Matrix Games Forums

Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

AAR: Defense of the USSR part 17

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Advanced Tactics Series >> After Action Reports >> AAR: Defense of the USSR part 17 Page: [1]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
AAR: Defense of the USSR part 17 - 7/14/2007 1:26:10 PM   
Vic


Posts: 8262
Joined: 5/17/2004
Status: offline
I was not able to push the german troops away from moscow....





Attachment (1)
Post #: 1
RE: AAR: Defense of the USSR part 17 - 7/14/2007 1:28:10 PM   
Vic


Posts: 8262
Joined: 5/17/2004
Status: offline
In the south the Rostov offensive lost steam due to the stiffening of the german lines.

Yes comrades.. it seems that next turn may well be the last. I dont think my Rostov offensive will be able to recapture Stalingrad before Moscow falls.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to Vic)
Post #: 2
RE: AAR: Defense of the USSR part 17 - 7/14/2007 2:13:13 PM   
tormy

 

Posts: 29
Joined: 7/8/2007
Status: offline
So the AI managed to beat you? It was AI+ or AI++ am I right?

(in reply to Vic)
Post #: 3
RE: AAR: Defense of the USSR part 17 - 7/14/2007 3:34:46 PM   
Vic


Posts: 8262
Joined: 5/17/2004
Status: offline
I am playing tweber as you can see in all the earlier posts since he posts his turns too.

(in reply to tormy)
Post #: 4
RE: AAR: Defense of the USSR part 17 - 7/14/2007 4:30:06 PM   
tweber

 

Posts: 1411
Joined: 6/27/2007
Status: offline
German turn 18, May, 1942

I was able to capture my final objective, Moscow. Vic has 1 remaining turn to liberate a victory location. But, given the balance of forces, this is unlikely.

Here is the picture near Moscow.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to Vic)
Post #: 5
RE: AAR: Defense of the USSR part 17 - 7/14/2007 4:53:33 PM   
tweber

 

Posts: 1411
Joined: 6/27/2007
Status: offline
Here is the final tally of kills (Soviet losses) and losses (German losses).

Note that different units have different costs. So I have adjusted for cost (of a rifle unit) and combined like units below to give a sense of the campaign:

Infantry (all types) - Soviet losses: 12,900; German losses: 4,700; Ratio: 2.7
Vehicles (all types) - Soviet losses: 5000; German losses: 3,900; Ratio: 1.3
Guns (all types) - Soviet losses: 2,900; German losses: 650; Ratio: 4.5
Planes (all types) - Soviet losses: 2,800; German losses: 760; Ratio: 3.6

Overall combat losses (normalized for cost)

Soviets: 23,600
Germans: 10,000

Ratio: 2.3

My ending force structure was (normalized to cost of rifle units - 1 light tank = 20 rifle units)

Infantry: 3,300
Vehicles: 2,400
Guns: 1,400
Planes: 1,100
Overall: 8,200

I was able to win by maintaining a high kill to loss ratio and by quickly capturing production centers. If I was slower in getting my troops forward during the summer, my ratio would have been lower, Soviet prodution would have been higher, and the overall ratio of forces would have been significantly against me. Over 2/3 rds of my losses were during the Soviet winter offensive and my Spring offensive. If the Soviets get throught the first summer in decent shape, they can hold in 42 and win in 43 and 44.

(in reply to tweber)
Post #: 6
RE: AAR: Defense of the USSR part 17 - 7/14/2007 4:59:21 PM   
tormy

 

Posts: 29
Joined: 7/8/2007
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Vic

I am playing tweber as you can see in all the earlier posts since he posts his turns too.



Oh.....sorry my bad.

(in reply to Vic)
Post #: 7
RE: AAR: Defense of the USSR part 17 - 7/14/2007 5:05:50 PM   
tweber

 

Posts: 1411
Joined: 6/27/2007
Status: offline
Here is the final screenshot. Vic is a great player and I enjoyed the game.






Attachment (1)

(in reply to tormy)
Post #: 8
RE: AAR: Defense of the USSR part 17 - 7/14/2007 5:25:00 PM   
Vic


Posts: 8262
Joined: 5/17/2004
Status: offline
Evaluation of my defense of the USSR

In retrospect i made some really poor decisions. My main two mistakes where:

(1) Sending all my new production directly to the frontline. I should have given my reinforcements 2 or 3 rounds of training and entrenchment. Not only did i waste my troops but it also increased the experience of the germans a lot. Not being able to keep a defensible line quickly led to a feedback loop where i kept pooring in inadequate reinforcements piecemeal into the german meatgrinder.

(2) I went to quickly to producing counter attack weaponry like the expensive Medium Tanks II. I should have focussed on infantry, fighter defense and at defense untill after the german summer offensive. If i would have used those defensive troops to man well prepared defensive lines i should have been able to stop the germans well before they got anywhere near moscow, leningrad and stalingrad.

(3) I commited my strongest units, the Medium Tanks II piecemeal too. I should have focussed them all on one piece of the frontline.

But i must say Tom played very aggressive and exploited my mistakes skillfully!

Kind regards,
Vic


(in reply to tweber)
Post #: 9
RE: AAR: Defense of the USSR part 17 - 7/14/2007 5:59:33 PM   
Arditi


Posts: 681
Joined: 6/24/2005
Status: offline
  Good game gentlemen!  Like watching a movie!  Switch sides?
...or how about another scenario to see the strength of naval maneuvers along with ground combat?
       Ciao, Arditi


< Message edited by Arditi -- 7/14/2007 9:08:16 PM >


_____________________________

Semper Fi
www.ironlegions.weebly.com
author of: Italy At War: Uniforms, Weapons,
Equipment and Ephemera

Released!
Japan At War: Uniforms, Weapons,
Equipment and Ephemera

(in reply to Vic)
Post #: 10
RE: AAR: Defense of the USSR part 17 - 7/14/2007 6:33:20 PM   
jwarrenw13

 

Posts: 1897
Joined: 8/12/2000
From: Louisiana, USA
Status: offline
Maybe tweber was using performance-enhancing drugs.  You should demand an independent drug test.

(in reply to Arditi)
Post #: 11
RE: AAR: Defense of the USSR part 17 - 7/14/2007 8:36:05 PM   
Ola Berli


Posts: 133
Joined: 2/7/2005
Status: offline
Gents,

a fantastic AAR! Thanks to both gentlemen.

I look very much forward to this game.

_____________________________

War does not determine who is right - only who is left.

(in reply to jwarrenw13)
Post #: 12
RE: AAR: Defense of the USSR part 17 - 7/14/2007 10:21:57 PM   
seille

 

Posts: 2134
Joined: 6/19/2007
From: Germany
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Vic

Evaluation of my defense of the USSR

In retrospect i made some really poor decisions. My main two mistakes where:

(1) Sending all my new production directly to the frontline. I should have given my reinforcements 2 or 3 rounds of training and entrenchment. Not only did i waste my troops but it also increased the experience of the germans a lot. Not being able to keep a defensible line quickly led to a feedback loop where i kept pooring in inadequate reinforcements piecemeal into the german meatgrinder.

(2) I went to quickly to producing counter attack weaponry like the expensive Medium Tanks II. I should have focussed on infantry, fighter defense and at defense untill after the german summer offensive. If i would have used those defensive troops to man well prepared defensive lines i should have been able to stop the germans well before they got anywhere near moscow, leningrad and stalingrad.

(3) I commited my strongest units, the Medium Tanks II piecemeal too. I should have focussed them all on one piece of the frontline.

But i must say Tom played very aggressive and exploited my mistakes skillfully!

Kind regards,
Vic




Well analyzed Vic. I think this is 100% true.
You had a great routing of production, but you sent them too early into fire.
From a other game i learned how important the experience of the troops is.
So a 20 xp unit well entrenched with good staff support is a much better help than the very green troops.

With fighter defense i can also agree, but i think you did not make any mistakes here.
You had stronger units in the center and the south. It was bad luck for you that Tom got the 100PP
to upgrade his fighters. But one mistake you did definitely and this was not to vacuate the planes from
Leningrad. They could have served well in Moscow area.

@Tom

Thanks for the wonderful losses statistic. Exactly the stuff i missed here

Many thanks to you guy´s for that great AAR. I´ll miss it to read very much.
I strongly suggest a rematch with Vic as attacker !!! Common guys !

(in reply to Vic)
Post #: 13
RE: AAR: Defense of the USSR part 17 - 7/14/2007 11:16:24 PM   
Whytfyjrd

 

Posts: 23
Joined: 7/25/2005
From: Colorado
Status: offline
Super AAR!

I especially appreciated your comments and analyses of certain turns, as well as the final comments in this thread: they really illustrated how this game will play ... and the differences from and improvements over People's Tactics.

I'm now even more eager to see this on my 'Puter. Very effective marketing !   :::big grin:::

(in reply to seille)
Post #: 14
RE: AAR: Defense of the USSR part 17 - 11/26/2007 9:27:14 PM   
jjdenver

 

Posts: 2247
Joined: 11/2/2007
Status: offline
Hey I was looking at this scenario and have a few quick questions that I am hoping someone can answer.

1) I'm playing it vs the AI as Germany and am unable to get my battleships to bombard anyone. I park them in the water hex next to Riga and then click on a Russian unit next to the battleships. I then click the artillery bombard button and then try to select the battleship but the green check mark button is not able to be clicked - it's shaded. How do you use battleships to bombard in this scenario?
2) Any tips for how the Russians can blow bridges early on? There don't seem to be any engineers outside of the few in HQ units. Regular troops don't seem to be able to blow bridges in this scenario. If on turn 1 as Russia you detach the engineers into a separate unit to blow bridges then they won't be able to take any action on that first turn since they are getting transferred (i.e. no bridges blown). When I play the AI I see a lot of blown bridges by the Soviets but I'm not sure how to best accomplish this. Do you run around w/ the HQ's blowing bridges (for example the one west of Odessa) on turn 1 then detach the engineers at end of the turn to continue their destruction work on turn 2? Maybe this is obvious to veterans but I'm not sure how to go about it.
3) To defend against German panzers is it best for Russia to invest in AT guns, bazookas, or medium tanks in 1941? Which should be built as a priority?
4) To defend vs the Luftwaffe should Russia invest in fighters or flak? Which is the priority in 1941?

Thanks for any thoughts.

JJ

< Message edited by jjdenver -- 11/26/2007 9:28:51 PM >

(in reply to Vic)
Post #: 15
RE: AAR: Defense of the USSR part 17 - 11/26/2007 9:40:38 PM   
Barthheart


Posts: 3194
Joined: 7/20/2004
From: Nepean, Ontario
Status: offline
Some answers:

1) Don't pick the artillery bombard button use the shore bombard button a few buttons to the right, next to the naval battle button.

2) Like you said, use the HQ to start then transfer to separate units.

3) I'd use med. tanks and at-guns. Think real war T-34's an 57mm at-guns.... Germans hated and feared these...

4) Fighters have better intercept range but cost more... so do both... just let them train up before putting them in the line of fire.

Now all this advice comes with a note of caution.... JAMIAM (German) is clobbering me (Russia) in our game so.....

< Message edited by Barthheart -- 11/26/2007 9:41:43 PM >


_____________________________

Life is not a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving safely in a pretty & well preserved body,
but rather to skid in broadside, totally worn out & proclaiming "WOW, what a ride!"

(in reply to jjdenver)
Post #: 16
RE: AAR: Defense of the USSR part 17 - 11/26/2007 11:05:23 PM   
jjdenver

 

Posts: 2247
Joined: 11/2/2007
Status: offline
Hey Barth - thanks for the reply. I find blowing bridges to be difficult in practice on turn 1. For example the Odessa HQ needs to move 1 hex to blow the bridge NW of the city. However if any of the Odessa Front units get cut off then the Odessa HQ is not able to distribute their supply and so is left with "in stock" supply points. The Odessa HQ has 40 carry capacity and 40 unit weight with no supplies. However with for example 553 in stock supply points the carry weight of the HQ jumps from 40 to 95 - thus leaving it with an "immobile" unit movement type and a movement allowance of one. So if it moves one hex NW to be next to the bridge it needs to blow then it has exhausted its action points and can't blow the bridge. Is this a bug or is there any other option available to the Russian commander to get the Odessa bridge (for example) blown on turn 1?

Thanks

(in reply to Barthheart)
Post #: 17
RE: AAR: Defense of the USSR part 17 - 11/26/2007 11:31:27 PM   
JAMiAM

 

Posts: 6165
Joined: 2/8/2004
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: jjdenver

Hey Barth - thanks for the reply. I find blowing bridges to be difficult in practice on turn 1. For example the Odessa HQ needs to move 1 hex to blow the bridge NW of the city. However if any of the Odessa Front units get cut off then the Odessa HQ is not able to distribute their supply and so is left with "in stock" supply points. The Odessa HQ has 40 carry capacity and 40 unit weight with no supplies. However with for example 553 in stock supply points the carry weight of the HQ jumps from 40 to 95 - thus leaving it with an "immobile" unit movement type and a movement allowance of one. So if it moves one hex NW to be next to the bridge it needs to blow then it has exhausted its action points and can't blow the bridge. Is this a bug or is there any other option available to the Russian commander to get the Odessa bridge (for example) blown on turn 1?

Thanks

Create a new unit, transfer to it, the 10x Staff and the Flak unit. Then, since you are in wheeled mode, move the one hex, blow bridge, and move back, for 10+50+10 MP's. Finally, re-transfer the Staff and Flak back into unit.

Alternately, you can spend your PP's on researching Rifle/SMG II, then spend out your HQ's supplies upgrading its subformations.

Or, mix and match the two, spending some, and dropping off less.

(in reply to jjdenver)
Post #: 18
RE: AAR: Defense of the USSR part 17 - 11/27/2007 12:45:09 AM   
seille

 

Posts: 2134
Joined: 6/19/2007
From: Germany
Status: offline
Hehe, moving, blowing and moving back in turn 1 of the russians ?
You can be really happy when your engineers come to the bridges

Ok, want to blow bridges ? Then you have to prepare this in turn 1.

Save as many of your front engineers as possible. They are often in front HQ´s.
Let new engineers (not more than 15 per bridge) arrive in Baltic HQ (Riga) and Kiev HQ.
There are very important bridges. In the turn they arrived you try to blow the bridge direct out of the HQ.
After that you create engineer units in the same hex. You can use them in the next turn to blow up neighbour
bridges. Upper Dnjepr you can let arrive some engineers in Charkov HQ, but i think there are already some engineers.
And you have lot´s of engineers in Stavka available. Here you have to decide if your use them for fortifications
or for blowing bridges or for both.
In turn 2 you start to blow up the bridges, but make sure all your forces moved over before.
It´s often a question of luck, but it´s important for the russian defenders
since it makes attacks much harder and delays the germans a lot.

When you plan the upgrades my first choice (russians or germans doesn´t matter) would always be rifle II.
As russian player you have to save tons of PP´s for new units.


Defense against German tanks ? Choose the right terrain for your defense ! Build fortifications !
Fight behind rivers and in forests ! I use bazookas as AT weapon here. Attack them if there is a chance !!
No AT guns (need trucks for better movement, not flexible enough) and no Med tanks (too expensive
and a too good target for german Luftwaffe). Read the AAR and you´ll see Vic said the Med tanks has
been a bad investment. AT guns you could use for a very static defense line and if you think you won´t do a counterattack.
In winter 1941/42 these AT guns will prevent you from hard attacks since they slow down your forces.
But in bad terrain with masses of infantry they could do a good job. But I tend to use most of my troops for attacks in winter.
That´s why i prefer the bazooka or simply higher infantry number (SMG II and Rifle II)

Defense against planes ? If you play russia you can go for both, flak and fighters.
But there are several disadvantages. Most important is that the flak makes the units slow if there are no trucks.
It´s more a static defense. At key points and in the right terrain it can be useful.
Good protection is not to put too many tanks in one unit. Split them ! When i see as german attacker
a russian tank unit with 6 tanks i´ll attack until at least 4 of them are dead and the others in bad shape  
When you use flak as protection in your more static defense lines it´s the best to spread them ro the german
can´t fly concentrated attacks to destroy them.

(in reply to JAMiAM)
Post #: 19
RE: AAR: Defense of the USSR part 17 - 11/27/2007 1:56:03 AM   
Barthheart


Posts: 3194
Joined: 7/20/2004
From: Nepean, Ontario
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: seille

Hehe, moving, blowing and moving back in turn 1 of the russians ?
You can be really happy when your engineers come to the bridges

Ok, want to blow bridges ? Then you have to prepare this in turn 1.

Save as many of your front engineers as possible. They are often in front HQ´s.
Let new engineers (not more than 15 per bridge) arrive in Baltic HQ (Riga) and Kiev HQ.
There are very important bridges. In the turn they arrived you try to blow the bridge direct out of the HQ.
After that you create engineer units in the same hex. You can use them in the next turn to blow up neighbour
bridges. Upper Dnjepr you can let arrive some engineers in Charkov HQ, but i think there are already some engineers.
And you have lot´s of engineers in Stavka available. Here you have to decide if your use them for fortifications
or for blowing bridges or for both.
In turn 2 you start to blow up the bridges, but make sure all your forces moved over before.
It´s often a question of luck, but it´s important for the russian defenders
since it makes attacks much harder and delays the germans a lot.

When you plan the upgrades my first choice (russians or germans doesn´t matter) would always be rifle II.
As russian player you have to save tons of PP´s for new units.


Defense against German tanks ? Choose the right terrain for your defense ! Build fortifications !
Fight behind rivers and in forests ! I use bazookas as AT weapon here. Attack them if there is a chance !!
No AT guns (need trucks for better movement, not flexible enough) and no Med tanks (too expensive
and a too good target for german Luftwaffe). Read the AAR and you´ll see Vic said the Med tanks has
been a bad investment. AT guns you could use for a very static defense line and if you think you won´t do a counterattack.
In winter 1941/42 these AT guns will prevent you from hard attacks since they slow down your forces.
But in bad terrain with masses of infantry they could do a good job. But I tend to use most of my troops for attacks in winter.
That´s why i prefer the bazooka or simply higher infantry number (SMG II and Rifle II)

Defense against planes ? If you play russia you can go for both, flak and fighters.
But there are several disadvantages. Most important is that the flak makes the units slow if there are no trucks.
It´s more a static defense. At key points and in the right terrain it can be useful.
Good protection is not to put too many tanks in one unit. Split them ! When i see as german attacker
a russian tank unit with 6 tanks i´ll attack until at least 4 of them are dead and the others in bad shape  
When you use flak as protection in your more static defense lines it´s the best to spread them ro the german
can´t fly concentrated attacks to destroy them.


Err.... yeah... what he said!



_____________________________

Life is not a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving safely in a pretty & well preserved body,
but rather to skid in broadside, totally worn out & proclaiming "WOW, what a ride!"

(in reply to seille)
Post #: 20
RE: AAR: Defense of the USSR part 17 - 11/27/2007 11:27:48 AM   
PDiFolco

 

Posts: 1200
Joined: 10/11/2004
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: jjdenver

Hey Barth - thanks for the reply. I find blowing bridges to be difficult in practice on turn 1. For example the Odessa HQ needs to move 1 hex to blow the bridge NW of the city. However if any of the Odessa Front units get cut off then the Odessa HQ is not able to distribute their supply and so is left with "in stock" supply points. The Odessa HQ has 40 carry capacity and 40 unit weight with no supplies. However with for example 553 in stock supply points the carry weight of the HQ jumps from 40 to 95 - thus leaving it with an "immobile" unit movement type and a movement allowance of one. So if it moves one hex NW to be next to the bridge it needs to blow then it has exhausted its action points and can't blow the bridge. Is this a bug or is there any other option available to the Russian commander to get the Odessa bridge (for example) blown on turn 1?

Thanks



You can throw away supplies to make it mobile - not that it's usually a good idea but here it could be useful...

(in reply to jjdenver)
Post #: 21
RE: AAR: Defense of the USSR part 17 - 11/27/2007 4:57:25 PM   
jjdenver

 

Posts: 2247
Joined: 11/2/2007
Status: offline
how do you throw away supplies?

(in reply to PDiFolco)
Post #: 22
RE: AAR: Defense of the USSR part 17 - 11/27/2007 5:36:32 PM   
PDiFolco

 

Posts: 1200
Joined: 10/11/2004
Status: offline
IIRC (don't have the game at hands), click on the HQ "stock" and a window opens to ask how much you want to dump

(in reply to jjdenver)
Post #: 23
Page:   [1]
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Advanced Tactics Series >> After Action Reports >> AAR: Defense of the USSR part 17 Page: [1]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

0.734