Matrix Games Forums

 Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

RE: New Development for War In The Pacific -- MUST READ

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [Current Games From Matrix.] >> [World War II] >> War In The Pacific - Struggle Against Japan 1941 - 1945 >> RE: New Development for War In The Pacific -- MUST READ Page: <<   < prev  2 3 [4] 5 6   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: New Development for War In The Pacific -- MUST READ - 3/4/2006 5:31:06 AM   
tsimmonds


Posts: 5498
Joined: 2/6/2004
From: astride Mason and Dixon's Line
Status: offline 		This is GREAT news.....so where do we go with our (most humble) suggestions and requests?

_____________________________

Fear the kitten!

(in reply to 33Vyper)
Post #: 91
RE: New Development for War In The Pacific -- MUST READ - 3/4/2006 5:31:54 AM   
dtravel


Posts: 4533
Joined: 7/7/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Mike Scholl

May I ask one thing. If/when you ever get around to playing with WITP II, will you consider making it a PBEM game first and formost.


Well, that will kill off some 80% of potential sales right there. Despite how vocal they are in these forums, PBEM players are a minority of the paying customers according to Matrix's own numbers.


_____________________________

This game does not have a learning curve. It has a learning cliff.

"Bomb early, bomb often, bomb everything." - Niceguy

Any bugs I report are always straight stock games.


(in reply to Mike Scholl)
Post #: 92
RE: New Development for War In The Pacific -- MUST READ - 3/4/2006 5:38:54 AM   
Erik Rutins

 

Posts: 37503
Joined: 3/28/2000
From: Vermont, USA
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: itsjustme
Not to bring a downer to this thread, but does this mean that the new War in Russia is being pushed back/delayed/canceled?


Nope, this will have no effect on WiR's development schedule.

Regards,

- Erik

_____________________________

Erik Rutins
CEO, Matrix Games LLC



For official support, please use our Help Desk: http://www.matrixgames.com/helpdesk/

Freedom is not Free.

(in reply to itsjustme)
Post #: 93
RE: New Development for War In The Pacific -- MUST READ - 3/4/2006 5:38:59 AM   
rroberson

 

Posts: 2050
Joined: 5/25/2004
From: Arizona
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Gary Childress


quote:

ORIGINAL: Reiryc

quote:

ORIGINAL: rroberson

quote:

ORIGINAL: BossGnome

WITP 2? What the hell would there be left to improve upon after patch 1.8? If everything works as planned, I really don't see how they could make the game more complete... Graphics...maybe??


Ah to see a VAL come screaming out of the sun as it drops its payload into another hapless American Battlewagon one sunday.


Yea...I could live with a graphic upgrade.


I'll drink to that...




Vals flying out of the sun? Yuk. It's hard enough to achieve quality 2D with current video technology. 3D is just asking for the proverbial polygons banging away at each other from point blank range a la Command and Conquer. I'll take Subchaser's plane sides and The Elf's plane tops over 3D bells and whistles any day.

Gary




god IM not asking for rts replays...I just think during the combat replay it would be nice to see the turn...play out :). like combat mission.

_____________________________


(in reply to GaryChildress)
Post #: 94
RE: New Development for War In The Pacific -- MUST READ - 3/4/2006 6:22:41 AM   
MkXIV


Posts: 343
Joined: 6/4/2005
From: North Georgia
Status: offline 		Absoutly great news Thanks!

_____________________________

F4U Corsair; When you Absolutely, Positively need to kill every freaking Zero in a 40 mile hex....

(in reply to rroberson)
Post #: 95
RE: New Development for War In The Pacific -- MUST READ - 3/4/2006 6:27:03 AM   
Mike Scholl

 

Posts: 9349
Joined: 1/1/2003
From: Kansas City, MO
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: BossGnome

WITP 2? What the hell would there be left to improve upon after patch 1.8? If everything works as planned, I really don't see how they could make the game more complete... Graphics...maybe??


I'd like to see a REAL multi-player capability for one thing. How about a weather system that actyually had some semblence to the weather in the Pacific? A land supply system that we have some control of..., and that perhaps had some semblence of reality to the amount and speed that the transportation system could handle.

_____________________________


(in reply to Black Mamba 1942)
Post #: 96
RE: New Development for War In The Pacific -- MUST READ - 3/4/2006 6:39:21 AM   
Ideologue

 

Posts: 47
Joined: 12/14/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Erik Rutins

Nope, this will have no effect on WiR's development schedule.

Regards,

- Erik


Hooray!

(in reply to Erik Rutins)
Post #: 97
RE: New Development for War In The Pacific -- MUST READ - 3/4/2006 6:43:04 AM   
Ron Saueracker


Posts: 12121
Joined: 1/28/2002
From: Ottawa, Canada OR Zakynthos Island, Greece
Status: offline 		Well, now I can shut the heck up. That should please about as many as this new development news has.

Congrats to Don, Joe and the devs for making a great call.

Ron, recently retired squawk box.

_____________________________





Yammas from The Apo-Tiki Lounge. Future site of WITP AE benders! And then the s--t hit the fan

(in reply to Ideologue)
Post #: 98
RE: New Development for War In The Pacific -- MUST READ - 3/4/2006 6:51:54 AM   
rogueusmc


Posts: 4583
Joined: 2/8/2004
From: Texas...what country are YOU from?
Status: offline 		Wait Ron...you're one of my main sources of entertainment here...just one of them mind you (wouldn't want you to get a big head)

_____________________________

There are only two kinds of people that understand Marines: Marines and the enemy. Everyone else has a second-hand opinion.

Gen. William Thornson, U.S. Army


(in reply to Ron Saueracker)
Post #: 99
RE: New Development for War In The Pacific -- MUST READ - 3/4/2006 6:55:19 AM   
mogami


Posts: 12789
Joined: 8/23/2000
From: You can't get here from there
Status: offline 		Hi, I was going to say something but after I seen Rogueusmc posted I checked my email and there is a turn waiting so I'll go capture Canton Island instead. (I've spent months organizing my last great Japanese offensive)

_____________________________






I'm not retreating, I'm attacking in a different direction!

(in reply to rogueusmc)
Post #: 100
RE: New Development for War In The Pacific -- MUST READ - 3/4/2006 6:59:38 AM   
rogueusmc


Posts: 4583
Joined: 2/8/2004
From: Texas...what country are YOU from?
Status: offline 		He brought the kitchen sink to that little island...

_____________________________

There are only two kinds of people that understand Marines: Marines and the enemy. Everyone else has a second-hand opinion.

Gen. William Thornson, U.S. Army


(in reply to mogami)
Post #: 101
RE: New Development for War In The Pacific -- MUST READ - 3/4/2006 7:02:03 AM   
bradfordkay

 

Posts: 8683
Joined: 3/24/2002
From: Olympia, WA
Status: offline 		Great news! Best wishes to Don and John, I'm glad it's you guys.





Now, if we're talking dream WITP, I dream of the day that we'll have a rotateable globe for a map, with the ability to zoom in to watch each day progress, as in CM. I remember when UV was announced, I thought that graphically we'd see an improved BotR - picture that on a globe and beter detail. It should have real weather systems, tides and currents. I figure that by 2020, consumers should have computers that could handle such a game.

So, Don, John, are you in for the long haul?

_____________________________

fair winds,
Brad

(in reply to rogueusmc)
Post #: 102
RE: New Development for War In The Pacific -- MUST READ - 3/4/2006 8:07:50 AM   
pad152

 

Posts: 2871
Joined: 4/23/2000
Status: offline 		Good News at Last!

But the problem remains, WITP will never be finished , so you might as well bite the bullet and start on WITP II soon as possible !

(in reply to bradfordkay)
Post #: 103
RE: New Development for War In The Pacific -- MUST READ - 3/4/2006 8:11:51 AM   
ckk

 

Posts: 1268
Joined: 10/18/2000
From: Pensacola Beach FL
Status: offline 		Does that mean you were/are the Bear editor? God I used the hell out of that editor for years. I don't mean Mog's Bear, but I thought the Bear editor Pacwar editor lived in Texas

(in reply to Don Bowen)
Post #: 104
RE: New Development for War In The Pacific -- MUST READ - 3/4/2006 8:12:35 AM   
Ron Saueracker


Posts: 12121
Joined: 1/28/2002
From: Ottawa, Canada OR Zakynthos Island, Greece
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: pad152

Good News at Last!

But the problem remains, WITP will never be finished , so you might as well bite the bullet and start on WITP II soon as possible !


No reason why they can't test some new ideas and refine existing ones with the current game. No point in going ahead on a WITP2 if WITP's basic design issues are not ironed out. Good way to "finish" WITP while testing concepts for WITP2.


_____________________________





Yammas from The Apo-Tiki Lounge. Future site of WITP AE benders! And then the s--t hit the fan

(in reply to pad152)
Post #: 105
RE: New Development for War In The Pacific -- MUST READ - 3/4/2006 8:38:16 AM   
pad152

 

Posts: 2871
Joined: 4/23/2000
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Ron Saueracker


quote:

No reason why they can't test some new ideas and refine existing ones with the current game. No point in going ahead on a WITP2 if WITP's basic design issues are not ironed out. Good way to "finish" WITP while testing concepts for WITP2.


Ron

I guess you never worked with software, one company I use to work for would hire new programers telling them they wanted them to develop the new application, but first they had to fix a few things in the old application! Two years later they where still trying to fix the old application(fixing one thing would break five others, sound familar?)! In 5 years six different programers came and went, the old application never really got any better, just older, and the new application never got developed.

Becareful what you ask for!

(in reply to Ron Saueracker)
Post #: 106
RE: New Development for War In The Pacific -- MUST READ - 3/4/2006 8:47:43 AM   
Don Bowen


Posts: 8183
Joined: 7/13/2000
From: Georgetown, Texas, USA
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: ckk

Does that mean you were/are the Bear editor? God I used the hell out of that editor for years. I don't mean Mog's Bear, but I thought the Bear editor Pacwar editor lived in Texas


No Sir, I am not the great Bear but I worked with him, primarily in decoding the PacWar save files. His old website went down some time ago. Do you know of a new one?

(in reply to ckk)
Post #: 107
RE: New Development for War In The Pacific -- MUST READ - 3/4/2006 9:05:37 AM   
FeurerKrieg


Posts: 3397
Joined: 6/15/2005
From: Denver, CO
Status: offline 		MOST EXCELLENT NEWS!!

Good luck Don & John!

This made my day!

_____________________________


Upper portion used with permission of www.subart.net, copyright John Meeks

(in reply to Don Bowen)
Post #: 108
RE: New Development for War In The Pacific -- MUST READ - 3/4/2006 9:15:02 AM   
Ron Saueracker


Posts: 12121
Joined: 1/28/2002
From: Ottawa, Canada OR Zakynthos Island, Greece
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: pad152

quote:

ORIGINAL: Ron Saueracker


quote:

No reason why they can't test some new ideas and refine existing ones with the current game. No point in going ahead on a WITP2 if WITP's basic design issues are not ironed out. Good way to "finish" WITP while testing concepts for WITP2.


Ron

I guess you never worked with software, one company I use to work for would hire new programers telling them they wanted them to develop the new application, but first they had to fix a few things in the old application! Two years later they where still trying to fix the old application(fixing one thing would break five others, sound familar?)! In 5 years six different programers came and went, the old application never really got any better, just older, and the new application never got developed.

Becareful what you ask for!



No I never did. Oh and I'm not talking about specifics really, more broader issues like logistics etc. Seeing as the game is less than perfect anyway, use it like a test bed for ideas before WITP2 is completed. Anyway, I'm done badgering about things. Just glad that perhaps something came of it.


_____________________________





Yammas from The Apo-Tiki Lounge. Future site of WITP AE benders! And then the s--t hit the fan

(in reply to pad152)
Post #: 109
RE: New Development for War In The Pacific -- MUST READ - 3/4/2006 9:46:03 AM   
Charles2222


Posts: 3993
Joined: 3/12/2001
Status: offline 		Ah good, then before too much longer there will actually be an official patch again and I will have reason to play. Good to see GG is in on the act too, though his usual silence prevails.

(in reply to Ron Saueracker)
Post #: 110
RE: New Development for War In The Pacific -- MUST READ - 3/4/2006 10:27:04 AM   
rockmedic109

 

Posts: 2390
Joined: 5/17/2005
From: Citrus Heights, CA
Status: offline 		Most wonderful news I've heard since the release of this "evil, time consuming thing" as my wife {I forgot her name} would say.

Congradulations to Don and Jwilkerson. Indeed. I think congradulations are in order for all of us. We all just got an early Christmas gift.

My only question {and it is a selfish one} is if this will have any impact on the release of the new version of CHS {crossing my fingers, toes and eyes in hope that it won't}.

Thank you Matrix. Great support for a great game.

(in reply to tsimmonds)
Post #: 111
RE: New Development for War In The Pacific -- MUST READ - 3/4/2006 10:32:20 AM   
argaur


Posts: 277
Joined: 5/13/2005
From: Spain
Status: offline 		I love you all!!

_____________________________


"... tell the Emperor that I am facing Russians.
If they had been Prussians, I'd have taken the
position long ago."
- Marshal Ney, 1813

(in reply to rockmedic109)
Post #: 112
RE: New Development for War In The Pacific -- MUST READ - 3/4/2006 10:56:45 AM   
U2


Posts: 3332
Joined: 7/17/2001
From: Västerås,Sweden
Status: offline 		Great news to wake up to!

But I won't go as far as the guy who said "I love you all"

_____________________________


(in reply to argaur)
Post #: 113
RE: New Development for War In The Pacific -- MUST READ - 3/4/2006 11:23:42 AM   
Tankerace


Posts: 6400
Joined: 3/21/2003
From: Stillwater, OK, United States
Status: offline 		Way to go guys!

_____________________________

Designer of War Plan Orange
Allied Naval OOBer of Admiral's Edition
Naval Team Lead for War in the Med

Author of Million-Dollar Barrage: American Field Artillery in the Great War coming soon from OU Press.

(in reply to U2)
Post #: 114
RE: New Development for War In The Pacific -- MUST READ - 3/4/2006 11:52:25 AM   
saj42


Posts: 1125
Joined: 4/19/2005
From: Somerset, England
Status: offline 		GREAT NEWS......

Oh damn..... this means I'm gonna have to ditch the GF Mk2 and cancel wot's left of my social life
After 1.8 i'll stop practicing against the AI and finally start a PBEM game

_____________________________


Banner by rogueusmc

(in reply to David Heath)
Post #: 115
RE: New Development for War In The Pacific -- MUST READ - 3/4/2006 3:45:11 PM   
Mr.Frag


Posts: 13410
Joined: 12/18/2002
From: Purgatory
Status: offline 		This is where I drop by and say "I told ya so" ... problem is it still doesn't make up for all the whining and abuse

(in reply to saj42)
Post #: 116
RE: New Development for War In The Pacific -- MUST READ - 3/4/2006 3:53:49 PM   
Oleg Mastruko


Posts: 4921
Joined: 10/21/2000
Status: offline 		Great news! But as some tough guy in some movie said, lets not start sucking each other's d*cks yet, gentlemen

Don and Jim you have my congratulations and my condolances, simoultaneously. I'll do my best to continue being "developer yes man" when complaints start flying anew, as I am sure they will. Don's IBM experience speaks volumes though - whoever survived IBM can survive anything.

Please, please, PLEASE do not concentrate on just making the database "Allied friendly" - which is, I am sure, pretty high on your task list . Pay attention, now that you have an opportunity, to the damn *interface* (IMHO, the part of the game that could best use some improvements), also can you squeeze in the support for *higher resolutions*?? There are some huuugee monitors out there (some on my desk too) and playing the 1024 x 768 game on them feels lke a crime!

Hmmm, that's about it for now... Oh yes whoever said any future improvements/new versions should concetrate on making the WITP PBEM game first and foremost, has my support. Doing the sensible *strategic* AI for a game this huge seems like impossible task anyway. (You'll never hear me complain about strategic AI in a game this huge, now tactical AI is another matter, as even in PBEM we live and die by tac AI)

Good luck!

PS. Set some *deadlines* There's no serious work without deadlines.

Oleg


_____________________________


(in reply to saj42)
Post #: 117
RE: New Development for War In The Pacific -- MUST READ - 3/4/2006 4:29:52 PM   
Demosthenes


Posts: 525
Joined: 12/8/2005
From: Los Angeles CA
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Oleg Mastruko

Please, please, PLEASE do not concentrate on just making the database "Allied friendly" - which is, I am sure, pretty high on your task list . Pay attention, now that you have an opportunity, to the damn *interface*
Oleg



The interface can use some attention - true. But as for making it Allied friendly - you guys know WitP's shortcomings...make it more historical! Let the modders' worry about making it fair and balanced with their editors

(in reply to Oleg Mastruko)
Post #: 118
RE: New Development for War In The Pacific -- MUST READ - 3/4/2006 4:34:06 PM   
RevRick


Posts: 2617
Joined: 9/16/2000
From: Thomasville, GA
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Don Bowen


quote:

ORIGINAL: ckk

Does that mean you were/are the Bear editor? God I used the hell out of that editor for years. I don't mean Mog's Bear, but I thought the Bear editor Pacwar editor lived in Texas


No Sir, I am not the great Bear but I worked with him, primarily in decoding the PacWar save files. His old website went down some time ago. Do you know of a new one?


It's been too long, but I had some contact with Bear before, and IIRC, there was some allusion to some health problems. My memory being contracted in accuracy in direct proportion to the accumulation of birthdays though, I could be confusing him with another on of our cyber contacts. Does anyone have any news on Bear?

_____________________________

"Action springs not from thought, but from a readiness for responsibility.” ― Dietrich Bonhoeffer

(in reply to Don Bowen)
Post #: 119
RE: New Development for War In The Pacific -- MUST READ - 3/4/2006 5:53:55 PM   
ParachuteProne

 

Posts: 207
Joined: 8/2/2004
Status: offline 		Have you thought of doing a War in the Atlantic/Med addon?

Mark

(in reply to David Heath)
Post #: 120
Page:   <<   < prev  2 3 [4] 5 6   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Current Games From Matrix.] >> [World War II] >> War In The Pacific - Struggle Against Japan 1941 - 1945 >> RE: New Development for War In The Pacific -- MUST READ Page: <<   < prev  2 3 [4] 5 6   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

0.938