RE: QB Avoiding Sack Problem

Matrix Games Forums

Forums Register Login Photo Gallery Member List Search Calendars FAQ

My Profile Inbox Address Book My Subscription My Forums Log Out

RE: QB Avoiding Sack Problem

View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest

Users viewing this topic: none

Printable Version

All Forums >> [Current Games From Matrix.] >> [Sports] >> Maximum-Football 2.0 >> Play Development System (PDS) >> RE: QB Avoiding Sack Problem

Page: << < prev 1 [2]

Message

<< Older Topic Newer Topic >>

RE: QB Avoiding Sack Problem - 10/20/2008 4:23:47 PM

dreamtheatervt

Posts: 483
Joined: 4/22/2006
From: Virginia
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: hack153

thanks for the info. if any one finds a problem, let me know what play it is and i will fix it. with the amount of plays and playbooks i made, there is going to be a couple mistakes.

looking at Coach Goode, i might just trash several more formations. the pro/splitback is a real pain to make good running plays with. any thoughts on this?

Your problem isn't unique to you - it's the same problem that racked college and pro teams in the early 90's when everyone was trying to copy Bill Walsh. Split backs is really a horrendous running formation (surprisingly though, moving the FB behind center fixes most of them) because its hard to get RB's to square up in the hole except when diving straight ahead, which makes the "power-O/off-tackle/lead/whatever one wants to call it" less effective because it makes it harder for the RB to make man miss.

Long story short - it's not you, and it's not the game that's failing your pro set. Now, if you are Lavell Edwards and you don't care that you only get 50 yds per game on the ground, then split backs is fine

_____________________________

DTVT's Playbooks

(in reply to hack153)

Post #: 31

RE: Problem with Some Running Plays - 10/20/2008 6:02:44 PM

Marauders

Posts: 4428
Joined: 3/17/2005
From: Minnesota
Status: offline

quote:

i wondered what happened to this thread...

Yeah, the topic headline didn't really have anything to do with what was being discussed.

For future reference, it would have been confusing to leave the headline as it was.

(in reply to hack153)

Post #: 32