gothfather
Posts: 27
Joined: 10/29/2007 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: MarkShot Gothfather, In another thread where you were rude and insulting to me, I tried subtly to point out your poor behavior in a light humorous way and give you a chance to save face by showing a little more courtesy and respect. But for whatever reason, you seem to feel a need to go out of your way to be abrassive and insulting. You know I may play GOA or I may not. I may find that it has bugs such that it is not worth my time. Either way, there is no reason why any issues I have with the game cannot be intelligently and respectfully discussed here. I am beta tester for Matrix, but not for this product. So, I am not acquainted with Frank Hunter. In any case, in one of my first posts here which I directly addressed a question to him, I received a thoughtful and extensive reply. In fact, I was suprised to see the developer go into some detail how his planned design did not live up to his expectations in how the AI was realized for the game. Something one would surely say to beta testers in a private forum, but was not really necessary to disclose to the general public. Well, I am not a forum admin (I am just part of the Matrix family). However, I hope those with admin priviledges offer you the opportunity to be a little more respectful of people or pack your bags. Paying $40-$60/game entitles one to use the software and discuss it and raise issues and get reasonable problems addressed. However, I don't think it entitles you to abuse developers, beta testers, and other customers. Now, if you want to call me an idiot again, you'll have a lot more cause to this time. :) I said your question was stupid and foolish. I never caled you an idiot. You wanted people to tell you if the game had replayability, but specificly stated you didn't want to install the game specificly invest time into it if it will not be on your hard drive in 5 years. A game that is only a few months old and you want to know if it will be on your hard drive in 5 years. in your own words... quote:
/snip So, is this a game I can play for the next few years or am I going to learn it in a few weeks and find the game getting repetitive and uninteresting after a few months of play? By the way, there is nothing wrong with replayability being limited. For some, if they have fun for a few months, then they got their money's worth. For me however, I got enough excellent games that I am very picky about investing time (I already have the game; received it as a gift) in something if it won't be my hard drive for the next five years. /snip How could anyone tell you that? Honestly how could we? or as I stated in a follow up post.. I mean really how could anyone here know if in five years you would still be playing the game? How do we judge that criteria? is any time less than 5 years a failure in your opinion? would 4 years 11 months be too little return. what about 18 months, would it be too little return on your time investment? As for calling you an idiot, i didn't. i said your question was stupid and foolish. And i know a lot of brilliant people who ask stupid questions. So I think its a rather huge leap to say you are an idiot just because your question is stupid. You continue to claim I called you an idiot and I'd like to see where I used that wording. I clarified that i was ONLY refering to your question and not your IQ. I was explicit about what i thought was foolish and stupid and that was neither your character or intelligence. I still think your question is stupid. If you feel thats an attack on your person all I can say it is not it is directed at your question yet again. Do you honestly think its reasonable to expect total strangers to be able to tell you if a game they have only had for a few months at most will be on YOUR hard drive in 5 years from now?
|