CamelCity
Posts: 10
Joined: 4/15/2005 From: Winston-Salem, NC Status: offline
|
I got GoT last spring, and played the Thermopolae scenario a couple of times without really learning the game first (I'm a huge "Gates of Fire" fan, so I wanted to jump right in-- that's why I bought GoT). Needless to say, I got crushed, and then I got busy with other things, and didn't play GoT after that. Got a new computer in January, and on a whim put GoT on it. Spent an evening really going through the tutorials (which are excellent, by the way), and I must say I've been pleasantly surprised as well. I've since added Spartan so that I can play the full complement of scenarios. Regarding the supply chain & troops in the field: I think charging double for troops in the field is a good solution (rather than constructing a supply chain to have to micro manage). Overall, I think the integration of the economics system and the martial system is very elegant and well thought out. You can't have a huge conquering force out in the field without the economy to back it up. I like how the economics can become an integral part of the military strategy-- for example, if you are the Spartans, you need to capitalize on copper. If you are fighting the Spartans, you had better deny them copper so they can't afford those deadly heavy infantry units. You CAN attack an enemy's supply chain, in an indirect way. If you can find a "soft" city in the enemies empire that is also resource-rich, attack and conquer it! The loss of income from the resources, as well as the loss of taxation income, will hurt the silver supply, and can thus cripple those expensive armies out in the field.
|