Erik Rutins
Posts: 37503
Joined: 3/28/2000 From: Vermont, USA Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Veldor Yes, it has been the recommendation since Windows 95 which was over a decade ago. But to be clear, using a different installation path other than /Program Files, isn't actually a problem with Vista. It's only a problem because then your not forced to test compatibility with where Applications and Games are supposed to go. Installing into that directory (/Program Files) is actually then the problem for some of your games. My new machines have one gigantic C-Drive and I install everything to /Program Files since thats where 99% of it installs to begin with. It also keeps the root tidy instead of having hundreds of vendor directories there. Yep, I understand that, which is precisely why it wasn't caught. quote:
The best way to achieve that, IMHO, is to develop the games on Vista. Backwards compatibility between Vista and XP is far far easier than forwards compatibility from XP to Vista. This is furthermore the case because many of your developers (I know of at least one) are already using tools that are technically obsolete from an XP standpoint so the likelihood of error is even greater then. By running development software and packaging tools made for Vista you maximize compatibility. Vista is definitely where things are heading, but it's currently a small share of the market, particularly for wargamers. Secondly, we have games coming out now that have been in development for YEARS before Vista even existed in public beta form, so that was hardly an option. quote:
In a perfect world the developers would each have their own Vista test system. That perfect world unfortunately doesn't exist in a niche market like wargaming. A few developers do have Vista systems now, for the rest we do the Vista testing until that is possible. Regards, - Erik
_____________________________
|