redwolf1
Posts: 366
Joined: 5/13/2005 From: Maple Ridge, B.C., Canada Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: David Winter Okay well the proposal above is fairly straight forward to implement. Probably a couple of hours work at most. So this solution combines the weighted proposal + the use the first profile item / position proposal. So everyone gets a little bit of what they're asking for RB (SPD + AGL + STR + INT + END + DIS + BLK + CAT + HND) + (Profile1 + Profile2) WR/TE-SB (SPD + CAT + AGL + STR + INT + END + DIS + BLK + HND) + (Profile1 + Profile2) QB/HO (PSS + PSA + INT + SPD + AGL + STR + END + DIS + HND) + (Profile1 + Profile2) DB (SPD + COV + AGL + STR + INT + END + DIS + CAT + BLA) + (Profile1 + Profile2) LB/CM (SPD + COV + AGL + STR + INT + END + DIS + CAT + BLA) + (Profile1 + Profile2) CT/OL/BL (SPD + AGL + STR + INT + END + DIS + BLK) + (Profile1 + Profile2) DL (SPD + AGL + STR + INT + END + DIS + BLA) + (Profile1 + Profile2) KI (KST + KAC) PU (KST + KAC) KR (SPD + AGL + HND + INT + END + DIS + CAT) + (Profile1 + Profile2) Just getting up to speed with this. I've actually pretty much just been playing quick games and custom teaming (while waiting for the 2.2 patch before any serious league play) so I am a bit behind the eight ball on this one (so please forgive me)... I have to echo previous sentiments by others that it is very important that depth charting is handled very well (particularily for cpu teams). I think a weighted average of several ratings is the key here. I guess what is ultimately being done is the calculation of a unreported "Overall" rating for each player to determine depth charting (correct me if I am wrong). That being the case, I also like to see more than two ratings factored in. I am happy to see the draft postion be removed from the calculation and the ability of the users, per se, to impact this overall by the profile items (a good call David). I'd even go one step further, if possible, and establish a "base" forumla, like the above, but also alow for the users to create/modifiy it further to their own liking if they wish. That way we could impact more than 2 ratings (currently in the form of the profile1 & profile2) if we wish. For example, have the users, if they chose, to input the formula ratings for this, essentially hidden, "overall". So I could do RB (2.5SPD + 1.5AGL + STR + 1.2INT + END + DIS + 0.8BLK + 0.7CAT + 1.1HND) If I liked, for example. However, if this would create a massive amount of work for you David, or be very difficult, what you have above would be fine. Also, what about player age? Doesn't there become a point where a pretty equally talented young player get the nod over the aging and close to retiring veteran? (sorry to perhaps throw in this monkey wrench as well ).
< Message edited by redwolf1 -- 3/28/2008 2:50:39 AM >
_____________________________
|