Matrix Games Forums

Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

Reinforcement problem in Shingle

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [Current Games From Matrix.] >> [World War II] >> Decisive Battles: Battles In Italy >> Battles In Italy Support >> Reinforcement problem in Shingle Page: [1]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
Reinforcement problem in Shingle - 8/15/2005 2:11:55 PM   
Carl Myers

 

Posts: 136
Joined: 9/16/2003
Status: offline
The recon unit of the 1st British Infantry Division is listed as a standard unit instead of in lane 2.
Post #: 1
RE: Reinforcement problem in Shingle - 8/16/2005 2:47:52 AM   
TheHellPatrol


Posts: 1588
Joined: 7/3/2004
Status: offline
Hello Carl, thanks for all your invaluable input in our PBEM games of BiI. Ready for another??????

_____________________________

A man is rich in proportion to the number of things he can afford to let alone.
Henry David Thoreau


(in reply to Carl Myers)
Post #: 2
RE: Reinforcement problem in Shingle - 8/16/2005 3:41:41 AM   
Fred98


Posts: 4430
Joined: 1/5/2001
From: Wollondilly, Sydney
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Carl Myers
........listed as a standard unit instead of in lane 2.



I can't follow the question


_____________________________


(in reply to Carl Myers)
Post #: 3
RE: Reinforcement problem in Shingle - 8/16/2005 5:06:09 AM   
Carl Myers

 

Posts: 136
Joined: 9/16/2003
Status: offline
quote:

I can't follow the question


This unit's entry point is in sea lane #2. The rest of the division was listed as in lane #2 and can be landed. This unit is not on a naval transport and can not be landed, it just keeps being bumped to the next turn.

(in reply to Fred98)
Post #: 4
RE: Reinforcement problem in Shingle - 9/8/2005 4:11:55 PM   
GO FOR BROKE


Posts: 2
Joined: 9/8/2005
Status: offline
How do I get that little sucker to land? Must the scenaro be edited?




Attachment (1)

_____________________________





(in reply to Carl Myers)
Post #: 5
RE: Reinforcement problem in Shingle - 9/9/2005 6:08:28 PM   
Carl Myers

 

Posts: 136
Joined: 9/16/2003
Status: offline
SSG, is there going to be a patch to change this unit's arrival status to lane #2?

(in reply to GO FOR BROKE)
Post #: 6
RE: Reinforcement problem in Shingle - 9/10/2005 1:49:09 PM   
WachtamRhein


Posts: 46
Joined: 7/30/2005
From: England
Status: offline
Carl, you could clearly do this fix in a variant scenario like I'm fixing WiE

(in reply to Carl Myers)
Post #: 7
RE: Reinforcement problem in Shingle - 9/10/2005 3:36:40 PM   
Fred98


Posts: 4430
Joined: 1/5/2001
From: Wollondilly, Sydney
Status: offline
In a commment a few weeks ago, there is a patch on the way.

I presume this issue is addressed.




_____________________________


(in reply to WachtamRhein)
Post #: 8
RE: Reinforcement problem in Shingle - 9/12/2005 5:40:31 AM   
alexs


Posts: 417
Joined: 8/27/2003
From: Sydney
Status: offline
Hi Guys,

This is a data entry error which will be fixed in the next patch. In the meantime, you can correct the error yourself. In the editor, select units (centre icon in first column) then select editor (centre icon in the last column). Find the recon miscreant, and click on its icon. Change the entry in 'Arrival Status' from 'Standard' to 'Lane 2'. Save the change. That should fix it.

Regards
Alexs


_____________________________


(in reply to Fred98)
Post #: 9
Page:   [1]
All Forums >> [Current Games From Matrix.] >> [World War II] >> Decisive Battles: Battles In Italy >> Battles In Italy Support >> Reinforcement problem in Shingle Page: [1]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

2.937