Mousectl - Any Clues?

Matrix Games Forums

Forums Register Login Photo Gallery Member List Search Calendars FAQ

My Profile Inbox Address Book My Subscription My Forums Log Out

Mousectl - Any Clues?

View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest

Users viewing this topic: none

Printable Version

All Forums >> [General] >> Unofficial Tech Support By Gamers for Gamers >> Mousectl - Any Clues?

Page: [1]

Message

<< Older Topic Newer Topic >>

Mousectl - Any Clues? - 8/31/2003 1:09:31 AM

Charles2222

Posts: 3993
Joined: 3/12/2001
Status: offline

Do any of you have any advice for this particular problem I'm having?

I'm running mousestl to try to fix a slow mouse for a DOS program and no matter what values I give it, it doesn't make the slightest difference in the world. Is there anything you can think of that may be causing it to be ignored? I'm currently running this thing through vdmsound, though soundwise it was doing fine without it. Before, when I ran it straight through autoexec.nt it did the same thing of course.

It's not that big a deal, since CL will replace me wanting to run this program (SPWW2), but I am more concerned about trying to run anything else DOS on this XP-HE if the mouse will always be shot. Nevermind that I haven't even tried running a CPU killer yet. Is there any way that running a killer would straighten the mouse out, or at least make it responsive to mousectl?

Any ideas are appreciated, as I'm completely out of any, apart from the probably doomed idea of running a CPU killer and hoping somehow the mouse gets the magic wand treatment from that. Thanks.

Post #: 1

- 8/31/2003 10:12:16 AM

junk2drive

Posts: 12907
Joined: 6/27/2002
From: Arizona West Coast
Status: offline

hi, i dl'd dosbox and abandon loader hoping to solve the spww2 mouse prob. neither did. dosbox ctd's and abandon didnt change anything. vogon forums had a talk about mousectl and mouse something else but too dos for me. someone will come out with an all in one package, long after we give up, lol

(in reply to Charles2222)