Matrix Games Forums

Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

26th and 27th September, 1942

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [Current Games From Matrix.] >> [World War II] >> War In The Pacific - Struggle Against Japan 1941 - 1945 >> After Action Reports >> 26th and 27th September, 1942 Page: <<   < prev  14 15 [16] 17 18   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
26th and 27th September, 1942 - 4/30/2006 11:52:26 AM   
pauk


Posts: 4162
Joined: 10/21/2001
From: Zagreb,Croatia
Status: offline


We passed 10.000 hits, i hoped i would have something about to cheer, but Andy does know how to play cat and mouse game....

AFTER ACTION REPORTS FOR 09/26/42

BURMA

TF 61 encounters mine field at Akyab (30,29)

TF 61 troops unloading over beach at Akyab, 30,29

Japanese ground losses:
358 casualties reported


Fast transprts disembarks another SNLF at Akyab. The other one bring supplies to my brave soldiers. I thought that i got him, if Fortune kisses me....


PACIFIC

Day Air attack on Mili , at 84,85

Allied aircraft
B-25C Mitchell x 34
B-17E Fortress x 40


No Allied losses

Airbase hits 2
Airbase supply hits 5
Runway hits 41


Strong CAP over Mili ordered (from KB and Maloelap)...

AFTER ACTION REPORTS FOR 09/27/42


BURMA

Hyuga bombardment TF visited Akyab again and went with good results.

Naval bombardment of Akyab, at 30,29

Japanese Ships
CA Kumano
CA Suzuya
BB Hyuga


Allied ground losses:
433 casualties reported

Airbase hits 2
Airbase supply hits 1
Runway hits 22
Port hits 3
Port supply hits 7



I've done everthing i could, and was hoped that enemy bombers would stay down due thunderstorms in area. But, you guessed it already - my bombers ordered on ground attack on Akyab were stood down... Enemys bombers didn't, of course ....

Day Air attack on Yokosuka 2nd SNLF, at 30,29

Allied aircraft
Wellington III x 14
Beaufort V-IX x 6
B-25C Mitchell x 3


No Allied losses

Japanese ground losses:
18 casualties reported

All bombing at 7000 feet

-------------------------------------------
Day Air attack on Yokosuka 2nd SNLF, at 30,29

Allied aircraft
B-25C Mitchell x 12
B-17E Fortress x 16
B-24D Liberator x 9
IL-4c x 6


No Allied losses

Japanese ground losses:
105 casualties reported

at 7000 feet

------------------------------------------
Day Air attack on Ikaiei SNLF, at 30,29


Allied aircraft
Wellington III x 25
Beaufort V-IX x 13
P-40B Tomahawk x 51


No Allied losses

Japanese ground losses:
117 casualties reported
Guns lost 2

at 7000 feet

--------------------------------------------
Day Air attack on Ikaiei SNLF, at 30,29


Allied aircraft
B-25C Mitchell x 11
B-17E Fortress x 50
B-24D Liberator x 39
IL-4c x 12


Japanese ground losses:
247 casualties reported
Guns lost 2


He moved fast transport, but closed port prevents his ships to retreat before daylight. Unfortunatly i had only couple of LBA ready for action....

Day Air attack on TF, near Akyab at 30,29

Japanese aircraft
G4M1 Betty x 3

Japanese aircraft losses
G4M1 Betty: 3 damaged

Allied Ships
DD Isaac Sweers

Aircraft Attacking:
3 x G4M1 Betty launching torpedoes at 200 feet



Ground combat at Akyab - outcome was predictable after he bombed to dust my poor soldiers..

Japanese Shock attack

Attacking force 1696 troops, 5 guns, 0 vehicles, Beginning Assault Value = 54

Defending force 1366 troops, 6 guns, 0 vehicles, Beginning Assault Value = 39

Japanese max assault: 36 - adjusted assault: 4

Allied max defense: 32 - adjusted defense: 59

Japanese assault odds: 0 to 1 (fort level 0)


Japanese ground losses:
217 casualties reported
Guns lost 2


Ok, Guadal-Akyab (that is what Andy wrote to me yesterday) definitly goes historical. So time is for withdrawing from there and fight where i can defend. I can keep Akyab AF closed with army bombers, port will closed to - thats why i have Hyuga bombardment TF there and it would take time while Akyab become operational.

PACIFIC

Enemy bombers didn't attack Mili and i've paid high price in ops losses for that - 6 Zeros and 2 Tony. At least KB wasn't spoted so he would think that were ground based Zeros.

Glen reconed Palmyra yesterday and look what she saw:


It could be anything (Glen reconed Palmyra again and this time reported AVDs and AKs), but i certainly prefers any kind of intel, rather then nothing.







Attachment (1)

< Message edited by pauk -- 4/30/2006 11:55:35 AM >


_____________________________


(in reply to pauk)
Post #: 451
RE: 26th and 27th September, 1942 - 5/1/2006 10:45:16 AM   
pauk


Posts: 4162
Joined: 10/21/2001
From: Zagreb,Croatia
Status: offline


AFTER ACTION REPORTS FOR 09/28/42


BURMA AND INDIA

I'm telling you guys, laying minefields provides excellent intel (until someone start the all seeing eye of non-glen subs thread). No hits, but it is good to know what enemy doing (these DDs are on fast transport duty for Akyab)

TF 1054 encounters mine field at Diamond Harbor (28,23)

Allied Ships
DD Tjerk Hiddes
DD Isaac Sweers



Day Air attack on Ikaiei SNLF, at Akyab. Same old story... Rangoon is closed, enemy AFs in India are open. Bah!

Allied aircraft
Wellington III x 44
Beaufort V-IX x 24
P-40B Tomahawk x 51
B-25C Mitchell x 11


No Allied losses

Japanese ground losses:
125 casualties reported



AUSTRALIA

No sign of enemy yet there. Enemy units withdrew closer to Charters Town and Alice Springs probably. I'm sending SNLF to investigate where are they. What i can expect there? Perth is obvious target - he would mass divisions on south Australian railroad and go for Perth. I'm expecting that he will have amphibious fleet to - just in case that i defend rairoad to Perth. But i have no intention to defned such isolated base - although it have great strategic value... I think that i would talk about "needs for frontline corrections" in the near future

PACIFIC

I've canceled planned air offensive against Tarawa. Why? Not that i doubt in succes, but i think it's not worth planes i would lost and time i need to devote to this operation. Yes, i'm getting tired of this "sitz-krieg" (sp?).

Imperial HQ now considering "snake-go" which is based on strike at enemy shipping at Palmyra. Plan is simple: when enemy ships enters Palmyra (mines would inform me) i will send surface TF under cover KB (they will wait 10 hexes from Palmyra) and strike fast.

Plan is based on presumption that lots of American CVs are going for upgrade in next month and wont be at the seas. But i'm not sure if i will go with snake-go.


CHINA

Air strike on Chengtu ordered. Let's see if we can have Ichang and Sian operational at the same time.


IMPERIAL HQ NEWS SHEET

Our inteligence made a report about future enemy plans:

"We have strong reasons to believe that future enemy plans are based on:

1. Burma - securing Akyab. Operation Typhoon II would start after this goal is reached. Typhoon II have main goal to achive air superiority in Burma - closing Rangoon.

2. We had been told that US Army reciving new long-range fighters. In month or two enemy will start air offensive on Marshalls with B-17 under protection of this long range fighters.

3. Australia - Perth.

4. Solomons, NG are also possible targets, since enemy recon reported moderate/weak defence.




< Message edited by pauk -- 5/1/2006 10:48:57 AM >


_____________________________


(in reply to pauk)
Post #: 452
RE: 26th and 27th September, 1942 - 5/1/2006 11:10:28 AM   
Nemo121


Posts: 5821
Joined: 2/6/2004
Status: offline
Just a question but would you consider holding Perth with enough force to withstand his initial attack and then running a few tank regiments down the road/railroa in central Australia to cut off his lines of supply to the forces attacking Perth overland? It wouldn't be more than an annoyance but it could certainly delay any fall of Perth by a few more weeks.

(in reply to pauk)
Post #: 453
29th september, 1942 - 5/1/2006 2:59:33 PM   
pauk


Posts: 4162
Joined: 10/21/2001
From: Zagreb,Croatia
Status: offline
greetings...

it is certainly a good idea, but i don't think i have sufficient forces to do that. I need to defend Independent State of Aborigians (the Mighty Emperor gave his word to natives of this continent that Japan would do everything to protect ISA from white imperialists and our two countries could live in peace and harmony for a 1000 years!).

I need to keep strong armoured garnison in Burma - he can not invade Burma right now, but once when Perth is lost he can commit CVs to India and Burma will be threatend. And IIRC, there is quite a lot british armoured units in India.

One independent bde will arrive in Derby in a month so my defence there would be: 3 divisions and one tk division (38/38) in Darwin; one division, tk rtg in Derby ( plus mix bde from Perth and ind bde from DEI) - i simply can't assign more forces there...

I have to keep in mind one more thing after the Perth fallen - direct invasion on Timor or even Java (i have only one bde in Soerbaya) rather than attacking Northern Australia. I need to secure Koepang and i spend most of the time clicking on LCUs on the map to find what i can send there.



AFTER ACTION REPORTS FOR 09/29/42

BURMA

Day Air attack on Akyab - AF is closed 100%... and I'm going to make sure it will stay closed in the future.

Japanese aircraft
A6M2 Zero x 7
Ki-44-IIb Tojo x 25
Ki-21 Sally x 25
Ki-49 Helen x 26
Ki-46-II Dinah x 1

Japanese aircraft losses
Ki-49 Helen: 1 damaged


Allied ground losses:
7 casualties reported

Airbase hits 1
Airbase supply hits 2
Runway hits 46


One Daitai from Rangoon was patroling over Akyab. 6 Samurais lost their lives while enemy lost 5 Tomahawks and 5 Wellingtons (11-6 A2A, 16-11 total for today).

Day Air attack on Yokosuka 2nd SNLF, at 30,29

Japanese aircraft
A6M2 Zero x 12

Allied aircraft
Wellington III x 44
Beaufort V-IX x 21
P-40B Tomahawk x 50
B-25C Mitchell x 14

Japanese aircraft losses
A6M2 Zero: 6 destroyed

Allied aircraft losses
Wellington III: 3 destroyed, 5 damaged
Beaufort V-IX: 1 damaged
P-40B Tomahawk: 5 destroyed
B-25C Mitchell: 1 destroyed

Japanese ground losses:
39 casualties reported


What annoys me most is that fast transport bug still works!.... i ordered two TF to pick units at Akyab, but they didn't (or they loaded units but dissapears in ships). The latter is more than possible cause during day phase remaints of "Akyab invasion force" withdrew spontaneusly (sp?) from Akyab. When i open my turn i saw that these units are only 1/3 of their OOB... damn, damn, damn.....!

PACIFIC

MSW's cleared minefields at Johnston Islands. I'm sending KB and SC TF towards Palmyra (lots of ships reported there again) but i will turn them back on first bad sign.


TF 1043 encounters mine field at Johnston Island (102,74)

Allied Ships
MSW Wasaga
MSW Ungava
MSW Outarde



CHINA

Both Ichang and Sian were closed and Andy gets a warning, "xy airmissions aborted due bad weather). So I've canceled bombers but left 60 Tony on sweep mission on Chengtu (Andy could move Spits there from Ledo).


PROPAGANDA WARFARE

Andy told me that he was amazed that i reacted at Akyab, and it was a really cheap attack for him at minimal risk...

I had to boost my moral somehow, and i've responed to him:


If you weren't Felix at guadalakyab, you would loose this base. But, your bombers regulary attacked my troops while my AF were closed. I needed only one turn without attack from air....Damn, it seems to me that AFs in India are never closed!

PS.

You took this worthless malaria base only because i allowed that. Please keep in mind that there is no more bases which you could took with "condom forces" (FT and Catalinas) :)




< Message edited by pauk -- 5/1/2006 3:28:48 PM >


_____________________________


(in reply to Nemo121)
Post #: 454
RE: 26th and 27th September, 1942 - 5/1/2006 3:45:59 PM   
Jim D Burns


Posts: 4013
Joined: 2/25/2002
From: Salida, CA.
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: pauk
(mines would inform me)


One word:

Gamey.



I know the game lets you see his ships because of mine attacks where normally you wouldn't, but don't you think actually using this game design flaw as recon for a surface attack is a tad gamey?

Jim


_____________________________


(in reply to pauk)
Post #: 455
RE: 26th and 27th September, 1942 - 5/1/2006 4:24:26 PM   
pauk


Posts: 4162
Joined: 10/21/2001
From: Zagreb,Croatia
Status: offline
Greetings, Jim

hi, we can argue about that for a million years.

1. Laying mines isn't gamey - why the hell i wouldn't lay mines and hope for a hit or two?
2. Ok, i don't really expect that my mines will hit enemy CV, but i do not lay 10 mines - i'm using non-minelaying subs in wolf-packs - 5 or 6 so we are talking about 50-60 mines....
3. I'm not guilty that japanese subs have only one puropse - to be sunk (please, no arguments like "1.8 tweaked effectivnes of the ASW", in my other game i had sub which was attacked twice and get sunk...)

4. I'm not guilty that japanese subs wont attack big fat transports (you can find numerous posts in my AAR) so they are mostly useless

5. I'm not guilty that my opponents uses sub tranports for FAMOUS evacuation from PI and arguing that is not gamey.

6. I'm not guilty that there several game flaws (as you mentioned) but when Allies uses this flaws then is ok? (i would mention only x symbol over base with planes in combination with keeping an eye on air balance).

7. I'm not guilty that my opponents runs into their holes and waiting for their toys in 1943. What the hell i should supposed to do? Continue with attacks? run into hornets nest without any info?

Therefore I stronlgy reject "gamey statement" but everyone has right on oppinion.

PS... i'm not complaining about my opponents moves and style play, but i think i'm quite honorable player (I could overrun China and took AV but i'm here to play and enjoy in the game).

One of the reasons why i'm doing AAR is allowing other players to know me (i'm not hiding anything and it is certainly my deficit to the my future opponent cause they will know my way of thinking) and let them decide if i'm opponent for them.

I do not want to find myself in situation described in post #63 and #64 of this AAR....


_____________________________


(in reply to Jim D Burns)
Post #: 456
RE: 26th and 27th September, 1942 - 5/1/2006 4:51:41 PM   
Jim D Burns


Posts: 4013
Joined: 2/25/2002
From: Salida, CA.
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: pauk
1. Laying mines isn't gamey - why the hell i wouldn't lay mines and hope for a hit or two?


I have no problem at all with laying mines and never suggested I did. I just had a problem with the satellite data they were beaming back to your surface combat task force letting them know the optimal time to charge into the base and attack enemy ships.

quote:


2. Ok, i don't really expect that my mines will hit enemy CV, but i do not lay 10 mines - i'm using non-minelaying subs in wolf-packs - 5 or 6 so we are talking about 50-60 mines....


There could be 10,000 mines, it doesn’t change the fact that WWII mines did not have the ability to relay recon data to the side that laid the mines, it’s a game design flaw that gives players that data in my opinion. I think the only person who should get mine collision data is the side that suffers the hit.

quote:


3. I'm not guilty that japanese subs have only one puropse - to be sunk (please, no arguments like "1.8 tweaked effectivnes of the ASW", in my other game i had sub which was attacked twice and get sunk...)


No arguments here, subs do not work as they should, not even close, so we agree completely.

quote:


4. I'm not guilty that japanese subs wont attack big fat transports (you can find numerous posts in my AAR) so they are mostly useless


I totally agree, in my game we are into mid October and I’ve hit maybe 5 of his ships total with sub weapons so far in the game, perhaps sinking one or two of those ships.

quote:


5. I'm not guilty that my opponents uses sub tranports for FAMOUS evacuation from PI and arguing that is not gamey.


If the game had some ability to rebuild land units that were destroyed, I’d totally agree with you on this point. But since there is no way to compensate (EITHER SIDE) for unexpected non-historical losses, players need to be able to pull cadres out of combat theatres to assure them the ability to resist if they’ve suffered more losses than their side did historically. The problem with historically hard coded OOB’s is as soon as someone takes non-historical losses, the game no longer represents history. Had the US 1 USMC division been destroyed at Guadalcanal, I guarantee the US would have rebuilt it or replaced it with another formation eventually, but that isn’t simulated in the game, so I think cadres are a necessary evil. For now at least.

Were I playing Japan, I’d have a small cadre of every land unit defending in the Pacific sent back to the home island for rebuilding later if needed. You don’t have to rebuild them, but the capacity to do so should be there to allow you as much flexibility in your defense as possible.

quote:


6. I'm not guilty that there several game flaws (as you mentioned) but when Allies uses this flaws then is ok? (i would mention only x symbol over base with planes in combination with keeping an eye on air balance).


No it is not ok for the allies either. To me satellite style recon data from deployed mines is simply a design flaw and using it for any purpose against your opponent is gamey.

The x symbol air balance data too is a flaw in my opinion and I personally do not use it.

quote:


7. I'm not guilty that my opponents runs into their holes and waiting for their toys in 1943. What the hell i should supposed to do? Continue with attacks? run into hornets nest without any info?


Running and hiding is a legitimate tactic for either side to use, so I wouldn’t use that as an argument to justify recon mines.


quote:


but i think i'm quite honorable player


I never questioned your honor, I’m very sorry you felt I was. I merely wanted to raise the topic for discussion. I know the word gamey possibly holds negative connotations for some, but I did not intend it as a negative comment towards you, simply as a topic of discussion.

Jim


_____________________________


(in reply to pauk)
Post #: 457
RE: 26th and 27th September, 1942 - 5/2/2006 1:14:41 AM   
pauk


Posts: 4162
Joined: 10/21/2001
From: Zagreb,Croatia
Status: offline
Greetings....

I guess (corret me if i'm wrog) that you are "ulitmate history fanboy". I didn't mean anything rude by that, i'm UHF deep in my heart too. But then again, there is difference in your point of view and mine (hey, i did't mean type 88 mine)...

I can see (from your post) that you and me have similar oppinion regarding game issue (design flaws). But the main difference between us is that you don't accept anything that is "using game design flaw"( and you are right!) and I accept....

You are probably perfectionist (i was perfectionist before this game relased too), and you want that game works in "historical ways". Nothing wrong with that, i wish the same.

But, i realised that, if anyone is guilty for unhistorical play, then it is our fault. I've started this game with tactical reasoning (puting LR CAP over TF with 9 Zeros, but my opponent send a strike with 20 W-hawks and i've responded with 30 Zero; then he used 50 W-hawks and i've responded with 70 Zero on CAP) but realised that is not good approach to the game - i've mentioned reasons for that in brackets.....

So, what to do? quit the game and accuse all for the failure of the Game (like Pas). Nah, i wont do it... it's probably my fault, because i have BA in humanistic studies and i would never blame the product (WiTP) because our own limits. The main problem here is human nature (just test AI vs AI and you never see the issues we have,right?)

I dream about a perfect game where house rules aren't needed, but then again i'm aware i should play against myself. But, i'm realist (sp) too ...

i've play one campaing nas Allies in UV - my dear friend pfognoff kick my ass - but hey, i've enjoy in that game - i do not find any fun in hiding knowing i would get my toys (strictly speaking - isn't that gamey?????). I've always looking for challenge.... but that is my problem (rather than AV i'm looking for long struggle)... so no, i'm not using the argument "runing and hiding" for my actions. I'm using it only as answer to Allied strategy....

Allied runs into their holes. Ok. Allies send British CVs in Pacific. Ok. Allies uses subs and catalinas as main offensive weapons "condom transports", hiding their carriers in PH, WC and Australia. OK....Allies uses picket line between PH and WC (with single PC or AK)...ok

But you cant expect from me that i'm not going to use "mines early warning system" after all those actions...

I'm not questioning Andy's honour too, he is nice guy and good opponent (i didn't mentioned above mentioned moves because i'm against them - i'm not!) and i really enjoy in game with him. The only problem with Scotland is that is full of Scots (film Braveheart).

He use the game design in his favour, and i'm using game design in my favour. But we are very careful and we are do not cross over "gamey line". It is hard to find/agree (with) opponent who suits you but i think i found him.

I wish that WiTP is ultimate historical simulation. But, "unfortunatly" it is only best ever wargame we have/we will have ever.

i'm apologise if this replay is somewhat hestic (and totally without grammar), but i just came back after veterans soccer game (hey, i've assisted to one gol!!:) and celebrating the victory..... we won 5:0 so i had to drink 5 beers.....


_____________________________


(in reply to Jim D Burns)
Post #: 458
RE: 26th and 27th September, 1942 - 5/2/2006 3:35:23 AM   
Honda


Posts: 953
Joined: 5/5/2004
From: Karlovac, Croatia
Status: offline
lol
I just finished my paper so that's what, 1 beer for me?
Edited for: successfuly drank!

< Message edited by Honda -- 5/2/2006 3:37:20 AM >


_____________________________


(in reply to pauk)
Post #: 459
RE: 26th and 27th September, 1942 - 5/2/2006 10:40:25 AM   
pauk


Posts: 4162
Joined: 10/21/2001
From: Zagreb,Croatia
Status: offline
Ok, drunken Japanese fanboy party is over (this is a sake break for JF AAR after all:), lets go back to the war...



AFTER ACTION REPORTS FOR 09/30/42

Not much action.

Previous British penalty - 1100 PP - paid .

British withdrawl for 10/42 - 1 BB + 2 DD.


AFTER ACTION REPORTS FOR 10/01/42

CHINA

Sian AF was operational and hordes of Tony sweept Chengtu. Suprisingly, Chinese airmen fought well and i lost 5 Tony (4 to A2A combat).

Day Air attack on Chengtu , at 41,29

Japanese aircraft
Ki-61 KAIc Tony x 83
Ki-15 Babs x 1

Allied aircraft
I-153c x 8
I-16c x 11

Japanese aircraft losses
Ki-61 KAIc Tony: 4 destroyed

Allied aircraft losses
I-153c: 6 destroyed
I-16c: 9 destroyed


Second strike comes from Chengtu and weak opposition wasn't trouble for my Zero crew.

Day Air attack on Chengtu , at 41,29

Japanese aircraft
A6M2 Zero x 27
G3M Nell x 9
Ki-21 Sally x 72
Ki-49 Helen x 27
Ki-46-II Dinah x 4

Allied aircraft
I-16c x 2

No Japanese losses

Allied aircraft losses
I-16c: 4 destroyed
I-153c: 3 destroyed


Allied ground losses:
14 casualties reported

Airbase hits 16
Airbase supply hits 5
Runway hits 56


Ok, 26 Chinese fighters are destroyed (9 on ground), my overall losses for today were 11 planes (lots of ops losses). I wonder enemy figther presence in Chengtu is decoy - i have to rest my bombers and can not attack Chungking next turn. So... he could transfer fighters to Chungking....

I'm trying to encircle enemy at Chungking-Sian-Ichang crossroad.

BURMA

Pretty quiet there. Army bombers didn't fly to Akyab.

PACIFIC

KB approaches slowly towards Palmyra. No sign of enemy yet.

I've realised that i have only one Tojo Sentai in the Pacific and will transfer two crack Tojo air groups to Pac in the near future.

IMPERIAL HQ NEWS SHEET

3 Kongos recived their upgrade and now they have respectable () AA rating - 510. Last Kongo class BB just sailed from Truk to Home islands.

Ise upgraded in Singapore....she get radar, nothing more.

< Message edited by pauk -- 5/2/2006 10:41:32 AM >


_____________________________


(in reply to Honda)
Post #: 460
RE: 26th and 27th September, 1942 - 5/2/2006 3:42:51 PM   
jumper

 

Posts: 489
Joined: 2/23/2006
Status: offline
Hi Pauk,
the "minefield intel" discussion brought another question to my mind. How much are you using minefields in defensive role?
Are you planning to lay some huge minefields in some certain areas? I know the mines can not stop the invasion (even 25k+ mines can be passed without single hit - it happened to me ) but sometimes they can hit hard.
For example Perth - once he will decide to take it, he can not use bombers to soften your lines, so I would expect bombardment raid at least. He will not conquer the base immedietly I think and it is a long way to the nearest friendly port (even with the allied damage control).. You should be able to lay a few thousands mines there. It might be worth to take a risk and move a MLE and a few MLs to Perth to boost a defence and get them out of there asap
Truly - I don´t know how the game handles the hit chance with connection to minefield size . I just hope more is better and if you could hit some of his capital ships and send them to dry docks, you would have more time to prepare your defense and he would get very nervous about future invasions.. I like mines even they didn´t prove their worth yet..
greets

(in reply to pauk)
Post #: 461
RE: 26th and 27th September, 1942 - 5/2/2006 4:34:22 PM   
Jim D Burns


Posts: 4013
Joined: 2/25/2002
From: Salida, CA.
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: pauk
I guess (corret me if i'm wrog) that you are "ulitmate history fanboy".


Guilty as charged. A lot of my frustration with WitP stems from me wanting things to work historically. I guess if I simply went with the flow and learned to game the system instead perhaps I'd have a lot less frustration to deal with.

quote:

ORIGINAL: pauk
But you cant expect from me that i'm not going to use "mines early warning system" after all those actions...


Fair enough if you both are using system design flaws to your advantage I agree you should use what you can. I haven't read your opponents AAR (I assume he has one up too), so I was unaware he had been gaming the system too.

In my next PBEM I'll probably be playing Japan, hence my interest in your AAR. Keep it coming, it's a great read and very informative.

Jim


< Message edited by Jim D Burns -- 5/2/2006 4:36:34 PM >


_____________________________


(in reply to pauk)
Post #: 462
Some days are just better.... - 5/3/2006 12:00:32 PM   
pauk


Posts: 4162
Joined: 10/21/2001
From: Zagreb,Croatia
Status: offline
Greetings jumper - it isn't bad idea, but my MLEs and ML are extremely busy with mining "box defencive line" - Solomons, Marshalls and Malaya/Burma. Mines are good, but not so efficient against bombardment TFs - mostly DDs will hit mines (even if they are on do not escort bombardment one or two DD will hit them) while capital ships wouldnt (they firing from the greater range and mines are laid down in shallow waters).

I'm sure that mines working with dice roll, Grigsby favourite toy, sometimes will slaughter your invasion fleet, sometimes wont....


quote:

ORIGINAL: Jim D Burns
Guilty as charged. A lot of my frustration with WitP stems from me wanting things to work historically. I guess if I simply went with the flow and learned to game the system instead perhaps I'd have a lot less frustration to deal with.

Fair enough if you both are using system design flaws to your advantage I agree you should use what you can. I haven't read your opponents AAR (I assume he has one up too), so I was unaware he had been gaming the system too.


Nothing wrong with being ultimate history fanboy - i would like to see WiTP as ultimate historical simulation but i'm aware that is not possible (for the reasons i stated in previous posts).

For me, it's not big deal to use mines in that way - i'm only laying them in strategicaly important bases (Johnson Islands, Palmyra) and not in WC or PH (now, that would be tricky IMHO). What is the difference - i know that he must use Johnson Island, Palmyra and my mines can hit something. Plus, i get intel...

I will do my best Jim and try to make it interesting till end. I'm hoping i wouldn't become frustrate late in the war and my dear audience would never leave me (but i do know that everyone like winners!)

Now, let me explain title in replay..some days are just better...than another...



AFTER ACTION REPORTS FOR 10/02/42


PACIFIC

I couldn't believe what i saw! Big fat, unprotected conwoy founded 60 miles from KB and SC TF sailing towards Palmyra. I didn't react before, when i saw his tranports sailing on Tarawa-Johnston Islands/Palmyra sea route. To be honest, i' couldnt react with my LBA from Maloelap because LBA didn't attack transports although they foung them. But, I was hoping that Andy would run into trap sooner or latter (i missed opportunity to catch his Force Z and Lexington early in the game - DEI, but this time i've got consolation).

What a huge mistake by him.... I've expected that he will make mistake somewhere, but sailing with big conwoy 11 hex from Maloelap.....


Day Air attack on TF at 91,81

Japanese aircraft
A6M2 Zero x 172
D3A Val x 122
B5N Kate x 137
E7K2 Alf x 1

Japanese aircraft losses
B5N Kate: 1 destroyed, 3 damaged

Allied Ships
AK Arcata, Bomb hits 1, on fire, heavy damage
AK Prusa
TK W.S. Miller, Torpedo hits 2, on fire, heavy damage
AK Proteus, Bomb hits 1, Torpedo hits 3, on fire, heavy damage
AK Nisqually, Bomb hits 1, Torpedo hits 1, on fire, heavy damage
AK Mobile City, Torpedo hits 1, on fire
MSW Lithgow, Bomb hits 1, on fire
SC SC-703, Torpedo hits 1, on fire, heavy damage
SC SC-709, Torpedo hits 1, on fire, heavy damage
TK M.E. Lombardi, Bomb hits 1, Torpedo hits 4, on fire, heavy damage
TK K.R. Kingsbury, Bomb hits 3, Torpedo hits 1, on fire, heavy damage
MSW Bunbury, Torpedo hits 4, on fire, heavy damage
TK J.C. Fitzsimmons, Bomb hits 2, Torpedo hits 3, on fire, heavy damage
AK Kaiping, Bomb hits 3, Torpedo hits 1, on fire, heavy damage
AK Nevadan, Bomb hits 1, on fire
AK Dukat, Bomb hits 3, Torpedo hits 2, on fire, heavy damage
AK Empire Mariott
TK Solana, Bomb hits 1, Torpedo hits 2, on fire, heavy damage
AK Malda
AK Steel Age, Bomb hits 3, Torpedo hits 1, on fire, heavy damage
PG Moncton, Bomb hits 1, Torpedo hits 3, on fire, heavy damage
TK Empire Gold, Bomb hits 2, on fire
TK D.G. Scofield, Bomb hits 1, Torpedo hits 1, on fire
TK Ardmore, Bomb hits 1, Torpedo hits 1, on fire
MSW Mildura
TK Frank G Drum, Torpedo hits 1, on fire


-----------------------------------------------------

Day Air attack on TF at 91,81

Japanese aircraft
A6M2 Zero x 5
D3A Val x 19
B5N Kate x 15

No Japanese losses

Allied Ships
MSW Mildura, Bomb hits 1, Torpedo hits 2, on fire, heavy damage
MSW Bunbury, on fire, heavy damage
AK Empire Mariott, Bomb hits 1
PG Vancouver, Bomb hits 1, on fire, heavy damage
TK Solana, on fire, heavy damage
AK Nisqually, on fire, heavy damage
TK K.R. Kingsbury, Torpedo hits 3, on fire, heavy damage


--------------------------------------------------------------------

Day Air attack on TF at 91,81

Japanese aircraft
A6M2 Zero x 175
D3A Val x 138
B5N Kate x 146

No Japanese losses

Allied Ships
AK Steel Age, Bomb hits 3, on fire, heavy damage
TK W.S. Miller, Bomb hits 2, Torpedo hits 2, on fire, heavy damage
MSW Lithgow, Torpedo hits 1, on fire, heavy damage
PG Vancouver, Bomb hits 4, on fire, heavy damage
TK D.G. Scofield, Torpedo hits 1, on fire, heavy damage
AK Arcata, Bomb hits 1, Torpedo hits 3, on fire, heavy damage
AK Nisqually, Torpedo hits 1, on fire, heavy damage
TK Frank G Drum, Torpedo hits 2, on fire, heavy damage
AK Mobile City, Bomb hits 2, on fire, heavy damage
TK Ardmore, Bomb hits 1, Torpedo hits 3, on fire, heavy damage
AK Kaiping, Bomb hits 2, on fire, heavy damage






Now that was good.... 20 enemy ships sunk immediately, including 8 TKs. I do not know how many TKs Allies could have in late 42 but i'm hoping that losing 26 TKs so far (including british and dutch TKs) would have impact on his logistics.

According to report, only five ships escaped and i don't think i'm going to chase them. KB will move SW of current position (but still under LBA cover from Maloelap) while subs will try to finish some of remaining ships. I will form surface raider groups too and try to intercept them.

Tks were full of fuel, heading for Gilberts which mean that Andy planing advance in Gilberts/Marshalls area. Hopefully, lost of the fuel would slow him and buy me some more time. In addition he must change route for Gilberts (PH-Palmyra-Baker island-Tarawa) what will buy me few days more. But, he have to be careful with this route too... KB is still ruler of the Pacific!


CHINA

I tested enemy strengh in northern crossroad, while part of my troops trying to cut their retreath path to Chungking.

Ground combat at 45,30

Japanese Bombardment attack

Attacking force 3323 troops, 14 guns, 0 vehicles, Beginning Assault Value = 5001

Defending force 123069 troops, 403 guns, 6 vehicles, Beginning Assault Value = 3233


Allied ground losses:
25 casualties reported


BURMA

Some of my bombers didn't find target....


Day Air attack on Akyab , at 30,29

Japanese aircraft
Ki-44-IIb Tojo x 2
Ki-21 Sally x 6
Ki-49 Helen x 12

No Japanese losses


Allied ground losses:
6 casualties reported

Runway hits 14

Aircraft Attacking:
9 x Ki-49 Helen bombing at 6000 feet
3 x Ki-21 Sally bombing at 6000 feet
3 x Ki-21 Sally bombing at 6000 feet
3 x Ki-49 Helen bombing at 6000 feet





Attachment (1)

< Message edited by pauk -- 5/3/2006 12:04:43 PM >


_____________________________


(in reply to Jim D Burns)
Post #: 463
RE: 26th and 27th September, 1942 - 5/3/2006 2:47:51 PM   
Sneer


Posts: 2654
Joined: 10/29/2003
Status: offline
excellent job - congrats
and big or very big mistake from Andy to choose this route
as far as TK are concerned i remember i sunk 30+ before 1st half42 and Raverdave claimed it did not hurt him so much ...

_____________________________


(in reply to pauk)
Post #: 464
RE: 26th and 27th September, 1942 - 5/3/2006 5:58:39 PM   
jumper

 

Posts: 489
Joined: 2/23/2006
Status: offline
BANZAI!!

at the right time on the righ place..
If it doesn´t hurt his capacities, it surely hurted his pride..

congratulations!!

(in reply to Sneer)
Post #: 465
October the 3rd, 1942 - 5/4/2006 2:27:19 PM   
pauk


Posts: 4162
Joined: 10/21/2001
From: Zagreb,Croatia
Status: offline
It seemy Raver was right - masive tanker fleet arrives in San Francisco a month after PH...

But, as Jumper mentioned, it will certainly hurt Andy's pride, and lots of fuel goes away.

AFTER ACTION REPORTS FOR 10/03/42


PACIFIC

I forgot mention few things about yesterday's victory. The good thing is that he would be slowed down. Why he sent a huge conwoy so near Marshalls. Was he in hurry or he was just careless... well i guess we shall find out soon.

He now knows where is KB (yeah, that's what i call expensive intel but...) and i have to think what to do with KB. I will problably move my striking force towards Solomons just in case that he try something there...

My attack was perfectly exectuted - i have three CV fleets and got coordinated strike (more than 120 Zeros on escort)... if only i could get coordinated strike in "mother of all battles"...

My surface raiders didn't found his fleeing merchies. I will try caught them tonight, but will not push the luck after that. AK Steel Age reported sunk so only 4 or 25 ships will survive.

Day Air attack on 64th Naval Guard Unit at Nauru.

Allied aircraft
B-25C Mitchell x 47
B-17E Fortress x 20


No Allied losses

Japanese ground losses:
76 casualties reported

Aircraft Attacking:
All bombing at 6000 feet


He testing my defence there. Only part of NG and TK rtg are there.

CHINA

China. Heavy air raids on Chungking from Ichang and Wuhan.


Day Air attack on Chengtu , at 41,29

Japanese aircraft
Ki-61 KAIc Tony x 33
Ki-15 Babs x 1

Allied aircraft
I-153c x 3
I-16c x 5

Japanese aircraft losses
Ki-61 KAIc Tony: 1 destroyed

Allied aircraft losses
I-153c: 1 destroyed
I-16c: 3 destroyed


Tony isn't wonder fighter when is opposed to another fighter. Andy got a Chinese ace - LT Chou awarded with 4th kill.


Ground combat at 45,30 - at the northern crossroad

Japanese Bombardment attack

Attacking force 3336 troops, 14 guns, 0 vehicles, Beginning Assault Value = 5012

Defending force 122430 troops, 396 guns, 6 vehicles, Beginning Assault Value = 3222


Allied ground losses:
3 casualties reported







BURMA

Bombers from Rangoon keeping Akyab closed.






Attachment (1)

< Message edited by pauk -- 5/4/2006 2:28:58 PM >


_____________________________


(in reply to jumper)
Post #: 466
October the 4th, 1942 - 5/5/2006 3:27:52 PM   
pauk


Posts: 4162
Joined: 10/21/2001
From: Zagreb,Croatia
Status: offline


AFTER ACTION REPORTS FOR 10/04/42

PACIFIC

My raider groups were much more successful tonight. It seems that only two enemy AKs will reach Johnson islands (i don't believe that damaged AKs and TK would make it). God, i like these small victories...


Night Time Surface Combat at 95,79

Japanese Ships
DD Hiyodori
DD Kari

Allied Ships
AK Prusa
AK John C. Fremont, Shell hits 9, Torpedo hits 1, on fire, heavy damage
TK Empire Gold, Shell hits 6, Torpedo hits 1, on fire, heavy damage
AK Malda


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Night Time Surface Combat at 95,79

Japanese Ships
DD Mikazuki
DD Kuri

Allied Ships
AK Nevadan, Shell hits 1, Torpedo hits 3, and is sunk
AK Empire Mariott


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Night Time Surface Combat at 96,80

Japanese Ships
DD Hibiki
DD Manazuru

Allied Ships
AK Empire Mariott, Shell hits 10, on fire, heavy damage






I wasn't lazy and checked experience of DDs involved in interception. Only Kuri didn't gain any exp point:

Hibiki 65/74 +2 night exp
Manazuru 67/73 +1 night exp
Mikazuki 68/73 +1 night exp
Kari 67/71 +4 night exp
Hiyodori 68/76 +4 night exp


Another visit to Nauru garnison. I'm moving KB there and if Andy continue with bombing i will ambush him.


Day Air attack on 64th Naval Guard Unit, at 79,91


Allied aircraft
B-25C Mitchell x 56
B-17E Fortress x 21


No Allied losses

Japanese ground losses:
154 casualties reported


I've started airlift one bde (from divided division) to Mili. Paras will recapture Majuro soon. It was nice training ground for last month or two, but i don't need push luck anymore.

CHINA

Chinese withdrawing from northern crossroads and avoiding encirclement - deliberate attack ordered for tomorrow.

Enemy lost 11 planes due operational losses (3 B-24D, 3 PBY Catalinas, 2 B-17E and Mitchells). It could be that they are lost in China (supply missions) because Chengtu is still damaged. And will get deserved attention tomorrow.

AUSTRALIA

Very quiet at the moment. SNLF unit didn't find any enemy troops south of Darwin-Alice Springs-Charters town crossroads and will investigate little further





Attachment (1)

< Message edited by pauk -- 5/5/2006 3:31:10 PM >


_____________________________


(in reply to pauk)
Post #: 467
RE: October the 4th, 1942 - 5/5/2006 3:35:05 PM   
Nomad


Posts: 5905
Joined: 9/5/2001
From: West Yellowstone, Montana
Status: offline
Hmmm, October 4th, 1942. In exactly 4 years I will be born.

26 TKs will make no significant difference.



_____________________________


(in reply to pauk)
Post #: 468
October the 5th, 1942 - 5/7/2006 1:33:14 PM   
pauk


Posts: 4162
Joined: 10/21/2001
From: Zagreb,Croatia
Status: offline
You are older than my Dad just four years....



AFTER ACTION REPORTS FOR 10/05/42


PACIFIC

One of my sub founds enemy AK near Johnston Islands but those Allied merchies are sometimes hard to sink!

Sub attack at 97,79

Japanese Ships
SS I-31

Allied Ships
AK Empire Mariott, Torpedo hits 2, on fire, heavy damage


Enemy turns to Mili again, but he paid a modest price. 4 Mitchells and 3 B-17Es are lost due ops losses (total air losses are 24-6 in my favour).


Day Air attack on Mili , at 84,85


Allied aircraft
B-25C Mitchell x 59
B-17E Fortress x 47


No Allied losses

Japanese ground losses:
12 casualties reported

Airbase hits 6
Airbase supply hits 3
Runway hits 40

Aircraft Attacking:
14 x B-25C Mitchell bombing at 6000 feet


Unfortunatly KB was spoted near Jaulit. Andy increases air search that's for sure. Now the suprise is gone and KB going to Truk for some R&R.

BURMA

Regular naval bombardment of Akyab - 142 casaulties, 7 runway hits, 3 port supply hits and one port hit.

CHINA

Tonies shot down 2 chinese fighters - no single plane was lost on our side.

Day Air attack on Chengtu , at 41,29

Japanese aircraft
A6M2 Zero x 27
G3M Nell x 9
Ki-21 Sally x 96
Ki-49 Helen x 26
Ki-46-II Dinah x 4

Japanese aircraft losses
Ki-21 Sally: 1 damaged

Allied aircraft losses
I-153c: 4 destroyed
I-16c: 1 destroyed


Allied ground losses:
18 casualties reported

Airbase hits 11
Airbase supply hits 9
Runway hits 110






Many Chinese units were defeated and forced to retreat. But those units are decimated and demoralised units. They are understrenghtened, only 34 K Chinese are reported.

Ground combat at 45,30

Japanese Deliberate attack

Attacking force 220902 troops, 2412 guns, 38 vehicles, Beginning Assault Value = 4558

Defending force 33817 troops, 27 guns, 0 vehicles, Beginning Assault Value = 1030

Japanese max assault: 4387 - adjusted assault: 3479

Allied max defense: 983 - adjusted defense: 159

Japanese assault odds: 21 to 1


Japanese ground losses:
2498 casualties reported
Guns lost 76
Vehicles lost 2

Allied ground losses:
2634 casualties reported
Guns lost 5

Defeated Allied Units Retreating!


IMPERIAL HQ NEWS SHEET

I can't count on my training grounds in PI and Sumatra for to much longer. Enemy moved PA division to Roxas. In Sumatra i have only one BF near Palembang available for ground attack mission and I need to prepare Chinese training camps (i need to encircle one enemy LCU near Homan and Sian)...




Attachment (1)

_____________________________


(in reply to Nomad)
Post #: 469
6th-8th October, 1942 - 5/7/2006 6:17:15 PM   
pauk


Posts: 4162
Joined: 10/21/2001
From: Zagreb,Croatia
Status: offline


Not much action... Andy probably upgrading his DDs and CVs and waiting for his toys....

AFTER ACTION REPORTS FOR 10/06/42

Three enemy transports went down today. I-172 found Mobile City and finish her, while earlier damaged AK Mariott and another one reported sunk.

Sub attack at 98,78

Japanese Ships
SS I-172

Allied Ships
AK Mobile City, Torpedo hits 2, on fire, heavy damage - SINKS



100 enemy bombers again attacked Mili. I'm asking myself is it worth to sacrify some KB pilots (i have reserve pool for them) and ambush him? Another 4 B-17 and one Mitchells lost due ops (enemy lost 10 ac due ops today, i've lost 5 planes).

Day Air attack on Mili , at 84,85

Allied aircraft
B-25C Mitchell x 59
B-17E Fortress x 45


No Allied losses

Japanese ground losses:
26 casualties reported

Airbase hits 4
Airbase supply hits 11
Runway hits 45



Ground combat at Majuro - paras took Majuro, fragments of US Marines and Sea Beas surrenders.

Japanese Shock attack

Attacking force 688 troops, 5 guns, 0 vehicles, Beginning Assault Value = 37

Defending force 20 troops, 0 guns, 0 vehicles, Beginning Assault Value = 4

Japanese max assault: 40 - adjusted assault: 10

Allied max defense: 2 - adjusted defense: 1

Japanese assault odds: 10 to 1 (fort level 0)

Japanese forces CAPTURE Majuro base !!!


Japanese ground losses:
19 casualties reported

Allied ground losses:
65 casualties reported




AFTER ACTION REPORTS FOR 10/07/42


And last of damaged ships goes to the bottom thanks to my sub...

Sub attack at 99,77

Japanese Ships
SS I-16

Allied Ships
TK Empire Gold, Torpedo hits 2, on fire, heavy damage - SINKS!


CHINA

Day Air attack on Chengtu

Japanese aircraft
Ki-61 KAIc Tony x 11
Ki-15 Babs x 1

Allied aircraft
I-153c x 2
I-16c x 3

No Japanese losses

Allied aircraft losses
I-153c: 1 destroyed
I-16c: 1 destroyed


------------------------------------------

Day Air attack on Chengtu , at 41,29

Japanese aircraft
A6M2 Zero x 26
G3M Nell x 6
Ki-21 Sally x 87
Ki-49 Helen x 26
Ki-46-II Dinah x 5

Japanese aircraft losses
Ki-21 Sally: 1 damaged


Allied ground losses:
7 casualties reported
Guns lost 1

Airbase hits 3
Airbase supply hits 3
Runway hits 70


Chinese withdraws from Wuchow-Kwelin-Kweyiang crossroads.

AFTER ACTION REPORTS FOR 10/08/42

BURMA

Naval and air bombardment of Akyab (i wont mention it anymore since they are routine missions keeping AF closed).


CHINA

Pressure on Chinese units east of Chungking continues....




Attachment (1)

_____________________________


(in reply to pauk)
Post #: 470
October the 9th, 1942 - 5/7/2006 8:42:39 PM   
pauk


Posts: 4162
Joined: 10/21/2001
From: Zagreb,Croatia
Status: offline


AFTER ACTION REPORTS FOR 10/09/42


CHINA

Mongolian Calvary divison tried to cut Chinese units south of Chungking.

Ground combat at 44,33

Japanese Shock attack

Attacking force 4908 troops, 40 guns, 0 vehicles, Beginning Assault Value = 102

Defending force 9728 troops, 0 guns, 0 vehicles, Beginning Assault Value = 331

Japanese max assault: 98 - adjusted assault: 16

Allied max defense: 316 - adjusted defense: 31

Japanese assault odds: 0 to 1


Japanese ground losses:
487 casualties reported
Guns lost 5

Allied ground losses:
30 casualties reported



Few Chinese corps attacked our blocking force east of Chungking. 116th division came right on time and help ind
bde... I'm more and more sure that 40 enemy units east of that hex will be driven into the woods...

Ground combat at 43,31

Allied Shock attack

Attacking force 20551 troops, 144 guns, 0 vehicles, Beginning Assault Value = 662

Defending force 39921 troops, 446 guns, 12 vehicles, Beginning Assault Value = 839

Allied max assault: 1314 - adjusted assault: 351

Japanese max defense: 827 - adjusted defense: 711


Allied assault odds: 0 to 1


Japanese ground losses:
234 casualties reported
Guns lost 13

Allied ground losses:
2437 casualties reported
Guns lost 50



Who is remembering top IJA pilot F. Chiba? Well guys he meet his family in Osaka. It was dearly meeting and his
mother couldn't sustain tears. 59th Sentai is transfered to Home islands and will stay there in the future.

Chiba was glad to see parents and his wife, but little bit dissapointed when he was told that 59th Sentai is transfered to
Home island defence....





PACIFIC

I've strenghten three Zero daitais in Marshalls with additional pilots. These groups now have 30+ pilots with exp from 90 to 50 (group exp is from 70-75). Idea is that those groups can fly and escort bombers several days without rest and weaken enemy CAP. After that, KB will engage enemy...




Attachment (1)

< Message edited by pauk -- 5/7/2006 8:43:57 PM >


_____________________________


(in reply to pauk)
Post #: 471
Perth under threat! - 5/8/2006 5:38:24 PM   
pauk


Posts: 4162
Joined: 10/21/2001
From: Zagreb,Croatia
Status: offline


AFTER ACTION REPORTS FOR 10/10/42

Only action was in China. Andy geting nervous and send B-17 from Ledo which attack my blocking force one hex NE of Chungking.

Day Air attack on 116th Division, at 43,31

Allied aircraft
B-17E Fortress x 54

Japanese ground losses:
198 casualties reported
Guns lost 2
Vehicles lost 1

Fortress bombing at 7000 feet



My Mongolian unit was barely defeated on southern Chungking road. Andy withdrawing Chinese units towards Chungking. Good - all my "Northern China" Army preparing for Kweiyang already. I want throw out Chinese in Chengtu woods first...

Ground combat at 44,33

Allied Shock attack

Attacking force 9686 troops, 0 guns, 0 vehicles, Beginning Assault Value = 329

Defending force 4105 troops, 31 guns, 0 vehicles, Beginning Assault Value = 68

Allied max assault: 574 - adjusted assault: 118

Japanese max defense: 44 - adjusted defense: 59

Allied assault odds: 2 to 1


Japanese ground losses:
48 casualties reported

Allied ground losses:
157 casualties reported


Defeated Japanese Units Retreating!





AFTER ACTION REPORTS FOR 10/11/42

You may call me paranoic , you can may me witch, you may call me lunatic, but something is going on in Australia! It's time for explaining the title!






Of course i'm not naive and dont believe that Andy going for Darwin or Wyndham, i guess this is only diversion. A couple of units wont fooled me... what i do really expect is seaborne invasion on Perth (that's why i named title "Perth under threat"! You guys know that i'm not going to defend this city so this title have only propaganda meaning - perhaps Andy would read my title and.....)

Why do i think that Perth is target?

#1 Perth is very important base for the Allies (i know that many Japanese player thinking about Perth as a "base in middle of nowhere") for several reasons:

- guards India-Australia-US sea route
- Perth allowing constant flow of supply and fuel from India to Oz
- losing Perth means that American fleet can not sneak into Indian ocean unseen (?) (same for the Brits to Pacific)

i'm not concerned about amphibious invasion on Malaya/Burma because i know where the majority of British CV (if not all of them) are - in Pacific and i need to keep only minimal naval forces in Malaya


#2 After dissaster near Marshalls where Andy lost 25 transports and aux ships he knows where is KB now. It could be that he waited with his planed advance on Perth for some time until he know where exactly is KB...

These are my speculations - i could be wrong of course (perhaps it is only reconing mission) but since i do not plan any counter-measure i won't loose anything....

Anyway, we shall see soon am I great prophet or just paranoic person



Attachment (1)

< Message edited by pauk -- 5/8/2006 5:41:53 PM >


_____________________________


(in reply to pauk)
Post #: 472
RE: Perth under threat! - 5/9/2006 6:47:44 PM   
Honda


Posts: 953
Joined: 5/5/2004
From: Karlovac, Croatia
Status: offline
You've done well since I was gone. Maybe I should make myself absent more often
And it really is much more refreshing to read a few combat reports at the time as opposed to hanging around the forum daily...

_____________________________


(in reply to pauk)
Post #: 473
RE: Perth under threat! - 5/10/2006 5:08:14 PM   
pauk


Posts: 4162
Joined: 10/21/2001
From: Zagreb,Croatia
Status: offline
Tjah...There is no need to stick around daily because nothing happening....



AFTER ACTION REPORTS FOR 10/12/42

22nd Mix bde arrives in Taan. This is not elite unit (53 exp, 3/4 strenght, 148 assault point) but will help defence of Solomons (i set preparing for Torokina).

AFTER ACTION REPORTS FOR 10/13/42

P-38G are on CAP duty over Tarawa. I can expect a visit to Marshalls soon, me thinks...

Andy lost 13 planes due ops losses (4 Dakota I, 2 B-26, 2 Hurricanes...) and that's most exciting news for today.


CHINA

Day Air attack on 116th/B Division, at 43,31 - from LEDO

Allied aircraft
B-17E Fortress x 54

Japanese ground losses:
195 casualties reported
Guns lost 7


Tested chinese defence again - few divisions arrives in next few days and then we strike hard on communists!

Ground combat at 44,30

Japanese Bombardment attack

Attacking force 16064 troops, 208 guns, 0 vehicles, Beginning Assault Value = 4278

Defending force 109879 troops, 371 guns, 14 vehicles, Beginning Assault Value = 2822


AUSTRALIA

12th Ind bde arrives at Darwin. I have 4 divisions, 2 bdes (one in Perth), tk rtg and tank division (42/100) available for defence of northern Oz. In more than one month (5 weeks) tk division was reinforced by 17% (from 25% to 42%). I'm curious if this rate would continue - that means i would have this nice division at full strength in app 4 months...


NAVAL LOSSES

Not much changed from the last time. Few more aux ships sunk and 9 enemy TKs joined the list. Only one enemy sub sunk after last posting (still don't have clue what he doing with subs???)


--------------------Allies-------------Japan

CA___________3___________0

CL/CLAA_______5___________2

DDs__________22__________16

Subs_________46__________16

PG/PC/SCs____14__________12

PTs__________41___________0

MSWs________13___________6


Tenders______9____________1

TK/AOs______29____________0

AKs________120___________12

APs_________18___________23

ML/DM________4____________1

APDs_________3____________0


WAR INDUSTRY SCREEN

Small but constant advance in HI points.

Supply still around 2.6 million (i have it more on ships plus i'm investing supply in increasing HI in Korea/Manchuria - i will loose Perth 300 HI and need to replace this loss).

Oil and resources stocks are more than pleasing. I have no complaints on production of raw materials too:)

R&D - even with 400 rd points Jack wasnt moved one month earlier. I hope that some progress will be achived by the start of the november. (don't believe in r&d but i have to try it since even devs don't know how it works - does it matter if you have lot of rd or not?)





Attachment (1)

< Message edited by pauk -- 5/10/2006 5:22:36 PM >


_____________________________


(in reply to Honda)
Post #: 474
RE: Perth under threat! - 5/10/2006 6:04:24 PM   
jumper

 

Posts: 489
Joined: 2/23/2006
Status: offline
I´m afraid that noone really knows how R&D works. Or better said - everyone knows something different. The only thing you can be sure - it is definitely not working according to the manual..
btw if you are expanding HI, I think that HI pruduces also 1 point of fuel if it is in port (or is it only for oil fields ) so I´m always prefering expanding HI in ports..
How is your fuel situation? have you experienced any shortage? I have also about 2000000 as you, but I have just bad feeling that more than 50% of this amount is just a dream..


(in reply to pauk)
Post #: 475
RE: Perth under threat! - 5/10/2006 8:06:38 PM   
pauk


Posts: 4162
Joined: 10/21/2001
From: Zagreb,Croatia
Status: offline
hi,

if it is possible i'm expanding HI in port bases. the reason why i'm expanding HI in Korea/Manchuria is that Allies don't get VP for bombing HI outside Home islands...

As for fuel situation. It doesn't look brilliant from the numbers, i can agree but i'm not worried (yet). I still have KB repelnishment fleet (100+ K of oil) and my tankers and AKs are busy with distributing fuel from Home islands to Truk, Singapore etc. I call it triangle transport (TK bring oil from SRA to HI,then they are loaded with fuel and sails to Truk, from Truk to Balikpapan....). i'm using AKs in similar way, trying to maximize them...

The point is that i probably have more than 200 K of fuel on TKs....

_____________________________


(in reply to jumper)
Post #: 476
RE: Perth under threat! - 5/12/2006 4:27:55 PM   
pauk


Posts: 4162
Joined: 10/21/2001
From: Zagreb,Croatia
Status: offline


AFTER ACTION REPORTS FOR 10/14/42

CHINA

I'm preparing for attack on Chinese LCU's east of Chungking - bombers from Ichang attack this hot spot and two Chinese corps suffered significant casaulties. Thirty B17 bombed our dbe one hex east of Chungking.

One enemy ground unit crossed river and immediately attacked our blocking force but suffered 900 casaulties for nothing.



RECON REPORTS




Enemy presence is stronger in northern area, but still don't think that Darwin ofr Wyndham are main targets. Anyway, one division (from Derby) is now moving towards Wyndham, while 48th division is empbarked at Truk and sails to Palau (strategic reserve).

Can i believe my flying boats? dunno... last turn several transports were sought at Apanama. Hm... i'm on alert, just in case.





Attachment (1)

< Message edited by pauk -- 5/12/2006 4:28:21 PM >


_____________________________


(in reply to pauk)
Post #: 477
RE: Perth under threat! - 5/13/2006 8:18:10 AM   
pauk


Posts: 4162
Joined: 10/21/2001
From: Zagreb,Croatia
Status: offline



AFTER ACTION REPORTS FOR 10/15/42

PACIFIC

Day Air attack on Mili , at 84,85

Allied aircraft
B-25C Mitchell x 59
B-17E Fortress x 40


No Allied losses

Japanese ground losses:
28 casualties reported

Airbase hits 5
Airbase supply hits 10
Runway hits 24


CHINA





Day Air attack on 90th Chinese Corps, at 44,30 (1.)

Japanese aircraft
G3M Nell x 3
Ki-21 Sally x 67
Ki-49 Helen x 15

Japanese aircraft losses
G3M Nell: 3 damaged
Ki-21 Sally: 1 destroyed, 7 damaged
Ki-49 Helen: 1 destroyed


Allied ground losses:
135 casualties reported
Guns lost 5


Day Air attack on 116th/C Division, at 43,31 (2.)


Allied aircraft
B-17E Fortress x 27

Japanese ground losses:
92 casualties reported
Guns lost 3



1. I was close but mountain terrain saved Chinese from another defeat. I'm down to 4000 AP and my supply is extremely low. Disruption is high also so we will wait for few days and see what we can do there.


Ground combat at 44,30

Japanese Deliberate attack

Attacking force 234911 troops, 2598 guns, 38 vehicles, Beginning Assault Value = 5540

Defending force 108579 troops, 352 guns, 12 vehicles, Beginning Assault Value = 2792

Japanese max assault: 4549 - adjusted assault: 1454

Allied max defense: 2590 - adjusted defense: 1018

Japanese assault odds: 1 to 1


Japanese ground losses:
9292 casualties reported
Guns lost 218
Vehicles lost 4

Allied ground losses:
2840 casualties reported
Guns lost 29



2. Enemy is defeated but not all units retreat.

Ground combat at 43,31

Japanese Shock attack

Attacking force 38230 troops, 425 guns, 15 vehicles, Beginning Assault Value = 1782

Defending force 25226 troops, 90 guns, 0 vehicles, Beginning Assault Value = 440

Japanese max assault: 1334 - adjusted assault: 570

Allied max defense: 446 - adjusted defense: 221

Japanese assault odds: 2 to 1


Japanese ground losses:
1209 casualties reported
Guns lost 34
Vehicles lost 7

Allied ground losses:
302 casualties reported
Guns lost 5


Defeated Allied Units Retreating!



INDIA

Big enemy conwoy spoted, does he really want to start offensive form India?

AUSTRALIA

Now there are six enemy units there but i'm not convinced yet that he is going for Darwin...



Attachment (1)

< Message edited by pauk -- 5/13/2006 8:23:36 AM >


_____________________________


(in reply to pauk)
Post #: 478
RE: Perth under threat! - 5/14/2006 11:44:40 AM   
pauk


Posts: 4162
Joined: 10/21/2001
From: Zagreb,Croatia
Status: offline


AFTER ACTION REPORTS FOR 10/16/42

60 B17 and 46 Mitchells bombed Mili.


AFTER ACTION REPORTS FOR 10/17/42


PACIFIC


Day Air attack on Mili , at 84,85

Allied aircraft
B-25C Mitchell x 57
B-17E Fortress x 41


No Allied losses

Japanese ground losses:
11 casualties reported

Airbase hits 1
Airbase supply hits 1
Runway hits 66


AUSTRALIA

Bombers form Darwin ordered to attack enemy units 480 miles south for Darwin. I want check my theory about attack on Perth.


Day Air attack on 1st Australian Cavalry Division, at 36,92

Japanese aircraft
Ki-21 Sally x 21
Ki-49 Helen x 31

No Japanese losses


Allied ground losses:
23 casualties reported



Ground combat at 36,92 - look at the enemy units....

Allied Shock attack

Attacking force 30038 troops, 272 guns, 106 vehicles, Beginning Assault Value = 730

Defending force 2833 troops, 14 guns, 0 vehicles, Beginning Assault Value = 84

Allied max assault: 1380 - adjusted assault: 2097

Japanese max defense: 82 - adjusted defense: 16

Allied assault odds: 131 to 1


Japanese ground losses:
247 casualties reported
Guns lost 8

Allied ground losses:
122 casualties reported
Guns lost 7





Defeated Japanese Units Retreating - but in wrong direction! Towards Alice springs instead Darwin.....


Ground combat at 26,106 - near Alice springs- south australia railroad crossroad.

Allied Shock attack

Attacking force 1840 troops, 0 guns, 125 vehicles, Beginning Assault Value = 124

Defending force 558 troops, 0 guns, 0 vehicles, Beginning Assault Value = 7

Allied max assault: 126 - adjusted assault: 58

Japanese max defense: 6 - adjusted defense: 2

Allied assault odds: 29 to 1


Japanese ground losses:
27 casualties reported


Two tank regiments are probably followed with main group. Base force couldn't resist and withdrew....

I sent Andy a message,I was right, you are going for Perth. You are not going to fool me with attack of 1 full division and 3 decimated LCUs.

I'm more and more sure that Perth is his target. After American fleet upgrades in October he now can use British carriers and even some American for amphibious invasion for Perth. Meanwhile he will clear south Australia railroad with ground units.

Happy days in Perth seems over and i have to prepare defence for Timor area too (I will need naval LBA and fighters there soon).

I already reacted. BB Ise, Mikuma, Naka and 7 old DDs sails from Singapore to Soerbaya. Kirishima + 3 old DDs sails from Home islands to Kendari (i'm planing to use them in bombarding enemy units if he attack north Australia).

One tank regiment sent to Derby, while 48th divison will reach Darwin in two weeks.

I'm not sure if i need more units at North Australia, i can send one bde from Java but i don't like that idea. After the Perth is re-captured i will lost "East gate" and Java is potential place for enemy invasion too.

There is still chance that Andy goes to Darwin via land route, but i don't think he is that exotic...



Attachment (1)

< Message edited by pauk -- 5/14/2006 11:46:38 AM >


_____________________________


(in reply to pauk)
Post #: 479
I'm the lumberjack, Mao says - 5/14/2006 11:41:34 PM   
pauk


Posts: 4162
Joined: 10/21/2001
From: Zagreb,Croatia
Status: offline


CR for 18th October lost but i can't recall any significant action.


AFTER ACTION REPORTS FOR 10/19/42

Enemy still pounding Mili and airfield is closed. Marshalls are obvious one of the next targets...


CHINA





Chinese resistance at northern crossroads broken! The enemy flee int Chengtu woods...I can not understand why Andy keep continuing with mistakes in that particular area. Few months ago I've sent paras which captured Yunan towards Chengtu, just to interupt his supply lines. He pursued them and isolate in, we thinks then, unimportant hex. After that he forgot my paras. But when i captured Sian i continue with pursuing the enemy towards Chungking and he choose to defend at mountain hex.

Nothing wrong with this but he failed to secure retreat path towards Chengtu (he starts to attack my paras just few turns ago when he realises that his units will retreat to Chengtu woods) and he allowed me to cut off him from Chungking.



Ground combat at 44,30

Japanese Shock attack

Attacking force 257235 troops, 2720 guns, 31 vehicles, Beginning Assault Value = 5064

Defending force 103203 troops, 289 guns, 8 vehicles, Beginning Assault Value = 2661

Japanese max assault: 9604 - adjusted assault: 2209

Allied max defense: 2500 - adjusted defense: 1084

Japanese assault odds: 2 to 1


Japanese ground losses:
11854 casualties reported
Guns lost 324
Vehicles lost 8

Allied ground losses:
2505 casualties reported
Guns lost 19

Defeated Allied Units Retreating!


I've paid modest price, but these are mostly disabled troops (I was awarded with 86 VP for enemy killed while Andy got 13). Several enemy units remained in that hex (including american mercenaries - US BF) but i decided to rest my troops (disruption is extremely high 70-80).

After the northern China area is cleared we could go for Kweiyang... I can guard north with minimal forces for three months (it will take a time while Mao's lumberjacks arrives in Chengtu and after that they need replacements to become operational) which will allow me open hands in the south China with bulk of the Chinese Exp. Army...


AUSTRALIA

It seems that enemy tanks stopped on southern railroad. I already pulling out units from the Perth and decided to wait him at the Perth-Derby junction (thanks Nemo). If he continue with panzer-blitzkrieg, i'm think I would be able to gain couple of days.

9 enemy units reported 8 hexes south of Darwin...






Attachment (1)

< Message edited by pauk -- 5/14/2006 11:55:09 PM >


_____________________________


(in reply to pauk)
Post #: 480
Page:   <<   < prev  14 15 [16] 17 18   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Current Games From Matrix.] >> [World War II] >> War In The Pacific - Struggle Against Japan 1941 - 1945 >> After Action Reports >> 26th and 27th September, 1942 Page: <<   < prev  14 15 [16] 17 18   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

1.937