Froonp
Posts: 7995
Joined: 10/21/2003 From: Marseilles, France Status: offline
|
quote:
Meanwhile I have two problems with the names. First, my naive decision to use blanks as separators failed completely with the Italians. Those should be P 108A, P 108B, and SM 82, for example. With the Also-Known-As portion of the name Piaggio, Piaggio, and Marsupiale, respectively. The second problem with the names is a need to hyphenate Mitchell, Dominator, and the like. That's how it was done for the WIF FE counters. Those Italian bombers names could be modificated in your Unit file by removing the blank space and putting a dot. Anyway, that's the way they were written usually. P 108A is P.108A, SM 82 is SM.82, etc... It may also fail with the German planes if there is a space within the name (Bf 109E). In that case, simply remove the blank space. quote:
Notice the tankbusters with the red circles and the flying boats with the blue circles. I really like them (I hope you do too). I love them too ! I also love that the the black outline is absent for the circles, except for the yellow circles on yellow background (Chinese P-36). I love the blue circle and don't care if it is nearly on the tail of the NAV bomber depicted. It is great !!!! The extended ranges are great to without outlines !!!! For the names of the LND bombers, maybe you could put the usual name (Mitchell, Dominator, etc...) on the top of the counter, as for the NAV, and lower the picture by a couple of pixels. I think that we don't care if the right wing is partialy covered by the range circle. Or better, for both the NAVs and the LND, put the designation on the top (A-20, B-25, A-31) as for the Fighters, and the usual name (Boston, Mitchell, Vengeance) on the bottom where the designation is presently. This would be more consistent within all the planes.
< Message edited by Froonp -- 4/30/2006 3:46:29 PM >
|