Matrix Games Forums

Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

RE: MWiF Map Review - Pacific Islands

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> World in Flames >> RE: MWiF Map Review - Pacific Islands Page: <<   < prev  4 5 6 [7] 8   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: MWiF Map Review - Pacific Islands - 9/6/2006 11:02:21 PM   
sajbalk


Posts: 264
Joined: 7/11/2005
From: Davenport, Iowa
Status: offline
The changes are certainly acceptable. I was just thinking about all those US subs basing there without fear of being overrun in a surprise invasion.

Thanks for all your excellent work on the project.

I shall submit my map input when you get to N.America.



_____________________________

Steve Balk
Iowa, USA

(in reply to Froonp)
Post #: 181
RE: MWiF Map Review - Pacific Islands - 9/6/2006 11:07:12 PM   
Froonp


Posts: 7995
Joined: 10/21/2003
From: Marseilles, France
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: sajbalk

The changes are certainly acceptable. I was just thinking about all those US subs basing there without fear of being overrun in a surprise invasion.

Thanks for all your excellent work on the project.

I shall submit my map input when you get to N.America.

You're input will be warmly welcomed, as North America will come sometime in the future. I'm eager to see how wrong the great lakes are, because I was told they were.

(in reply to sajbalk)
Post #: 182
RE: MWiF Map Review - Pacific Islands - 9/7/2006 10:48:00 PM   
Froonp


Posts: 7995
Joined: 10/21/2003
From: Marseilles, France
Status: offline
Talking about places that rarely see combat, here are the Fiji, Samoa, Phoenix, Tonga, Ellice Islands, who are just east of the Solomon and the Gilbert.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to Froonp)
Post #: 183
RE: MWiF Map Review - Pacific Islands - 9/7/2006 10:49:51 PM   
Froonp


Posts: 7995
Joined: 10/21/2003
From: Marseilles, France
Status: offline
Here's how it looks in WiF FE, at the Pacific Scale.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to Froonp)
Post #: 184
RE: MWiF Map Review - Pacific Islands - 9/7/2006 10:54:29 PM   
Froonp


Posts: 7995
Joined: 10/21/2003
From: Marseilles, France
Status: offline
To the east of these, there are the Line & Cook Islands.
Except for SUBs action, I fear none of these island will see the smallest gun. They don't know how happy they are.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to Froonp)
Post #: 185
RE: MWiF Map Review - Pacific Islands - 9/7/2006 10:56:23 PM   
Shannon V. OKeets

 

Posts: 22095
Joined: 5/19/2005
From: Honolulu, Hawaii
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Froonp

Talking about places that rarely see combat, here are the Fiji, Samoa, Phoenix, Tonga, Ellice Islands, who are just east of the Solomon and the Gilbert.




How about straightening out some of these sea area boundaries?

What I have in mind is moving the boundary from Baker --> Rotuma one hex to the NorthWest along its entire length (still going through Tumiloto), and
moving the boundary from Rotuma to V. Levu northwards so that the three all sea hexes in the middle of the boundary are no longer in the Polynesia sea area.

_____________________________

Steve

Perfection is an elusive goal.

(in reply to Froonp)
Post #: 186
RE: MWiF Map Review - Pacific Islands - 9/7/2006 10:56:51 PM   
Froonp


Posts: 7995
Joined: 10/21/2003
From: Marseilles, France
Status: offline
Here's the same place in WiF FE at the pacific scale. This is really the edge of the paper map.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to Froonp)
Post #: 187
RE: MWiF Map Review - Pacific Islands - 9/7/2006 11:00:53 PM   
Froonp


Posts: 7995
Joined: 10/21/2003
From: Marseilles, France
Status: offline
Here are the French Polynesia archipelago next, east of the previous islands.
East of this, there is only water for hundred miles, and then south America.
Even SUBs rarely appear here. The only units that are likely to come here are Convoys on CW and US Convoy lines.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to Froonp)
Post #: 188
RE: MWiF Map Review - Pacific Islands - 9/7/2006 11:03:31 PM   
Froonp


Posts: 7995
Joined: 10/21/2003
From: Marseilles, France
Status: offline
And now, the same area on the WiF FE maps.
Here we are on the American in Flames maps, that can be used in regular WiF FE campaigns. This is far better than the simple America Minimap. MWiF is even better .




Attachment (1)

(in reply to Froonp)
Post #: 189
RE: MWiF Map Review - Pacific Islands - 9/7/2006 11:11:04 PM   
Froonp


Posts: 7995
Joined: 10/21/2003
From: Marseilles, France
Status: offline
quote:

How about straightening out some of these sea area boundaries?

What I have in mind is moving the boundary from Baker --> Rotuma one hex to the NorthWest along its entire length (still going through Tumiloto), and
moving the boundary from Rotuma to V. Levu northwards so that the three all sea hexes in the middle of the boundary are no longer in the Polynesia sea area.

Good idea. I looked at the big picture, and moving those sea area borders do not seem to have secondary effects.

(in reply to Shannon V. OKeets)
Post #: 190
RE: MWiF Map Review - Pacific Islands - 9/8/2006 12:21:14 AM   
lomyrin


Posts: 3741
Joined: 12/21/2005
From: San Diego
Status: offline
Many of these Islands are very useful for staging aircraft on successive rebases from the USA to the Pacific fronts and from Japan to the Pacific fronts respectively.  That has been my experience with CWiF play in the same scale.   With that in mind those Island that are on the Sea boundaries are very good as air bases.

Lars


(in reply to Froonp)
Post #: 191
RE: MWiF Map Review - Pacific Islands - 9/8/2006 8:16:36 AM   
Zorachus99


Posts: 1066
Joined: 9/15/2000
From: Palo Alto, CA
Status: offline
The change of Pago Page from clear to mountain terrain is pretty major...

What caused the change?

_____________________________

Most men can survive adversity, the true test of a man's character is power. -Abraham Lincoln

(in reply to lomyrin)
Post #: 192
RE: MWiF Map Review - Pacific Islands - 9/8/2006 8:54:07 AM   
Froonp


Posts: 7995
Joined: 10/21/2003
From: Marseilles, France
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Zorachus99

The change of Pago Page from clear to mountain terrain is pretty major...

What caused the change?

It was jungle, but good catch, I did not pay attention to it.
Well, by looking at Google Earth, it seems that this island can be either Mountain, as it is mostly mountainous, or something more flat, maybe jungle.
I don't think the terrain of Pago Pago is really relevant, I nealy never saw it under fire. Once, but it was out of supplied and unoccupied, so being mountain or jungle would have been the same, it was worth 0 combat factors. Once also I saw the Japanese navy blockading an US Navy who fled here after the loss of Pearl Harbor, but with no invasion threat.

(in reply to Zorachus99)
Post #: 193
RE: MWiF Map Review - Pacific Islands - 9/8/2006 9:18:01 AM   
Zorachus99


Posts: 1066
Joined: 9/15/2000
From: Palo Alto, CA
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Froonp

quote:

ORIGINAL: Zorachus99

The change of Pago Page from clear to mountain terrain is pretty major...

What caused the change?

It was jungle, but good catch, I did not pay attention to it.
Well, by looking at Google Earth, it seems that this island can be either Mountain, as it is mostly mountainous, or something more flat, maybe jungle.
I don't think the terrain of Pago Pago is really relevant, I nealy never saw it under fire. Once, but it was out of supplied and unoccupied, so being mountain or jungle would have been the same, it was worth 0 combat factors. Once also I saw the Japanese navy blockading an US Navy who fled here after the loss of Pearl Harbor, but with no invasion threat.


I agree the invasion threat is pretty minor, but I've eyed it more than once as Japanese, and threatened it by forcing a garrison in the past. The value of the base to the allies is decent. It is useful for rebasing ships to protect convoy lines, as well as being a useful midpoint between Hawaii, Australia, and New Guinea.

Never seen it invaded though.

(in reply to Froonp)
Post #: 194
RE: MWiF Map Review - Pacific Islands - 9/8/2006 6:28:08 PM   
lomyrin


Posts: 3741
Joined: 12/21/2005
From: San Diego
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Froonp

quote:

ORIGINAL: Zorachus99

The change of Pago Page from clear to mountain terrain is pretty major...

What caused the change?

It was jungle, but good catch, I did not pay attention to it.
Well, by looking at Google Earth, it seems that this island can be either Mountain, as it is mostly mountainous, or something more flat, maybe jungle.
I don't think the terrain of Pago Pago is really relevant, I nealy never saw it under fire. Once, but it was out of supplied and unoccupied, so being mountain or jungle would have been the same, it was worth 0 combat factors. Once also I saw the Japanese navy blockading an US Navy who fled here after the loss of Pearl Harbor, but with no invasion threat.


I have seen Pago Pago invaded by Japan several times in CWiF play.

Since MWiF is in the same scale it could become important.

Lars

(in reply to Froonp)
Post #: 195
RE: MWiF Map Review - Pacific Islands - 9/8/2006 6:57:18 PM   
mlees


Posts: 2263
Joined: 9/20/2003
From: San Diego
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Froonp

quote:

How about straightening out some of these sea area boundaries?

What I have in mind is moving the boundary from Baker --> Rotuma one hex to the NorthWest along its entire length (still going through Tumiloto), and
moving the boundary from Rotuma to V. Levu northwards so that the three all sea hexes in the middle of the boundary are no longer in the Polynesia sea area.

Good idea. I looked at the big picture, and moving those sea area borders do not seem to have secondary effects.


The difference that I can see is that an air unit based in Nukufetau would have its traveling distance to the Polynesia Sea Zone reduced by one. Not that I expect this to be a game maker/breaker...

quote:

Here are the French Polynesia archipelago next... The only units that are likely to come here are Convoys on CW and US Convoy lines.


I like to try to get as many French naval units to Tahiti as is feasable before the fall of France, so that my Free French fleet is buffed as much as possible. Am i doing it the hard way?

(in reply to Froonp)
Post #: 196
RE: MWiF Map Review - Pacific Islands - 9/8/2006 8:08:18 PM   
Froonp


Posts: 7995
Joined: 10/21/2003
From: Marseilles, France
Status: offline
quote:

I like to try to get as many French naval units to Tahiti as is feasable before the fall of France, so that my Free French fleet is buffed as much as possible. Am i doing it the hard way?

Well Tahiti is far from France, I wonder how many turns are needed to send the 2-movers to Tahiti.
If it is too long, this means that those units have to leave France soon, so they won't be used against Italy, so for me it is the hard way.
Anyway, it is a good thing for units quick enough.

(in reply to mlees)
Post #: 197
RE: MWiF Map Review - Pacific Islands - 9/8/2006 8:11:19 PM   
Froonp


Posts: 7995
Joined: 10/21/2003
From: Marseilles, France
Status: offline
quote:

I have seen Pago Pago invaded by Japan several times in CWiF play.
Since MWiF is in the same scale it could become important.

First thing, an US player worth his name, would always have some kind of land unit in Pago Pago, denying the auto invasion that the Japanese could mount on the opening turn of the Pacific War.
Second thing, Pago Pago was also a mountain hex in CWiF, the map was not changed in between.

In fact I was wondering what point you wanted to make lomyrin, whether having Pago Pago be a Mountain be good, or bad, or not that much important.

(in reply to lomyrin)
Post #: 198
RE: MWiF Map Review - Pacific Islands - 9/8/2006 8:30:05 PM   
lomyrin


Posts: 3741
Joined: 12/21/2005
From: San Diego
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Froonp

quote:

I have seen Pago Pago invaded by Japan several times in CWiF play.
Since MWiF is in the same scale it could become important.

First thing, an US player worth his name, would always have some kind of land unit in Pago Pago, denying the auto invasion that the Japanese could mount on the opening turn of the Pacific War.
Second thing, Pago Pago was also a mountain hex in CWiF, the map was not changed in between.

In fact I was wondering what point you wanted to make lomyrin, whether having Pago Pago be a Mountain be good, or bad, or not that much important.


Not that important, mountain is fine with me. Indeed, most US players would garrison Pago Pago, but things sometimes change priorities.

Lars

(in reply to Froonp)
Post #: 199
RE: MWiF Map Review - Pacific Islands - 9/8/2006 8:35:31 PM   
wfzimmerman


Posts: 660
Joined: 10/22/2003
Status: offline
It seems to me that the terrain justifies mountain on the theory that if the island ever saw combat the volcanic mountains would be heavily defended a la Iwo Jima.

_____________________________


(in reply to lomyrin)
Post #: 200
RE: MWiF Map Review - Pacific Islands - 9/10/2006 11:00:34 AM   
rtamesis

 

Posts: 78
Joined: 7/24/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Froonp

quote:

ORIGINAL: Froonp
Looking at both maps I just posted, I think that Mindoro is too large now .

Here is my last try at improving the various inner islands.
What do you think ?






I think you did a great job!

(in reply to Froonp)
Post #: 201
RE: MWiF Map Review - Pacific Islands - 2/7/2008 8:12:52 PM   
marcuswatney

 

Posts: 279
Joined: 2/28/2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: SurrenderMonkey

Definitely to many usable islands between Hawaii and Midway, IMHO. Take a look at the WitP map - I think the only usable piece of ground is French Frigate Shoals, and it is extremely marginal at best. Johnston Island is due west, and much more viable. What's that west of Midway, between Midway and Wake?


I'd like to ask if anything has been done to eliminate from play islands too small to host an airstrip, a concern first raised in 2006 (Post 9)? War in the Pacific makes the distinction between islands and atolls, and at this new detailed scale I think MWiF should too.

The problem with putting in extra islands and atolls is that each new one reduces the imperative of capturing focus-hexes like Midway. The reason Midway was important was that it was the only airstrip in air range of Hawaii. This doesn't seem to be the case any more.

SurrenderMonkey mentioned French Frigate Shoals. Their sole involvement in the war was during the Midway operation when a Japanese submarine carrying avgas was tasked to rendez-vous there with two Emilies, and refuel them for a reconnaisaance of Pearl Harbor. The task was aborted when the submarine found there was an American seaplane tender there.

French Frigate Shoals is just a reef whose 'platform' is submerged a hundred feet. There is a rock sticking out of the water and that is about it. Millitarily it is totally useless so shouldn't appear on the map in any functional role. I reckon the other 'islands' between Midway and the Hawaiian Islands are even less significant.

The smallest island of military significance (defined as being large enough for an airstrip) is Wake. Mayfair Games published a delightful little game on the two invasions of triangular Wake, where the airstrip took up the whole of one side of the triangle, the other two being arms only a few yards wide. It is the only game I have played where PanAm staff get stuck into the fight!

(in reply to SurrenderMonkey)
Post #: 202
RE: MWiF Map Review - Pacific Islands - 2/7/2008 8:27:41 PM   
Shannon V. OKeets

 

Posts: 22095
Joined: 5/19/2005
From: Honolulu, Hawaii
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: marcuswatney


quote:

ORIGINAL: SurrenderMonkey

Definitely to many usable islands between Hawaii and Midway, IMHO. Take a look at the WitP map - I think the only usable piece of ground is French Frigate Shoals, and it is extremely marginal at best. Johnston Island is due west, and much more viable. What's that west of Midway, between Midway and Wake?


I'd like to ask if anything has been done to eliminate from play islands too small to host an airstrip, a concern first raised in 2006 (Post 9)? War in the Pacific makes the distinction between islands and atolls, and at this new detailed scale I think MWiF should too.

The problem with putting in extra islands and atolls is that each new one reduces the imperative of capturing focus-hexes like Midway. The reason Midway was important was that it was the only airstrip in air range of Hawaii. This doesn't seem to be the case any more.

SurrenderMonkey mentioned French Frigate Shoals. Their sole involvement in the war was during the Midway operation when a Japanese submarine carrying avgas was tasked to rendez-vous there with two Emilies, and refuel them for a reconnaisaance of Pearl Harbor. The task was aborted when the submarine found there was an American seaplane tender there.

French Frigate Shoals is just a reef whose 'platform' is submerged a hundred feet. There is a rock sticking out of the water and that is about it. Millitarily it is totally useless so shouldn't appear on the map in any functional role. I reckon the other 'islands' between Midway and the Hawaiian Islands are even less significant.

The smallest island of military significance (defined as being large enough for an airstrip) is Wake. Mayfair Games published a delightful little game on the two invasions of triangular Wake, where the airstrip took up the whole of one side of the triangle, the other two being arms only a few yards wide. It is the only game I have played where PanAm staff get stuck into the fight!


Good point.

The quick and dirty way to do this is to make them mountain terrain, since air units can not base in mountains. I guess we could add a new terrain type to cover this, but that would be a lot of work.

_____________________________

Steve

Perfection is an elusive goal.

(in reply to marcuswatney)
Post #: 203
RE: MWiF Map Review - Pacific Islands - 2/7/2008 9:02:07 PM   
Froonp


Posts: 7995
Joined: 10/21/2003
From: Marseilles, France
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: marcuswatney
quote:

ORIGINAL: SurrenderMonkey

Definitely to many usable islands between Hawaii and Midway, IMHO. Take a look at the WitP map - I think the only usable piece of ground is French Frigate Shoals, and it is extremely marginal at best. Johnston Island is due west, and much more viable. What's that west of Midway, between Midway and Wake?


I'd like to ask if anything has been done to eliminate from play islands too small to host an airstrip, a concern first raised in 2006 (Post 9)? War in the Pacific makes the distinction between islands and atolls, and at this new detailed scale I think MWiF should too.

The problem with putting in extra islands and atolls is that each new one reduces the imperative of capturing focus-hexes like Midway. The reason Midway was important was that it was the only airstrip in air range of Hawaii. This doesn't seem to be the case any more.

SurrenderMonkey mentioned French Frigate Shoals. Their sole involvement in the war was during the Midway operation when a Japanese submarine carrying avgas was tasked to rendez-vous there with two Emilies, and refuel them for a reconnaisaance of Pearl Harbor. The task was aborted when the submarine found there was an American seaplane tender there.

French Frigate Shoals is just a reef whose 'platform' is submerged a hundred feet. There is a rock sticking out of the water and that is about it. Millitarily it is totally useless so shouldn't appear on the map in any functional role. I reckon the other 'islands' between Midway and the Hawaiian Islands are even less significant.

The smallest island of military significance (defined as being large enough for an airstrip) is Wake. Mayfair Games published a delightful little game on the two invasions of triangular Wake, where the airstrip took up the whole of one side of the triangle, the other two being arms only a few yards wide. It is the only game I have played where PanAm staff get stuck into the fight!


I don't think that this is a problem. The important places of the Pacific War are still important because they sit on multiple sea area. This is what makes them important in WiF. Midway in WiF is much more important that any other island in the Hawaiian chain, except for Ohau, because it has a port which allows for a base stacking of 2 air units, and because it is put in supply from the adjacent sea area. The other islands in the chain needs their owner to put them in supply through the Hawaiian island sea area. You see what I mean ? That there are more possible bases in the Hawaiian chain is not a problem either, there are aready too much on the WiF FE map, there is no restrain.

This said, I would love if we had an "Atoll" terrain type in the game. It would only allow to stack 1 seaplane, and nothing else (no land unit, no ships).

(in reply to marcuswatney)
Post #: 204
RE: MWiF Map Review - Pacific Islands - 2/7/2008 9:05:00 PM   
Froonp


Posts: 7995
Joined: 10/21/2003
From: Marseilles, France
Status: offline
quote:

The quick and dirty way to do this is to make them mountain terrain, since air units can not base in mountains. I guess we could add a new terrain type to cover this, but that would be a lot of work.


This was already done in some key island chains, such as the Bonin and the Marianas, where we nearly have the same number of possible places to base planes.

This said, I would love if we had an "Atoll" terrain type in the game. It would only allow to stack 1 seaplane, and nothing else (no land unit, no ships).
I already said that ? Really ?

The only work it would need would be :
- Make the Graphic artist draw something recognisable, especially noting that only a small portion of that drawing will be shown, as 95% of the hex will be covered with water.
- Change the map data and transform some islands in Atoll. This I can do easily and gladly .

(in reply to Shannon V. OKeets)
Post #: 205
RE: MWiF Map Review - Pacific Islands - 2/7/2008 10:04:23 PM   
composer99


Posts: 2923
Joined: 6/6/2005
From: Ottawa, Canada
Status: offline
Midway is about 25 hexes away from Honolulu, meaning it is too far (in WiF) for pretty well every land-based plane that is likely to see action in that area (I just checked the posted map on page 1 and counted hexes ).

_____________________________

~ Composer99

(in reply to Froonp)
Post #: 206
RE: MWiF Map Review - Pacific Islands - 2/7/2008 10:26:45 PM   
Froonp


Posts: 7995
Joined: 10/21/2003
From: Marseilles, France
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: composer99

Midway is about 25 hexes away from Honolulu, meaning it is too far (in WiF) for pretty well every land-based plane that is likely to see action in that area (I just checked the posted map on page 1 and counted hexes ).

You know as well as I know that what Midway brings is : one foot in the Hawaiian sea area. This foot through projected LBA air power and naval bases for SUBs.
Range to Honolulu is not the most important point, and I bet this was the same in WWII. Midway was a steping stone to threaten Honolulu, not simply to bombard it.

This said, Midway-Honolulu are 2,112 km far away, which means 25 hexes that are 84,48 km long.
Pretty much consistent with the rest of the map as far as the scale is.

(in reply to composer99)
Post #: 207
RE: MWiF Map Review - Pacific Islands - 2/8/2008 12:21:12 AM   
Shannon V. OKeets

 

Posts: 22095
Joined: 5/19/2005
From: Honolulu, Hawaii
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Froonp

quote:

The quick and dirty way to do this is to make them mountain terrain, since air units can not base in mountains. I guess we could add a new terrain type to cover this, but that would be a lot of work.


This was already done in some key island chains, such as the Bonin and the Marianas, where we nearly have the same number of possible places to base planes.

This said, I would love if we had an "Atoll" terrain type in the game. It would only allow to stack 1 seaplane, and nothing else (no land unit, no ships).
I already said that ? Really ?

The only work it would need would be :
- Make the Graphic artist draw something recognisable, especially noting that only a small portion of that drawing will be shown, as 95% of the hex will be covered with water.
- Change the map data and transform some islands in Atoll. This I can do easily and gladly .

There are more than a few rules that check terrain type. Every line of code that references terrain type would have to address the new type, if only to ignore it. That's a lot of code.

_____________________________

Steve

Perfection is an elusive goal.

(in reply to Froonp)
Post #: 208
RE: MWiF Map Review - Pacific Islands - 2/8/2008 12:23:18 AM   
marcuswatney

 

Posts: 279
Joined: 2/28/2006
Status: offline

quote:

This said, I would love if we had an "Atoll" terrain type in the game. It would only allow to stack 1 seaplane, and nothing else (no land unit, no ships).


I would very much support this idea if somebody was willing to do the work. I especially like terrain rules that 'reward' the purchase of special units like seaplanes, as it gives the player some reason to invest in them.

The way WitP depicted atolls was to have one or more tiny irregular circles for the atoll itself, set in a slightly brown disc filling most of the hex. I don't think the disc was supposed to represent anything, but merely to draw the eye to it saying, "yeah, that's not a crumb from your bagel".

My copy of WitP is packed away somewhere in my roof-space, but if someone is willing to do the code-conversion work, I would be happy to try and find WitP and pass on the names of the atolls they identified.

(in reply to Froonp)
Post #: 209
RE: MWiF Map Review - Pacific Islands - 2/8/2008 12:27:25 AM   
Froonp


Posts: 7995
Joined: 10/21/2003
From: Marseilles, France
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: marcuswatney
My copy of WitP is packed away somewhere in my roof-space, but if someone is willing to do the code-conversion work, I would be happy to try and find WitP and pass on the names of the atolls they identified.

Is it this map that you talk about ?
Or is your WitP another game ?




Attachment (1)

(in reply to marcuswatney)
Post #: 210
Page:   <<   < prev  4 5 6 [7] 8   next >   >>
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> World in Flames >> RE: MWiF Map Review - Pacific Islands Page: <<   < prev  4 5 6 [7] 8   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

0.656