a white rabbit
Posts: 2366
Joined: 4/27/2002 From: ..under deconstruction..6N124E.. Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: AdamRinkleff quote:
fixing holes in the same place in any modern jet is not quite the same level of technology.. And who said I was talking about modern jets? Why are you all so insistent on assuming that I'm wrong, without any idea of what is actually happening on my computer? I'm using 100% supplies across the board, and you guys are talking about running out of fuel... if that's what happens on 100% supply, then TOAW should be fixed to give people a little more flexibility. quote:
The US Army I'm sure has a lot of people with the same, and they considered TOAW to be realistic enough to use for their own studies. Given their track record, I'm not too impressed. There are LOTS of examples of air forces fighting on under extreme duress; I am not asking all of you how I can model a weak ultra-modern delicate force, but how I can model an effective air force with reliable machinery and excellent ground crews. TOAW seems to be using a one-size fits all equation, and rather than trying to understand it so that it can be fixed, everyone here seems almost obsessed with proving how wonderful it is. Groupthink is not cool! You said this issue was brought up before; well, what was done to fix it? I rather doubt you guys convinced the people who brought this up before; my guess, is they simply left the TOAW community, and what good did that do? Look, maybe everyone here is all pro army, and you don't think much of the air force... but honestly, air force pilots will usually keep flying as long as even just ONE plane is working. All I want to do is create an air force that does that, instead of being lectured to about how wrong my impressions are. And if TOAW can't model this, because someone wrote an equation which forces designers to accept super-delicate planes... then just admit it, and acknowledge the problem. ..take a look at the Japanese air units in South Pacific Struggle, sometimes they fly till around 1/3rd strength, sometimes the same unit craps out at 3/4 strength. If you want kamikaze, then look at the Japanese air design in Okinawa. Both scens give air the right feel and fit the historical use, what more do you want ? ..get the perspective right here, you are not the air group/wing commander, it isn't your role in a toaw scen. Air is something you call on, if it can fly it will, if it can't it won't, and the reasons air won't fly are many, from lack of serviceable aircraft to fog on the runway, you don't control any of these factors. The battle of the Bulge is just one battle where air was grounded by weather, there are many others. Don't you think that asking for 100% control, regardless of all external factors is just a tad unrealistic and anhistorical...
_____________________________
..toodA, irmAb moAs'lyB 'exper'mentin'..,..beàn'tus all..?,
|