Hornblower
Posts: 1361
Joined: 9/10/2003 From: New York'er relocated to Chicago Status: offline
|
The apparent lack of Allied response to the drive in the SoPac and CenPac has gotten me thinking, as no doubt it has you, as to why that is. This might be kinda far fetched, but here it is anyway. If the CV’s don’t come out now to protect the LOC to Samoa and whatever Islands still reside under his control in that area, then in my opinion, nothing short of a direct attack on Hawaii, Kodack, Anchorage, or the west coast, will prompt a response. And that being said I am half inclined to say that if the KB was to sail to Hawaiian waters again, the PacFleet would head north and trust to his land based CAP and tremendous AA capabilities to bleed you white. Then counterpunch. The Rocky Balboa defense from Rocky 2 lets call it. He’s going to let you punch and punch, he’ll take it, then when your all strung out, come back with a crushing blow that you can’t recover from – at least so he hopes. And that blow must come before the Auto-conditions kick in at ’43. As I see it, assuming the Baker/Canton Island operation goes off as planned, your next western axis of advance is along one of three routes 1- Redirect your forces to continue the advance up the Aleutians’ from Dutch harbor to Kodack with the Ultimate object being Anchorage. 2- Leave a holding force in the SoPac/CenPac and move the bulk of your offensive force and try to knock Oz out of the war 3- Take Johnson, and the rest of the Line Islands – which would be the stepping stones to attack Hawaii. Taking the 1st option would incur the heavy operational losses associated to the Arctic, put Hawaii between the KB and anything south, and possibly resulting in a battle at Anchorage where no doubt he has at least 5-6 RCT’s behind fortifications. And leaving him the opportunity to sortie south and cause some havoc in your shipping lanes. And if you don’t support it with the KB, based on my strength at Hawaii (see below), I’d send a TF north and try to slaughter the shipping and there embarked troops from the air. Taking the 2nd option won’t, in my opinion, prompt a response. He has to know he can’t get any Cargo TF’s there anyway, so why worry or react to something that will ultimately cost him heavily? The 3rd option I think is what he wants you to do. Which if I was in his shoes, so would I. At this point in the game I would want you to hit me at my point of strength, which is pearl. A High attrition battle of the KB verse land based air. And if he’s been training them up and moving what was earmarked for the southern front to here, there must he 400+ fighters, and equal or greater amount of LB’s, along with the Marine SBD’s and F4F’s that would normally be found near Nouema. Same with my Land units. There must be at least 6 Divisions there sitting behind level 9 fortifications with tons of support units. Yep, I’d like to have you take a crack at that. Because at this point, what other options do I have? Also at this point he has to be thinking this. How many Units has he committed to garrison duty on the locations taken? How many AK’s has he committed to supplying these units. There has to be an air umbrella – a mobile attack force – in place in order to protect and utilize what has been taken. How many units are committed to that? Lastly there must be a mobile Surface TF to act in conjunction with your Air. In 1 month I’ll have 6 USN CV’s with upgraded airgroups, TBF’s and increased AA that I can send in to the south. Not take the islands, because slogging my way back island by island will add months, but to Sink the Cargo TF’s and again, bleed the air groups white. I would have the area of Truk west to Canton swimming with Subs to attrite your shipping. Long term objective being to make the losses necessary to support the new gains unsustainable by the IJN. All said and done his counterpunch will not be in the south but along the Axis of Wake-Marcus, and Wake Enewetak-Wotho -Ujae. Anything west of that line would be cut off and left to wither on the vine. If that happens how many Troops/Units would be, for all intents and purpose, knocked out of the war?
< Message edited by Hornblower -- 4/14/2009 8:30:44 PM >
|