Matrix Games Forums

Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

RE: Admiral's Edition Air War Thread

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> RE: Admiral's Edition Air War Thread Page: <<   < prev  38 39 [40] 41 42   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Admiral's Edition Air War Thread - 4/2/2009 2:59:26 PM   
timtom


Posts: 2358
Joined: 1/29/2003
From: Aarhus, Denmark
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: HistoryGuy

Shifting from disbanding to building, I noticed a number of official histories in our library that included the "Australia in the War of 1939 - 1945" voume entitled "THe Role of Science and Industry".  I was flipping through the pages when I noticed it contained the manufacturing/delivery information for Aussie Beauforts, Beaufighters, Wirraway and Boomerang aircraft listed below.  You probably already have the information but I added it below just in case:

Wirraway deliveries began in July 39 (2 per month) which reached 8 per month by the end of the year.  It varied between 5 and 11 aircraft per month until July 1940, when 16 Wirraways were built (out of a total of 83 to date).  The delivery rate climbed to 33 in October, 34 in November before dropping to 23 in December 1940 (total 204 built).   In 1941 delivery rates varied between 5 and 22 for the first six months (91 total manufactured) before reaching 26 in August, 36 in September, 45 in October, 37 in November and 42 in December 1941.  In 1942, Wirraway production was 25 in January, 22 in February, 29 in March, 26 in April, 18 in May and 9 in June 1942 - when deliveries ended. 

Boomerang deliveries began in August 1942 with one aircraft.  They "climbed" to 3 in September, 5 in October, dropping to 4 in November and climbing again to 11 in December 1942.  Boomerang deliveries in 1943 started at 3 in January, 13 in February, 21 in March, 18 in April, 16 in May, 10 in June, 4 in July, 22 in August, 14 in September, 7 in October, 9 in November and ended with eight machines delivered in December 1943 (for a cumulative total of 169).  In 1944, the Aussies built 4 Boomerangs in January, 5 in February, 6 in March, 12 in April, 5 in May and June, 6 in July, 5 in August, 2 in September, 4 in October, 5 in November, and 7 in December for 248 cumulative aircraft delivered.  Deliveries ended in January 1945 with a run of thirteen more Boomerangs.

Australian production/deliveries of Beauforts began in August 1941 and ended in August 1944 with a cumulative total of 700 aircraft delivered during that period.  During 1941, the monthly manufacturing totals hovered between 2 and 3 with a cumulative total of 10 aircraft delivered.  In 1942, deliveries picked up from single digits (Jan - March) to reach 12 in April, 16 in May, 20 in June, 13 in July, 17 in August, 24 in September, 29 in October, 25 in November, and 24 in December 1942 for a cumulative total of 208 aircraft.  Deliveries increased slightly during 1943, beginning with 19 Beauforts per month in January, 27 in February, 23 in March, 27 in April, 24 in May, 33 during June through August, 37 in September, 34 in October, 32 in November, and 29 in December for a cumulative total of 559 aircraft.  Deliveries in 1944 spanned January through August, with peak figures in Jan and Feb 44 (25 and 26), dropping to 17 in March, 11 in April, 20 in May, 15 in June and July, and 12 in August for a cumulative total of 700 aircraft.

Australian Beaufighter deliveries began in may 1944.  This took me aback as it seemed to me that the Aussies were "making them" before that date.  The official history notes on page 412 that "for several reasons the proposal to manufacture the Beaufighter was temporarily abandoned and not revived until November 1942."   
Beaufighter deliveries in May 1944 totaled one aircraft, with two more built in June, 8 in July, 13 in August, 20 in September, 23 in October, 27 in November, and 18 in December 1944 for a cumulative total of 112.  During 1945, the Aussies produced 28 in January, 26 in February, 28 in March, 30 in April, 29 in May, 31 in June, 26 in July, and 19 in August for a cumulative total of 329.


Mark - a belated thank you. Good data is always helpful and welcome :)

_____________________________

Where's the Any key?


(in reply to HistoryGuy)
Post #: 1171
RE: Admiral's Edition Air War Thread - 4/2/2009 4:38:26 PM   
Long Lance


Posts: 274
Joined: 7/31/2002
From: Ebbelwoi Country
Status: offline
May I set 'restrictions' for Airgroups other than range?

i. e. Betties from Rabaul may attack at up to a range of 11, but not Port Moresby (range 9 or so) and any TF or whatever that sits there?

(in reply to timtom)
Post #: 1172
RE: Admiral's Edition Air War Thread - 4/2/2009 5:22:29 PM   
NormS3


Posts: 521
Joined: 12/10/2007
From: Wild and Wonderful WV, just don't drink the water
Status: offline
Has the firebombing in the late game changed any?

Is it easier to achieve a firestorm?

(in reply to Long Lance)
Post #: 1173
RE: Admiral's Edition Air War Thread - 4/2/2009 10:02:44 PM   
Yamato hugger

 

Posts: 5475
Joined: 10/5/2004
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Long Lance

May I set 'restrictions' for Airgroups other than range?

i. e. Betties from Rabaul may attack at up to a range of 11, but not Port Moresby (range 9 or so) and any TF or whatever that sits there?


No


_____________________________


(in reply to Long Lance)
Post #: 1174
RE: Admiral's Edition Air War Thread - 4/12/2009 9:59:02 AM   
Dili

 

Posts: 4708
Joined: 9/10/2004
Status: offline
Does the splited units have their own name or will be A/B/C like in Witp or can be like in LCU's where they can start splitted under specific names and then when assembled loose that and split A/B/C?



_____________________________


(in reply to Yamato hugger)
Post #: 1175
RE: Admiral's Edition Air War Thread - 4/12/2009 10:01:48 AM   
Dili

 

Posts: 4708
Joined: 9/10/2004
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Yamato hugger


quote:

ORIGINAL: Long Lance

May I set 'restrictions' for Airgroups other than range?

i. e. Betties from Rabaul may attack at up to a range of 11, but not Port Moresby (range 9 or so) and any TF or whatever that sits there?


No




Would a sector search limit an attack to that zone only? Let's say a Betty squadron have a sector search limit, it can still attack everywhere? even if so would there will be more chances attacking in their sector?

(in reply to Yamato hugger)
Post #: 1176
RE: Admiral's Edition Air War Thread - 4/12/2009 11:42:39 AM   
Yamato hugger

 

Posts: 5475
Joined: 10/5/2004
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Dili

Does the splited units have their own name or will be A/B/C like in Witp or can be like in LCU's where they can start splitted under specific names and then when assembled loose that and split A/B/C?



If you divide a unit (a division or a larger air unit) you get /A, /B, /C just like stock. Note many units start "broken down" (some even to companies) and if you dont re-form the parent these will remain as long as you want. After a few test runs through as the Japs I have determined that some of the Jap inf divs that are broken down to their battalions would work very well as garrison troops on the atolls (2 bns plus misc base forces). Generally the atolls arent big enough for a full regiment plus the additional base forces.

_____________________________


(in reply to Dili)
Post #: 1177
RE: Admiral's Edition Air War Thread - 4/12/2009 11:42:53 AM   
Yamato hugger

 

Posts: 5475
Joined: 10/5/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Dili


quote:

ORIGINAL: Yamato hugger


quote:

ORIGINAL: Long Lance

May I set 'restrictions' for Airgroups other than range?

i. e. Betties from Rabaul may attack at up to a range of 11, but not Port Moresby (range 9 or so) and any TF or whatever that sits there?


No




Would a sector search limit an attack to that zone only? Let's say a Betty squadron have a sector search limit, it can still attack everywhere? even if so would there will be more chances attacking in their sector?


Yes, it will still have a 360 degree attack arc. That isnt settable.

< Message edited by Yamato hugger -- 4/12/2009 11:43:31 AM >


_____________________________


(in reply to Dili)
Post #: 1178
RE: Admiral's Edition Air War Thread - 4/12/2009 11:45:41 AM   
Dili

 

Posts: 4708
Joined: 9/10/2004
Status: offline
Okay but in first part of my question is if Air units can came split with their names instead of A/B/C and assembled like LCU's?

(in reply to Yamato hugger)
Post #: 1179
RE: Admiral's Edition Air War Thread - 4/12/2009 12:16:52 PM   
Terminus


Posts: 41459
Joined: 4/23/2005
From: Denmark
Status: offline
Pre-split air units don't come with A/, B/, C/ etc. If you COMBINE them and then split them again, then you'll get A/, B/, etc...

_____________________________

We are all dreams of the Giant Space Butterfly.

(in reply to Dili)
Post #: 1180
RE: Admiral's Edition Air War Thread - 4/13/2009 12:20:31 PM   
Dili

 

Posts: 4708
Joined: 9/10/2004
Status: offline
Thanks T.

_____________________________


(in reply to Terminus)
Post #: 1181
RE: Admiral's Edition Air War Thread - 4/14/2009 11:50:08 PM   
HistoryGuy


Posts: 80
Joined: 1/7/2009
From: Woodbridge, VA
Status: offline
U R very welcome. My curiosity about homegrown Aussie production grew after a game versus the Allied AI when there seemed to be too many RAAF Beauforts in mid-1942....

(in reply to timtom)
Post #: 1182
RE: Admiral's Edition Air War Thread - 4/14/2009 11:58:17 PM   
JeffroK


Posts: 6391
Joined: 1/26/2005
Status: offline
The problem is that with the Beaufort, and many other types, is that the modders get production right but make no adjustment for the large numbers sent to OTU's etc.

Therefore 100% of production is available for combat service.

If you try the ADF Serials website you could (manually) count the numbers by type which where issued to combat Sqns.

_____________________________

Interdum feror cupidine partium magnarum Europae vincendarum

(in reply to HistoryGuy)
Post #: 1183
RE: Admiral's Edition Air War Thread - 4/15/2009 7:37:53 AM   
Flying Tiger

 

Posts: 496
Joined: 3/11/2008
From: ummmm... i HATE that question!
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: JeffK

The problem is that with the Beaufort, and many other types, is that the modders get production right but make no adjustment for the large numbers sent to OTU's etc.

Therefore 100% of production is available for combat service.

If you try the ADF Serials website you could (manually) count the numbers by type which where issued to combat Sqns.


And are you volunteering to do that for us Jeff??

(in reply to JeffroK)
Post #: 1184
RE: Admiral's Edition Air War Thread - 4/15/2009 7:49:46 AM   
JeffroK


Posts: 6391
Joined: 1/26/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Flying Tiger


quote:

ORIGINAL: JeffK

The problem is that with the Beaufort, and many other types, is that the modders get production right but make no adjustment for the large numbers sent to OTU's etc.

Therefore 100% of production is available for combat service.

If you try the ADF Serials website you could (manually) count the numbers by type which where issued to combat Sqns.


And are you volunteering to do that for us Jeff??


Only if you hop in your sedan and drive over to Buna & back on that nice country road

I actually did this some years back for the P-40's in the RAAF (and didnt keep the data), someone else's turn

_____________________________

Interdum feror cupidine partium magnarum Europae vincendarum

(in reply to Flying Tiger)
Post #: 1185
RE: Admiral's Edition Air War Thread - 4/15/2009 11:34:09 AM   
steveh11Matrix


Posts: 944
Joined: 7/30/2004
Status: offline
How are the changes in Carrier Air Groups that occur as time goes on handled in AE? Is there an explicit way of handling these, perhaps in the editor, or is it still hard-coded and linked to slots, or something different?

_____________________________

"Nature always obeys Her own laws" - Leonardo da Vinci

(in reply to JeffroK)
Post #: 1186
RE: Admiral's Edition Air War Thread - 4/16/2009 4:33:19 PM   
foliveti


Posts: 371
Joined: 9/12/2002
From: Buffalo, NY
Status: offline
I have a question on carrier loadouts.  In WitP the 10 sorties per plane seems to allow carriers to stay on station forever without returning to port.  Since they get 10 sorties for fighter also and CAP does not count as a sortie.  I understand there will be limits to the number of torpedos, will the number of non torpedo sorties be more limited than WitP?

_____________________________

Frank

(in reply to Hipper)
Post #: 1187
RE: Admiral's Edition Air War Thread - 4/23/2009 1:38:19 PM   
steveh11Matrix


Posts: 944
Joined: 7/30/2004
Status: offline
Shameless bump!

quote:

ORIGINAL: steveh11Matrix

How are the changes in Carrier Air Groups that occur as time goes on handled in AE? Is there an explicit way of handling these, perhaps in the editor, or is it still hard-coded and linked to slots, or something different?



_____________________________

"Nature always obeys Her own laws" - Leonardo da Vinci

(in reply to steveh11Matrix)
Post #: 1188
RE: Admiral's Edition Air War Thread - 4/23/2009 1:40:57 PM   
Terminus


Posts: 41459
Joined: 4/23/2005
From: Denmark
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: steveh11Matrix

Shameless bump!

quote:

ORIGINAL: steveh11Matrix

How are the changes in Carrier Air Groups that occur as time goes on handled in AE? Is there an explicit way of handling these, perhaps in the editor, or is it still hard-coded and linked to slots, or something different?




I don't understand your question, could you please clarify?

_____________________________

We are all dreams of the Giant Space Butterfly.

(in reply to steveh11Matrix)
Post #: 1189
RE: Admiral's Edition Air War Thread - 4/23/2009 1:54:33 PM   
steveh11Matrix


Posts: 944
Joined: 7/30/2004
Status: offline
Sure.

Each carrier begins with a certain air group, but as time goes on this morphs into a different mix of aircraft - the maximum sizes of each squadron changes. This was hard-coded in WitP, has this changed in AE?

Steve.

_____________________________

"Nature always obeys Her own laws" - Leonardo da Vinci

(in reply to Terminus)
Post #: 1190
RE: Admiral's Edition Air War Thread - 4/23/2009 2:00:38 PM   
Terminus


Posts: 41459
Joined: 4/23/2005
From: Denmark
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: steveh11Matrix

Sure.

Each carrier begins with a certain air group, but as time goes on this morphs into a different mix of aircraft - the maximum sizes of each squadron changes. This was hard-coded in WitP, has this changed in AE?

Steve.


Yeah, it's different. Take a pre-war USN carrier (1 each of VF/VS/VB/VT). All four squadrons use the new re-sizing system in the editor to change their sizes at pre-defined dates through the game (scenario creator can set this, as with all air groups).

The VS squadrons are set to be deleted at a given date and come back as VBFs (same way as other air groups withdraw).

Nothing is hard-coded with this.

_____________________________

We are all dreams of the Giant Space Butterfly.

(in reply to steveh11Matrix)
Post #: 1191
RE: Admiral's Edition Air War Thread - 4/23/2009 2:14:45 PM   
steveh11Matrix


Posts: 944
Joined: 7/30/2004
Status: offline
Excellent! Thanks for the reply, Terminus.

Steve.

_____________________________

"Nature always obeys Her own laws" - Leonardo da Vinci

(in reply to Terminus)
Post #: 1192
RE: Admiral's Edition Air War Thread - 4/23/2009 3:30:11 PM   
vettim89


Posts: 3615
Joined: 7/14/2007
From: Toledo, Ohio
Status: offline
Do the VBF sq appear at SF? If so, an AFB better be paying attention as he could find his VS sq gone with no VBF near by to replace them

_____________________________

"We have met the enemy and they are ours" - Commodore O.H. Perry

(in reply to Terminus)
Post #: 1193
RE: Admiral's Edition Air War Thread - 4/23/2009 3:40:38 PM   
rjopel

 

Posts: 614
Joined: 12/19/2007
From: Charlottesville, VA, USA
Status: offline
The VBF's didn't appear until 45.

(in reply to vettim89)
Post #: 1194
RE: Admiral's Edition Air War Thread - 4/23/2009 5:40:33 PM   
Terminus


Posts: 41459
Joined: 4/23/2005
From: Denmark
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: vettim89

Do the VBF sq appear at SF? If so, an AFB better be paying attention as he could find his VS sq gone with no VBF near by to replace them


They appear on their carriers.

_____________________________

We are all dreams of the Giant Space Butterfly.

(in reply to vettim89)
Post #: 1195
RE: Admiral's Edition Air War Thread - 4/23/2009 8:26:21 PM   
Barb


Posts: 2503
Joined: 2/27/2007
From: Bratislava, Slovakia
Status: offline
Well what about VF(N) and VT(N) for Big E (She served as Night carrier in 1944 and 1945)
How this is handled?


_____________________________


(in reply to Terminus)
Post #: 1196
RE: Admiral's Edition Air War Thread - 4/23/2009 8:31:17 PM   
Terminus


Posts: 41459
Joined: 4/23/2005
From: Denmark
Status: offline
It isn't. The USN carrier air groups switched around so often and so much, we had to put a stop somewhere. Otherwise we'd still be doing OOB revisions today...

So, no night-specialized carrier air units in the master scenario, although I'll probably put them into the Downfall scenario.

_____________________________

We are all dreams of the Giant Space Butterfly.

(in reply to Barb)
Post #: 1197
RE: Admiral's Edition Air War Thread - 4/24/2009 7:54:30 AM   
Barb


Posts: 2503
Joined: 2/27/2007
From: Bratislava, Slovakia
Status: offline
Well, then 1-2 Night groups could arrive independently of the carriers, and replaced manually, giving original Air groups Rest.
As is my knowlidge Big E, Independence and maybe one more carrier was designated for night ops.


_____________________________


(in reply to Terminus)
Post #: 1198
RE: Admiral's Edition Air War Thread - 4/24/2009 8:00:03 AM   
wworld7


Posts: 1727
Joined: 2/25/2003
From: The Nutmeg State
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Barb

Well, then 1-2 Night groups could arrive independently of the carriers, and replaced manually, giving original Air groups Rest.
As is my knowlidge Big E, Independence and maybe one more carrier was designated for night ops.



IIRC, the Saratoga and Big E formed a team for night fighting late in the war.

_____________________________

Flipper

(in reply to Barb)
Post #: 1199
RE: Admiral's Edition Air War Thread - 4/24/2009 8:10:06 AM   
Barb


Posts: 2503
Joined: 2/27/2007
From: Bratislava, Slovakia
Status: offline
Well then it was Big E, Sara and Independance


_____________________________


(in reply to wworld7)
Post #: 1200
Page:   <<   < prev  38 39 [40] 41 42   next >   >>
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> RE: Admiral's Edition Air War Thread Page: <<   < prev  38 39 [40] 41 42   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

1.452