Reiryc
Posts: 4991
Joined: 1/5/2001 Status: offline
|
Ok ron... Im not sure but I think the advantages of LRCap and when to use them haven't addressed your issues so far... quote:
If LR CAP is all or nothing, how does one protect ones own TF and strike missions if, let's say, we have only one CV in a TF? Sounds like one must rob Peter to pay Paul, especially if there is only one group of fighters(IE. all 36 F4Fs are in one group). If split in two flights, no prob. Is this the case? Ok here's the deal. In this case of 1 carrier the goal would not really be to provide LRCAP to another base or TF with that carrier group. Instead, you would want to provide LRCap with some base for that carrier. So, lets say I have the akagi in an air combat group. This air combat group is following a surface combat group that Im using to attack an american fleet at lunga (guadalcanal). I would want to provide LRCap from one of my bases, say rabaul, for those TF's going to lunga. Thus increasing the amount of fighter protection for those TF's. So you're right, you probably wouldnt want to LRCAP from that single carrier, you would however want a land base with 3 fighter groups, say like rabaul, to add fighter support for that carrier TF. LRCAP only provides about 20% of its total fighter group strength as cap to the intended target, so its not a huge sum of fighters being added for help, but adding 20 fighters from 3-4 fighter air groups is better than nothing. :) Now for the current Air combat TF with 1 carrier, you'd probably want to set the fighter group mission as escort and about 70-80% cap...maybe more on cap if going to a known aircraft dominated area of the enemy. Thus if at escort 80% cap, 20% of the carriers fighter strength will escort a strike on the enemy, the remaining 80% will provide cap over the hex the task force is currently in. Hope this is what you were lookin' for... Reiryc
_____________________________
|