriously plz).

For the rest nothing important happened. I got a Tony Sentai completely screwed up by a damned bug ( the parental unit is at Kungchang with 6 pilots and 36 planes, while the /1 fragment is at Shangai with 30 planes and 30 pilots-_-'').

Sideshow is going on as scheldued, even if i stopped my CVs at Palau...no fuel source gotta wait for the replenishment TF from Manila.... I'm an idiot!


Still no sign of his CVs....wonder why he's not searching for my Carriers now that he has the avengers...i'd do that all the time at this stage!






Attachment (1)

_____________________________

[image]http://yfrog.com/2m70331348022314716641664j [/image]

(in reply to Gen.Hoepner)
Post #: 569
RE: the quite american - 10/13/2005 9:25:52 AM   
Gen.Hoepner


Posts: 3645
Joined: 9/4/2001
From: italy
Status: offline
AFTER ACTION REPORTS FOR 08/15/42

Heavy traffic near Bora Bora... Is it possible that he decided to wake up when i decide to take the initiative in this area!??!?! Murphy's law.... However, spotted a convoy going from Bora Bora to Pago Pago...very strange indeed...is he invading!??! If so...where are his carriers and his BBs????...really do not read through the lines of his actual strategy

While in Burma and Bengal Bay his ideas are clear enough to my eyes. He wants Port Blair and probably his further step will be Sebang. Need some fighters at Seband...probably the next Tony sentai will be sent here if i only could find the time....
But i wonder how can he immagine to get to Port Blair and Sebang without his american carriers....ok, he can use fast transports for his troops and his 4Es to deal with my Navy, but ...com'on! I could bring there 4 divisions in less than 2 weeks and the whole KB in 3 weeks...with some 250 Nells and if needed more 200 zeros.....mmm.....He could try to move his CVs from Oz to India...that would be a risky move but at the moment i could not face it with my light carrier div.... ... however now IO seems to be clear of any enemy ship. The attention level remains high in this area anyway.

I'm starting to build a new strong point: Menado-Ambonia-Weda and ( do not remember the name)... a kind of a first barrier against any push from Darwin to Mindanao. 4 bases with level 4 AFs, well supplied and with heavy forts ( ambonia has already 2 port,almost 5 AF and 6 forts)...

In China everything has slowed down...43 units at Chungking...It's been rainy here for 5 days in a row.... what a nasty place! My main 3 AFs now have each 150/180(50% zeros, 30% Tonies, 10% Nates, 10% Tojos) fighters on LRCAP 0 range, 150/200 bombers ( Sining, Lanchow,Chungking and Tsuyung as targets) and some 18 recce planes each. 250 AV points each obviously. Not bad.

Building up GeorgeTown and Sebang and moving here troops and base forces.





--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TF 105 encounters mine field at Sabang (19,41)

Japanese Ships
MSW W.11
MSW W.8
MSW W.5
MSW W.4
MSW W.2
MSW W.1
PG Tatsumiya Maru, Mine hits 1, on fire



_____________________________

[image]http://yfrog.com/2m70331348022314716641664j [/image]

(in reply to Gen.Hoepner)
Post #: 570
Page:   <<   < prev  17 18 [19] 20 21   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Current Games From Matrix.] >> [World War II] >> War In The Pacific - Struggle Against Japan 1941 - 1945 >> After Action Reports >> RE: Love springs back Page: <<   < prev  17 18 [19] 20 21   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

7.516