patch v4.5 from v4.4

Matrix Games Forums

Forums Register Login Photo Gallery Member List Search Calendars FAQ

My Profile Inbox Address Book My Subscription My Forums Log Out

patch v4.5 from v4.4

View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest

Users viewing this topic: none

Printable Version

All Forums >> [Current Games From Matrix.] >> [World War II] >> Steel Panthers World At War & Mega Campaigns >> patch v4.5 from v4.4

Page: [1]

Message

<< Older Topic Newer Topic >>

patch v4.5 from v4.4 - 2/19/2001 9:54:00 PM

robdam

Posts: 21
Joined: 6/26/2000
Status: offline

I patched my v4.4 to v4.5. Game still says v4.4 on the scenario screen. When I patched, was told patch was successful. Not sure what's going on....any ideas?

_____________________________

Post #: 1

- 2/20/2001 12:11:00 AM

Lars Remmen

Posts: 357
Joined: 5/9/2000
From: Copenhagen, Denmark
Status: offline

quote:

Originally posted by robdam: I patched my v4.4 to v4.5. Game still says v4.4 on the scenario screen. When I patched, was told patch was successful. Not sure what's going on....any ideas?

Are you sure you patched it to the right directory? The first WAW patch I did created a SPWAW sub directory in the SPWAW main directory. I found it hard to get the target directory right as I didn't use the path suggested by the game when I first installed. Took me a couple of patches to get it right. ------------------ Lars Nec Temere - Nec Timide

_____________________________

"Beer is proof that God loves us and wants us to be happy" - Benjamin Franklin

(in reply to robdam)

Post #: 2

- 2/20/2001 12:28:00 AM

robdam

Posts: 21
Joined: 6/26/2000
Status: offline

Yep, that was it. It's not @ all a very "user friendly" patch. A-It said the patch was successful when in fact it wasn't B- The patch prompts you for a target folder which when directed to said target folder it goes ahead and creates a subfolder....makes no sense whatsoever. @ least the game works! Thank you for your response

_____________________________

(in reply to robdam)

Post #: 3