Matrix Games Forums

Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

Question re Pensacola

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [Current Games From Matrix.] >> [World War II] >> War In The Pacific - Struggle Against Japan 1941 - 1945 >> Question re Pensacola Page: [1]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
Question re Pensacola - 3/17/2007 5:58:18 PM   
JWE

 

Posts: 6580
Joined: 7/19/2005
Status: offline
I'm looking for the date of Pensacola's 1st refit, when the full size tripod mainmast was replaced with the short tripod mainmast. I think it was sometime late '41 or very early '42?? I have some info that she had the short main in May, '42 and certainly had it in June, '42. But did she (or Salt Lake City) have the full length main on Dec. 7??

The second refit was the May, 1944 Mare Island job where the short tripod was replaced with the house structure. I don't need that one. Thanks.

JWE
Post #: 1
RE: Question re Pensacola - 3/17/2007 6:00:42 PM   
m10bob


Posts: 8622
Joined: 11/3/2002
From: Dismal Seepage Indiana
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: JWE

I'm looking for the date of Pensacola's 1st refit, when the full size tripod mainmast was replaced with the short tripod mainmast. I think it was sometime late '41 or very early '42?? I have some info that she had the short main in May, '42 and certainly had it in June, '42. But did she (or Salt Lake City) have the full length main on Dec. 7??

The second refit was the May, 1944 Mare Island job where the short tripod was replaced with the house structure. I don't need that one. Thanks.

JWE


Shown at Mare Island on May 20, 1944 after being refitted. The tall foremast has a year to remain and this was a hallmark of the class from their completion. The original tripod mainmast is replaced with a short tower and 40mm A.A. guns are mounted at the open bridge level



http://www.navsource.org/archives/04/024/04024.htm


[




Attachment (1)

< Message edited by m10bob -- 3/17/2007 6:12:29 PM >


_____________________________




(in reply to JWE)
Post #: 2
RE: Question re Pensacola - 3/17/2007 6:05:26 PM   
tsimmonds


Posts: 5498
Joined: 2/6/2004
From: astride Mason and Dixon's Line
Status: offline
According to Cruisers of WWII An International Encyclopedia:
quote:

By November 1941 the AA outfit had been increased by two quad 1.1in. Various changes were made to the rig, including fitting a main battery director on the cut-down mainmast quadruped.


_____________________________

Fear the kitten!

(in reply to JWE)
Post #: 3
RE: Question re Pensacola - 3/17/2007 6:08:27 PM   
m10bob


Posts: 8622
Joined: 11/3/2002
From: Dismal Seepage Indiana
Status: offline
and this:

USS Pensacola (CA-24) At the Mare Island Navy Yard, California, 3 July 1945, at the end of her final overhaul. Circles mark recent alterations to the ship. Note her main battery of twin and triple eight-inch gun turrets. USS Indianapolis (CA-35) and the lighter YF-390 are at left. . (Tall tripod foremast is cut down, tripod mainmast is replaced by a short tower, 40mm A.A. guns have been added at the bow, #1 and #4 turret range finders are removed and the starboard catapult is removed due to weight problems. The Pensacola was the last cruiser refit during WW2)

Photograph from the Bureau of Ships Collection in the U.S. National Archives #19-N-87792





Attachment (1)

_____________________________




(in reply to m10bob)
Post #: 4
RE: Question re Pensacola - 3/17/2007 6:11:09 PM   
JWE

 

Posts: 6580
Joined: 7/19/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: m10bob

Shown at Mare Island on May 20, 1944 after being refitted. The tall foremast has a year to remain and this was a hallmark of the class from their completion. The original tripod mainmast is replaced with a short tower and 40mm A.A. guns are mounted at the open bridge level



http://www.navsource.org/archives/04/024/04024.htm






Thanks Bob, but I have the May, '44 data. What I would like is when the long tripod "Main"mast was replaced by the short mainmast. Thanks again.

JWE

(in reply to m10bob)
Post #: 5
RE: Question re Pensacola - 3/17/2007 6:14:12 PM   
m10bob


Posts: 8622
Joined: 11/3/2002
From: Dismal Seepage Indiana
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: JWE


quote:

ORIGINAL: m10bob

Shown at Mare Island on May 20, 1944 after being refitted. The tall foremast has a year to remain and this was a hallmark of the class from their completion. The original tripod mainmast is replaced with a short tower and 40mm A.A. guns are mounted at the open bridge level



http://www.navsource.org/archives/04/024/04024.htm






Thanks Bob, but I have the May, '44 data. What I would like is when the long tripod "Main"mast was replaced by the short mainmast. Thanks again.

JWE


Did you see my 2nd post? Is this correct?


_____________________________




(in reply to JWE)
Post #: 6
RE: Question re Pensacola - 3/17/2007 6:14:17 PM   
JWE

 

Posts: 6580
Joined: 7/19/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: irrelevant

According to Cruisers of WWII An International Encyclopedia:
quote:

By November 1941 the AA outfit had been increased by two quad 1.1in. Various changes were made to the rig, including fitting a main battery director on the cut-down mainmast quadruped.



Ahh! So the the mainmast was cut down by Nov. '41; that's good news. Thanks irrelevant.
JWE

(in reply to tsimmonds)
Post #: 7
RE: Question re Pensacola - 3/17/2007 6:17:21 PM   
m10bob


Posts: 8622
Joined: 11/3/2002
From: Dismal Seepage Indiana
Status: offline
USS "PENSACOLA" (CA 24) 1930-1948


USS Pensacola, name ship of a class of two 9.100-ton light cruisers, was built by the New York Navy Yard. Commissioned in February 1930, she made a shakedown cruise to Peru and Chile then began regular operations in the western Atlantic, Caribbean and Pacific. In July 1931, her classification was changed to heavy cruiser and her hull number became CA-24. Pensacola shifted home port from Norfolk, Virginia, to San Diego, California, in January 1935 and thereafter mainly served in the Pacific.
When the Pacific War began on 7 December 1941 with Japan's attack on Pearl Harbor, Pensacola was at sea escorting a convoy that was subsequently diverted to Australia. Following patrols in the vicinity of Samoa, the cruiser screened the carriers Lexington and Yorktown during their operations in the southern Pacific from February into April 1942. In the early June Battle of Midway Pensacola escorted both USS Enterprise and USS Yorktown. From August to December 1942, she operated in support of the Guadalcanal campaign, mainly serving with aircraft carriers, and was present during the Battle of the Santa Cruz Islands in late October and the Naval Battle of Guadalcanal in mid-November. At the end of November, Pensacola was badly damaged by a torpedo in the Battle of Tassafaronga, with the loss of over 120 of her crewmen.

Pensacola was under repair until well into 1943, but returned to service in time to participate in the Tarawa invasion in November. In 1944 she took part in the conquest of the Marshall Islands and operated with carrier striking forces during raids in the central Pacific. From May into August, she patrolled in the north Pacific and bombarded Japanese positions in the Kurile Islands. Moving south, Pensacola shelled Wake Island in September and Marcus in early October, then joined the Third Fleet's carrier forces to participate in attacks on Formosa and in the Battle of Leyte Gulf.

During the rest of the year and into 1945, Pensacola regularly conducted bombardments in the Bonin and Volcano Islands. While off Iwo Jima on 17 February 1945, she was hit several times by Japanese coastal guns, but was soon able to resume shelling the island. She provided more gunfire support during the campaign to seize Okinawa in March and April. When the fighting ended in mid-August, she was serving in the North Pacific. Pensacola's final months of active service were spent supporting the occupation of northern Japan and transporting Pacific War veterans home as part of Operation "Magic Carpet". In 1946 the now-elderly cruiser was assigned to target duty in connection with the atomic bomb tests at Bikini Atoll. Badly damaged by the two explosions on 1 July and 25 July, she was formally decommissioned in August. More than two years later, on 10 November 1948, USS Pensacola was sunk as a target in fleet exercises off the coast of Washington State










http://www.warship.get.net.pl/StZjednoczone/Cruisers/CA_1929_Pensacola_class/_Pensacola_photos.html



Ya can't say we don't all jump in to help a friend...

BTW, look at that 1st pic I posted..It was 1944 and the ship still has the high tripod main mast.
Apparently Pensacola was last to convert since she was in repair from prior combat action,(according to both narratives?)

< Message edited by m10bob -- 3/17/2007 6:21:12 PM >


_____________________________




(in reply to JWE)
Post #: 8
RE: Question re Pensacola - 3/17/2007 6:21:47 PM   
JWE

 

Posts: 6580
Joined: 7/19/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: m10bob

Did you see my 2nd post? Is this correct?


I'm pretty sure it is. She had a few refits; I guess one before Nov. '41 (according to irrelevant) where the long tripod "mainmast" was cut down to a short tripod mainmast; one in May, '44 where the short tripod "mainmast" was replaced by the house structure; and one in mid '54 where the tripod "foremast" was replaced with a radar and director tower.

I just wanted to make sure she didn't have the long tripod main (the one at the back) in the PH period. One less image to make. Thanks for your help.

JWE

(in reply to m10bob)
Post #: 9
RE: Question re Pensacola - 3/17/2007 6:23:52 PM   
JWE

 

Posts: 6580
Joined: 7/19/2005
Status: offline
Ahh. I see the confusion. The mainmast is the one at the back of the ship. The one at the front is the foremast. We seem to be posting past each other. LOL.

JWE

(in reply to m10bob)
Post #: 10
RE: Question re Pensacola - 3/17/2007 6:27:14 PM   
m10bob


Posts: 8622
Joined: 11/3/2002
From: Dismal Seepage Indiana
Status: offline
Here for looks in 1942:

Pensacola in Pearl Harbor in May 1942 before any modifications/refits. Clearly shown are old style radar on foremast and small tripod mainmast. Tripod mainmast was eventually replaced with a small tower superstructure between searchlight platform and #3 turret




Attachment (1)

_____________________________




(in reply to m10bob)
Post #: 11
RE: Question re Pensacola - 3/17/2007 6:31:24 PM   
m10bob


Posts: 8622
Joined: 11/3/2002
From: Dismal Seepage Indiana
Status: offline
Just one of my favourite classes..








Attachment (1)

_____________________________




(in reply to m10bob)
Post #: 12
RE: Question re Pensacola - 3/17/2007 6:34:37 PM   
JWE

 

Posts: 6580
Joined: 7/19/2005
Status: offline
Great! Thanks for the replies. Funny thing about naming the masts; it's convention from the days 'o sail. Front one is foremast and next one is main. A third, if fitted, would be the mizzen, even if the front one is way bigger than the rest. Anyhow, thanks again.

JWE

(in reply to m10bob)
Post #: 13
RE: Question re Pensacola - 3/18/2007 2:34:52 AM   
Admiral DadMan


Posts: 3627
Joined: 2/22/2002
From: A Lion uses all its might to catch a Rabbit
Status: offline
Being "towed" 9 Nov 1948...

Looks to me like her anchors are run out, so... she's being towed by... a sub?





Attachment (1)

< Message edited by Admiral DadMan -- 3/18/2007 2:37:46 AM >


_____________________________

Scenario 127: "Scraps of Paper"
(\../)
(O.o)
(> <)

CVB Langley:

(in reply to JWE)
Post #: 14
RE: Question re Pensacola - 3/18/2007 2:52:25 AM   
JWE

 

Posts: 6580
Joined: 7/19/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Admiral DadMan

Being "towed" 9 Nov 1948...

Looks to me like her anchors are run out, so... she's being towed by... a sub?

[

Picture caption might say 'towed', but there's no evidence of a tow line in the pic. Lookin at the wave patterns, they're beating in on the starboard bow, thus the "wave cream" on her side. Looks like she is in an anchorage under 20-25 knots (horsetails begin to appear on the water surface at about 12 knots).

I'm thinkin she's anchored somewhere in a nice, fresh 18-22. She is not being towed.

Beautiful pic!! Love it!!

JWE

(in reply to Admiral DadMan)
Post #: 15
RE: Question re Pensacola - 3/18/2007 5:05:28 AM   
Admiral DadMan


Posts: 3627
Joined: 2/22/2002
From: A Lion uses all its might to catch a Rabbit
Status: offline
Alongside USS Vestal (AR-4), undergoing repair of torpedo damage received during the Battle of Tassafaronga, off Guadalcanal on 30 November 1942.

Note the hole in her side below the mainmast, and the extensive fire damage in the area of that mast and the number three eight-inch gun turret.

Photographed at Espirito Santo, New Hebrides, on 17 December 1942.

Click Here for more pictures




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Scenario 127: "Scraps of Paper"
(\../)
(O.o)
(> <)

CVB Langley:

(in reply to JWE)
Post #: 16
RE: Question re Pensacola - 3/18/2007 6:35:55 AM   
bradfordkay

 

Posts: 8683
Joined: 3/24/2002
From: Olympia, WA
Status: offline
I never did understand the 2-3-3-2 gun layout... It always seemed to me that 3-2-2-3 would make more sense. Does it have to do with a wet deck or seakeeping abilities?

_____________________________

fair winds,
Brad

(in reply to Admiral DadMan)
Post #: 17
RE: Question re Pensacola - 3/18/2007 9:11:19 AM   
AW1Steve


Posts: 14507
Joined: 3/10/2007
From: Mordor Illlinois
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Admiral DadMan

Being "towed" 9 Nov 1948...

Looks to me like her anchors are run out, so... she's being towed by... a sub?





Yeah , and I don't see a towline either. Put it does look like Puget Sound.

(in reply to Admiral DadMan)
Post #: 18
RE: Question re Pensacola - 3/18/2007 10:26:26 AM   
herwin

 

Posts: 6059
Joined: 5/28/2004
From: Sunderland, UK
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: bradfordkay

I never did understand the 2-3-3-2 gun layout... It always seemed to me that 3-2-2-3 would make more sense. Does it have to do with a wet deck or seakeeping abilities?


Lines of the ship.

_____________________________

Harry Erwin
"For a number to make sense in the game, someone has to calibrate it and program code. There are too many significant numbers that behave non-linearly to expect that. It's just a game. Enjoy it." herwin@btinternet.com

(in reply to bradfordkay)
Post #: 19
RE: Question re Pensacola - 3/18/2007 3:00:45 PM   
Admiral DadMan


Posts: 3627
Joined: 2/22/2002
From: A Lion uses all its might to catch a Rabbit
Status: offline
Maybe a squid got hold of her chains and is pulling her...

_____________________________

Scenario 127: "Scraps of Paper"
(\../)
(O.o)
(> <)

CVB Langley:

(in reply to herwin)
Post #: 20
RE: Question re Pensacola - 3/18/2007 3:16:46 PM   
Ron Saueracker


Posts: 12121
Joined: 1/28/2002
From: Ottawa, Canada OR Zakynthos Island, Greece
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: m10bob

Here for looks in 1942:

Pensacola in Pearl Harbor in May 1942 before any modifications/refits. Clearly shown are old style radar on foremast and small tripod mainmast. Tripod mainmast was eventually replaced with a small tower superstructure between searchlight platform and #3 turret





The tripod mainmast was actually replaced by the small "tower" during the refit instigated by the damage caused during Tassaforanga in Nov, 42. Salt Lake City kept the cutdown tripod mainmast throuughout her career.


< Message edited by Ron Saueracker -- 3/18/2007 3:43:15 PM >


_____________________________





Yammas from The Apo-Tiki Lounge. Future site of WITP AE benders! And then the s--t hit the fan

(in reply to m10bob)
Post #: 21
RE: Question re Pensacola - 3/18/2007 4:25:33 PM   
MkXIV


Posts: 343
Joined: 6/4/2005
From: North Georgia
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Admiral DadMan

Being "towed" 9 Nov 1948...

Looks to me like her anchors are run out, so... she's being towed by... a sub?






She looks pretty good for having been hit by two nukes!

_____________________________

F4U Corsair; When you Absolutely, Positively need to kill every freaking Zero in a 40 mile hex....

(in reply to Admiral DadMan)
Post #: 22
RE: Question re Pensacola - 3/19/2007 5:39:12 AM   
RevRick


Posts: 2617
Joined: 9/16/2000
From: Thomasville, GA
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: herwin


quote:

ORIGINAL: bradfordkay

I never did understand the 2-3-3-2 gun layout... It always seemed to me that 3-2-2-3 would make more sense. Does it have to do with a wet deck or seakeeping abilities?


Lines of the ship.


And specifically the room belowdecks for magazine storage. More magazine storage farther from the ends of the ship meant more reloads for the triple turrets - hence they were in superfiring position to the two twins, which of course, had smaller magazine spaces.

_____________________________

"Action springs not from thought, but from a readiness for responsibility.” ― Dietrich Bonhoeffer

(in reply to herwin)
Post #: 23
RE: Question re Pensacola - 3/19/2007 11:07:14 AM   
Ron Saueracker


Posts: 12121
Joined: 1/28/2002
From: Ottawa, Canada OR Zakynthos Island, Greece
Status: offline
I always thought the US "Treaty" cruisers looked cool. The Pensacola 2332 mount arrangement always interested me ever since seeing the cover of an old wargame called "CA" when I was just a wee bairn.

_____________________________





Yammas from The Apo-Tiki Lounge. Future site of WITP AE benders! And then the s--t hit the fan

(in reply to RevRick)
Post #: 24
RE: Question re Pensacola - 3/19/2007 8:13:50 PM   
bradfordkay

 

Posts: 8683
Joined: 3/24/2002
From: Olympia, WA
Status: offline
I remember thinking that they had drawn them incorrectly when I first saw the counters for AH's Midway so long ago...

CA... IIRC, that was an SPI game similar to Frigate, right? I never had that one, but a friend of mine in high school did...

_____________________________

fair winds,
Brad

(in reply to Ron Saueracker)
Post #: 25
Page:   [1]
All Forums >> [Current Games From Matrix.] >> [World War II] >> War In The Pacific - Struggle Against Japan 1941 - 1945 >> Question re Pensacola Page: [1]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

3.938