Matrix Games Forums

 Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

opinions on this

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [Current Games From Matrix.] >> [Sports] >> PureSim Baseball >> opinions on this Page: [1]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
opinions on this - 7/9/2006 4:39:52 PM   
No New Messages
rowech
Matrix Trooper


 

Posts: 215
Joined: 6/9/2005
Status: offline 		What year is a good year to start with for a historical league? 1901? 1920? 1946? 1962? 1977?

Anybody have a favorite starting point?
Post #: 1
RE: opinions on this - 7/9/2006 6:07:40 PM   
No New Messages
Dunk44
Matrix Recruit


 

Posts: 7
Joined: 7/3/2006
Status: offline 		Really depends on what your looking for. My favorite thing to do is to rebuild some of the worst teams in history. Taking over the '27 Yankees isn't fun for me.


(in reply to rowech)
Post #: 2
RE: opinions on this - 7/9/2006 7:49:39 PM   
No New Messages
rwd59
Matrix Recruit


 

Posts: 46
Joined: 7/3/2006
From: LA (Lower Alabama)
Status: offline 		Pre-60's doesn't do much for me. Start in 1962 and take over the Mets if you want a challenge.

(in reply to Dunk44)
Post #: 3
RE: opinions on this - 7/9/2006 10:41:00 PM   
No New Messages
Tanaka
Matrix Legion of Merit



Posts: 4378
Joined: 4/8/2003
From: USA
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: rowech

What year is a good year to start with for a historical league? 1901? 1920? 1946? 1962? 1977?

Anybody have a favorite starting point?


Definitely 1946!

_____________________________


(in reply to rowech)
Post #: 4
RE: opinions on this - 7/9/2006 11:03:25 PM   
No New Messages
Nukester
Matrix Veteran



Posts: 472
Joined: 7/3/2006
From: Newburgh, NY
Status: offline 		I always start in 1903, if only because leagues dont change much after that for a long time (excpet a few name changes). Only thing is, in 1904 the schedule went from 140 games to 154 games

(in reply to Tanaka)
Post #: 5
RE: opinions on this - 7/9/2006 11:15:59 PM   
No New Messages
33sherman
Matrix Trooper


 

Posts: 175
Joined: 8/22/2005
Status: offline 		I also start in 1903, for the same reasons (easy expansion). In 1901 you get that anomalous Brewers' team. You chop a couple years off Christy Mathewson's career, but you get all of Ty Cobb, Tris Speaker, etc. The fictional players fizzle out after a few years and it's all historical.

(in reply to Nukester)
Post #: 6
RE: opinions on this - 7/9/2006 11:17:24 PM   
No New Messages
DandricSturm
Matrix Veteran



Posts: 492
Joined: 8/7/2005
Status: offline 		Often mentioned in this type of thread is 1951. Mantle and Mays.

_____________________________



"The Guns, Thank God, The Guns..." - Rudyard Kipling
http://www.bluemax-ara-assoc.com/

(in reply to 33sherman)
Post #: 7
RE: opinions on this - 7/10/2006 9:58:47 AM   
No New Messages
Claymore Cut
Matrix Veteran



Posts: 270
Joined: 5/16/2006
Status: offline 		If you want one of the worst teams in history, the 62' mets are a must!

(in reply to DandricSturm)
Post #: 8
Page:   [1]
All Forums >> [Current Games From Matrix.] >> [Sports] >> PureSim Baseball >> opinions on this Page: [1]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

2.844