Matrix Games Forums

Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

Have anyone tested for this case of air combat?

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [Current Games From Matrix.] >> [World War II] >> War In The Pacific - Struggle Against Japan 1941 - 1945 >> The War Room >> Have anyone tested for this case of air combat? Page: [1]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
Have anyone tested for this case of air combat? - 6/15/2007 10:28:07 AM   
zhengxuacmilan

 

Posts: 40
Joined: 12/30/2006
Status: offline
We all know that it is quite hard for allied CVs to fight with Japanese CVs before May 1942, when the zeros still have the bonus.
Now I am quite curious about that, if it is possible, is it wise to use only one allied CV to fight with a japanese CVL? What about the result?
Post #: 1
RE: Have anyone tested for this case of air combat? - 6/15/2007 10:34:37 AM   
Apollo11


Posts: 24082
Joined: 6/7/2001
From: Zagreb, Croatia
Status: offline
Hi all,

quote:

ORIGINAL: zhengxuacmilan

We all know that it is quite hard for allied CVs to fight with Japanese CVs before May 1942, when the zeros still have the bonus.
Now I am quite curious about that, if it is possible, is it wise to use only one allied CV to fight with a japanese CVL? What about the result?



I have seen early 1942 battles where Allies have won teh CV vs. Cv conflict - anything can happen (and that's the beauty of WitP) - check the multitude of AARs!

Also quantity many times manages to overcome the quality so US CV can beat tha Japanese CVL even at the beginning of the game...


Leo "Apollo11"

_____________________________



Prior Preparation & Planning Prevents Pathetically Poor Performance!

A & B: WitW, WitE, WbtS, GGWaW, GGWaW2-AWD, HttR, CotA, BftB, CF
P: UV, WitP, WitP-AE

(in reply to zhengxuacmilan)
Post #: 2
RE: Have anyone tested for this case of air combat? - 6/15/2007 10:44:16 AM   
rockmedic109

 

Posts: 2390
Joined: 5/17/2005
From: Citrus Heights, CA
Status: offline
From reading some of the other threads, the Maneuver Rating might help the Zero avoid getting shot down more than helping it to shoot something down.  If this is the case, then go for it.  An Allied CV vs an IJN CVL is a fight stacked in the allied favor. If you loose you get an Essex in 43 to replace the loss. 

(in reply to Apollo11)
Post #: 3
RE: Have anyone tested for this case of air combat? - 6/15/2007 10:54:50 AM   
zhengxuacmilan

 

Posts: 40
Joined: 12/30/2006
Status: offline
Hi Apollo, thank you for your reply.
But I think if the distance is beyond the range of allied TB, the japanese bomber still have chance to hurt the allied CV heavily.

(in reply to Apollo11)
Post #: 4
RE: Have anyone tested for this case of air combat? - 6/15/2007 10:57:07 AM   
zhengxuacmilan

 

Posts: 40
Joined: 12/30/2006
Status: offline
Yes, what u mentioned is quite important, thank u.

quote:

ORIGINAL: rockmedic109

From reading some of the other threads, the Maneuver Rating might help the Zero avoid getting shot down more than helping it to shoot something down.  If this is the case, then go for it.  An Allied CV vs an IJN CVL is a fight stacked in the allied favor. If you loose you get an Essex in 43 to replace the loss. 


(in reply to rockmedic109)
Post #: 5
RE: Have anyone tested for this case of air combat? - 6/15/2007 11:28:41 AM   
Apollo11


Posts: 24082
Joined: 6/7/2001
From: Zagreb, Croatia
Status: offline
Hi all,

quote:

ORIGINAL: zhengxuacmilan

But I think if the distance is beyond the range of allied TB, the japanese bomber still have chance to hurt the allied CV heavily.


Every battle is a gamble... to get the feel of what is calculated risk and what is gamble is the art...

Nonetheless in pure US CV vs. IJN CVL the Allies should prevail because they simply have much bigger air wing and they can have both strong CAP (for own CV protection) and good escorted attack - IJN CVL can't do both!


Leo "Apollo11"

_____________________________



Prior Preparation & Planning Prevents Pathetically Poor Performance!

A & B: WitW, WitE, WbtS, GGWaW, GGWaW2-AWD, HttR, CotA, BftB, CF
P: UV, WitP, WitP-AE

(in reply to zhengxuacmilan)
Post #: 6
RE: Have anyone tested for this case of air combat? - 6/15/2007 12:25:11 PM   
castor troy


Posts: 14330
Joined: 8/23/2004
From: Austria
Status: offline
I see the chances completely being at the Allied side when a US CV meets an IJN CVL! 90 US planes vs 27 IJN planes (mostly as there´s Ryuho? with 48 planes also).

_____________________________


(in reply to Apollo11)
Post #: 7
RE: Have anyone tested for this case of air combat? - 6/15/2007 2:45:28 PM   
herwin

 

Posts: 6059
Joined: 5/28/2004
From: Sunderland, UK
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: castor troy

I see the chances completely being at the Allied side when a US CV meets an IJN CVL! 90 US planes vs 27 IJN planes (mostly as there´s Ryuho? with 48 planes also).


To maintain a CAP, you have to be able to launch and land. The Ryujo had a tiny flight deck on top of two hangers. It couldn't walk and chew gum at the same time--its deckload strike was on the order of 9 aircraft, and to handle a CAP it either had to strike aircraft down as they landed, or shuttle the few aircraft it could afford to keep on deck alert down the length of the flight deck. Can you spell AVT?

_____________________________

Harry Erwin
"For a number to make sense in the game, someone has to calibrate it and program code. There are too many significant numbers that behave non-linearly to expect that. It's just a game. Enjoy it." herwin@btinternet.com

(in reply to castor troy)
Post #: 8
RE: Have anyone tested for this case of air combat? - 6/15/2007 5:01:00 PM   
Nikademus


Posts: 25684
Joined: 5/27/2000
From: Alien spacecraft
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: zhengxuacmilan

We all know that it is quite hard for allied CVs to fight with Japanese CVs before May 1942, when the zeros still have the bonus.
Now I am quite curious about that, if it is possible, is it wise to use only one allied CV to fight with a japanese CVL? What about the result?



Unless the die rolls go really badly for you, i see the CV winning over the CVL 9 times out of 10. "Winning" doesn't mean however that you might not eat a torp or two which could make things dicey for your CV.



_____________________________


(in reply to zhengxuacmilan)
Post #: 9
RE: Have anyone tested for this case of air combat? - 6/15/2007 5:30:31 PM   
spence

 

Posts: 5400
Joined: 4/20/2003
From: Vancouver, Washington
Status: offline
From the AAR of my CHS with Treespider.....



quote:

In a bold move a British task force containing the CV's Formidable and Indomitable appeared 180 miles south of Djokjakarta. The Task Force did not go unspotted and the Japanese Distant Cover Force containing the CVL's Zuiho and Ryujo responded and moved to engage the Task Force. Simultaneous strikes were launched by both sides.

02/16/42
Day Air attack on TF at 21,66

Japanese aircraft
A6M2 Zero x 16

Allied aircraft
Fulmar x 22
Albacore x 19

Japanese aircraft losses
A6M2 Zero: 4 destroyed

Allied aircraft losses
Fulmar: 6 destroyed
Albacore: 1 destroyed, 15 damaged

Japanese Ships
DD Amatsukaze
CVL Zuiho, Torpedo hits 1, on fire
CVL Ryujo, Torpedo hits 2, on fire, heavy damage

Aircraft Attacking:
3 x Albacore launching torpedoes at 200 feet
3 x Albacore launching torpedoes at 200 feet
4 x Albacore launching torpedoes at 200 feet
4 x Albacore launching torpedoes at 200 feet
4 x Albacore launching torpedoes at 200 feet
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Day Air attack on TF at 21,66

Japanese aircraft
A6M2 Zero x 6

Allied aircraft
Fulmar x 4
Albacore x 17

No Japanese losses

Allied aircraft losses
Fulmar: 1 destroyed
Albacore: 4 destroyed, 3 damaged

Japanese Ships
CVL Zuiho, Torpedo hits 3, on fire, heavy damage

Aircraft Attacking:
2 x Albacore launching torpedoes at 200 feet
4 x Albacore launching torpedoes at 200 feet
3 x Albacore launching torpedoes at 200 feet
4 x Albacore launching torpedoes at 200 feet
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Day Air attack on TF at 18,64

Japanese aircraft
A6M2 Zero x 15
B5N2 Kate x 17

Allied aircraft
Sea Hurricane x 12
Fulmar x 11

Japanese aircraft losses
A6M2 Zero: 3 destroyed
B5N2 Kate: 5 destroyed, 7 damaged

Allied aircraft losses
Sea Hurricane: 2 destroyed
Fulmar: 1 destroyed

Allied Ships
CV Formidable
CV Indomitable, Torpedo hits 2, on fire

Aircraft Attacking:
3 x B5N2 Kate launching torpedoes at 200 feet
4 x B5N2 Kate launching torpedoes at 200 feet
2 x B5N2 Kate launching torpedoes at 200 feet
3 x B5N2 Kate launching torpedoes at 200 feet
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Day Air attack on TF at 18,64

Japanese aircraft
A6M2 Zero x 11
B5N2 Kate x 8

Allied aircraft
Sea Hurricane x 6
Fulmar x 10

Japanese aircraft losses
B5N2 Kate: 3 destroyed, 2 damaged

Allied aircraft losses
Sea Hurricane: 1 destroyed
Fulmar: 2 destroyed

Allied Ships
CV Formidable
CV Indomitable, Torpedo hits 1, on fire, heavy damage

Aircraft Attacking:
2 x B5N2 Kate launching torpedoes at 200 feet
3 x B5N2 Kate launching torpedoes at 200 feet
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Day Air attack on TF at 21,66


Allied aircraft
Fulmar x 12
Albacore x 9


Allied aircraft losses
Albacore: 4 damaged

Japanese Ships
CVL Zuiho, on fire, heavy damage
CVL Ryujo, Torpedo hits 1, on fire, heavy damage

Aircraft Attacking:
1 x Albacore launching torpedoes at 200 feet
4 x Albacore launching torpedoes at 200 feet
4 x Albacore launching torpedoes at 200 feet
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Day Air attack on TF at 18,64

Japanese aircraft
G4M1 Betty x 15

Allied aircraft
Fulmar x 5

Japanese aircraft losses
G4M1 Betty: 1 destroyed, 9 damaged


Allied Ships
CV Indomitable, Torpedo hits 1, on fire, heavy damage

Aircraft Attacking:
2 x G4M1 Betty launching torpedoes at 200 feet
4 x G4M1 Betty launching torpedoes at 200 feet
4 x G4M1 Betty launching torpedoes at 200 feet
4 x G4M1 Betty launching torpedoes at 200 feet
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Unfortunately neither Japanese CVL survived the day ...On the plus side I now know where the British CV's are and I know one of them has four fish in her side...





quote:

For the third time in as many engagements the British Fleet Air arm once again beat the Japanese Carriers to the punch. However this time instead of facing just a couple of CVL's or CVE's the British faced a task force containing at least one Japanese CV... The newly launched Junyo. The Japanese cap performed admirably, even still the tough british bombers stilled forced their way through and were able to inflict serious damage...

04/17/42
Day Air attack on TF at 19,34
Japanese aircraft
A6M2 Zero x 38
Allied aircraft
Fulmar x 19
Albacore x 18
Japanese aircraft losses
A6M2 Zero: 1 destroyed
Allied aircraft losses
Fulmar: 13 destroyed
Albacore: 6 destroyed, 6 damaged
Japanese Ships
CV Junyo
CVE Unyo, Torpedo hits 2, on fire, heavy damage
CVL Shoho, Torpedo hits 1

04/17/42
Day Air attack on TF at 19,34
Japanese aircraft
A6M2 Zero x 35
Allied aircraft
Fulmar x 5
Swordfish x 8
No Japanese losses
Allied aircraft losses
Fulmar: 2 destroyed
Swordfish: 6 destroyed
Japanese Ships
CVE Unyo, on fire, heavy damage

Even still while the British were inflicting damage on the Japanese fleet, Japanese strike aircraft were enroute to the British Fleet. The day would not end well for the British...

04/17/42
Day Air attack on TF at 17,32
Japanese aircraft
A6M2 Zero x 18
D3A2 Val x 8
B5N2 Kate x 21
Allied aircraft
Fulmar x 7
Japanese aircraft losses
A6M2 Zero: 2 destroyed
D3A2 Val: 1 destroyed, 3 damaged
B5N2 Kate: 2 destroyed, 17 damaged
Allied aircraft losses
Fulmar: 1 destroyed
Allied Ships
CVL Hermes, Torpedo hits 1, on fire
CL Capetown, Bomb hits 2, on fire
CV Formidable, Torpedo hits 2, on fire, heavy damage

04/17/42
Day Air attack on TF at 17,32
Japanese aircraft
A6M2 Zero x 6
B5N2 Kate x 24
Allied aircraft
Fulmar x 3
Japanese aircraft losses
B5N2 Kate: 2 destroyed, 14 damaged
Allied Ships
CV Formidable, Torpedo hits 1, on fire, heavy damage
CA Cornwall, Torpedo hits 1, on fire
CVL Hermes, Torpedo hits 3, on fire, heavy damage

04/17/42
Day Air attack on TF at 17,32
Japanese aircraft
D3A2 Val x 7
Allied aircraft
Fulmar x 3
Japanese aircraft losses
D3A2 Val: 7 damaged
Allied Ships
CV Formidable, Bomb hits 2, on fire, heavy damage

04/17/42
Day Air attack on TF at 17,32
Japanese aircraft
A6M2 Zero x 19
D3A2 Val x 6
B5N2 Kate x 10
Japanese aircraft losses
B5N2 Kate: 6 damaged
Allied Ships
CVL Hermes, on fire, heavy damage
CV Formidable, Torpedo hits 3, on fire, heavy damage

By the end of the day the Formidable and Hermes both succumbed to the terrible damage inflicted upon them.

Although making a valiant effort to salvage the Unyo she to succumbed the two torpedo hits. Most importantly most of the pilots from the CVE were able to fly their aircraft to other carriers and the Japanese base at Sabang.

So far in three exchanges with British Carriers the Japanese have lost two CVL's and a CVE. The British have lost two CV's and a CVL.

_____________________________


(in reply to zhengxuacmilan)
Post #: 10
RE: Have anyone tested for this case of air combat? - 6/15/2007 5:48:45 PM   
herwin

 

Posts: 6059
Joined: 5/28/2004
From: Sunderland, UK
Status: offline
Four torps was all she wrote for any WWII carrier that actually was operational. The Midway class could take five or four on one side.

_____________________________

Harry Erwin
"For a number to make sense in the game, someone has to calibrate it and program code. There are too many significant numbers that behave non-linearly to expect that. It's just a game. Enjoy it." herwin@btinternet.com

(in reply to spence)
Post #: 11
RE: Have anyone tested for this case of air combat? - 6/15/2007 7:26:18 PM   
spence

 

Posts: 5400
Joined: 4/20/2003
From: Vancouver, Washington
Status: offline
Four torpedos is probably 4 more than were ever launched by all the B5Ns of all of those CVLs/CVEs (involved in those actions above) combined during the course of all of WW2.

(in reply to herwin)
Post #: 12
RE: Have anyone tested for this case of air combat? - 6/15/2007 7:58:54 PM   
ChezDaJez


Posts: 3436
Joined: 11/12/2004
From: Chehalis, WA
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: zhengxuacmilan

We all know that it is quite hard for allied CVs to fight with Japanese CVs before May 1942, when the zeros still have the bonus.
Now I am quite curious about that, if it is possible, is it wise to use only one allied CV to fight with a japanese CVL? What about the result?



The question for me would not be could it be done and survive, it would be more like "Is the return worth it?" The loss of a JAP CVL is not going to have much impact on the Japanese player but the loss of, or severe damage to, an allied CV early makes things much easier for the Japanese player.

I would think it would have to be a pretty important target to risk an allied CV early in the game. If your CV sinks or is heavily damaged, that's one less the Jap player has to worry about. Keeping your CVs around will cause the Japanese player to wonder where they are and to provide additional air cover for any offensive moves he plans. Hit and run strikes where he is vulnerable will cause the Japanese player to spread his forces out to cover soft spots.

Striking a Japanese fleet carrier might be worth the risk but not a CVL. To risk it without a decent return just because you know it will be replaced in 18 months is just wrong IMHO.

Chez


_____________________________

Ret Navy AWCS (1972-1998)
VP-5, Jacksonville, Fl 1973-78
ASW Ops Center, Rota, Spain 1978-81
VP-40, Mt View, Ca 1981-87
Patrol Wing 10, Mt View, CA 1987-90
ASW Ops Center, Adak, Ak 1990-92
NRD Seattle 1992-96
VP-46, Whidbey Isl, Wa 1996-98

(in reply to zhengxuacmilan)
Post #: 13
RE: Have anyone tested for this case of air combat? - 6/20/2007 3:56:11 AM   
KPAX


Posts: 735
Joined: 6/3/2004
From: Where the heart is; Home of the Fighting Irish
Status: offline
Typically, in early 1942, KB vs even US CVs will ring the death toll for the US CVs.

I think that the XP difference in the pilots is enough to make a mess out of the US CVs.

_____________________________

"War makes Heros on both sides." Hero (the movie)



Thanks !!

KPAX

(in reply to ChezDaJez)
Post #: 14
Page:   [1]
All Forums >> [Current Games From Matrix.] >> [World War II] >> War In The Pacific - Struggle Against Japan 1941 - 1945 >> The War Room >> Have anyone tested for this case of air combat? Page: [1]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

3.031