Matrix Games Forums

Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

RE: AAR swift vs fochinell

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Gary Grigsby's Eagle Day to Bombing the Reich >> RE: AAR swift vs fochinell Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3 4 5   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: AAR swift vs fochinell - 6/6/2007 2:44:48 PM   
Hard Sarge


Posts: 22741
Joined: 10/1/2000
From: garfield hts ohio usa
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: fochinell


At the end of the day I had lost 33 A/C ( 21 of them Bf109G-6) for another 73 Allied A/C and once again many Spitfire VBs ( 36 !! )


I'd forgotten how heavily the Spit Vb's got hammered in the early stages if you use them seriously. More annoying was the bug (or was it weather?) that made my B-17 raid attack the road junction rather than Foggia RR; I seem to remember this being a bug similar to that UFAC near Kiel which I could never bomb despite repeated missions to it.

Time for a rest turn and a chance to replenish those fighter losses while the weather clamps down. At the moment Supreme Allied Command is moving the preferred aircraft types to the preferred units. For example, the light A-20 bombload plus the abysmal bombing accuracy of the mediums means I prefer to allocate them to the 12th AF while the heavier bombload of the B-25 goes to the RAF medium bomber units (24 x 6 x 500lb making them fractionally more useful than 24 x 4 x 500lb in the A-20C). I've tried using Stirlings with their heavier bombloads to make the RAF tactical bomber units more effective before, but I can't remember if they made any difference. At the moment my main fighter problem is replacing the Spit Vb losses, which I normally do by converting the 12th AF Spit units to the P-38 while upgrading the RAF Spit Vbs to the IX. I also convert a couple of MAC Spit Vb squadrons to the P-40 for their higher bombload as fighter-bombers when the flow of P-38's is sufficient to re-equip the 317-319 FS.

just in case, the Meds had some trouble in the old game, and it was something to do with the FBs, get the FB to fight back and the Meds couldn't hit the side of a barn, let the FBs get clobbered and the Meds could hit, we got that screwed away, and the Meds can now hit and the FBs can now fight back, the early A-20s should be a nice plane, as it is fast, and HARD for the LW to catch (heck, HARD for the Allies to escourt too)(the Boston III has a small bombload, but once the IIIA is out and the Havoc, they are going to be nasty light bombers)


Tactically, I'm prepared to do some deep-penetration unescorted raids when the weather is right, but until then short-distance tactical raids to the Bay of Naples and occupied territories are the order of the day. BC is just going to tick over generating terror damage (although with the prospect of some SB score by targetting the larger Axis RR sites) while 5 Group will do some (attempted) precision bombing in the near future.




_____________________________


(in reply to fochinell)
Post #: 31
RE: AAR swift vs fochinell - 6/6/2007 4:12:35 PM   
fochinell

 

Posts: 287
Joined: 11/19/2005
Status: offline
we got that screwed away, and the Meds can now hit and the FBs can now fight back

Excellent. Meanwhile Supreme Allied HQ laugh the laugh of an evil galactic dark lord at the P-39 losses . Their poor MVR and short range mean that I like to use them as strafing cannon fodder. The only problem is that OKL have moved their Italian units out of strafe range. I mean even the D.520's. Where's the fun in that? I was hoping to see the worst Allied and worst Axis fighters go head to head whilst Werner and I laughed and drank beer at their losses.

Another problem will soon be the lack of Italian bases to cram my MAC units into. JC did something to add the 15th AF bases in Corsica and so forth in his OB, but I'm hoping for MAC to get some more bases (like Montecorvino, which they moved a Spit wing into during the Salerno landings). A similar problem came up with the number of 2nd TAF bases, which also reminds me that the 85 Group Tempest units arrived after the post-D-Day breakout switch of UK 2TAF bases to the 8th AF, which seemed to make those squadrons disappear just like the old 12th AF -> 15th AF FS bug. Have you got that far in beta testing, HS?

Hot news flash: Wimpey III now gone out of service as 205 Group move to the Wimpey X. Two new CW P-40 sqns languish due to lack of replacements, but get moved forward into Sicily for slaughter anyway.

< Message edited by fochinell -- 6/6/2007 4:15:33 PM >

(in reply to Hard Sarge)
Post #: 32
RE: AAR swift vs fochinell - 6/6/2007 5:51:41 PM   
wernerpruckner


Posts: 4148
Joined: 5/5/2005
Status: offline
25st August 1943:

more of the same all over the map:
- small scale sweeps and raids in the West
- bigger pre-invasion attacks in Italy
- BC attacked Bremen
- NI´s killed 7 Wilde Sau fighter

My best defence weapon at the moment is the Flak.....
Lots of moving stuff around...RR-Flak units to more important sites...AA to RRs and A/Fs...evacuating more units from southern Italy....




Attachment (1)

_____________________________


(in reply to wernerpruckner)
Post #: 33
RE: AAR swift vs fochinell - 6/6/2007 9:20:18 PM   
wernerpruckner


Posts: 4148
Joined: 5/5/2005
Status: offline
good weather and daring attacks by the 8Th AF !!
what a bloody day!

The Allied tried a maximum effort day in the West!
The 8th AF made deep strikes against some UFAC sites. But luckily half of the missions did not hit their primary target.
The heavy bombers attacked the UFACs F.Schichau GmbH and Flenderwerke and also the ARM Wenzendorf and a single RADAR site.

Meanwhile the tactical air forces hit the RRs Montzen, Einhoven, Tilburg and Zeebrugge.

In the south not only Italy was the target, there was also a low level strike against the Greek PORT Piraeus.
Other than that Gavin continued with his pre-Invasion raids in southern Italy with raids against various targets.

In the night there was the first Berlin raid of the Bomber Command - losses were light on both sites during this one.

I am not happy with the outcome of this turn, because even against un-escorted B-17 raids my Bf109G-6 had often a 1:1 loss ratio.
But the cannon version did fine, as did some other units.

84 lost Axis A/C versus 146 lost Allied A/C ( including 118 B-17F Fortress )




Attachment (1)

_____________________________


(in reply to wernerpruckner)
Post #: 34
RE: AAR swift vs fochinell - 6/6/2007 9:59:29 PM   
wernerpruckner


Posts: 4148
Joined: 5/5/2005
Status: offline
another picture of the combats against the B17´s




Attachment (1)

_____________________________


(in reply to wernerpruckner)
Post #: 35
RE: AAR swift vs fochinell - 6/6/2007 10:00:39 PM   
wernerpruckner


Posts: 4148
Joined: 5/5/2005
Status: offline
and another one:




Attachment (1)

_____________________________


(in reply to wernerpruckner)
Post #: 36
RE: AAR swift vs fochinell - 6/7/2007 2:54:53 PM   
fochinell

 

Posts: 287
Joined: 11/19/2005
Status: offline
The 8th AF made deep strikes against some UFAC sites. But luckily half of the missions did not hit their primary target.



The losses were, if anything, slightly lower than I suspected. On the other hand the B-26 raid over the occupied territories was too late to distract from the 8th AF as they approached over the German Bight, and my failure to hit the Dutch radar stations didn't help confuse OKL, so I might have done better than that. The poor bombing was the real annoyance, but the weather wasn't 100% and I was getting bored waiting.

In the meantime, the B-17 losses were heavy enough to reduce the chances of further unescorted raids until long-range escort fighters turn up. Roll on thos P-38J's and P-47D's.

Meanwhile I offer the traditional expressions of sympathy given by Galactic Dark Lords to their minions after heavy losses - by posting the B-17 bombardiers to the first wave to hit the beach at Tarawa.

< Message edited by fochinell -- 6/7/2007 2:59:56 PM >

(in reply to wernerpruckner)
Post #: 37
RE: AAR swift vs fochinell - 6/7/2007 3:38:24 PM   
wernerpruckner


Posts: 4148
Joined: 5/5/2005
Status: offline
and on the next day the Dark Lord Gavin is resting all his daylight forces - including the recce birds !!!

There were only a few night missions ( Rome and a target in the Ruhr Valley ).
Nothing important was hit .

Luftwaffe is resting and continuing the relocation of the Southern Italy stuff....

_____________________________


(in reply to fochinell)
Post #: 38
RE: AAR swift vs fochinell - 6/7/2007 4:43:56 PM   
fochinell

 

Posts: 287
Joined: 11/19/2005
Status: offline
In reference to Werner's morale/fatigue strategy, I usually ground my bombers if they are below 50% morale unless it's either a maximum effort, or if they're mediums, where I'll run them down to 40% morale. I normally use about 50% of my tactical bomber units every turn in order to keep Axis fatigue up and cause some attritional losses in between strategic attacks. I use my fighters more, but nomally select the highest morale units and leave at least a couple with the lowest morale to rest. I've found lower altitudes increase the accuracy of mediums - e.g. three CW sqns of B25's can do some damage to RR targets below 14,000 feet. But when the heavy Flak arrives, it massacres them

(in reply to wernerpruckner)
Post #: 39
RE: AAR swift vs fochinell - 6/7/2007 6:28:33 PM   
wernerpruckner


Posts: 4148
Joined: 5/5/2005
Status: offline
28th August 1943:

Gavin continues with his pre-invasion attacks in Italy.
I let him do this for the most part - but one raid attacked a target near Rome and therefore got butchered.

In the West there was a RR-raid with tons of escorts - the P-47Cs did fight quite well against my Bf109G-6s.

In the night only a small BC raid - no German counteraction.

23 Axis lost A/C
and 62 kill Allied A/C
and still no Axis aces - but 6 pilots with 4 kills.

_____________________________


(in reply to fochinell)
Post #: 40
RE: AAR swift vs fochinell - 6/7/2007 9:23:53 PM   
wernerpruckner


Posts: 4148
Joined: 5/5/2005
Status: offline
29th August:
weather is getting worse

Limited action in Italy with two fighter-bombing and dive-bombing attacks against the 29th Panzergrenadierdivision...Flak was very accurate and also the 10 balloons assigned to defend this unit were a good investment

More attacks in the West - RR Lille and Charleroi, RADAR Schaffen and POWER Langenbrugge
Some bigger air battles happened here, but nothing surprising.

BC was active and bombed Wedau - only limited response by the German Nightfighter force.

17 Axis for 50 Allied A/C lost.

highest losses so far:
136 Bf109G-6
143 Spit VB
135 B-17F

_____________________________


(in reply to wernerpruckner)
Post #: 41
RE: AAR swift vs fochinell - 6/8/2007 12:00:02 PM   
fochinell

 

Posts: 287
Joined: 11/19/2005
Status: offline
The 8th AF escorts are getting tired (some of them down to the 20% range), but being an Evil Galactic Dark Lord I just order them back into battle anyway as the weather over the channel is just too good not to flog them out into combat one more time. The wearing-down phase of tactic ops should last for another week or so, at least until the P-38J and P-47D arrive in the 8th AF escort units, and the Italian tactical raids will dry up after the invasion and before the Italian bases come online. Which means a boring few turns where the mayhem will be a little limited. Losses of B-17's were high enough for SAHQ to divert all B-17 supplies to the 8th AF and re-equip the 12th AF heavy bomber units exclusively with B-24's, so they'll also be out of action for a few turns as they build up. In short, boredom ahead But the B-17 stock should be sufficiently high as the B-17G's arrive to allow some massacres after that

(in reply to wernerpruckner)
Post #: 42
RE: AAR swift vs fochinell - 6/8/2007 1:34:55 PM   
wernerpruckner


Posts: 4148
Joined: 5/5/2005
Status: offline
30th August:

tactical victory for the Allied forces in the air in the West - I thought Gavin will go deep inland for a UFAC strike, but his units flew the way back and bombed some tactical targets...A/F Gilze Rijen, ARM Zaamstad, RR Arnheim.

In Italy lots of preparation raids for the Invasion, but also a bigger raid to the Rome area (RRs and POWER attacked )

BC was once again active and bombed Hannover.

77 Axis A/C (49 Bf109G-6 most of them in the West ) versus 102 Allied A/C ( with 43 B-26Bs ) lost

At the end of the turn:
INVASION of Italy.....only four Italian units are still with me...all are dayfighter units...3 Staffel sized units and one Gruppen sized unit.

_____________________________


(in reply to fochinell)
Post #: 43
RE: AAR swift vs fochinell - 6/8/2007 4:30:05 PM   
fochinell

 

Posts: 287
Joined: 11/19/2005
Status: offline
tactical victory for the Allied forces in the air in the West - I thought Gavin will go deep inland for a UFAC strike, but his units flew the way back and bombed some tactical targets...A/F Gilze Rijen, ARM Zaamstad, RR Arnheim.

Every trick works once in a while. Werner has punished that sort of tactic before (supporting raids radiating from the axis of the main attack to catch blue interceptors), but this time the 2TAF Spits struck hard on 109's returning from the B-17 raid.

On the other hand, the Marauders bombing Rome/Littorio were hammered, and the A-20's following were badly routed to provide any support; not early enough or close enough to help, not late enough to catch blue units breaking off from the Marauders.

This turn the weather defeats me, and some more RAF weather forecasters find themselves transferred to Burma.

< Message edited by fochinell -- 6/8/2007 4:32:20 PM >

(in reply to wernerpruckner)
Post #: 44
RE: AAR swift vs fochinell - 6/8/2007 4:45:42 PM   
wernerpruckner


Posts: 4148
Joined: 5/5/2005
Status: offline
Gavin plays Nero and burns Rome....
other than that no action




Attachment (1)

_____________________________


(in reply to fochinell)
Post #: 45
RE: AAR swift vs fochinell - 6/8/2007 5:21:57 PM   
fochinell

 

Posts: 287
Joined: 11/19/2005
Status: offline
Gavin plays Nero and burns Rome....

Durn durn durn dah-dah-durn dah-dah-durn

Here's some of my top-scoring minions of doom at the end of August '43.








Attachment (1)

< Message edited by fochinell -- 6/8/2007 5:23:16 PM >

(in reply to wernerpruckner)
Post #: 46
RE: AAR swift vs fochinell - 6/8/2007 5:58:31 PM   
wernerpruckner


Posts: 4148
Joined: 5/5/2005
Status: offline
1st of September:

Italy - very quiet !!

Westfront:
several tactical raids - RR Abbeville, Hazebrouck, RADAR Ft. Rouge, CFAC Amsterdam Fokker and the 719th Infantry Division.
The raid against my ground troops got a bloody nose - 25+ Marauders did not leave the Low Countries

BC action against Halle and a Mossiebomber raid to Berlin.
NI killed some more Wilde Sau pilots - the Bf109 Wilde Sau variant is no longer in production !!


29 vs 61 losses




Attachment (1)

_____________________________


(in reply to fochinell)
Post #: 47
RE: AAR swift vs fochinell - 6/8/2007 8:30:12 PM   
wernerpruckner


Posts: 4148
Joined: 5/5/2005
Status: offline
2nd September 1943:

limited action in the West only

2:11 losses

_____________________________


(in reply to wernerpruckner)
Post #: 48
RE: AAR swift vs fochinell - 6/8/2007 10:49:59 PM   
wernerpruckner


Posts: 4148
Joined: 5/5/2005
Status: offline

3rd September 1943:

weather
but BC still active

0:2 losses

production of D520 is changed to a different Co-Axis A/C.

_____________________________


(in reply to wernerpruckner)
Post #: 49
RE: AAR swift vs fochinell - 6/9/2007 11:42:49 AM   
fochinell

 

Posts: 287
Joined: 11/19/2005
Status: offline
Werner just reminded me about houserules. It might be worth posting them for reference, so here they are. As I remember them, the rules we play under are:

Allies:

1. No Andrei raids/bombing cheating (maximum alt, daylight/night attacks - apologies to Andrei who first posted on that and had his name associated with it, not that he was a cheat). Maximum bombing altitude of 25,000 feet to keep things in range of HAA.

2. No escorted recon. I would do that with fighter-recce a/c like the Spit FR XIV or F-6 on tactical targets if it was alowed, though.

3. NI's limited to four active over any airfield at any one time (I stagger mine as lone sorties at 20-30 minute intervals to ensure a good overlap coverage on active NJG airfields) at a maximum altitude of 12,000 feet to expose them to airfield flak (I don't think Werner's bothered about that, but it seems fair to me). I've actually killed 30 from an individual NJG Gruppe on one night when playing against the AI with no limit before, so I think some limit is needed.

4. No wild evasion of mandatory targeting. I am reasonable about UFAC and UPEN targeting as well as AVALANCHE and OVERLORD, but I tend to do about a third of the demanded VSITE targeting once I've done substantive damage to all visible VSITES.

5. Basic historical usage of aircraft (no B-17's in 9th AF as extra strategic bombers, etc). This is more for me than Werner, and it hits the Axis more in any case.

6. I also don't deliberately plot recce a/c along with raids on the same track to divert Axis interceptors. If the AI does it during auto-plotting, at least I'm innocent.

Axis -

1. Flak limits (Size x 10) limit to number of AA guns on any site. I prefer a strict limit to HAA as well, as it really destroys bombing accuracy and causes too many losses (as opposed to damaged a/c), but I can't remember if Werner agreed to it or not in our last game. Normally I stick to a maximum of 50 HAA on large sites (size 10 plus) and 25 on smaller ones. Werner can correct me on this for whatever he's doing in this game.

2. Historical usage of aircraft - R&D limited until an aircraft appears in production, to avoid the early appearance of jets.

3. No attacking bombers returning over the continent after making the Allied-held coast. No bomber crew in their right minds would have done that in RL.

That's all I can remember that I use, Werner can correct me and fill in any others, even if they aren't in use during our game.

(in reply to wernerpruckner)
Post #: 50
RE: AAR swift vs fochinell - 6/9/2007 12:55:27 PM   
Hard Sarge


Posts: 22741
Joined: 10/1/2000
From: garfield hts ohio usa
Status: offline
Manatory targeting, we fixed a bug that the old game had, that it didn't count everything in the list as being damaged when it really was, so Overlord and AVALANCHE should now work the way it was planned to work



_____________________________


(in reply to fochinell)
Post #: 51
RE: AAR swift vs fochinell - 6/10/2007 11:46:37 AM   
wernerpruckner


Posts: 4148
Joined: 5/5/2005
Status: offline
4th September 1943:

resting in the Med due to weather

only small skirmishes in the West - A/F Courelles and RR Courtrai

BC targeted Dresden this turn.

8:26 losses - still no Axis ace !!!

_____________________________


(in reply to wernerpruckner)
Post #: 52
RE: AAR swift vs fochinell - 6/10/2007 11:55:25 AM   
wernerpruckner


Posts: 4148
Joined: 5/5/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: fochinell

Werner just reminded me about houserules. It might be worth posting them for reference, so here they are. As I remember them, the rules we play under are:

Allies:

1. No Andrei raids/bombing cheating (maximum alt, daylight/night attacks - apologies to Andrei who first posted on that and had his name associated with it, not that he was a cheat). Maximum bombing altitude of 25,000 feet to keep things in range of HAA.

2. No escorted recon. I would do that with fighter-recce a/c like the Spit FR XIV or F-6 on tactical targets if it was alowed, though.

3. NI's limited to four active over any airfield at any one time (I stagger mine as lone sorties at 20-30 minute intervals to ensure a good overlap coverage on active NJG airfields) at a maximum altitude of 12,000 feet to expose them to airfield flak (I don't think Werner's bothered about that, but it seems fair to me). I've actually killed 30 from an individual NJG Gruppe on one night when playing against the AI with no limit before, so I think some limit is needed.

4. No wild evasion of mandatory targeting. I am reasonable about UFAC and UPEN targeting as well as AVALANCHE and OVERLORD, but I tend to do about a third of the demanded VSITE targeting once I've done substantive damage to all visible VSITES.

5. Basic historical usage of aircraft (no B-17's in 9th AF as extra strategic bombers, etc). This is more for me than Werner, and it hits the Axis more in any case.

6. I also don't deliberately plot recce a/c along with raids on the same track to divert Axis interceptors. If the AI does it during auto-plotting, at least I'm innocent.

Axis -

1. Flak limits (Size x 10) limit to number of AA guns on any site. I prefer a strict limit to HAA as well, as it really destroys bombing accuracy and causes too many losses (as opposed to damaged a/c), but I can't remember if Werner agreed to it or not in our last game. Normally I stick to a maximum of 50 HAA on large sites (size 10 plus) and 25 on smaller ones. Werner can correct me on this for whatever he's doing in this game.

2. Historical usage of aircraft - R&D limited until an aircraft appears in production, to avoid the early appearance of jets.

3. No attacking bombers returning over the continent after making the Allied-held coast. No bomber crew in their right minds would have done that in RL.

That's all I can remember that I use, Werner can correct me and fill in any others, even if they aren't in use during our game.



Allied 4:
mandatory Avalanche includes not only the area given by the game - we go around it and there is also Southern France, Dalmatia, parts of Croatia, Albania and Greece included. Mandatory is not only the targets given by the game - in our houserules it includes all targets in the given area
( info for non/or not yet btr gamers: mandatory in the original only includes tactical targets like troops, RR, A/F, Radar, ports and Vsites )

Allied 6 + Axis: Axis will not concewntrate in recce killing, because it was not historically done and it is too easy to kill recce in the game!!

Axis 1: size +1 x10 => size 1 can have up to 20 AA added
AA will not be overused by the Axis
RR-Flak units do not count ( moveable railroad flak units - there are 2 original versions - light and heavy; the OBOA we use has also a third one JAVA with additional radar )



_____________________________


(in reply to fochinell)
Post #: 53
RE: AAR swift vs fochinell - 6/10/2007 12:08:09 PM   
Hard Sarge


Posts: 22741
Joined: 10/1/2000
From: garfield hts ohio usa
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: swift


quote:

ORIGINAL: fochinell

Werner just reminded me about houserules. It might be worth posting them for reference, so here they are. As I remember them, the rules we play under are:

Allies:

1. No Andrei raids/bombing cheating (maximum alt, daylight/night attacks - apologies to Andrei who first posted on that and had his name associated with it, not that he was a cheat). Maximum bombing altitude of 25,000 feet to keep things in range of HAA.

2. No escorted recon. I would do that with fighter-recce a/c like the Spit FR XIV or F-6 on tactical targets if it was alowed, though.

3. NI's limited to four active over any airfield at any one time (I stagger mine as lone sorties at 20-30 minute intervals to ensure a good overlap coverage on active NJG airfields) at a maximum altitude of 12,000 feet to expose them to airfield flak (I don't think Werner's bothered about that, but it seems fair to me). I've actually killed 30 from an individual NJG Gruppe on one night when playing against the AI with no limit before, so I think some limit is needed.

4. No wild evasion of mandatory targeting. I am reasonable about UFAC and UPEN targeting as well as AVALANCHE and OVERLORD, but I tend to do about a third of the demanded VSITE targeting once I've done substantive damage to all visible VSITES.

5. Basic historical usage of aircraft (no B-17's in 9th AF as extra strategic bombers, etc). This is more for me than Werner, and it hits the Axis more in any case.

6. I also don't deliberately plot recce a/c along with raids on the same track to divert Axis interceptors. If the AI does it during auto-plotting, at least I'm innocent.

Axis -

1. Flak limits (Size x 10) limit to number of AA guns on any site. I prefer a strict limit to HAA as well, as it really destroys bombing accuracy and causes too many losses (as opposed to damaged a/c), but I can't remember if Werner agreed to it or not in our last game. Normally I stick to a maximum of 50 HAA on large sites (size 10 plus) and 25 on smaller ones. Werner can correct me on this for whatever he's doing in this game.

2. Historical usage of aircraft - R&D limited until an aircraft appears in production, to avoid the early appearance of jets.

3. No attacking bombers returning over the continent after making the Allied-held coast. No bomber crew in their right minds would have done that in RL.

That's all I can remember that I use, Werner can correct me and fill in any others, even if they aren't in use during our game.



Allied 4:
mandatory Avalanche includes not only the area given by the game - we go around it and there is also Southern France, Dalmatia, parts of Croatia, Albania and Greece included. Mandatory is not only the targets given by the game - in our houserules it includes all targets in the given area
( info for non/or not yet btr gamers: mandatory in the original only includes tactical targets like troops, RR, A/F, Radar, ports and Vsites )

Allied 6 + Axis: Axis will not concewntrate in recce killing, because it was not historically done and it is too easy to kill recce in the game!!

well, it will be a little HARDer to kill them off now, of course, the trick is to catch them, if you can catch them you can kill them, but they are HARDer to catch, (was reading some stories of the war, one was talking about a mission his unit had, to escourt a Recon 38 with there P-51 Ds, they met up flew to the target, the recon bird took the snaps and made his turn, they seen the pilot looking at them, wag his wings, and poured the coals to the fire and left them behind)

plus, we got the bug that had the AI drag intercepting units to the Recon mission



Axis 1: size +1 x10 => size 1 can have up to 20 AA added
AA will not be overused by the Axis
RR-Flak units do not count ( moveable railroad flak units - there are 2 original versions - light and heavy; the OBOA we use has also a third one JAVA with additional radar )





_____________________________


(in reply to wernerpruckner)
Post #: 54
RE: AAR swift vs fochinell - 6/10/2007 2:05:40 PM   
wernerpruckner


Posts: 4148
Joined: 5/5/2005
Status: offline
5th September 1943:

more or less a resting turn:
tactical raids in the West (A/F Longuemesse; RR Lille ) that were missed by the JG26 Fw190s
and BC active with bomber raid to Magdeburg and a Mossie bomber run to Berlin.

3:3 losses

_____________________________


(in reply to Hard Sarge)
Post #: 55
RE: AAR swift vs fochinell - 6/10/2007 2:09:16 PM   
wernerpruckner


Posts: 4148
Joined: 5/5/2005
Status: offline
forgot one Axis houserule:

Co-Axis units stay in their area ( or very close by )
Italian: Italy, Dalmatia, Croatia, Dodekanes ( some Greek islands )
Bulgarian: Bulgaria
Romanian: Romania
Hungarian: Hungary

_____________________________


(in reply to wernerpruckner)
Post #: 56
RE: AAR swift vs fochinell - 6/10/2007 4:02:20 PM   
wernerpruckner


Posts: 4148
Joined: 5/5/2005
Status: offline
6th September 1943:

good weather
Hard day for my pilots....too many lost for too few kills

Italy:
many raids in the Rome area - RR Rome, Rome/Littorio, A/F Centocelle and POWER Acquaria Nova
there was also a raid across the Adriatic Sea to RR Florina

Westfront:
several tactical raids - RR Amsterdam, Utrecht, Tilburg, Cherbourg and ARM Phillips.

In the night Bomber Command attcked Leipzig, also once again a Mosquito bomber raid to Berlin.

50:60 losses - very bad ratio for me

The picture shows the Allied advance in Italy




Attachment (1)

_____________________________


(in reply to wernerpruckner)
Post #: 57
RE: AAR swift vs fochinell - 6/10/2007 5:08:50 PM   
fochinell

 

Posts: 287
Joined: 11/19/2005
Status: offline
Hard day for my pilots....too many lost for too few kills

Heh heh A satisfying day, with 2TAF and especially MAC Spits inflicting some useful losses rather than dying by the score as per usual. The MAC squadrons followed the 12th AF raids over Rome to cover their withdrawl and 93 Sqn in their Spit V's alone got 6 190F's. The P-38H's fought hard, despite substantial losses.

Meanwhile the cowardly NJG forces have yet again hidden in their bunkers as BC devastates another German city; rumour has it the population are beginning to refer to Reichsmarshal Werner as "Meier". The 8th AF will rejoin the battle soon now that their new escort units are equipped with the P-38L and P-47D.

Complete Allied victory is only a matter of time...



< Message edited by fochinell -- 6/10/2007 5:09:07 PM >

(in reply to wernerpruckner)
Post #: 58
RE: AAR swift vs fochinell - 6/11/2007 7:14:46 PM   
wernerpruckner


Posts: 4148
Joined: 5/5/2005
Status: offline
7th September 1943

major action around the map!
Italy - most targets were in the Rome area
West: tactical raids to RR Liege and to ARM Fabrique d´Arms and a big raid by the 8th AF to the PORT Dortmund Herne
BC and the 205thGroup were active - raids to Florence, Berlin and Falkenberg

a really bad day with 76 Axis lost vs 79 Allied


8th September 1943:
bad wether in Italy
8th AF targeted the PORT Duisburg Ruhrort
the tacticals attacked the RRs of Eindhoven and Nijmwegen
Bomber Command attacked Kiel

much less action by my Luftwaffe units - a major reorganization is going on, units with low morale are moved into the hinterland and high morale units to the frontlines

18:29 losses

_____________________________


(in reply to fochinell)
Post #: 59
RE: AAR swift vs fochinell - 6/11/2007 8:32:44 PM   
wernerpruckner


Posts: 4148
Joined: 5/5/2005
Status: offline
9th September:

weather turn - no missions by the Allied forces....



_____________________________


(in reply to wernerpruckner)
Post #: 60
Page:   <<   < prev  1 [2] 3 4 5   next >   >>
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Gary Grigsby's Eagle Day to Bombing the Reich >> RE: AAR swift vs fochinell Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3 4 5   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

0.641