What was the fix for LCI(R)+(M)+(G)s ?

Matrix Games Forums

Forums Register Login Photo Gallery Member List Search Calendars FAQ

My Profile Inbox Address Book My Subscription My Forums Log Out

What was the fix for LCI(R)+(M)+(G)s ?

View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest

Users viewing this topic: none

Printable Version

All Forums >> [Current Games From Matrix.] >> [World War II] >> War In The Pacific - Struggle Against Japan 1941 - 1945 >> What was the fix for LCI(R)+(M)+(G)s ?

Page: [1]

Message

<< Older Topic Newer Topic >>

What was the fix for LCI(R)+(M)+(G)s ? - 12/5/2008 11:15:24 PM

FOW

Posts: 499
Joined: 11/6/2008
From: England
Status: offline

I remember this was resolved and the fix needed a database correction for the anti-soft and anti-armour values, but I lost the note I kept

Could some kind soul refresh my memory ( I nearly lost the will to live trying the search facility).

Thanks

Post #: 1

RE: What was the fix for LCI(R)+(M)+(G)s ? - 12/5/2008 11:39:25 PM

Terminus

Posts: 41459
Joined: 4/23/2005
From: Denmark
Status: offline

It was resolved for AE. Pretty sure they still don't work in stock.

_____________________________

We are all dreams of the Giant Space Butterfly.

(in reply to FOW)

Post #: 2

RE: What was the fix for LCI(R)+(M)+(G)s ? - 12/5/2008 11:54:54 PM

FOW

Posts: 499
Joined: 11/6/2008
From: England
Status: offline

Thanks T.

If thats the case I'll not bother to correct the scenario files before I start a new game.

(in reply to Terminus)

Post #: 3

RE: What was the fix for LCI(R)+(M)+(G)s ? - 12/6/2008 12:03:31 AM

Terminus

Posts: 41459
Joined: 4/23/2005
From: Denmark
Status: offline

Not worth it. In stock, the problem was not that they were firing blanks, but that they weren't firing at all.

_____________________________

We are all dreams of the Giant Space Butterfly.

(in reply to FOW)

Post #: 4

RE: What was the fix for LCI(R)+(M)+(G)s ? - 12/6/2008 1:48:13 AM

Feinder

Posts: 6589
Joined: 9/4/2002
From: Land o' Lakes, FL
Status: offline

I thot wilkerson said they just needed a soft attack value or something, let me see if I can figure out the voo-doo of the search function.

-F-

_____________________________

"It is obvious that you have greatly over-estimated my regard for your opinion." - Me

(in reply to Terminus)

Post #: 5

RE: What was the fix for LCI(R)+(M)+(G)s ? - 12/6/2008 1:54:48 AM

Feinder

Posts: 6589
Joined: 9/4/2002
From: Land o' Lakes, FL
Status: offline

Thread about the mortars on LCI(M) - Devices 83-85 need soft atk value in editor

< Message edited by Feinder -- 12/6/2008 1:55:33 AM >

_____________________________

"It is obvious that you have greatly over-estimated my regard for your opinion." - Me

(in reply to Feinder)

Post #: 6

RE: What was the fix for LCI(R)+(M)+(G)s ? - 12/6/2008 1:01:21 PM

FOW

Posts: 499
Joined: 11/6/2008
From: England
Status: offline

Thanks Feinder.
I'll give it a go. Got nothing to loose anyway, except a few LCI(R)s to CD guns

(in reply to Feinder)

Post #: 7

RE: What was the fix for LCI(R)+(M)+(G)s ? - 12/7/2008 7:45:03 AM

Alfred

Posts: 6685
Joined: 9/28/2006
Status: offline

Gentlemen,

One thing about these vessels has never been fully clarified. I understand that unless the above editor fix (adding a soft attack value) is made, they will not suppress defensive coastal artillery fire etc but even without the "fix", do their anti-air guns (Bofors etc) provide AA cover. If yes then these vessels still serve a useful role in amphibious landings.

Alfred

(in reply to FOW)

Post #: 8

RE: What was the fix for LCI(R)+(M)+(G)s ? - 12/7/2008 5:56:12 PM

bradfordkay

Posts: 8683
Joined: 3/24/2002
From: Olympia, WA
Status: offline

They also absorb fire that would otherwise hit troop laden vessels.

_____________________________

fair winds,
Brad

(in reply to Alfred)

Post #: 9

Page: [1]

All Forums >> [Current Games From Matrix.] >> [World War II] >> War In The Pacific - Struggle Against Japan 1941 - 1945 >> What was the fix for LCI(R)+(M)+(G)s ?

Page: [1]