Counters

Matrix Games Forums

Forums Register Login Photo Gallery Member List Search Calendars FAQ

My Profile Inbox Address Book My Subscription My Forums Log Out

Counters

View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest

Users viewing this topic: none

Printable Version

All Forums >> [Current Games From Matrix.] >> [World War II] >> Commander - Europe at War Gold >> Counters

Page: [1]

Message

<< Older Topic Newer Topic >>

Counters - 6/7/2007 9:01:23 PM

benpark

Posts: 3884
Joined: 8/12/2002
Status: offline

Could we get a zoomed in screen shot using the counters graphics? Thanks.

_____________________________

"Fear is a darkroom where the devil develops his negatives" Gary Busey

Post #: 1

RE: Counters - 6/8/2007 7:50:21 PM

Erik Rutins

Posts: 37503
Joined: 3/28/2000
From: Vermont, USA
Status: offline

Ben,

Is this what you were looking for?

Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Erik Rutins
CEO, Matrix Games LLC

For official support, please use our Help Desk: http://www.matrixgames.com/helpdesk/

Freedom is not Free.

(in reply to benpark)

Post #: 2

RE: Counters - 6/9/2007 5:13:58 AM

Laryngoscope

Posts: 1085
Joined: 7/8/2004
From: Newcastle, Australia
Status: offline

A Panther with a stumpy gun???????

_____________________________

"It is not a Commonwealth division, it is an Australian Division. Why, give me two Australian Divisions and I will conquer the world for you!"

-- Erwin Rommel

(in reply to Erik Rutins)

Post #: 3

RE: Counters - 6/11/2007 11:46:37 AM

freeboy

Posts: 9088
Joined: 5/16/2004
From: Colorado
Status: offline

ks like one of those goffy 1-48 scale tanks with wheels on them made as knock off of good companies.. lol

(in reply to Laryngoscope)

Post #: 4

RE: Counters - 6/11/2007 3:01:48 PM

IainMcNeil

Posts: 2804
Joined: 10/26/2004
From: London
Status: offline

Sorry about the barrel - because of the length of the barrel we either had to greatly scale down the graphic to fit in the 128 pixel width, which ended up with a lot of wasted space ( and actually made the Pather smaller than the older tanks with shorter guns) so didn't look so nice, chop of the end of the barrel, which also didn't look nice, or make it look stumpy.

_____________________________

Iain McNeil
Director
Matrix Games

(in reply to freeboy)

Post #: 5

RE: Counters - 6/13/2007 10:54:36 AM

Laryngoscope

Posts: 1085
Joined: 7/8/2004
From: Newcastle, Australia
Status: offline

In the pic about it looks like there is extra space the gun could grow into?

_____________________________

"It is not a Commonwealth division, it is an Australian Division. Why, give me two Australian Divisions and I will conquer the world for you!"

-- Erwin Rommel

(in reply to IainMcNeil)

Post #: 6

RE: Counters - 6/13/2007 12:18:41 PM

IainMcNeil

Posts: 2804
Joined: 10/26/2004
From: London
Status: offline

The image is used in more than one place and needs to fit all of them. In addition the images size is actually 128x128 and it's filling that already. It's not technically impossible to fix, it was just that we found the problem too late in the process to go back and change everything else.

_____________________________

Iain McNeil
Director
Matrix Games

(in reply to Laryngoscope)

Post #: 7

RE: Counters - 6/13/2007 1:36:21 PM

HansBolter

Posts: 7704
Joined: 7/6/2006
From: United States
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Iain McNeil

The image is used in more than one place and needs to fit all of them. In addition the images size is actually 128x128 and it's filling that already. It's not technically impossible to fix, it was just that we found the problem too late in the process to go back and change everything else.

And I am sorry to have to point out that it is already costing you a serious hit to the game's credibility!

Anyone with any wargaming experience or knowledge of history should have had the foresight to realize that a horizontal rectangular display format would be necessary to depict late war tanks accurately while maintaining a scale proportion relevant to the depiction of early war tanks.

Frankly, sacrificing the scale proportion relationship and depicting late war tanks as a smaller graphic would have been the better choice.

(in reply to IainMcNeil)

Post #: 8

RE: Counters - 6/13/2007 1:43:26 PM

IainMcNeil

Posts: 2804
Joined: 10/26/2004
From: London
Status: offline

Sometimes I think people forget that their own opinions are only opinions and not facts ;)

_____________________________

Iain McNeil
Director
Matrix Games

(in reply to HansBolter)

Post #: 9

RE: Counters - 6/13/2007 2:04:58 PM

Marc von Martial

Posts: 10875
Joined: 1/4/2001
From: Bonn, Germany
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: HansBolter

quote:

ORIGINAL: Iain McNeil

The image is used in more than one place and needs to fit all of them. In addition the images size is actually 128x128 and it's filling that already. It's not technically impossible to fix, it was just that we found the problem too late in the process to go back and change everything else.

And I am sorry to have to point out that it is already costing you a serious hit to the game's credibility!

Anyone with any wargaming experience or knowledge of history should have had the foresight to realize that a horizontal rectangular display format would be necessary to depict late war tanks accurately while maintaining a scale proportion relevant to the depiction of early war tanks.

Frankly, sacrificing the scale proportion relationship and depicting late war tanks as a smaller graphic would have been the better choice.

Does the game also "loose credibility" because the Panther only uses one camo job for all theatres

?

_____________________________

Marc von Martial
instagram stream

(in reply to HansBolter)

Post #: 10

RE: Counters - 6/13/2007 2:44:08 PM

HansBolter

Posts: 7704
Joined: 7/6/2006
From: United States
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Iain McNeil

Sometimes I think people forget that their own opinions are only opinions and not facts ;)

Methinks that sometimes designers and publishers forget the fact that consumers make purchases based on their opinions.

(in reply to IainMcNeil)

Post #: 11

RE: Counters - 6/13/2007 2:47:41 PM

HansBolter

Posts: 7704
Joined: 7/6/2006
From: United States
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Marc Schwanebeck

quote:

ORIGINAL: HansBolter

quote:

ORIGINAL: Iain McNeil

The image is used in more than one place and needs to fit all of them. In addition the images size is actually 128x128 and it's filling that already. It's not technically impossible to fix, it was just that we found the problem too late in the process to go back and change everything else.

And I am sorry to have to point out that it is already costing you a serious hit to the game's credibility!

Anyone with any wargaming experience or knowledge of history should have had the foresight to realize that a horizontal rectangular display format would be necessary to depict late war tanks accurately while maintaining a scale proportion relevant to the depiction of early war tanks.

Frankly, sacrificing the scale proportion relationship and depicting late war tanks as a smaller graphic would have been the better choice.

Does the game also "loose credibility" because the Panther only uses one camo job for all theatres ?

No Marc, of course not. Taking any point to the level of the absurd in order to belittle it does not in any way, shape or form undermine the validity of it. Anyone can engage in the game of extrapolation to the absurd. It acomplishes nothing.

Depicting a panther as though it is armed with a 37mm gun is a decided faux pas from the perspective of this particular grognard consumer. Take the offer of constructive criticism, or leave it.

(in reply to Marc von Martial)

Post #: 12

RE: Counters - 6/13/2007 2:52:05 PM

Laryngoscope

Posts: 1085
Joined: 7/8/2004
From: Newcastle, Australia
Status: offline

Iain, are your armour models internal renders?

One option would be to re render with the turret facing out of the page and that way everyone would be happy.

In some ways I agree with Hans. Just as easy to get this kind of stuff right rather than wrong. Such a simple little thing ...

quote:

Does the game also "loose credibility" because the Panther only uses one camo job for all theatres

In the game of monopoly no one complains that there is a dog playing piece larger than a battleship, nor that they are all silver! Players recognize that they are symbolic. However if the dog was made with an abnormally small head (compared to its body), I think most players would think that rather odd and would likely comment on the fact that the dog was horribly misshapen

_____________________________

"It is not a Commonwealth division, it is an Australian Division. Why, give me two Australian Divisions and I will conquer the world for you!"

-- Erwin Rommel

(in reply to Marc von Martial)

Post #: 13

RE: Counters - 6/13/2007 3:16:42 PM

IainMcNeil

Posts: 2804
Joined: 10/26/2004
From: London
Status: offline

Absolutely we understand that & value your input.

The point I'm trying to make is that there are thousands, maybe tens of thousands of design decisions to be made in every game. It's ok for you not to agree with us on all of them. If you didn't agree with most of them then you wouldn't even be looking at teh game :) If one of our decisions does not tie up with what you think should have been done, then it's fine for you to disagree - "I think you should have done X". It's not the same thing to state that the game has lost all credability because of said design decision.

I've already lost count of the number of times we have the "lost credability" line thrown at us, and each time for a completely different design decision :)

_____________________________

Iain McNeil
Director
Matrix Games

(in reply to Laryngoscope)

Post #: 14

RE: Counters - 6/13/2007 3:24:34 PM

HansBolter

Posts: 7704
Joined: 7/6/2006
From: United States
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Iain McNeil

Absolutely we understand that & value your input.

The point I'm trying to make is that there are thousands, maybe tens of thousands of design decisions to be made in every game. It's ok for you not to agree with us on all of them. If you didn't agree with most of them then you wouldn't even be looking at teh game :) If one of our decisions does not tie up with what you think should have been done, then it's fine for you to disagree - "I think you should have done X". It's not the same thing to state that the game has lost all credability because of said design decision.�

I've already lost count of the number of times we have the "lost credability" line thrown at us, and each time for a completely different design decision :)

Perhaps your skin has just grown a little thin under the weight if those posts.

By the use of the phrase "lost credibility" I, of course, meant "with me", and not "in general". I speak only for myself.

In order not to be perceived as "Mr. Negative", I will offer some positive criticism.

I don't find Gary Grigsby's World at War particularly fun as it is scaled at too high a level to hold my interest. I have been waiting for someone to publish a strategic game of WWII at a level that will hold my interest and you appear to be on track to accomplish that. I will likely not boycott your peoduct over the minor consideration that the vehicle depictions tend towrd the, in my opinion, "absurdly cartoonish". I will simply wish that you had adopted a stricter doctrine with regard to the historical accuracy of your artwork. The nuances of historical accuracy always rise to the forefront with us grognard types.

(in reply to IainMcNeil)

Post #: 15

RE: Counters - 6/13/2007 4:12:16 PM

IainMcNeil

Posts: 2804
Joined: 10/26/2004
From: London
Status: offline

I know you guys are hard to please - if it wasn't this it would be because we used a 1942 model instead of the 1943 version which was much more numerous ;)

I just feel people focus too much on what is not there and less on what is. It's like the closer the game gets to being what you are looking for the more faults you find with it. I guess it's just human nature :)

_____________________________

Iain McNeil
Director
Matrix Games

(in reply to HansBolter)

Post #: 16

RE: Counters - 6/13/2007 4:51:30 PM

Marc von Martial

Posts: 10875
Joined: 1/4/2001
From: Bonn, Germany
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: HansBolter
By the use of the phrase "lost credibility" I, of course, meant "with me", and not "in general". I speak only for myself.

People, especially grogs, should be as picky with their wording as their are with game features they do not like, or as they are with historical nuances

I mean this in general, the tone towards game developers in wargame forums (not only here; and no I do not want to speak about mainstream game forums at all

) leaves sometimes a lot to be desired. The phrase "lost credibility" easily translates to that developers are complete morons and do not know what they are doing.

As Iain pointed out developing a game is about gazillions of design decisions. In our particular case here a design decision forced upon the developer by a technical restriction. Do you really think that the developers did not know that the Panther has longer barrel then a PzKw III N

, that is what "lost credibility" implies to me.

As often, much ado about nothing

. The game is so much fun you will not even notice it while playing.

< Message edited by Marc Schwanebeck -- 6/13/2007 4:53:25 PM >

_____________________________

Marc von Martial
instagram stream

(in reply to HansBolter)

Post #: 17

RE: Counters - 6/13/2007 5:00:48 PM

Erik Rutins

Posts: 37503
Joined: 3/28/2000
From: Vermont, USA
Status: offline

Goodness, I have to agree this a lot of ado about a very minor thing. This is at a grand strategy scale, folks - while we all love our eye candy, that's all it is at this scale. The Panther's cropped barrel does not impact its performance on the battlefield or change the game stats of a German armored unit. In fact, I hadn't even noticed it despite quite a bit of play.

I think that while playing, you don't focus on these things, but when there's a screenshot on the forum to scrutinize details like this seem more important. The game itself is a lot of fun, keep in miind that it's nice that it does have upgradable unit graphics, so that you can see the armor evolve as your technology does. Don't over-focus on a minor art issue.

Regards,

- Erik

_____________________________

Erik Rutins
CEO, Matrix Games LLC

For official support, please use our Help Desk: http://www.matrixgames.com/helpdesk/

Freedom is not Free.

(in reply to Marc von Martial)

Post #: 18

RE: Counters - 6/13/2007 5:48:38 PM

HansBolter

Posts: 7704
Joined: 7/6/2006
From: United States
Status: offline

My I certainly have stirred up the pot!

Marc, I strongly believe skins have grown thin when you take a comment like "lost credibility" and interpret it to mean "I think the designer is an idiot", whgen in reality it means "I think the designer failed to follow through and get it right".

I truly hope the game will be fun to play and look forward to giving it a whirl.

Eric is probably spot on with the observation we are overfocusing on a tidbit and this tends to happen when we are given a tidbit...after all it IS all we have to focus on.

No hard feelings here and I apologize for my brusk manner that gave offense.

(in reply to Erik Rutins)

Post #: 19

RE: Counters - 6/13/2007 5:52:32 PM

IainMcNeil

Posts: 2804
Joined: 10/26/2004
From: London
Status: offline

And the desire for information outpacing the supply is always at its height just before a game releases - when the developers are at thier most stressed and tired!

We're people too you know ...sob ...sob ;)

_____________________________

Iain McNeil
Director
Matrix Games

(in reply to HansBolter)

Post #: 20

RE: Counters - 6/13/2007 6:01:12 PM

freeboy

Posts: 9088
Joined: 5/16/2004
From: Colorado
Status: offline

are we looking at a release date soon, this week?

(in reply to IainMcNeil)

Post #: 21

RE: Counters - 6/13/2007 6:52:00 PM

sabre100

Posts: 393
Joined: 5/23/2004
Status: offline

Matrix and Iain -

I for one am very exicted about this game and cant wait until it is released... nice work now just release it before Fathers Day

(in reply to freeboy)

Post #: 22

RE: Counters - 6/13/2007 7:32:56 PM

TheHellPatrol

Posts: 1588
Joined: 7/3/2004
Status: offline

There was a time that i would have seen the Panther barrel graphic as blasphemy

...and ran away in horror. As i get older (45) i am very stuck in my ways but having kids gives you a very open mind. I love eye candy AND i think hexes and chits are sexy...go figure...i think the Panther graphic is beautiful and the "stubby" barrel is done well IMHO. It does NOT look anything like a 37mm, which would be very skinny scaled proportionately but i digress

, but it does look feasible enough for ones imagination. I can't wait for this release, hopefully today because my credit card expires at midnight

, and look forward to playing my first game. Who says you can't have awesome graphics AND hexes in a wargame!

_____________________________

A man is rich in proportion to the number of things he can afford to let alone.
Henry David Thoreau

(in reply to sabre100)

Post #: 23

RE: Counters - 6/14/2007 10:17:58 AM

Zap

Posts: 3639
Joined: 12/6/2004
From: LAS VEGAS TAKE A CHANCE
Status: offline

Laryngoscope, you may be wrong there. I can imagine someone easily finding fault with your idea and complaining about it. Saying, "It should have been a side view of the turret, so I could see the barrel of ther gun".

_____________________________

(in reply to Laryngoscope)

Post #: 24

RE: Counters - 6/14/2007 10:44:02 AM

Laryngoscope

Posts: 1085
Joined: 7/8/2004
From: Newcastle, Australia
Status: offline

Zap, you can see the problem can't you? ... It is *exactly* the same problem as widescreen DVDs on a standard TV display.

Unbreakable axiom #1 "There is a display square of size X".

You want to display an image of different units to a relative size but their aspect ratio is not 1:1 (and all of them vary).

3 ways to do it, 2 are standard, one is thinking outside the box a little.

1. Scale the unit to fit, this means that units with long guns will look small (this idea was discounted)
2. Clip the unit (this is what was done - after a fashion)
3. (my idea above) Make the unit fit better into a 1:1 aspect without clipping or scaling (ie rotate the turret by some degree)

These are the only three solutions to the the problem. Each has its strengths and weaknesses. Personally, I think option 2 is the least aesthetically pleasing and option 3 the most. But as always YMMV.

_____________________________

"It is not a Commonwealth division, it is an Australian Division. Why, give me two Australian Divisions and I will conquer the world for you!"

-- Erwin Rommel

(in reply to Zap)

Post #: 25

RE: Counters - 6/16/2007 8:32:23 AM

Zap

Posts: 3639
Joined: 12/6/2004
From: LAS VEGAS TAKE A CHANCE
Status: offline

Yes, Larry, I see your point and it would be acceptable to me and a good way to do it. I don't have a problem with the developers choice, though. I was only suggesting that there would be someone who might complain about your solution because they would like to see the side view of the turret.

_____________________________

(in reply to Laryngoscope)

Post #: 26