Gil R.
Posts: 10821
Joined: 4/1/2005 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: briny_norman Well, to be honest, while I love FOF, I'm so curious to see what WCS comes up with next, that I think I'd rather have them skip the expansion for FOF and devote the time and resources to the inevitable new project they must be at least contemplating at this moment. I suppose it would be futile to ask what you have been considering...? Thanks. Well, as I've mentioned before, we do have a secret project that we hope to release late this year, and that's already in an advanced state of programming (though not testing). A FOF expansion would come after that (and perhaps after another project that I've been doing preliminary research for). GShock, Nothing is set in stone, since the FOF expansion is not an official "go" project yet. If you dig down in the forum a few months back you'll find at least one or two threads in which various possibilities were discussed. One idea we are weighing would be the inclusion of historical battlefields and a map editor (there's definitely a thread on that somewhere), but if we did that it would come at the expense of other features. We definitely want to do more with how generals function in the game, both by adding new ratings (e.g., artillery, logistics, engineering) and adding some more rules for promotion/demotion. (ACW game players obviously love their generals, so we should make that part of the game more multifaceted.) We'd definitely want some more special abilities for brigades. Etc. etc. etc. Between the Wish List thread up above and our internal "Wish List" thread in the testers' forum there are literally dozens of excellent ideas, so it will be a matter of choosing the ones that would add the most to the game (and, one hopes, be easiest to do).
_____________________________
Michael Jordan plays ball. Charles Manson kills people. I torment eager potential customers by not sharing screenshots of "Brother Against Brother." Everyone has a talent.
|