Matrix Games Forums

 Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

RE: convoy intercepted

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [Current Games From Matrix.] >> [World War II] >> War In The Pacific - Struggle Against Japan 1941 - 1945 >> After Action Reports >> RE: convoy intercepted Page: <<   < prev  26 27 [28] 29 30   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: convoy intercepted - 6/14/2006 6:20:14 PM   
Ron Saueracker


Posts: 12121
Joined: 1/28/2002
From: Ottawa, Canada OR Zakynthos Island, Greece
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Sneer

i will publicate within few hours if there is interest


Just the major warships named would suffice for curiosity sake. Simple numbers of smaller ships like AKs would be of interest too just to see the breadth of the destruction.


_____________________________





Yammas from The Apo-Tiki Lounge. Future site of WITP AE benders! And then the s--t hit the fan

(in reply to Sneer)
Post #: 811
losses - 6/14/2006 6:33:24 PM   
Sneer


Posts: 2654
Joined: 10/29/2003
Status: offline 		losses inflicted /losses received


CV 7:0
Essex,Saratoga,lexington,hornet,enterprise,wasp,indomitable
CVL 1:1
hermes,Zuiho
CVE 4:0
Sangamon,Altmaha,chenango,Copahee

BB fast 6:0
Indiana,S.dakota,washington,N.carolina,Prince of wales,Repulse
BB slow 7:0
W.Virginia,N.mexico,Idaho,Tennessee,California,Nevada,Revenge

Cruisers
CA 8:0
CLAA 2:0
CL 15:4

Destroyers/DE /APD
60:8

Subs
48:16

Auxilaries (including ML/DM/DMS)
92:35

TK/AO
50:0

AK/AP
240:29


< Message edited by Sneer -- 6/14/2006 6:35:37 PM >

_____________________________


(in reply to Ron Saueracker)
Post #: 812
RE: losses - 6/14/2006 6:41:38 PM   
BrucePowers


Posts: 12094
Joined: 7/3/2004
Status: offline 		Ooooh. That's gotta hurt. Ouch

(in reply to Sneer)
Post #: 813
air losses - 6/14/2006 6:41:42 PM   
Sneer


Posts: 2654
Joined: 10/29/2003
Status: offline 		total losses - most important figures
wildcats 490
hurricanes 488
M2zero 416
Oscar 393
Sally 378
B17 366
Helen 336
SBD 318
P40B 287
Kate 281
I16c 259
Wellington 212
Tojo 189
Dinah II 160
Avenger 157
P40E 154
Val 139
M3Zero 134
P38 127
Nell 127
Betty 104
Hudson 103
catalina 98
Buffalo 94
Sworfish 91
etc


< Message edited by Sneer -- 6/14/2006 6:45:00 PM >

_____________________________


(in reply to Ron Saueracker)
Post #: 814
RE: air losses - 6/14/2006 6:59:30 PM   
veji1

 

Posts: 1019
Joined: 7/9/2005
Status: offline 		scaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaary... BBs don't respawn, and that's gonna hurt when bombarding of invaded islands is going to be needed, and for protection of landing forces when you'll send surface tfs to mess with them...

(in reply to Sneer)
Post #: 815
RE: air losses - 6/14/2006 7:09:08 PM   
Sneer


Posts: 2654
Joined: 10/29/2003
Status: offline 		that's why BB were chosen as target during last battle pursuit 

_____________________________


(in reply to veji1)
Post #: 816
RE: air losses - 6/14/2006 7:13:40 PM   
Sneer


Posts: 2654
Joined: 10/29/2003
Status: offline 		BTW
allied side still has quite a lot of them
3 old "R"class + warspite + malaya in RN
I think 6 old US BBs  too
+ new coming US fast BBs
+ many cruisers
he still have advantage in broadside



_____________________________


(in reply to Sneer)
Post #: 817
RE: air losses - 6/14/2006 7:23:58 PM   
veji1

 

Posts: 1019
Joined: 7/9/2005
Status: offline 		allies always have advantage in everything.... Whenever this advantage becomes marginal instead of overwhelming it is a victory...:)


(in reply to Sneer)
Post #: 818
RE: air losses - 6/14/2006 7:39:21 PM   
Mike Solli


Posts: 15792
Joined: 10/18/2000
From: the flight deck of the Zuikaku
Status: offline 		R Class = Target

(in reply to veji1)
Post #: 819
RE: air losses - 6/14/2006 7:42:58 PM   
Sneer


Posts: 2654
Joined: 10/29/2003
Status: offline 		"R" class is fearsome beast in night short range engagement
and always good to kill my atolls
i would change my Fuso /Ise  types for them

never underestimate enemy


_____________________________


(in reply to Mike Solli)
Post #: 820
RE: air losses - 6/14/2006 7:46:10 PM   
Mike Solli


Posts: 15792
Joined: 10/18/2000
From: the flight deck of the Zuikaku
Status: offline 		No, I don't underestimate the enemy, usually.

I've found that if I can take the Andaman Islands early (and put some Emily and Nell/Bettys there), those R Class are dead meat. They can't make it anywhere before they are turned into Swiss cheese.

(in reply to Sneer)
Post #: 821
RE: air losses - 6/14/2006 7:48:26 PM   
Sneer


Posts: 2654
Joined: 10/29/2003
Status: offline 		my enemy made this error and lost Revenge early - bombarded Rangoon when i moved planes to moulmain
now "R"class moves always with carriers


< Message edited by Sneer -- 6/14/2006 7:52:58 PM >

_____________________________


(in reply to Mike Solli)
Post #: 822
RE: losses - 6/14/2006 10:08:54 PM   
invernomuto


Posts: 986
Joined: 10/8/2004
From: Turin, Italy
Status: offline 		/invernomuto joins Sneer Fans Club...

_____________________________


(in reply to Sneer)
Post #: 823
RE: air losses - 6/14/2006 10:11:06 PM   
Ron Saueracker


Posts: 12121
Joined: 1/28/2002
From: Ottawa, Canada OR Zakynthos Island, Greece
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Sneer

"R" class is fearsome beast in night short range engagement
and always good to kill my atolls
i would change my Fuso /Ise  types for them

never underestimate enemy



Especially with BigBs funnel cap equipped profile!!! Mean buggers.


_____________________________





Yammas from The Apo-Tiki Lounge. Future site of WITP AE benders! And then the s--t hit the fan

(in reply to Sneer)
Post #: 824
RE: losses - 6/14/2006 10:46:56 PM   
Ursa MAior

 

Posts: 1416
Joined: 4/20/2005
From: Hungary, EU
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Sneer

losses inflicted /losses received


CV 7:0
Essex,Saratoga,lexington,hornet,enterprise,wasp,indomitable
CVL 1:1
hermes,Zuiho
CVE 4:0
Sangamon,Altmaha,chenango,Copahee

BB fast 6:0
Indiana,S.dakota,washington,N.carolina,Prince of wales,Repulse
BB slow 7:0
W.Virginia,N.mexico,Idaho,Tennessee,California,Nevada,Revenge

Cruisers
CA 8:0
CLAA 2:0
CL 15:4

Destroyers/DE /APD
60:8

Subs
48:16

Auxilaries (including ML/DM/DMS)
92:35

TK/AO
50:0

AK/AP
240:29



How could you sink 4 fast BBs? Their AAA is awesome.

_____________________________


Art by the amazing Dixie

(in reply to Sneer)
Post #: 825
RE: convoy intercepted - 6/14/2006 11:38:52 PM   
Sneer


Posts: 2654
Joined: 10/29/2003
Status: offline 		N.carolina was bombed by KB and heavy shelled by BB at Pago harbour
washington was damaged and detached from Air TF ( i think)
S.dakota was damaged probably the same way as washington and indiana had a duel with musashi at night and was finished when crippled by planes - whole story of this huge almost 2 week battle is few page earlier
- all of this happened 2 month of game time earlier

< Message edited by Sneer -- 6/14/2006 11:39:22 PM >

_____________________________


(in reply to Ron Saueracker)
Post #: 826
No wuckers! - 6/15/2006 12:27:32 PM   
Raverdave


Posts: 6520
Joined: 2/8/2002
From: Melb. Australia
Status: offline 		Regardless of what I have lost so far (as painful as those losses were) I am still in an aggressive mood and looking for blood and capable of dealing out some lumps of my own.

_____________________________




Never argue with an idiot, he will only drag you down to his level and beat you with experience.

(in reply to Sneer)
Post #: 827
RE: No wuckers! - 6/15/2006 12:48:03 PM   
Sneer


Posts: 2654
Joined: 10/29/2003
Status: offline 		convoy battle near Darwin
i moved nells to lautem and koepang
koepang mission failed to launch and was caught by b17
but second group ( escorted one ) managed to score few hits

AFTER ACTION REPORTS FOR 03/16/43

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ASW attack at 59,71
 
Japanese Ships
DD Hayate
DD Mutsuki
DD Ushio
DD Usugumo
DD Yukikaze
DD Hatsukaze
 
Allied Ships
SS Halibut, hits 3
 
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Day Air attack on Lautem , at 33,78
 
Japanese aircraft
no flights
 
Allied aircraft
P-38G Lightning x 3
B-17E Fortress x 96
 
Japanese aircraft losses
G3M Nell: 4 destroyed
 
Allied aircraft losses
B-17E Fortress: 13 damaged
 
Japanese ground losses:
154 casualties reported
Guns lost 6
 
Airbase hits 16
Airbase supply hits 13
Runway hits 32
 
Aircraft Attacking:
 8 x B-17E Fortress bombing at 10000 feet
 4 x B-17E Fortress bombing at 10000 feet
 3 x B-17E Fortress bombing at 10000 feet
 3 x B-17E Fortress bombing at 10000 feet
 4 x B-17E Fortress bombing at 10000 feet
 7 x B-17E Fortress bombing at 10000 feet
 3 x B-17E Fortress bombing at 10000 feet
 3 x B-17E Fortress bombing at 10000 feet
 3 x B-17E Fortress bombing at 10000 feet
 4 x B-17E Fortress bombing at 10000 feet
 3 x B-17E Fortress bombing at 10000 feet
 3 x B-17E Fortress bombing at 10000 feet
 3 x B-17E Fortress bombing at 10000 feet
 3 x B-17E Fortress bombing at 10000 feet
 3 x B-17E Fortress bombing at 10000 feet
 3 x B-17E Fortress bombing at 10000 feet
 3 x B-17E Fortress bombing at 10000 feet
 3 x B-17E Fortress bombing at 10000 feet
 3 x B-17E Fortress bombing at 10000 feet
 3 x B-17E Fortress bombing at 10000 feet
 3 x B-17E Fortress bombing at 10000 feet
 3 x B-17E Fortress bombing at 10000 feet
 3 x B-17E Fortress bombing at 10000 feet
 3 x B-17E Fortress bombing at 10000 feet
 3 x B-17E Fortress bombing at 10000 feet
 3 x B-17E Fortress bombing at 10000 feet
 3 x B-17E Fortress bombing at 10000 feet
 3 x B-17E Fortress bombing at 10000 feet
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Day Air attack on TF at 30,83
 
Japanese aircraft
A6M2 Zero x 27
G3M Nell x 7
G4M1 Betty x 33
 
Allied aircraft
Brewster 339D x 6
 
Japanese aircraft losses
G4M1 Betty: 5 damaged
 
Allied aircraft losses
Brewster 339D: 6 destroyed
 
Allied Ships
AK Steel Navigator, Torpedo hits 2,  on fire
AK Admiral Williams, Torpedo hits 2,  on fire,  heavy damage
AK Lahaina
AK Kahuku, Torpedo hits 1
AK Steel Exporter, Torpedo hits 1,  on fire,  heavy damage
 
Aircraft Attacking:
 3 x G3M Nell launching torpedoes at 200 feet
 4 x G4M1 Betty launching torpedoes at 200 feet
 1 x G4M1 Betty launching torpedoes at 200 feet
 3 x G4M1 Betty launching torpedoes at 200 feet
 4 x G4M1 Betty launching torpedoes at 200 feet
 4 x G3M Nell launching torpedoes at 200 feet
 2 x G4M1 Betty launching torpedoes at 200 feet
 3 x G4M1 Betty launching torpedoes at 200 feet
 4 x G4M1 Betty launching torpedoes at 200 feet
 4 x G4M1 Betty launching torpedoes at 200 feet
 4 x G4M1 Betty launching torpedoes at 200 feet
 4 x G4M1 Betty launching torpedoes at 200 feet
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Day Air attack on TF at 30,83
 
Japanese aircraft
A6M2 Zero x 22
G3M Nell x 3
 
Allied aircraft
Brewster 339D x 2
 
Japanese aircraft losses
G3M Nell: 1 damaged
 
 
Allied Ships
AK Steel Exporter, Torpedo hits 1,  on fire,  heavy damage
 
Aircraft Attacking:
 3 x G3M Nell launching torpedoes at 200 feet


_____________________________


(in reply to Raverdave)
Post #: 828
RE: No wuckers! - 6/15/2006 12:58:25 PM   
veji1

 

Posts: 1019
Joined: 7/9/2005
Status: offline 		well you still have your LBA, so even if you can hardly conquer anything on land for months to come, you can already severly weaken his indian and eastern DEI holdings...

But it would sure be braver to charge head on in cenpac....

(in reply to Raverdave)
Post #: 829
RE: No wuckers! - 6/15/2006 1:01:43 PM   
Sneer


Posts: 2654
Joined: 10/29/2003
Status: offline 		My bet is Raverdave will sonner or later try surprise cenpac assault

_____________________________


(in reply to veji1)
Post #: 830
RE: No wuckers! - 6/15/2006 1:40:12 PM   
Sneer


Posts: 2654
Joined: 10/29/2003
Status: offline 		03/17/43
night bombardment of tenimbar
27 allied planes destroyed

03/18/43
previously damaged AK sunk at Wyndham

< Message edited by Sneer -- 6/15/2006 2:30:24 PM >

_____________________________


(in reply to Sneer)
Post #: 831
darwin disaster - 6/15/2006 3:29:41 PM   
Sneer


Posts: 2654
Joined: 10/29/2003
Status: offline 		rushing turns brings sometimes unpleasant results - little warning to all WITP maniacs
i waited with light forces for enemy shipping at isle next to tenimbar close to amboina
this night they were ordered to check for enemy barges
unfortunately i did not unlock their patrol order and enemy bombers found them at enemy harbour during day phase
4 tomozuru class DD sunk 1 fubuki class is damaged
looks like time to slow down and check all things every turn



< Message edited by Sneer -- 6/15/2006 3:30:03 PM >

_____________________________


(in reply to Ron Saueracker)
Post #: 832
RE: darwin disaster - 6/15/2006 4:09:16 PM   
Raverdave


Posts: 6520
Joined: 2/8/2002
From: Melb. Australia
Status: offline 		Cenpac eh ?  so thats where you think I'll strike hard and fast next eh?   Well time will tell.    Nice to get a handful of Jap DDs........The battle North of Darwin is starting to scale up and it is getting bloody.

_____________________________




Never argue with an idiot, he will only drag you down to his level and beat you with experience.

(in reply to Sneer)
Post #: 833
RE: darwin disaster - 6/15/2006 4:10:40 PM   
BrucePowers


Posts: 12094
Joined: 7/3/2004
Status: offline 		I am still looking for Raver to come back strong. He probably has a few surprises up his sleeve.

(in reply to Sneer)
Post #: 834
RE: convoy intercepted - 6/15/2006 4:31:47 PM   
Sneer


Posts: 2654
Joined: 10/29/2003
Status: offline 		DDs were human error like your convoy
do not count on repeat
BTW you have advantage in region and I see more allied blood till moment
Cenpac -not now  - somewhere within 3-5 months when you recognize KB busy around darwin -


_____________________________


(in reply to Ron Saueracker)
Post #: 835
RE: darwin disaster - 6/15/2006 4:32:56 PM   
Raverdave


Posts: 6520
Joined: 2/8/2002
From: Melb. Australia
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: BrucePowers

I am still looking for Raver to come back strong. He probably has a few surprises up his sleeve.






_____________________________




Never argue with an idiot, he will only drag you down to his level and beat you with experience.

(in reply to BrucePowers)
Post #: 836
RE: darwin disaster - 6/15/2006 4:36:58 PM   
BrucePowers


Posts: 12094
Joined: 7/3/2004
Status: offline 		Never having gotten very far in this game (my own fault, other priorities) how long does it take you guys to input a turn before sending it. I realize when planning an invasion more time is required.

(in reply to Raverdave)
Post #: 837
RE: darwin disaster - 6/15/2006 5:03:41 PM   
Raverdave


Posts: 6520
Joined: 2/8/2002
From: Melb. Australia
Status: offline 		Takes me about 20 mintues on average....sometimes only 10 and other times upto an hour.

_____________________________




Never argue with an idiot, he will only drag you down to his level and beat you with experience.

(in reply to BrucePowers)
Post #: 838
RE: darwin disaster - 6/15/2006 5:05:15 PM   
Sneer


Posts: 2654
Joined: 10/29/2003
Status: offline 		10-15 min unless major operation underway - sometimes twice that

_____________________________


(in reply to BrucePowers)
Post #: 839
RE: convoy intercepted - 6/15/2006 5:11:59 PM   
Sneer


Posts: 2654
Joined: 10/29/2003
Status: offline 		it takes ap 30 min for us both to issue order and next 30 min to technical issue upload - transfer between mail servers and download
so in good time we do 1 turn /hour


_____________________________


(in reply to Ron Saueracker)
Post #: 840
Page:   <<   < prev  26 27 [28] 29 30   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Current Games From Matrix.] >> [World War II] >> War In The Pacific - Struggle Against Japan 1941 - 1945 >> After Action Reports >> RE: convoy intercepted Page: <<   < prev  26 27 [28] 29 30   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

1.016