pauk
Posts: 4162
Joined: 10/21/2001 From: Zagreb,Croatia Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: mc3744 Hi pauk I don't think this game is very historical anyway, under so many point of views. Hence if it's doable, I'll put Corsair's on CVE's. I don't mind if he puts Jacks on his carriers. well, you don't need that, you are going to win anyway. Of course you don't mind if he puts Jacks on his carriers simply because Corsairs are overpowered and you know you going to eat him quote:
ORIGINAL: mc3744 It doesn't look like we are going to fight anyway. He keeps retreating. How's that historical? Japan retreating from Burma without even trying to fight? No way Well, we learn that from our allied opponents which invented Sir Robin defence early in the war (subs transport, evacuating BF and that stuff) quote:
ORIGINAL: mc3744 I'm not complaining, I'm just saying that this is not a simulation (just to name a few examples: Australia, Indian Pond, massed aircrafts, massed armies with no stacking limits, DS, ...). It's a game, we've been handling it this way for the past year. I'll stick to the house rules, but beside those I'll do whatever the game allows me to. I'm totally understand your attitude. IMHO the both of you run into problems when (both of you) started massive air campaign (night bombing is still overated, IMHO). Well, it's your's game and you know better than me what is allowed and acceptable for both sides. Don't get me wrong, i'm not "Jap fanboy" here, this was only my 2 liras Sorry for going OT, i will back to reading this enjoyable AAR.
_____________________________
|