Matrix Games Forums

Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

carrier range question

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Advanced Tactics Series >> carrier range question Page: [1]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
carrier range question - 7/9/2008 12:38:49 AM   
ghoward

 

Posts: 147
Joined: 11/9/2007
Status: offline
I am playing with the idea of creating an alternative ptmaster for random scenarios with one of the changes being differing ranges for different ship types (slow subs, fast dd, etc). I plan on constraining supply capacity for ships to force players to use cargo ships as oilers and think strategically about advanced refueling points. I may create an oiler sftype and weaken makeshift ports to encourage this play approach. While I was playing with this, I noticed that carriers (10 sup consumed/turn) actually use 5, and fighters on them (30 sup consumed/turn) actually use 15. It is almost as if there is an event being executed to cut consumption in half. Do any of you designers out there know what I have missed?
Post #: 1
RE: carrier range question - 7/18/2008 11:47:46 PM   
ghoward

 

Posts: 147
Joined: 11/9/2007
Status: offline
Here is the answer. If a unit is at 100% readiness it consumes 50% nominal (set in the editor and shown in unit stats as per turn consumption) supplies per turn. My understanding of section 6.1.3, readiness, para 3,(calculating readiness) is at 99-90% readiness 100% nominal supply is consumed and below 90% readiness 150% nominal supply is consumed. There is, however, some greek involved in this paragraph.  Thus ships heading out of port are generally at 100% readiness and consume 50% of what you would expect if you just looked at the stat page for them.

In other news
I have broken most of the code in the editor and now have a working .master that implements varying ship speeds and endurances for random games. If anyone is interested I would be happy to post more info or post the .master it when I am done with the dusting and cleaning phase.  I am not sure which part of the forum is the right spot for this sort of thing, however.

(in reply to ghoward)
Post #: 2
RE: carrier range question - 7/19/2008 4:12:46 AM   
Jeffrey H.


Posts: 3154
Joined: 4/13/2007
From: San Diego, Ca.
Status: offline
Interesting. But there is already a naval supply aspect to the game. I've noticed that a fully supplied ship that has a bad combat outcome can go to zero supply as a result. I've had to resupply damaged units manualy from the HQ.

I suppose you should create a mod scenario that really highlights your vision of naval supply, maybe some South Pacific engagement ?



_____________________________

History began July 4th, 1776. Anything before that was a mistake.

Ron Swanson

(in reply to ghoward)
Post #: 3
RE: carrier range question - 7/19/2008 10:33:31 PM   
ghoward

 

Posts: 147
Joined: 11/9/2007
Status: offline
I had forgotten about that manual resupply thing -- I think that may ruin the soup. I dont see a way to prohibit manually resupplying ships in the editor either. I am going to press on with the new ships in some random games and just not use manual resupply. If it really makes the naval part of the game feel right, maybe Vic could make a change to make it enforceable in some future patch. Thanks for the input

(in reply to Jeffrey H.)
Post #: 4
Page:   [1]
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Advanced Tactics Series >> carrier range question Page: [1]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

1.328